Controversies Within the Scientific Revolution
Tel Aviv University / The University of Sydney
From the beginning of the Scientific Revolution around the late sixteenth century to its final crystallization in the early eighteenth century, hardly an observational result, an experimental technique, a theory, a mathematical proof, a methodological principle, or the award of recognition and reputation remained unquestioned for long. The essays collected in this book examine the rich texture of debates that comprised the Scientific Revolution from which the modern conception of science emerged. Were controversies marginal episodes, restricted to certain fields, or were they the rule in the majority of scientific domains? To what extent did scientific controversies share a typical pattern, which distinguished them from debates in other fields? Answers to these historical and philosophical questions are sought through a close attention to specific controversies within and across the changing scientific disciplines as well as across the borders of the natural and the human sciences, philosophy, theology, and technology.
[Controversies, 11]
2011.
vi, 287 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Hardbound – Available
ISBN
9789027218957
|
EUR
105.00
|
USD
158.00
e-Book – Sold by e-book platforms
ISBN
9789027282545
|
EUR
105.00
|
USD
158.00
Table of Contents
|
Introduction. Controversies and the dialectical texture of the Scientific Revolution
|
1–10
|
|
Part I. Astronomy and mechanics
|
|
|
13–32
|
|
|
33–52
|
|
|
Fair-mindedness versus sophistry in the Galileo affair: Two controversies for the price of one
|
53–74
|
|
Part II. Light and gravity
|
|
|
From cohesion to pesanteur: The origins of the 1669 debate on the causes of gravity
|
77–100
|
|
Leibniz versus Newton on the nature of gravity and planetary motion
|
101–122
|
|
The argumentative use of methodology: Lessons from a controversy following Newton’s first optical paper
|
123–148
|
|
Part III. Physiology and vitalism
|
|
|
Salient theories in the fossil debate in the early Royal Society: The influence of Johann Van Helmont
|
151–170
|
|
Were the arguments of William Harvey convincing to his contemporaries?
|
171–186
|
|
Why was there no controversy over life in the Scientific Revolution?
|
187–220
|
|
Part IV. Human sciences and theology
|
|
|
The pre-Adamite controversy and the problem of racial difference in seventeenth-century natural philosophy
|
223–150
|
|
Scientific revolution in the moral sciences: The controversy between Samuel Pufendorf and the Lutheran theologians in the late seventeenth century
|
251–276
|
|
Contributors
|
277–282
|
|
Index
|
283–288
|
Subjects
Benjamins Subject classification
Linguistics
Philosophy
BIC Subject
PDX: History of science
BISAC Subject
SCI034000: SCIENCE / History
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number: 2011035627