Copular Clauses
Specification, predication and equation
Author
This book is concerned with a class of copular clauses known as specificational clauses, and its relation to other kinds of copular structures, predicational and equative clauses in particular. Based on evidence from Danish and English, I argue that specificational clauses involve the same core predication structure as predicational clauses — one which combines a referential and a predicative expression to form a minimal predicational unit — but differ in how the predicational core is realized syntactically. Predicational copular clauses represent the canonical realization, where the referential expression is aligned with the most prominent syntactic position, the subject position. Specificational clauses involve an unusual alignment of the predicative expression with subject position. I suggest that this unusual alignment is grounded in information structure: the alignment of the less referential DP with the subject position serves a discourse connective function by letting material that is relatively familiar in the discourse appear before material that is relatively unfamiliar in the discourse. Equative clauses are argued to be fundamentally different.
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 85] 2005. viii, 210 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Acknowledgements | p. vii
-
1. Introduction | pp. 1–3
-
I. Structure
-
2. Predicate topicalization | pp. 6–40
-
3. Alternative structures for specificational clauses | pp. 41–45
-
II. Meaning
-
4. Decomposing copular clauses | pp. 48–63
-
5. Determining the subject type | pp. 64–93
-
6. The type of the predicate complement | pp. 94–107
-
7. Consequences and extensions | pp. 108–130
-
III. Use
-
8. Aspects of use | pp. 133–161
-
9. An intergrated analysis | pp. 162–190
-
10.Conclusion | pp. 191–194
-
-
Index | pp. 205–210
“This is a beautiful piece of work, one that I have had much pleasure reading and discussing with students and colleagues. Mikkelsen's account of copular clauses is simply elegant. She is so thorough in her treatment of these copular constructions that in our discussion of her analysis in a recent MIT seminar there wasn't any comment that wasn't already anticipated in her own caveats and footnotes.”
Michel DeGraff, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT
Cited by
Cited by 98 other publications
Akinlotan, Mayowa
Alcocer Urueta, Ricardo
Allahem, Khawlah Sulaiman & Bader Yousef Alharbi
Antón-Méndez, Inés
Aravind, Athulya, Martin Hackl & Ken Wexler
Arregi, Karlos, Itamar Francez & Martina Martinović
Bejar, Susana & Arsalan Kahnemuyipour
BÉJAR, SUSANA & ARSALAN KAHNEMUYIPOUR
Bertinetto, Pier Marco, Luca Ciucci & Margherita Farina
2019. Two types of morphologically expressed non-verbal predication. Studies in Language 43:1 ► pp. 120 ff.
Bondaruk, Anna
Bondaruk, Anna
2014. Polish equatives as symmetrical structures. In Advances in the Syntax of DPs [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 217], ► pp. 61 ff.
Branigan, Phil & Douglas Wharram
Béjar, Susana
Castroviejo, Elena, Katherine Fraser & Agustín Vicente
Chirkova, Katia
Christopher, Nadezda
2020. Chapter 3. Kazakh particle ğoj as an existential operator. In Information-Structural Perspectives on Discourse Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 213], ► pp. 72 ff.
Citko, Barbara, Allison Germain & Jacek Witkoś
Davidse, Kristin & Ngum Meyuhnsi Njende
Davidse, Kristin, Ngum Meyuhnsi Njende & Gerard O’Grady
Delahunty, Gerald P.
2022. An analysis of The thing is that S sentences. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 41 ff.
den Dikken, Marcel
Djärv, Kajsa
Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka
Felka, Katharina
FLEISHER, NICHOLAS
Fukuda, Shin
García Castillero, Carlos
Gumiel-Molina, Silvia, Norberto Moreno-Quibén & Isabel Pérez-Jiménez
Gécseg, Zsuzsanna
Hartmann, Jutta & Caroline Heycock
2017. Variation in copular agreement in Insular Scandinavian. In Syntactic Variation in Insular Scandinavian [Studies in Germanic Linguistics, 1], ► pp. 233 ff.
Hartmann, Jutta M.
2018. A focus analysis of apparent predicational clefts. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 32 ► pp. 121 ff.
Hartmann, Jutta M. & Caroline Heycock
2019. Restrictions on “Low” person agreement in Dutch specificational
copular constructions. Linguistics in the Netherlands 36 ► pp. 130 ff.
Hartmann, Jutta M. & Caroline Heycock
Hartmann, Jutta M. & Caroline Heycock
Heycock, Caroline
Heycock, Caroline
Jenks, Peter & Rassidatou Konate
Jin, Dawei
Jin, Dawei
Jin, Dawei & Jun Chen
Jurczyk, Rafał
Kampanarou, Anna
Keine, Stefan, Michael Wagner & Jessica Coon
Kujath, Elizabeth & Jenneke van der Wal
Kumamoto, Chiaki
KUMAMOTO, CHIAKI
Lauwers, Peter & Els Tobback
Lee, Seung-Ah
Lien, Chinfa
2022. Interpreting the eventive copula 做 tso3 in Taiwanese Southern Min. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 9:2 ► pp. 155 ff.
Martinović, Martina
Massam, Diane & Erin Grant
Milway, Daniel
Nie, Xiaowen & Feng-hsi Liu
2021. Indefinite subjects in Mandarin Chinese. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 12:2 ► pp. 181 ff.
Nuger, Justin
Oda, Hiromune
Okubo, Wataru & Hiroki Nomoto
2023. Chapter 9. A null stem analysis of Persian copular verbs. In Advances in Iranian Linguistics II [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 361], ► pp. 231 ff.
Palancar, Enrique L.
2018. Chapter 9. Subjects and focus in clefts. In Information Structure in Lesser-described Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series, 199], ► pp. 245 ff.
Palancar, Enrique L. & Martine Vanhove
Park, Chongwon & Jaehoon Yeon
2023. The Factive, IHRC, and Cleft constructions in Korean. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 140 ff.
Park, Dongwoo
Praet, Wout Van
2019. Aspect and modality in English predicative and specificational copular clauses. English Text Construction 12:2 ► pp. 196 ff.
Van Praet, Wout
Van Praet, Wout
2021. Re-evaluating the importance of discourse-embedding for specificational and predicative clauses. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 31:4 ► pp. 560 ff.
van Praet, Wout
Richardson, Kylie
Rieppel, Michael
Rieppel, Michael
Ringstad, Tina Louise
Saab, Andrés & Eleonora Orlando
Sabbagh, Joseph
Schwartzkopff, Robert
Schwartzkopff, Robert
Seres, Daria & M.Teresa Espinal
Silvagni, Federico
Snyder, Eric
Snyder, Eric, Richard Samuels & Stewart Shapiro
Sprugnoli, Rachele & Sara Tonelli
Staniewski, Przemysław & Adam Gołębiowski
2021. To what extent can source-based olfactory verbs be classified as copulas? The case of German and Polish. In The Linguistics of Olfaction [Typological Studies in Language, 131], ► pp. 403 ff.
Sæbø, Kjell Johan
Winter, Yoad
Zhang, Niina Ning
Ørsnes, Bjarne
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CF: Linguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General