Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation

Author

K.K. Luke | University of Hong Kong

Hardbound – Available

ISBN 9789027250193 (Eur) | EUR 115.00

ISBN 9781556192753 (USA) | USD 173.00

e-Book –

ISBN 9789027283320 | EUR 115.00 | USD 173.00

Utterance particles, also known as modal particles or sentence-final particles, form a class of words in Cantonese which is of great descriptive and theoretical interest to students of language. Most utterance particles do not have any semantic content (truth-conditional meaning), and few can be said to have a consistent grammatical function. They are notorious for being extremely resistant to conventional syntactic and semantic analysis. The aim of this book is to seek a better understanding of utterance particles by concentrating analytical attention on three of them; namely, LA (la55), LO (lo55), and WO (wo44). Adopting a set of theoretical assumptions and analytical methods in the tradition of Conversation Analysis within an ethnomethodological framework, an attempt is made to approach these objects by examining them in the context of interactional details in naturally occurring conversations. This book presents original accounts of, and fresh insights into these utterance particles in Cantonese. But it also raises theoretical and methodological questions of more general interest. These include, among other things, the status of data and evidence in the analysis of language, and the possibility of a socially constituted linguistics.

[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 9] 1990. xvi, 329 pp.

Publishing status: Available

https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.9

Table of Contents

Acknowlegements | p. i

Transcription and glossing conventions | p. iii

Romanization conventions | p. v

Introduction: Utterance particles in Cantonese | p. 1

Conversation and Conversation Analysis | p. 17

The Establishment of Common Ground in Conversation: The Utterance particle LA | p. 53

The Accomplissement of Endings in Conversation: The Utterance Particle LO | p. 119

Expectation and Noteworthiness: The Utterance Particle WO | p. 199

Utterance Particles as Conversational Objects | p. 263

Towards a Socially Constituted Linguistics | p. 289

Notes | p. 305

Subject Index | p. 325

Cited by

Cited by 58 other publications

Order by:

Aijmer, Karin

2015. Well in an English-Swedish and English-French Contrastive Perspective. In Researching Sociopragmatic Variability, ► pp. 201 ff.

Biq, Yung-O, James Tai & Sandra Thompson

1996. Recent Developments in Functional Approaches to Chinese. In New Horizons in Chinese Linguistics [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 36], ► pp. 97 ff.

Chan, Angela, Wei Zhang, Olga Zayts, Mary Hoi Yin Tang & Wai Keung Tam

2015. Directive-giving and grammatical forms. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 6:2 ► pp. 133 ff.

Chan, Kary K. L. & Carol K. S. To

2016. Do Individuals with High-Functioning Autism Who Speak a Tone Language Show Intonation Deficits?. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 46:5 ► pp. 1784 ff.

Chappell, Hilary

1991. Strategies for the assertion of obviousness and disagreement in mandarin: A semantic study of the modal particleme. Australian Journal of Linguistics 11:1 ► pp. 39 ff.

Chen, Katherine H.Y & M. Agnes Kang

2015. Demeanor indexicals, interpretive discourses and the “Kong Girl” stereotype. Journal of Language and Sexuality 4:2 ► pp. 193 ff.

Chor, Winnie Oi-Wan, Foong Ha Yap & Tak-Sum Wong

2016. Chinese interrogative particles as talk coordinators at the right periphery. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17:2 ► pp. 178 ff.

Diao, Wenhao

2016. Peer Socialization into Gendered L2 Mandarin Practices in a Study Abroad Context: Talk in the Dorm. Applied Linguistics 37:5 ► pp. 599 ff.

Diao, Wenhao & Chen Chen

2022. L2 use of pragmatic markers in peer talk: Mandarin utterance-final particles. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60:4 ► pp. 1293 ff.

Enfield, N. J.

2018. Mainland Southeast Asian Languages,

Enfield, N.J.

2005. AREAL LINGUISTICS AND MAINLAND SOUTHEAST ASIA. Annual Review of Anthropology 34:1 ► pp. 181 ff.

Foolen, Ad

1997. Pragmatic particles. In Handbook of Pragmatics, ► pp. 1 ff.

Fung, Andy

2016. Hasan’s Semantic Networks Revisited: a Cantonese Systemic Functional Approach. In Society in Language, Language in Society, ► pp. 115 ff.

Fung, Loretta & Ronald Carter

2007. New varieties, new creativities: ICQ and English-Cantonese e-discourse. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 16:4 ► pp. 345 ff.

Gourlay, Claire & Ilana Mushin

2015. ‘Up dere la’: Final Particlelain a Queensland Aboriginal Vernacular. Australian Journal of Linguistics 35:1 ► pp. 76 ff.

Hara, Yurie & Eric McCready

2017. Particles of (Un)expectedness: Cantonese Wo and Lo. In New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10091], ► pp. 27 ff.

Hayashi, Reiko

2019. Categorization for occasioned semantics: Reanalysis of a Japanese Yamagata 119 emergency call. Discourse Studies 21:5 ► pp. 495 ff.

HIRAMOTO, MIE

2015. Sentence‐final adverbs in Singapore English and Hong Kong English. World Englishes 34:4 ► pp. 636 ff.

Jin, Ying & Dennis Tay

2021. Discretion. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 12:2 ► pp. 158 ff.

Kádár, Dániel Z.

2023. Review of Chor (2018): Directional Particles in Cantonese: Form, Function, and Grammaticalization. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 24:2 ► pp. 332 ff.

Lam, Toni

2017. Intonational variation in Hong Kong English: a pilot study. Asian Englishes 19:1 ► pp. 22 ff.

Law, Jess H.-K., Haoze Li & Diti Bhadra

2024. Force shift: a case study of Cantonese ho2 particle clusters. Natural Language Semantics

Lee, Jonathan Him Nok, Harold Chui, Tan Lee, Sarah Luk, Dehua Tao & Nicolette Wing Tung Lee

2022. Formality in psychotherapy: How are therapists’ and clients’ use of discourse particles related to therapist empathy?. Frontiers in Psychiatry 13

Leung, Ester S. M. & John Gibbons

2007. Purposes, Roles and Beliefs in the Hostile Questioning of Vulnerable Witnesses. In The Language of Sexual Crime, ► pp. 139 ff.

Leung, Helen Hue Lam

2020. Combining NSM Explications for Clusters of Cantonese Utterance Particles: laa3-wo3 and zaa3-wo3. In Studies in Ethnopragmatics, Cultural Semantics, and Intercultural Communication, ► pp. 187 ff.

Li, David C.S.

2004. Review of Chan (2003): Aspects of the Syntax, the Pragmatics, and the Production of Code-Switching. Cantonese and English. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 25:2 ► pp. 311 ff.

Li, Jackie P. W., Thomas Law, Gary Y. H. Lam & Carol K. S. To

2013. Role of sentence-final particles and prosody in irony comprehension in Cantonese-speaking children with and without Autism Spectrum Disorders. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 27:1 ► pp. 18 ff.

Liu, Feng, Xi Li, Rurong Liu & Jianyu Zeng

2023. Linguistic expressions of negative stances: A conversation analysis of turn-medial particle dai in Jishou dialect (Hunan Province, China). Frontiers in Psychology 14

Liu, Feng, Jing-yu Zhang & Jian-yu Zeng

2022. 负面情感立场标记. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 13:2 ► pp. 226 ff.

Liu, Yuge, S. Zhu, Y. Chen & J. Liang

2023. An Acoustic Study on The Effects Intonation Imposes on Sentence-final Particles in Nanjing Dialect. SHS Web of Conferences 162 ► pp. 01035 ff.

Luke, Kang-kwong

2012. Dislocation or Afterthought?—A Conversation Analytic Account of Incremental Sentences in Chinese. Discourse Processes 49:3-4 ► pp. 338 ff.

Mori, Junko

1999. Well I May Be Exaggerating But Self-Qualifying Clauses in Negotiation of Opinions Among Japanese Speakers. Human Studies 22:2-4 ► pp. 447 ff.

Shih, Pei Chun

2020. On the translation of Japanese politeness into Cantonese. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 11:2 ► pp. 287 ff.

Simpson, Andrew

2014. Sentence‐Final Particles. In The Handbook of Chinese Linguistics, ► pp. 156 ff.

Sorjonen, Marja-Leena

2018. Chapter 9. Reformulating prior speaker’s turn in Finnish. In Between Turn and Sequence [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 31], ► pp. 251 ff.

Szeto, Pui Yiu, Jackie Yan-ki Lai & Umberto Ansaldo

2021. Creole typology is analytic typology. Language Ecology ► pp. 89 ff.

Tam, Hugo Wing-Yu

2021. 「粵語語法學習概覽」的建構. Chinese as a Second Language (漢語教學研究—美國中文教師學會學報). The journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, USA 56:3 ► pp. 209 ff.

Tang, Sze-Wing

2015. A generalized syntactic schema for utterance particles in Chinese. Lingua Sinica 1:1

Tang, Sze‐Wing & Siu‐Pong Cheng

2014. Aspects of Cantonese Grammar. In The Handbook of Chinese Linguistics, ► pp. 599 ff.

Thompson, Sandra A. & Ruey-Jiuan Regina Wu

2016. Introduction. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 7:2 ► pp. 175 ff.

Wakefield, John C.

2020. Intonational Meaning. In Intonational Morphology [Prosody, Phonology and Phonetics, ], ► pp. 21 ff.

Wakefield, John C.

2020. The Results of the Research. In Intonational Morphology [Prosody, Phonology and Phonetics, ], ► pp. 83 ff.

Wakefield, John C.

2020. Evidence via Cantonese. In Intonational Morphology [Prosody, Phonology and Phonetics, ], ► pp. 55 ff.

Wan, Helen

2020. Chapter 7. Understanding stancetaking through gestures and linguistic practices in a public political debate in Hong Kong. In Analysing Chinese Language and Discourse across Layers and Genres [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 13], ► pp. 120 ff.

Wan, Helen

2023. “Hypophora” and “question cascade” in Cantonese political discourse: the stance triangle and the use of rhetorical moves and utterance final particles. Text & Talk 43:5 ► pp. 647 ff.

Wierzbicka, Anna

2003. Singapore English: A semantic and cultural perspective. Multilingua - Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication 22:4 ► pp. 327 ff.

Winterstein, Grégoire, Regine Lai, Daniel Tsz-Hin Lee & Zoe Pei-Sui Luk

2018. From additivity to mirativity: The Cantonese sentence final particle <i>tim1</i>. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3:1

Woon Yee Ho, Judy

2006. Functional complementarity between two languages in ICQ. International Journal of Bilingualism 10:4 ► pp. 429 ff.

Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina & John Heritage

2017. Particles and epistemics. In Enabling Human Conduct [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 273], ► pp. 273 ff.

Wu, Yaxin & Guodong Yu

2022. Action Ascription and Action Assessment. In Action Ascription in Interaction, ► pp. 234 ff.

Yau, Alice, Margo Turnbull, Daniel Angus & Bernadette Watson

2020. Visualizing Conversations in Health Care: Using Discursis to Compare Cantonese and English Data Sets. In Expanding Horizons in Health Communication [The Humanities in Asia, 6], ► pp. 275 ff.

Yiu, Edwin M-L. & Linda E. Worrall

1996. Sentence production ability of a bilingual cantonese/english agrammatic speaker. Aphasiology 10:5 ► pp. 505 ff.

Yiu, Edwin M-L. & Linda E. Worrall

1996. Agrammatic production: A cross-linguistic comparison of english and cantonese. Aphasiology 10:6 ► pp. 623 ff.

Yu, Guodong & Yaxin Wu

2020. Social actions in Mandarin conversations. East Asian Pragmatics 5:3 ► pp. 289 ff.

[no author supplied]

2012. References. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ► pp. 741 ff.

[no author supplied]

2014. Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 3],

[no author supplied]

2018. Directional Particles in Cantonese [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 9],

[no author supplied]

2021. Language, Multimodal Interaction and Transaction [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 14],

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects