Cover not available
Part of
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2013: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' Amsterdam 2013
Edited by Enoch O. Aboh, Jeannette Schaeffer and Petra Sleeman
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 8] 2015
► pp. 203–220

Reflexively marked anticausatives are not semantically reflexive

| Universität Stuttgart
| Universidad Complutense de Madrid

We discuss the recent proposal by Koontz-Garboden (2009) (cf. also Chierchia 2004) that reflexively marked anticausative verbs (in Romance languages and beyond) are semantically reflexive. This proposal predicts that a sentence headed by a lexical causative verb should not entail the sentence headed by the reflexively marked anticausative counterpart. We uncover problems with the main argument for this claim and add further tests which show that a causative sentence does, in fact, entail its anticausative counterpart, whether reflexively marked or not. Our findings support standard semantics of the causative alternation according to which anticausatives, whether reflexively marked or not, denote inchoative one-place predicates. They also reconfirm that the relevant reflexive morphology is syncretic and does not necessarily derive reflexive semantics.

Published online: 2 December 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.8.11sch
References
Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou, and Florian Schäfer
2015 External Arguments in Transitivity Alternations: a Layering Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Florian Schäfer, and Giorgos Spathas
2014 “Delimiting Voice in Germanic: on Object Drop and Naturally Reflexive Verbs.” In Proceedings of NELS 44, ed. by Jyoti Iyer, and Leland Kusmer, 1-14. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Beavers, John, and Andrew Koontz-Garboden
2013 “In Defense of the Reflexivization Analysis of Anticausativization.” Lingua 131: 199-216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio
1980 Sobre la Negación. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro
2004 “A Semantics for Unaccusatives and its Syntactic Consequences.” In The Unaccusativity Puzzle, ed. by Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou, and Martin Everaert, 22-59. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia
2006 “Only, Emotive Factives, and the Dual Nature of Polarity Dependency.” Language 82: 575-603. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane
1981 “On the Lexical Representation of Romance Reflexivie Clitics.” In The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, ed. by Joan Bresnan, 87-148. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R
1985 “Metalinguistic Negation and Pragmatic Ambiguity.” Language 61: 121-174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horvath, Julia, and Tal Siloni
2011 “Anticausatives: Against Reflexivization.” Lingua 121: 2176-2186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Anticausatives Have no Causer: A Rejoinder to Beavers and Koontz-Garboden.” Lingua 131: 217-230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemmer, Susanne
1993 The Middle Voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koenig, Jean-Pierre, and Beate Benndorf
1998 “Meaning and context: German aber and sondern.” In Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap, ed. by J.P. Koenig, 365-386. Stanford: CSLI publications.Google Scholar
Koontz-Garboden, Andrew
2007 States, Changes of State, and the Monotonicity Hypothesis Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
2009 “Anticausativization.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27: 77-138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth, and Malka Rappaport Hovav
1995 Unaccusativity. At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pitteroff, Marcel, and Florian Schäfer
2014 “The Argument Structure of Reflexively Marked Anticausatives and Middles: Evidence from Datives.” In Proceedings of NELS 43, ed. by Hsin-Lun Huang, Ethan Poole, and Amanda Rysling, 67-78. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
2002 “The Theta System: An Overview.” Theoretical Linguistics 28: 229-290.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya, and Tal Siloni
2005 “The Lexicon-Syntax Parameter: Reflexivization and Other Arity Operations.” Linguistic Inquiry 36: 389-436. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schäfer, Florian
2008 The Syntax of (Anti-)Causatives. External Arguments in Change-of-state Contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swart, Henriëtte de
2010 Expression and Interpretation of Negation: An OT Typology. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stephens, Nola
2006 “Agentivity and the Virtual Reflexive Construction.” In Demoting the Agent, ed. by Benjamin Lyngfelt, and Torgrim Solstad, 275-300. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wood, Jim
2012 Icelandic Morphosyntax and Argument Structure. Ph.D. dissertation, NYU.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Boneh, Nora & Léa Nash
2017. The syntax and semantics of dative DPs in Russian ditransitives. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 35:4 ► pp. 899 ff. DOI logo
Caha, Pavel, Karen De Clercq & Guido Vanden Wyngaerd
2023. Zero morphology and change-of-state verbs. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 42:1 ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Fraser, Katherine
2019. The Athlete Tore a Muscle: English Locative Subjects in the Extra Argument Construction. In Language, Logic, and Computation [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11456], ► pp. 128 ff. DOI logo
Mashaqba, Bassil, Anas Huneety, Wael Zuraiq, Moh’D Al-Omari & Sabri Al-Shboul
2020. Labile anticausatives in Jordanian Arabic. Lingua Posnaniensis 62:2 ► pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Vietri, Simonetta
2021. Locatum and location verbs in Italian. Lingvisticae Investigationes 44:2 ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. The Middle Voice and Connected Constructions in Ibero-Romance [Studies in Language Variation, 29], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.