Studies in Anaphora
Editor
The last 15 years has seen an explosion of research on the topic of anaphora. Studies of anaphora have been important to our understanding of cognitive processes, the relationships between social interaction and grammar, and of directionality in diachronic change. The contributions to this volume represent the “next generation” of studies in anaphora — defined broadly as those morpho-syntactic forms available to speakers for formulating reference — taking as their starting point the foundation of research done in the 1980s. These studies examine in detail, and with a richness of methods and theories, what patterns of anaphoric usage can reveal to us about cognition, social interaction, and language change.
[Typological Studies in Language, 33] 1996. xii, 518 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Introduction | p. vii
-
The Discourse-referential and Typological Motivation of Pronominal Procliticization vs. EncliticizationWerner Abraham | p. 1
-
Referential Strategies and the Co-Construction of Argument Structure in Korean AcquisitionPatricia M. Clancy | p. 33
-
Ad Hoc Hierarchy: Lexical Structures for Reference in Consumer Reports ArticlesSusanna Cumming and Tsuyoshi Ono | p. 69
-
Proper Names as a Referential Option in English ConversationPamela A. Downing | p. 95
-
Interactional Motivations for Reference Formulation: He had. This guy had, a beautiful, thirty-two O:ldsCecilia E. Ford and Barbara A. Fox | p. 145
-
On Sources of Demonstratives and AnaphorsZygmunt Frajzyngier | p. 169
-
Demonstratives in Narrative Discourse: A Taxonomy of Universal UsesNikolaus P. Himmelmann | p. 205
-
Anaphora in Russian Narrative Prose: A Cognitive Calculative AccountAndrej A. Kibrik | p. 255
-
Anaphora, Deixis, and the Evolution of Latin IlleFlora Klein-Andreu | p. 305
-
Conceptual Grouping and Pronominal AnaphoraRonald W. Langacker | p. 333
-
Patterns of Anaphora in To’aba’ita Narrative DiscourseFrank Lichtenberk | p. 379
-
New Directions in ReferentialityMarianne Mithun | p. 413
-
Some Practices for Referring to Persons in Talk-in-Interaction: A Partial Sketch of a SystematicsEmanuel A. Schegloff | p. 437
-
Topic Discontinuity and Zero Anaphora in Chinese Discourse: Cognitive Strategies in Discourse ProcessingLiang Tao | p. 487
-
Index | p. 515
Cited by
Cited by 15 other publications
Camus, Laurent & Lorenza Mondada
2021. L’anaphore à distance : enjeux multimodaux, épistémiques et normatifs en interaction. Langue française N° 210:2 ► pp. 77 ff. 
De Mulder, Walter
Fox, Barbara A. & Sandra A. Thompson
2010. Responses toWh-Questions in English Conversation. Research on Language & Social Interaction 43:2 ► pp. 133 ff.
Jacquin, Jérôme & Marta Zampa
2016. Do we still need an army like in the First World War? An argumentative analysis of a television debate on abolishing compulsory military service in Switzerland. Discourse & Communication 10:5 ► pp. 479 ff.
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization,
Laury, Ritva
Levinson, Stephen C.
2017. Living with Manny’s dangerous idea. In Enabling Human Conduct [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 273], ► pp. 327 ff.
Li, Wendan
2004. Topic Chains in Chinese Discourse. Discourse Processes 37:1 ► pp. 25 ff.
Nariyama, Shigeko
2004. Subject ellipsis in English. Journal of Pragmatics 36:2 ► pp. 237 ff.
OBANA, YASUKO
2003. Anaphoric choices in Japanese fictional novels: The discourse arrangement of noun phrases, zero and third person pronouns. Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 23:3
Tsuyoshi Ono & Sandra A. Thompson
2003. Japanese (w)atashi/ore/boku I: Theyre not just pronouns. cogl 14:4 ► pp. 321 ff.
Rosen, Nicole
2003. Demonstrative Position in Michif. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 48:1-2 ► pp. 39 ff.
Simpson, Andrew, Zoe Wu & Yan Li
2016. Grammatical roles, Coherence Relations, and the interpretation of pronouns in Chinese. Lingua Sinica 2:1
[no author supplied]
2012. References. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ► pp. 741 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CF: Linguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General