Demonstratives
Form, function and grammaticalization
Author
All languages have demonstratives, but their form, meaning and use vary tremendously across the languages of the world. This book presents the first large-scale analysis of demonstratives from a cross-linguistic and diachronic perspective. It is based on a representative sample of 85 languages. The first part of the book analyzes demonstratives from a synchronic point of view, examining their morphological structures, semantic features, syntactic functions, and pragmatic uses in spoken and written discourse. The second part concentrates on diachronic issues, in particular on the development of demonstratives into grammatical markers. Across languages demonstratives provide a frequent historical source for definite articles, relative and third person pronouns, nonverbal copulas, sentence connectives, directional preverbs, focus markers, expletives, and many other grammatical markers. The book describes the different mechanisms by which demonstratives grammaticalize and argues that the evolution of grammatical markers from demonstratives is crucially distinct from other cases of grammaticalization.
[Typological Studies in Language, 42] 1999. xii, 205 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Acknowledgments | p. ix
-
Abbreviations | p. xi
-
Introduction | p. 1
-
Morphology | p. 13
-
Semantics | p. 35
-
Syntax | p. 57
-
Pragmatic use | p. 93
-
Grammaticalization | p. 115
-
Conclusion | p. 157
-
Notes | p. 163
-
Data sources | p. 169
-
The inflectional features of pronominal demonstratives | p. 171
-
-
Language Index | p. 193
-
Name Index | p. 197
-
Subject Index | p. 203
“The book is but a first step towards a good understanding of demonstratives in human language. Nevertheless, it is a promising, thought provoking, and wide ranging start. It opens up the basic question of what kind of linguistic phenomenon demonstratives are, a question that has been taken for granted much too long.”
Michael Cysouw, ZAS Berlin, in General Linguistics 39(1-4), 2002
“This is an important book, not only for typologists, but for all linguists, and especially those about to begin fieldwork on undescribed languages.
”
”
Joseph F. Eska in Language 77:4, 2001
Cited by
Cited by 351 other publications
Aguilar-Guevara, Ana, Bert Le Bruyn & Joost Zwarts
2014. Advances in weak referentiality. In Weak Referentiality [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 219], ► pp. 1 ff. 
Ahn, Dorothy
2022. Indirectly direct: An account of demonstratives and pointing. Linguistics and Philosophy 45:6 ► pp. 1345 ff.
Aigro, Mari
2020. POLAR QUESTION PARTICLES AND THEIR SOURCES: A SEMANTIC APPROACH TO GRAMMATICALISATION1. Transactions of the Philological Society 118:2 ► pp. 237 ff.
Albright, Adam
2008. 7 Explaining Universal Tendencies and Language Particulars in Analogical Change. In Linguistic Universals and Language Change, ► pp. 144 ff.
Alcaraz Carrión, Daniel & Javier Valenzuela
2021. Distant time, distant gesture: speech and gesture correlate to express temporal distance. Semiotica 2021:241 ► pp. 159 ff.
Andersen, Torben
Andriani, Luigi, Kim A. Groothuis & Giuseppina Silvestri
2020. Pathways of Grammaticalisation in Italo-Romance. Probus 32:2 ► pp. 327 ff.
Asiimwe, Allen
2016. Investigating the connection between the demonstrative and the definite morpheme -ain Runyankore-Rukiga. South African Journal of African Languages 36:1 ► pp. 65 ff.
Auer, Peter
2017. Chapter 14. Epilogue. In Imperative Turns at Talk [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 30], ► pp. 411 ff.
Baker, Brett & Mark Harvey
Ballester, Xaverio & Peter Dunphy-Hetherington
2024. On Indo–European /H/. Indian Journal of Language and Linguistics 5:1 ► pp. 15 ff.
BALPINAR, Metin
2021. JAPONCA VE TÜRKÇE İŞARET SÖZCÜKLERİNİN ALGISAL KULLANIMLARI ÜZERİNE. Selçuk Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi :53 ► pp. 291 ff.
Barbosa, Eduarda Calado & Felipe Nogueira De Carvalho
2020. What we do and presuppose when we demonstrate. Veritas (Porto Alegre) 65:3 ► pp. e38525 ff.
Bartkutė, Darija & Daiva Verikaitė-Gaigalienė
Berez, Andrea L.
2015. Directionals, episodic structure, and geographic information systems: Area/punctual distinctions in Ahtna travel narration. Linguistics Vanguard 1:1 ► pp. 155 ff.
Bergqvist, Henrik
2018. Chapter 1. Evidentiality as stance. In Evidence for Evidentiality [Human Cognitive Processing, 61], ► pp. 19 ff.
Bergqvist, Henrik & Dominique Knuchel
2019. Explorations of Engagement: Introduction. Open Linguistics 5:1 ► pp. 650 ff.
Bisang, Walter & Yicheng Wu
2017. Numeral classifiers in East Asia. Linguistics 55:2 ► pp. 257 ff.
Blevins, Juliette
2008. 4 Consonant Epenthesis: Natural and Unnatural Histories. In Linguistic Universals and Language Change, ► pp. 79 ff.
Bloom, Barthe
2023. Chapter 2. Life at the intersection. In Constructional Approaches to Nordic Languages [Constructional Approaches to Language, 37], ► pp. 24 ff.
BLYTHING, Liam P., Maialen IRAOLA AZPIROZ, Shanley ALLEN, Regina HERT & Juhani JÄRVIKIVI
2022. The influence of prominence cues in 7- to 10-year-olds’ pronoun resolution: Disentangling order of mention, grammatical role, and semantic role. Journal of Child Language 49:5 ► pp. 930 ff.
Bocale, Paola
2018. The Irrealis Use of the DeicticTAMin Contemporary Russian. Scando-Slavica 64:2 ► pp. 175 ff.
Bott, Oliver & Torgrim Solstad
2023. The production of referring expressions is influenced by the likelihood of next mention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 76:10 ► pp. 2256 ff.
Bozkurt, Emine Serap
2019. DİLİN ANLAM İNŞASINDA ADILLAR. Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 21:1 ► pp. 345 ff.
Breban, Tine
2010. Reconstructing paths of secondary grammaticalisation ofsamefrom emphasising to phoricity and single-referent-marking postdeterminer uses1. Transactions of the Philological Society 108:1 ► pp. 68 ff.
Breunesse, Merlijn & Holger Diessel
2023. Chapter 7. Iconicity in spatial deixis. In Reconnecting Form and Meaning [Studies in Language Companion Series, 230], ► pp. 185 ff.
Britsch, Susan
2009. Differential discourses: the contribution of visual analysis to defining scientific literacy in the early years classroom. Visual Communication 8:2 ► pp. 207 ff.
Brovold, Amanda & Rick Grush
2012. Towards an (improved) interdisciplinary investigation of demonstrative reference. In Perception, Realism, and the Problem of Reference, ► pp. 11 ff.
Budzisch, Josefina
2021. [Studiauralo-altaica, 54], ► pp. 1 ff.
Burenhult, Niclas
2022. Attention, accessibility, and the addressee. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 363 ff.
Bybee, Joan L.
2008. 5 Formal Universals as Emergent Phenomena: The Origins of Structure Preservation. In Linguistic Universals and Language Change, ► pp. 108 ff.
Błaszczyk, Izabela
2023. Expression of (in)definiteness in Polish-German bilinguals: an example of contact-induced grammaticalization. Linguistics Vanguard 9:s2 ► pp. 201 ff.
Calle-Martín, Javier
2019. No Cat Could be That Hungry!This/Thatas Intensifiers in American English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 39:2 ► pp. 151 ff.
Calude, Andreea S.
2017. Sociolinguistic variation at the grammatical/discourse level. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22:3 ► pp. 429 ff.
Cap, Piotr
2010. Pragmatics, Micropragmatics, Macropragmatics. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 6:2
Catasso, Nicholas
2011. The Grammaticalization of Demonstratives: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Universal Language 12:1 ► pp. 7 ff.
Chang, Franklin, Gary S. Dell & Kathryn Bock
2006. Becoming syntactic.. Psychological Review 113:2 ► pp. 234 ff.
Chang, Jung-Im
2022. The origin and the development of 焉 yān in Old Chinese. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 23:4 ► pp. 601 ff.
Chelliah, Shobhana L. & Willem J. de Reuse
2010. What to Expect in Morphosyntactic Typology and Terminology. In Handbook of Descriptive Linguistic Fieldwork, ► pp. 279 ff.
Chen, Rong
2020. Plural marking patterns of nouns and their associates in the world’s languages. Studies in Language 44:1 ► pp. 231 ff.
Christy, T. Craig
2013. Vygotsky, Cognitive Development and Language. Historiographia Linguistica 40:1-2 ► pp. 199 ff.
Chu, Chia-Ying & Utako Minai
2018. Children’s Demonstrative Comprehension and the Role of Non-linguistic Cognitive Abilities: A Cross-Linguistic Study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 47:6 ► pp. 1343 ff.
Ciecierski, Tadeusz & Piotr Tomasz Makowski
2022. Demonstrations as actions. Synthese 200:6
COLE, MARCELLE
2017. Pronominal anaphoric strategies in the West Saxon dialect of Old English. English Language and Linguistics 21:2 ► pp. 381 ff.
Consten, Manfred
2023. Who creates reference?. In Reference [Studies in Language Companion Series, 228], ► pp. 269 ff.
Consten, Manfred & Maria Averintseva-Klisch
2012. Tentative Reference Acts? ‘Recognitional Demonstratives’ as Means of Suggesting Mutual Knowledge – or Overriding a Lack of It. Research in Language 10:3 ► pp. 257 ff.
Cooperrider, Kensy
2016. The Co-Organization of Demonstratives and Pointing Gestures. Discourse Processes 53:8 ► pp. 632 ff.
Cooperrider, Kensy
Cornish, Francis
2008. When indexicals target discursively subsidiary information: How foregrounding and backgrounding in discourse affect indexical reference. Discours :3
Cornish, Francis
2010. Indexicaux, discours et mémoire discursive : ce que les premiers révèlent du second et de la troisième. Linx :62-63 ► pp. 111 ff.
Cornish, Francis
2015. Procédures référentielles indexicales, relations rhétoriques et structuration du discours1. Discours :17
CORNISH, FRANCIS
2017. SN démonstratifs et anadeixis: sens ‘spatial’, ou valeurs tributaires d'une stratégie pragmatique potentielle?. Journal of French Language Studies 27:2 ► pp. 215 ff.
Cornish, Francis
2017. Indexicals and L2 Learners’ Metadiscursive Awareness. In Essential Competencies for English-medium University Teaching [Educational Linguistics, 27], ► pp. 65 ff.
Coventry, Kenny R., Harmen B. Gudde, Holger Diessel, Jacqueline Collier, Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes, Mila Vulchanova, Valentin Vulchanov, Emanuela Todisco, Maria Reile, Merlijn Breunesse, Helen Plado, Juergen Bohnemeyer, Raed Bsili, Michela Caldano, Rositsa Dekova, Katharine Donelson, Diana Forker, Yesol Park, Lekhnath Sharma Pathak, David Peeters, Gabriella Pizzuto, Baris Serhan, Linda Apse, Florian Hesse, Linh Hoang, Phuong Hoang, Yoko Igari, Keerthana Kapiley, Tamar Haupt-Khutsishvili, Sara Kolding, Katri Priiki, Ieva Mačiukaitytė, Vaisnavi Mohite, Tiina Nahkola, Sum Yi Tsoi, Stefan Williams, Shunei Yasuda, Angelo Cangelosi, Jon Andoni Duñabeitia, Ramesh Kumar Mishra, Roberta Rocca, Jurģis Šķilters, Mikkel Wallentin, Eglė Žilinskaitė-Šinkūnienė & Ozlem Durmaz Incel
2023. Spatial communication systems across languages reflect universal action constraints. Nature Human Behaviour 7:12 ► pp. 2099 ff.
Cruz Fimbres, Juan Pablo & Manuel Peregrina Llanes
2022. Continuidad referencial en guarijío de Chihuahua. Cuadernos de Lingüística de El Colegio de México 9 ► pp. 1 ff.
Cuenca, Maria-Josep
2014. The use of demonstratives and context activation in Catalan parliamentary debate. Discourse Studies 16:6 ► pp. 729 ff.
Cáo 曹羽菲, Yǔfēi
2016. Anáfora con artículo definido y construcción del discurso: comparación entre español y chino. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 67 ► pp. 89 ff.
da Milano, Federica
2007. Demonstratives in parallel texts: a case study. Language Typology and Universals 60:2 ► pp. 135 ff.
Da Milano, Federica
2021. The category ‘pronoun’ in East and Southeast Asian languages, with a focus on Japanese. In Linguistic Categories, Language Description and Linguistic Typology [Typological Studies in Language, 132], ► pp. 389 ff.
Dachkovsky, Svetlana
2020. From a demonstrative to a relative clause marker. Sign Language & Linguistics 23:1-2 ► pp. 142 ff.
Dancygier, Barbara
2019. Proximal and distal deictics and the construal of narrative time
. Cognitive Linguistics 30:2 ► pp. 399 ff.
De Mulder, Walter
2021. Le déterminant démonstratif ce : d’un marqueur token -réflexif à une instruction contribuant à la construction de référents. Langue française N° 210:2 ► pp. 41 ff.
De Mulder, Walter & Anne Carlier
2006. Du démonstratif à l'article défini : le cas de ce en français moderne. Langue française n° 152:4 ► pp. 96 ff.
de Vaan, Michiel
2015. Reduplicated demonstratives in ancient Indo‐European languages. Transactions of the Philological Society 113:1 ► pp. 38 ff.
Diessel, Holger
2013. Where does language come from? Some reflections on the role of deictic gesture and demonstratives in the evolution of language. Language and Cognition 5:2-3 ► pp. 239 ff.
Diessel, Holger
2014. Demonstratives, Frames of Reference, and Semantic Universals of Space. Language and Linguistics Compass 8:3 ► pp. 116 ff.
Diessel, Holger
2019. The Grammar Network,
Diessel, Holger & Kenny R. Coventry
2020. Demonstratives in Spatial Language and Social Interaction: An Interdisciplinary Review. Frontiers in Psychology 11
DIESSEL, Holger & Sergei MONAKHOV
2023. Acquisition of demonstratives in cross-linguistic perspective. Journal of Child Language 50:4 ► pp. 922 ff.
Dupraz, Emmanuel
2010. Les démonstratifs et la catégorie de la personne en sabellique. Revue de philologie, de littérature et d'histoire anciennes Tome LXXXI:2 ► pp. 243 ff.
Dvorak, Jan, F. Neveu, S. Prévost, A. Steuckardt, G. Bergounioux & B. Hamma
2022. L’opposition -ci/-là/∅ avec le déterminant démonstratif dans le français oral informel. SHS Web of Conferences 138 ► pp. 11007 ff.
Dvořák, Jan
2022. Le démonstratif et autres marqueurs anaphoriques dans les chaînes de référence en français et en tchèque. Travaux de linguistique n° 82:1 ► pp. 77 ff.
Dékány, Éva
2021. Pronouns. In The Hungarian Nominal Functional Sequence [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 100], ► pp. 213 ff.
Dékány, Éva
2021. The Functional Sequence Above QP. In The Hungarian Nominal Functional Sequence [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 100], ► pp. 93 ff.
Edwards, Terra
2023. The medium of intersubjectivity. Anthropological Theory
Ellert, Miriam
2013. Information Structure Affects the Resolution of the Subject Pronouns Er and Der in Spoken German Discourse. Discours :12
Enfield, N. J.
2023. Scale in Language. Cognitive Science 47:10
EPSTEIN, RICHARD
2011. The distal demonstrative as discourse marker inBeowulf. English Language and Linguistics 15:1 ► pp. 113 ff.
Estevam, Adriana M.
2019. Chapter 17. Nominalization and its pervasiveness in Xavante. In Nominalization in Languages of the Americas [Typological Studies in Language, 124], ► pp. 591 ff.
EVANS, NICHOLAS, HENRIK BERGQVIST & LILA SAN ROQUE
2018. The grammar of engagement I: framework and initial exemplification. Language and Cognition 10:1 ► pp. 110 ff.
Everett, Daniel L.
2005. Cultural Constraints on Grammar and Cognition in Pirahã. Current Anthropology 46:4 ► pp. 621 ff.
Flick, Johanna
2019. „Alte“ Daten, neue Methoden. Jahrbuch für Germanistische Sprachgeschichte 10:1 ► pp. 151 ff.
Forker, Diana
2020. Elevation as a Grammatical and Semantic Category of Demonstratives. Frontiers in Psychology 11
Fortis, Jean-Michel & Alice Vittrant
2016. Path-expressing constructions: Toward a typology. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 69:3 ► pp. 341 ff.
Fossard, Marion, Alan Garnham & H. Wind Cowles
2012. Between anaphora and deixis … The resolution of the demonstrative noun phrase “that N”. Language and Cognitive Processes 27:9 ► pp. 1385 ff.
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt, Meichun Liu & Yingying Ye
2020. Reference system in modern Mandarin Chinese. Australian Journal of Linguistics 40:1 ► pp. 45 ff.
Fretheim, Thorstein, Nana Aba Appiah Amfo & Ildikó Vaskó
2011. Token-reflexive, anaphoric and deictic functions of ‘here’. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 34:3 ► pp. 239 ff.
Fricke, Lea
2020. A southern German use of prefield-eses: Evidence from the corpus and an experimental study. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 39:1 ► pp. 41 ff.
García-Castillero, Carlos
Garrett, Andrew
2008. 6 Paradigmatic Uniformity and Markedness. In Linguistic Universals and Language Change, ► pp. 125 ff.
Gast, Volker, Christian Wehmeier & Dirk Vanderbeke
2023. A Register-Based Study of Interior Monologue in James Joyce’s Ulysses. Literature 3:1 ► pp. 42 ff.
Gelderen, Elly Van
2004. The CP and split CP cross-linguistically: The layer parameter. <i>WORD</i> 55:3 ► pp. 369 ff.
Georgi, Geoff
2020. (Complex) Demonstratives. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Semantics, ► pp. 1 ff.
Gerner, Matthias
2009. Deictic Features of Demonstratives: A Typological Survey with Special Reference to the Miao Group. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 54:1 ► pp. 43 ff.
Ghesquière, Lobke, An Van linden & Kristin Davidse
2013. Subjective Compounds and Subjectivity/Subjectification in the English Noun Phrase. English Studies 94:1 ► pp. 90 ff.
Gibert, Guillaume
2016. Quelques réflexions à propos de olim. Pallas :102 ► pp. 159 ff.
Goldstein, David M.
2014. Object agreement in Lycian. Historical Linguistics 127:1 ► pp. 101 ff.
González Marín, Susana
2019. El epitafio de Ovidio (<em>Trist</em>. III 3.73-76): la complejidad de la deixis al servicio de la sofisticación poética. Emerita 87:1 ► pp. 99 ff.
González Pérez, Manuel David
2023. Spheres of interest: Space and social cognition in Phola deixis. Open Linguistics 9:1
Jeff Good
2008. 1 Introduction. In Linguistic Universals and Language Change, ► pp. 1 ff.
Jeff Good
2008. Linguistic Universals and Language Change,
Griffiths, Debra, Andre Bester & Kenny R. Coventry
2019. Space Trumps Time When Talking About Objects. Cognitive Science 43:3
GUIJARRO-FUENTES, Pedro, Harmen B. GUDDE, Patricia GONZÁLEZ-PEÑA & Kenny R. COVENTRY
2022. Children’s use of demonstrative words: spatial deictics beyond infancy. Journal of Child Language ► pp. 1 ff.
Guillot, Céline
2006. Le démonstratif en français – présentation. Langue française n° 152:4 ► pp. 3 ff.
Guillot, Céline
2006. Démonstratif et déixis discursive : analyse comparée d'un corpus écrit de français médiéval et d'un corpus oral de français contemporain. Langue française n° 152:4 ► pp. 56 ff.
Guillot-Barbance, Céline & Christiane Marchello-Nizia
2015. Spécialisation morpho-syntaxique et changement sémantique : le cas du démonstratif français. Langue française N° 187:3 ► pp. 79 ff.
Guz, Wojciech
2024. Quotative uses of Polish similative demonstratives. Linguistics 0:0
Gómez, Luis Unceta
2017. Chapter 4. Discursive and pragmatic functions of Latin em. In Pragmatic Approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek [Studies in Language Companion Series, 190], ► pp. 63 ff.
Halm, Tamás
2018. From possessive suffix to affective demonstrative suffix in Hungarian: a grammaticalization analysis. Morphology 28:4 ► pp. 359 ff.
Hanks, William F.
2005. Explorations in the Deictic Field. Current Anthropology 46:2 ► pp. 191 ff.
Harris, Alice C.
2008. 3 On the Explanation of Typologically Unusual Structures. In Linguistic Universals and Language Change, ► pp. 54 ff.
Harvey, Mark & Brett Baker
2020. Epenthetic prefixation in Alawa and Marra. Australian Journal of Linguistics 40:3 ► pp. 273 ff.
Hayward, Rachael, Robin Wooffitt & Catherine Woods
2015. The transgressivethat: Making the world uncanny. Discourse Studies 17:6 ► pp. 703 ff.
Hazem, Ali Hussein & Waleed Younus Meteab
2020. Demonstratives in English with Reference to Arabic : A Syntactico-Pragmatic Study. SSRN Electronic Journal
Heath, Jeffrey
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2005. Language Contact and Grammatical Change,
Heine, Bernd, Tania Kuteva, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Fang Wu
2020. Where do demonstratives come from?. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 73:3 ► pp. 403 ff.
HEINE, BERND & KYUNG-AN SONG
2011. On the grammaticalization of personal pronouns. Journal of Linguistics 47:3 ► pp. 587 ff.
Hieber, Daniel W.
2018. Chapter 2. Category genesis in Chitimacha. In Category Change from a Constructional Perspective [Constructional Approaches to Language, 20], ► pp. 15 ff.
Hilpert, Martin
2020.
Unity and diversity in grammaticalization scenarios, Bisang, Walter & Andrej
Malchukov. Diachronica 37:1 ► pp. 127 ff.
Hinterwimmer, Stefan & Andreas Brocher
2018. An experimental investigation of the binding options of demonstrative pronouns in German. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3:1
Hopper, Paul J.
2008. 11 Emergent Serialization in English: Pragmatics and Typology. In Linguistic Universals and Language Change, ► pp. 253 ff.
Huang, Xiyue
2024. The Semantic Features and Pragmatic Functions of Cantonese Quasi-Demonstrative Type Quantifier di1: A Comparison with Demonstratives ne1 and go2. In Chinese Lexical Semantics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 14514], ► pp. 46 ff.
Höhn, Georg F. K.
2020. The third person gap in adnominal pronoun constructions. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5:1
Inglis, Douglas
2017. Khamti Shan anti-ergative construction. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 40:2 ► pp. 133 ff.
Iraola Azpiroz, Maialen, Mikel Santesteban, Antonella Sorace & Maria-José Ezeizabarrena
2017. Pronoun preferences of children in a language without typical third-person pronouns. First Language 37:2 ► pp. 168 ff.
Ironside, Rachael & Robin Wooffitt
2021. What Is That?. In Making Sense of the Paranormal, ► pp. 69 ff.
Iwasaki, Shoichi & Parada Dechapratumwan
Jackson, Clare
2013. ‘Why do these people’s opinions matter?’ Positioning known referents as unnameable others. Discourse Studies 15:3 ► pp. 299 ff.
Jacques, Guillaume & Aimée Lahaussois
Janebová, Markéta & Michaela Martinková
Jarbou, Samer Omar
2018. Time frame as a determinant of accessibility of anaphoric demonstratives in Classical Arabic. Topics in Linguistics 19:2 ► pp. 57 ff.
Jarbou, Samir O. & Fathi Migdadi
2012. Testing the Limits of Anaphoric Distance in Classical Arabic: A Corpus-Based Study. Research in Language 10:4 ► pp. 423 ff.
Jarbou, Samir Omar
2022. Medial deictic demonstratives in Arabic. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 103 ff.
Jenks, Peter & Rassidatou Konate
2022. Indexed definiteness. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 7:1
Joffre, Marie-Dominique
2016. Deixis spatiale, deixis temporelle : le cas de hic, haec, hoc. Pallas :102 ► pp. 139 ff.
Jungbluth, Konstanze
2002. Der Gebrauch von Deiktika in alltäglichen Handlungszusammenhängen. Bericht einer Feldstudie aus der Provinz Toledo. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 32:1 ► pp. 56 ff.
Jurczyk, Rafał
2021. Between feature mapping and thematic prominence: Old englishse-demonstratives and pronouns in discourse. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 57:4 ► pp. 573 ff.
Kahl, Lukas & Bernd Vath
2013. Buchbesprechungen. Historical Linguistics 126:1 ► pp. 309 ff.
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2023. Chapter 1. On the use of there -clefts with zero subject relativizer. In Reconnecting Form and Meaning [Studies in Language Companion Series, 230], ► pp. 17 ff.
Kaneyasu, Michiko & Shoichi Iwasaki
2017. Indexing ‘entrustment’: An analysis of the Japanese formulaic construction [N da yo N]. Discourse Studies 19:4 ► pp. 402 ff.
Kang, Arum
2021. Marking definiteness in an articleless language. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 22:2 ► pp. 302 ff.
Khachaturyan, Maria
2019. Knowing Is Belonging: Recognitional Deixis and Emergence of Common Ground in Religious Conversion. Signs and Society 7:2 ► pp. 186 ff.
Khachaturyan, Maria
2020. Common Ground in Demonstrative Reference: The Case of Mano (Mande). Frontiers in Psychology 11
Khachaturyan, Maria
2023. From copula to focus, vice versa, or neither?. Mandenkan :69 ► pp. 87 ff.
Killian, Don
2022. Towards a typology of predicative demonstratives. Linguistic Typology 26:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Kim, Min-Joo
2019. Summary and Conclusion. In The Syntax and Semantics of Noun Modifiers and the Theory of Universal Grammar [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 96], ► pp. 301 ff.
Kiparsky, Paul
2008. 2 Universals Constrain Change; Change Results in Typological Generalizations. In Linguistic Universals and Language Change, ► pp. 23 ff.
Knuchel, Dominique
2019. Kogi Demonstratives and Engagement. Open Linguistics 5:1 ► pp. 615 ff.
Kobayashi, Harumi, Tetsuya Yasuda, Hiroshi Igarashi & Satoshi Suzuki
2020. Language Use in Joint Action: The Means of Referring Expressions. International Journal of Social Robotics 12:5 ► pp. 1021 ff.
Kocsány, Piroska
2018. A közelre mutatóeznévmás anaforikus kifejtő szerkezetekben és a diszkurzív kontinuitás fokozatai. Jelentés és Nyelvhasználat 5:1 ► pp. 117 ff.
Kossmann, Maarten
2015. The interplay of style, information structure and definiteness: Double indirect objects in Figuig Berber narratives. Corpus :14 ► pp. 59 ff.
Kroon, Caroline
2017. Textual Deixis and the ‘Anchoring’ Use of the Latin Pronoun hic. Mnemosyne 70:4 ► pp. 585 ff.
Kummerow, David
2012. The Person That Isn't: On Defining the Third-Person, Negatively and Positively So. Australian Journal of Linguistics 32:2 ► pp. 259 ff.
Kuteva, Tania & Bernd Heine
2008. 9 On the Explanatory Value of Grammaticalization. In Linguistic Universals and Language Change, ► pp. 215 ff.
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization,
König, Ekkehard
2015. Manner deixis as source of grammatical markers in Indo-European languages. In Perspectives on Historical Syntax [Studies in Language Companion Series, 169], ► pp. 33 ff.
König, Ekkehard
2017. Chapter 5. The deictic identification of similarity. In Similative and Equative Constructions [Typological Studies in Language, 117], ► pp. 143 ff.
König, Ekkehard
2021. The role of a single lingua franca in scientific inquiry. European Journal of Language Policy 13:1 ► pp. 29 ff.
König, Ekkehard & Jingying Li
2018. Functional similarity despite geographical distance. In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 202], ► pp. 55 ff.
König, Ekkehard & Letizia Vezzosi
2022. Chapter 13. On the development of OE swā to ModE so and related changes in an atypical group of demonstratives. In English Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 358], ► pp. 310 ff.
L, Adel Abdulrahman & Utpal Lahiri
2022. Demonstratives in Arabic: Evidence from Taizi Yemeni Arabic and Hodeidi Yemeni Arabic. Indian Journal of Language and Linguistics 3:4 ► pp. 9 ff.
Lander, Eric & Liliane Haegeman
2018. The Nanosyntax of Spatial Deixis. Studia Linguistica 72:2 ► pp. 362 ff.
Langacker, Ronald
2008. Cognitive Grammar,
Langacker, Ronald W.
2008. 13 Discourse. In Cognitive Grammar, ► pp. 457 ff.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2008. 6 Constructions. In Cognitive Grammar, ► pp. 161 ff.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2008. 14 Engaging the World. In Cognitive Grammar, ► pp. 500 ff.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2008. 8 Rules and Restrictions. In Cognitive Grammar, ► pp. 215 ff.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2008. 7 Constructions. In Cognitive Grammar, ► pp. 183 ff.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2008. 1 Orientation. In Cognitive Grammar, ► pp. 3 ff.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2008. 9 Grounding. In Cognitive Grammar, ► pp. 259 ff.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2008. 2 Conceptual Semantics. In Cognitive Grammar, ► pp. 27 ff.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2008. 10 Nominal Structure. In Cognitive Grammar, ► pp. 310 ff.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2008. 3 Construal. In Cognitive Grammar, ► pp. 55 ff.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2008. 11 Clause Structure. In Cognitive Grammar, ► pp. 354 ff.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2008. 4 Grammatical Classes. In Cognitive Grammar, ► pp. 93 ff.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2008. 12 Complex Sentences. In Cognitive Grammar, ► pp. 406 ff.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2008. 5 Major Subclasses. In Cognitive Grammar, ► pp. 128 ff.
Levinson, Stephen C.
2024. The Dark Matter of Pragmatics,
Li, Yu
2023. The versatile classifiervə¹³in Zauzou. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 46:1 ► pp. 95 ff.
Lin, Lin
2020. The German Demonstratives. In The German Demonstratives [Peking University Linguistics Research, 2], ► pp. 65 ff.
Lin, Lin
2020. Introduction. In The German Demonstratives [Peking University Linguistics Research, 2], ► pp. 1 ff.
Long, Hai-Ping
2013. On the formation of MandarinVdeO focus clefts. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 60:4 ► pp. 409 ff.
Long, Haiping & Pengfei Kuang
Louagie, Dana
2017. The Status of Determining Elements in Australian Languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics 37:2 ► pp. 182 ff.
Lu, Man
2022. Polygrammaticalization: the morphemekoin the Miluo Xiang dialect. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 75:2 ► pp. 239 ff.
Maes, Alfons, Emiel Krahmer & David Peeters
2022. Explaining variance in writers’ use of demonstratives: A corpus study demonstrating the importance of discourse genre. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 7:1
Maes, Alfons, Emiel Krahmer & David Peeters
2022. Understanding demonstrative reference in text: a new taxonomy based on a new corpus. Language and Cognition 14:2 ► pp. 185 ff.
Manfredi, Stefano
2017. Demonstratives and the emergence of a definite article in Juba Arabic and Ki-Nubi. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 32:2 ► pp. 205 ff.
Marchello-Nizia, Christiane
2004. La sémantique des démonstratifs en ancien français : une neutralisation en progrès ?. Langue française n°141:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Marchello-Nizia, Christiane
2005. Deixis and subjectivity: the semantics of demonstratives in Old French (9th–12th century). Journal of Pragmatics 37:1 ► pp. 43 ff.
Marchello-Nizia, Christiane
2006. Du subjectif au spatial : l'évolution des formes et du sens des démonstratifs en français. Langue française n° 152:4 ► pp. 114 ff.
Marchello-Nizia, Christiane
2009. Bibliographie. In Grammaticalisation et changement linguistique [Champs linguistiques, ], ► pp. 265 ff.
Massé-Arkan, Pascale
2013. How demonstrative determiners cil and cist contribute to text grammar and discourse comprehension in Old French narratives. zrph 129:3 ► pp. 559 ff.
Mazengia Beyene, Shimelis
2021. Reduplication in Oromo. In Grammatical and Sociolinguistic Aspects of Ethiopian Languages [IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society, 48], ► pp. 245 ff.
McBurney, Susan Lioyd
2002. Pronominal reference in signed and spoken language: Are grammatical categories modality-dependent?. In Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages, ► pp. 329 ff.
McGregor, William B.
Medrano, Samuel Navas, Max Pfeiffer & Christian Kray
2018. [Electronic Workshops in Computing, ],
Navas Medrano, Samuel, Max Pfeiffer & Christian Kray
2017. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, ► pp. 1 ff.
Navas Medrano, Samuel, Max Pfeiffer & Christian Kray
2020. Remote Deictic Communication: Simulating Deictic Pointing Gestures across Distances Using Electro Muscle Stimulation. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 36:19 ► pp. 1867 ff.
Meeuwis, Michael & Koen Stroeken
2022. Non-situational functions of demonstrative noun phrases in Lingala (Bantu). Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 147 ff.
Meibauer, Jörg, Ulrike Demske, Jochen Geilfuß-Wolfgang, Jürgen Pafel, Karl Heinz Ramers, Monika Rothweiler & Markus Steinbach
2002. Pragmatik. In Einführung in die germanistische Linguistik, ► pp. 208 ff.
Meibauer, Jörg, Ulrike Demske, Jochen Geilfuß-Wolfgang, Jürgen Pafel, Karl Heinz Ramers, Monika Rothweiler & Markus Steinbach
2007. Pragmatik. In Einführung in die germanistische Linguistik, ► pp. 210 ff.
Meier, Richard P., Kearsy Cormier & David Quinto-Pozos
2002. Using space and describing space: Pronouns, classifiers, and verb agreement. In Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages, ► pp. 321 ff.
Meier-Vieracker, Simon
2024. Automated football match reports as models of textuality. Text & Talk 0:0
Mesh, Kate, Emiliana Cruz, Joost van de Weijer, Niclas Burenhult & Marianne Gullberg
2021. Effects of Scale on Multimodal Deixis: Evidence From Quiahije Chatino. Frontiers in Psychology 11
Messineo, Cristina, Javier Carol & Harriet E. Manelis Klein
2016. Deíxis y contacto en la región del Gran Chaco: Los demostrativos en las lenguas guaycurúes y mataguayas. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2016:240 ► pp. 119 ff.
Mettouchi, Amina
2011. Linguistique berbère. École pratique des hautes études. Section des sciences historiques et philologiques. Livret-Annuaire :142 ► pp. 43 ff.
Michael, Lev
2015. Chapter 5. The cultural bases of linguistic form. In Language Structure and Environment [Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts, 6], ► pp. 99 ff.
Mihas, Elena
2012. Spatial deixis in Ashéninka Perené (Arawak). LIAMES: Línguas Indígenas Americanas 12:1 ► pp. 39 ff.
Mihas, Elena
2013. Nominal and verbal temporal morphology in Ashéninka Perené (Arawak). Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 45:1 ► pp. 43 ff.
MILLER, PHILIP
2023. Deicticthisand speaker containment. English Language and Linguistics 27:2 ► pp. 303 ff.
Miñana, Pau Martín
2023. L’evolució del demostratiu aqueix durant l’època moderna. In (De)bat a bat,
Moravcsik, Edith A.
2017. Number. In The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology, ► pp. 440 ff.
Muller, Claude
2023. Les démonstratifs neutres du français en cataphore d’une subordonnée complétive.
Lingvisticae Investigationes
46:1 ► pp. 18 ff.
Mwinlaaru, Isaac N.
2021. deixis in the Dagaare Nominal Group: Syntagmatic and Paradigmatic Perspectives. <i>WORD</i> 67:3 ► pp. 281 ff.
Nakayasu, Minako
2018. Chapter 6. Spatio-temporal systems in Chaucer. In Sociocultural Dimensions of Lexis and Text in the History of English [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 343], ► pp. 125 ff.
Nakayasu, Minako
2021. Spatio-Temporal Systems in Shakespeare’s Dialogues: A Case from Julius Caesar
. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 56:s1 ► pp. 425 ff.
Naruoka, Keiko
2022. The interactional functions of the Japanese demonstratives in conversation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 475 ff.
Nichols, Johanna
2008. 12 Universals and Diachrony: Some Observations. In Linguistic Universals and Language Change, ► pp. 287 ff.
Nikitina, Tatiana
2018. When Linguists and Speakers Do Not Agree: The Endangered Grammar of Verbal Art in West Africa. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 28:2 ► pp. 197 ff.
Nintemann, Julia & Maja Robbers
2019. Towards a typology of spatial deictic expressions
. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 72:3 ► pp. 335 ff.
Nykiel, Jerzy
2019. ‘Thone vpon thother’. In Developments in English Historical Morpho-Syntax [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 346], ► pp. 57 ff.
Loretta O'Connor & Pieter Muysken
1920. The Native Languages of South America,
Oshima, David Y. & Elin McCready
2017. Anaphoric demonstratives and mutual knowledge. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 35:3 ► pp. 801 ff.
Otero, Manuel A., Doris L. Payne & Alejandra Vidal
2021. Determiners and the Development of Grammatical Nominalization in Nivaĉle*. Studia Linguistica 75:2 ► pp. 234 ff.
O’Connell, Peter A.
2023. Pronouns, Persuasion, and Performance in the Athenian Courtroom: ΟΥΤΟΣ in Lysias. Classical Philology 118:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
O’Meara, Carolyn, Niclas Burenhult, Mikael Rothstein & Peter Sercombe
2018. Representing space and place: hunter-gatherer perspectives. Hunter Gatherer Research 4:3 ► pp. 287 ff.
Pafel, Jürgen
2015. Pragmatik. In Einführung in die germanistische Linguistik, ► pp. 212 ff.
Park, Jung‐ran
2007. Evolution of concept networks and implications for knowledge representation. Journal of Documentation 63:6 ► pp. 963 ff.
Parodi, Giovanni & Gina Burdiles
2019. Los pronombres neutros ‘esto’, ‘eso’ y ‘aquello’ como mecanismos encapsuladores en el discurso de la economía. Spanish in Context 16:1 ► pp. 104 ff.
Paul, Ileana & Eric Potsdam
2024. Malagasy framing demonstratives and the syntax of doubling. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 9:1
Pavesi, Maria
2014. This and That in the Language of Film Dubbing: A Corpus-Based Analysis. Meta 58:1 ► pp. 103 ff.
Payne, Doris L.
2020. Chapter 13. Robust argument phrases (DPs) but unruly NPs in Maa. In The ‘Noun Phrase’ across Languages [Typological Studies in Language, 128], ► pp. 330 ff.
Peeters, David, Emiel Krahmer & Alfons Maes
2021. A conceptual framework for the study of demonstrative reference. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 28:2 ► pp. 409 ff.
Peeters, David & Aslı Özyürek
2016. This and That Revisited: A Social and Multimodal Approach to Spatial Demonstratives. Frontiers in Psychology 7
Peltier, Joy P. G.
Penco, Carlo
2021. Indexicals and essential demonstrations. Semiotica 2021:240 ► pp. 261 ff.
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach
2015. PERSON climbing up a tree. In Signs and Structures [Benjamins Current Topics, 71], ► pp. 71 ff.
Radulescu, Alexandru
2018. The difference between indexicals and demonstratives. Synthese 195:7 ► pp. 3173 ff.
Real-Puigdollers, Cristina
Reile, Maria, Kristiina Averin & Nele Põldver
2020. Interpreting Estonian Demonstratives: The Effects of Referent’s Distance and Visual Salience. Frontiers in Psychology 11
Reile, Maria, Helen Plado, Harmen B. Gudde & Kenny R. Coventry
2020. Demonstratives as spatial deictics or something more? Evidence from Common Estonian and Võro. Folia Linguistica 54:1 ► pp. 167 ff.
Rijkhoff, Jan
2024. Nouns and Iconicity of Distance: When Syntactic Proximity to the Noun Mirrors Semantic Closeness. In Nouns and the Morphosyntax / Semantics Interface, ► pp. 295 ff.
Rocca, Roberta, Kristian Tylén, Mikkel Wallentin & Søren Wichmann
2019. This shoe, that tiger: Semantic properties reflecting manual affordances of the referent modulate demonstrative use. PLOS ONE 14:1 ► pp. e0210333 ff.
Rocca, Roberta & Mikkel Wallentin
2020. Demonstrative Reference and Semantic Space: A Large-Scale Demonstrative Choice Task Study. Frontiers in Psychology 11
Rocca, Roberta, Mikkel Wallentin, Cordula Vesper & Kristian Tylén
2019. This is for you: Social modulations of proximal vs. distal space in collaborative interaction. Scientific Reports 9:1
Rochet-Capellan, Amélie, Rafael Laboissière, Arturo Galván & Jean-Luc Schwartz
2008. The Speech Focus Position Effect on Jaw–Finger Coordination in a Pointing Task. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 51:6 ► pp. 1507 ff.
Roehrs, Dorian
2013. The Inner Makeup of Definite Determiners: The Case of Germanic. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 25:4 ► pp. 295 ff.
Rong, Yicheng
2023. Comprehension of Spatial Demonstratives in Mandarin-speaking Children on the Autism Spectrum: The Roles of Theory of Mind and Executive Function. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Rosen, Nicole
2003. Demonstrative Position in Michif. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 48:1-2 ► pp. 39 ff.
Rumsey, Alan
2014. Language and human sociality. In The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology, ► pp. 400 ff.
RUPP, LAURA & SALI A. TAGLIAMONTE
2019. This here town: evidence for the development of the English determiner system from a vernacular demonstrative construction in York English. English Language and Linguistics 23:1 ► pp. 81 ff.
Karin Ryding & David Wilmsen
2021. The Cambridge Handbook of Arabic Linguistics,
Rühlemann, Christoph & Matthew Brook O’Donnell
2014. Deixis. In Corpus Pragmatics, ► pp. 331 ff.
Sagna, Serge, Virve‑Anneli Vihman, Marilyn Vihman & Dunstan Brown
2022. The acquisition of demonstratives in a complex noun class system. Word Structure 15:3 ► pp. 226 ff.
Saltarelli, Mario
2016. Marsican deixis and the nature of indexical syntax. In Romance Linguistics 2013 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 9], ► pp. 399 ff.
Sarda, Laure & Benjamin Fagard
2022. Chapter 1. Introduction: The description of motion events. In Neglected Aspects of Motion-Event Description [Human Cognitive Processing, 72], ► pp. 1 ff.
Sawada, Osamu
Schapper, Antoinette
2023. From possessive to relative clause marker: a grammaticalization pathway in the Timor-Alor-Pantar languages. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 76:3 ► pp. 369 ff.
Schlachter, Eva
2020. A complex grammaticalization scenario for the definite article. In Walking on the Grammaticalization Path of the Definite Article [Studies in Language Variation, 23], ► pp. 18 ff.
Schmidt, Peter
2019. The Demonstrative Pronouns זֶה Zeh / זאֹת Zōʾt / אֵלּהֶ Ēlleh: Referring Backward or Forward?. Journal of Translation 15:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Scott, Kate
2019. Referring Expressions, Pragmatics, and Style,
Sengani, T. M.
2008. Zwikumelo—Referential praises for empowerment and talk management strategies for mahosi (royal leaders) with special reference to Thovhele Miḓiyavhathu Tshivhase. South African Journal of African Languages 28:2 ► pp. 87 ff.
Serhan, Baris & Angelo Cangelosi
2019. 2019 Joint IEEE 9th International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL-EpiRob), ► pp. 157 ff.
Sheng, Yimin
2015. The Location morpheme-demonstrative cycle in Wu dialects. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 2:1 ► pp. 121 ff.
Shi, Yuzhi
2022. Phonological derivation from proximal to distal demonstratives in Chinese. Linguistics 60:2 ► pp. 579 ff.
Shibasaki, Reijirou
2014. More Thoughts on the Grammaticalization of Personal Pronouns. In Grammaticalization – Theory and Data [Studies in Language Companion Series, 162], ► pp. 129 ff.
Shin, Naomi, Luis Hinojosa-Cantú, Barbara Shaffer & Jill P. Morford
2020. Demonstratives as indicators of interactional focus: Spatial and social dimensions of Spanish esta and esa
. Cognitive Linguistics 31:3 ► pp. 485 ff.
Sidnell, Jack, N. J. Enfield & Paul Kockelman
2014. Interaction and intersubjectivity. In The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology, ► pp. 343 ff.
SKILTON, Amalia
2023. Learning speaker- and addressee-centered demonstratives in Ticuna. Journal of Child Language 50:3 ► pp. 632 ff.
Skripka, V. К.
2023. The article function of the demonstrative pronoun totъ in South Russian documents of the 17th century. Philology and Culture :4 ► pp. 87 ff.
Skripka, Veronika
2022. The functioning of the pronoun ть (тоть) in Russian business writing of the XIV-XV centuries.. Litera :6 ► pp. 56 ff.
Sommerer, Lotte
2015. The influence of constructions in grammaticalization. In Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 18], ► pp. 107 ff.
Souag, Lameen
Speed, Laura J. & Asifa Majid
2017. Dutch modality exclusivity norms: Simulating perceptual modality in space. Behavior Research Methods 49:6 ► pp. 2204 ff.
Standing, William
2021. Review of Sommerer (2018): Article Emergence in Old English: A Constructionalist Perspective. Constructions and Frames 13:2 ► pp. 348 ff.
Staps, Camil & Johan Rooryck
2023. The interpretation of [+distal] in demonstratives and complementizers. Linguistics 61:5 ► pp. 1195 ff.
Stradioto, Sara
2018. Evidence of a two-way contrast in Mexican Spanish spatial deixis. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia ► pp. 1 ff.
Stukenbrock, Anja
2020. Deixis, Meta-Perceptive Gaze Practices, and the Interactional Achievement of Joint Attention. Frontiers in Psychology 11
Stukenbrock, Anja
2021. Multimodal Gestalts and Their Change Over Time: Is Routinization Also Grammaticalization?. Frontiers in Communication 6
Sun, Linlin & David Correia Saavedra
2020. Measuring grammatical status in Chinese through quantitative corpus analysis. Corpora 15:3 ► pp. 317 ff.
Sutarman, Sutarman & Nurachman Hanafi
2020. The Syntactic-Semantic Analyses of Sasak Demonstratives in Lombok. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature 7:2 ► pp. 200 ff.
Sánchez Argüelles, Gerardo & Bettelou Los
2022. Incipient articles in Old East Scandinavian varieties. NOWELE. North-Western European Language Evolution 75:2 ► pp. 160 ff.
Tacke, Felix
2022. Reference, Deixis and Perspective.Aspectual Readings of Italian Ecco- and French Voilà-Constructions. CogniTextes :Volume 23
Tacke, Felix
2023. Chapter 11. From he aquí to aquí está. In Constructions in Spanish [Constructional Approaches to Language, 34], ► pp. 280 ff.
Talmy, Leonard
2020. Targeting in Language: Unifying Deixis and Anaphora. Frontiers in Psychology 11
Tamburelli, Marco
2008. The Role of Paradigm Formation in Lexical Acquisition: Towards a Unified Account of Overgeneralization and Transfer Effects. Language Acquisition 15:3 ► pp. 130 ff.
Teixeira, Lovania Roehrig & Renato Miguel Basso
2022. Demonstrativos de kinds: sobre alguns usos de “aquele/aquela” no português brasileiro . Revista da ABRALIN ► pp. 1 ff.
Terenghi, Silvia
2019. Demonstrative-reinforcer constructions and the syntactic role of deictic features. Linguistics in the Netherlands 36 ► pp. 192 ff.
Terenghi, Silvia
2021. Chapter 16. Fission in Romance demonstrative-reinforcer constructions. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2018 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 357], ► pp. 304 ff.
Terenghi, Silvia
2022. Integrating deictic co-speech gestures in demonstrative forms. Linguistics in the Netherlands 39 ► pp. 225 ff.
Tizón-Couto, David
2021. Holger Diessel, The grammar network: How linguistic structure is shaped by language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. Pp. xvii + 289. ISBN 9781108671040.. English Language and Linguistics 25:3 ► pp. 663 ff.
Todisco, Emanuela, Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes, Harmen B. Gudde & Kenny R. Coventry
2024. Demonstratives in Spanish–Catalan simultaneous bilinguals: which system do they prefer?. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff.
Todisco, Emanuela, Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes & Kenny R. Coventry
2021. Analogical Levelling in the Majorcan Catalan Demonstrative System. Probus 33:1 ► pp. 33 ff.
Todisco, Emanuela, Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes & Kenny R. Coventry
2021. Analogical Levelling in the Majorcan Catalan Demonstrative System. Probus 33:1 ► pp. 33 ff.
TODISCO, EMANUELA, ROBERTA ROCCA & MIKKEL WALLENTIN
2021. The semantics of spatial demonstratives in Spanish: a Demonstrative Choice Task study. Language and Cognition 13:4 ► pp. 503 ff.
Todisco, Emanuela, Roberta Rocca & Mikkel Wallentin
2023. Aqueix Caught in the Middle. A Demonstrative Choice Task Study of Catalan Demonstratives. Probus 35:1 ► pp. 31 ff.
Toro, Francisca, Verónica Orqueda & Demian Inostroza
2022. Reevaluating the etymology of Latin reflexives. Folia Linguistica 56:s43-s1 ► pp. 33 ff.
Torregrossa, Jacopo, Christiane Bongartz & Ianthi Maria Tsimpli
Torregrossa, Jacopo, Christiane Bongartz & Ianthi Maria Tsimpli
2021. Bilingual reference production. In Psycholinguistic Approaches to Production and Comprehension in Bilingual Adults and Children [Benjamins Current Topics, 117], ► pp. 67 ff.
Turner, Darryl
2020. Towards a unified analysis of Katcha nominal modifiers. Faits de Langues 51:1 ► pp. 141 ff.
Tóth, Enikő
2019. Ez vagy az?. Jelentés és Nyelvhasználat 6:1 ► pp. 129 ff.
Tóth, Enikő & Péter Csatár
2015. Egy interfész jelenség: indexikális demonstratívumok azonosító fókuszban. Jelentés és Nyelvhasználat 2:1 ► pp. 63 ff.
Urban, Matthias
2020. Mountain linguistics. Language and Linguistics Compass 14:9
Ursini, Francesco & Haiping Long
2018. Spatial categories in Aquilan. Dialectologia et Geolinguistica 26:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Ursini, Francesco-Alessio & Giuseppe Samo
2022. The interpretation of urbanonyms in discourse: Reconciling theoretical accounts with experimental results. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 58:2 ► pp. 263 ff.
Vallejos-Yopán, Rosa
2023. From demonstrative to filler:estein Amazonian Spanish and beyond. Linguistics 61:3 ► pp. 651 ff.
Van de Velde, Freek
2009. Do we need the category of postdeterminer in the NP?1. Transactions of the Philological Society 107:3 ► pp. 293 ff.
VAN DE VELDE, FREEK
2011. Left-peripheral expansion of the English NP. English Language and Linguistics 15:2 ► pp. 387 ff.
Van Peteghem, Marleen
2020. Le pronom ce dans les phrases attributives. Langue française N° 205:1 ► pp. 31 ff.
VANDERBAUWHEDE, GUDRUN
2012. Les emplois référentiels du SN démonstratif en français et en néerlandais: pas du pareil au même. Journal of French Language Studies 22:2 ► pp. 273 ff.
Vanderbauwhede, Gudrun, Piet Desmet & Peter Lauwers
2011. The Shifting of the Demonstrative Determiner in French and Dutch in Parallel Corpora: From Translation Mechanisms to Structural Differences. Meta 56:2 ► pp. 443 ff.
Vindenes, Urd
Vulchanova, Mila, Jacqueline Collier, Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes & Valentin Vulchanov
2023. Variation in first-generation L1 deictic systems: Language attrition and bilingualism effects. International Journal of Bilingualism 27:1 ► pp. 104 ff.
Vulchanova, Mila, Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes, Jacqueline Collier & Valentin Vulchanov
2020. Shrinking Your Deictic System: How Far Can You Go?. Frontiers in Psychology 11
Vydrina, Alexandra
2020. Operator focus in discourse and grammar: The two perfectives in Kakabe. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 41:1 ► pp. 99 ff.
Wall, Albert & Álvaro S. Octavio de Toledo y Huerta
2016. Exploring and recycling. In Exaptation and Language Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 336], ► pp. 341 ff.
Wallentin, Mikkel, Roberta Rocca & Sofia Stroustrup
2019. Grammar, Gender and Demonstratives in Lateralized Imagery for Sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 48:4 ► pp. 843 ff.
West, Donna E.
2022. Promoting Dialectic Processes Through Dialogic Inquiry. In Narrative as Dialectic Abduction [Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, 64], ► pp. 1 ff.
Whitman, John
2008. 10 The Classification of Constituent Order Generalizations and Diachronic Explanation. In Linguistic Universals and Language Change, ► pp. 233 ff.
Williams, Nicholas
2020. Deixis and Indexicals. In The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology, ► pp. 1 ff.
Willis Oko, Christina M.
2015. Deictic expressions in Darma (Almora). Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 38:1 ► pp. 26 ff.
Wittenberg, Eva, Shota Momma & Elsi Kaiser
2021. Demonstratives as bundlers of conceptual structure. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6:1
Wolter, Lynsey
2009. Demonstratives in Philosophy and Linguistics. Philosophy Compass 4:3 ► pp. 451 ff.
Wu, Tong
2016. Chinese-style topics as indexicality. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 3:2 ► pp. 201 ff.
Wu, Yicheng
2017. Numeral classifiers in Sinitic languages: Semantic content, contextuality, and semi-lexicality. Linguistics 55:2 ► pp. 333 ff.
Yamaguchi, Toshiko
2015. The rise of demonstrative-based first/second-person markers in the history of Japanese. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16:2 ► pp. 250 ff.
Yliniemi, Juha
2023. Similarity of mirative and contrastive focus: three parameters for describing attention markers. Linguistic Typology 27:1 ► pp. 77 ff.
Yue, Ming & Boyang Sun
2023. Choice of Mandarin Spatial Demonstratives in Distant Interaction. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 52:3 ► pp. 763 ff.
Zaki, Mai
2021. Stylistics and Translation. In The Cambridge Handbook of Arabic Linguistics, ► pp. 583 ff.
Zhan, Fangqiong & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2019. The development of the Chinese copulashìconstruction. Functions of Language 26:2 ► pp. 139 ff.
Zingler, Tim
2022. Circumfixation: A semasiological approach. Word Structure 15:1 ► pp. 55 ff.
Zingler, Tim
2023. A functional approach to the formal mismatches of indexation markers. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 42:2 ► pp. 373 ff.
Çokal, Derya, Patrick Sturt & Fernanda Ferreira
2018. Processing ofItandThisin Written Narrative Discourse. Discourse Processes 55:3 ► pp. 272 ff.
[no author supplied]
2003. Bibliography. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, ► pp. 744 ff.
[no author supplied]
2006. Bibliography. In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ► pp. 742 ff.
[no author supplied]
2008. ABBREVIATIONS. In Linguistic Universals and Language Change, ► pp. xiii ff.
[no author supplied]
2008. Copyright Page. In Cognitive Grammar, ► pp. iv ff.
[no author supplied]
2008. THE CONTRIBUTORS. In Linguistic Universals and Language Change, ► pp. ix ff.
[no author supplied]
2012. References. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ► pp. 741 ff.
[no author supplied]
2013. Determiners. In Varieties of English, ► pp. 87 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2017. Bibliography. In The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Applied Linguistics: A Handbook for Language Teaching, ► pp. 744 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CF: Linguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General