Impoliteness, often described as non-cooperative and norm-disrupting verbal behavior (Keinpointner 2008; Culpeper et al. 2003; Beebe 1995), can also serve important sociability functions. When tension is present between individual and group face wants, impoliteness can be used to establish, reinforce, or (re)negotiate values salient to the group (Culpeper 2011; Lea at al. 1992; Graham 2007). The intersection of impoliteness with group face concerns is especially important in polylogous online contexts (Blitvich 2010; Lorenzo-Dus at al. 2011; Perelmutter 2013). This study examines the intersection between individual and group face concerns by examining impoliteness in an online Russian-language forum dedicated to discussions of marital infidelity. This forum is frequented by both mistresses and cheated-upon wives. Mistresses post confessions, expecting and sometimes even soliciting shaming responses from other forum members; wives engage in troubles-telling and are mocked by mistresses; mistresses and wives insult and shame each other. Since the overarching societal norms and expectations of family mores and gendered behavior in the post-Soviet society are often unclear, these shaming practices help Russian-speaking women construct and negotiate their identities within a group of peers. These negotiations integrate individual, group, and societal face concerns.
Ashwin, S. (ed). 2000. Gender, State, and Society in Soviet and Post-Soviet Russia. New York NY: Routledge.
Barker, C. & Galasinski, D. 2001. Cultural Studies and Discourse Analysis. A Dialogue on Language and Identity. London: Sage.
Beebe, L. 1995. Polite fictions: Instrumental rudeness as pragmatic competence. In Georgetown University Round Table on Language Teachers: Ethnolinguistic, Psycholinguistic, and Sociolinguistic Aspects, J. Alatis, C. Straehle, B. Gallenberger & M. Ronkin (eds), 154–168. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
Belyaeva, Y. 1996. Advice and soviet: A cross-cultural perspective on speech acts. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, J.M. Johnson, M.L. Juge & J.L. Moxley (eds), 13–24. Berkeley CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Berman, H.J. & Spindler, J.W. 1963. Soviet comrades’ courts. Washington Law Review 38: 854–855.
Bilaniuk, L. 2003. Gender, language attitudes, and language status in Ukraine. Language in Society 32: 47–78.
Bousfield, D. 2008. Impoliteness in Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 167]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bousfield, D. & Locher, M.A. 2008. Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bruxelles, S. & Kerbrat Orecchioni, C. 2004. Coalitions in polylogues. Journal of Pragmatics 36: 75–113.
Buckley, M. 2009. Public opinion in Russia on the politics of human trafficking. Europe-Asia Studies 61(2): 213–248.
Cohn, E.D. 2009. Sex and the married communist: Family troubles, marital infidelity, and party discipline in the postwar USSR, 1945–64. The Russian Review 68: 429–450.
Culpeper, J. 1996. Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 349–367.
Culpeper, J. 2008. Reflections on impoliteness, relational work and power. In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, D. Bousfield & M.A. Locher (eds), 17–44. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Culpeper, J. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: CUP.
Culpeper, J., Bousfield, D. & Wichmann, A. 2003. Impoliteness revisited: With special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1545–1579.
Eckert, P. & McConnell-Ginet, S. 1992. Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 461–490.
Fairclough, N. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
Filippov, E.I. 1979. Obščestvenno-tovariščeskoe sudoproizvodstvo v SSSR [Communal comrade courts in the USSR]. Rostov: Izdatel’stvo Rostovskogo universiteta.
Gal, S. & Kligman, G. 2000. The Politics of Gender after Socialism: A Comparative-Historical Essay. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. 2010. A genre approach to the study of (im)politeness. International Review of Pragmatics 2: 46–94.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. 2013. Introduction: Face, identity and im/politeness. Looking backward, moving forward: From Goffman to practice theory. Journal of Politeness Research 9: 1–33.
Goffman, E. 1967[1955]. Interaction Ritual. Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour. New York NY: Pantheon Books.
Graham, S.L. 2007. Disagreeing to agree: Conflict, (im)politeness and identity in a computer-mediated community. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 742–759.
Haugh, M. 2007. The discursive challenge to politeness research: an interactional alternative. Journal of Politeness Research 3: 95–317.
Hayne, S.C. & Rice, R.E. 1997. Attribution accuracy when using anonymity in group support systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 47: 429–452.
Holmes, J. & Meyerhoff, M. 1999. The community of practice: theories and methodologies in language and gender research. Language in Society 28: 173–183.
Issoupova, O. 2000. From duty to pleasure? Motherhood in Soviet and post-Soviet Russia. In Gender, State, and Society in Soviet and Post-Soviet Russia, S. Ashwin (ed.), 30–54. New York NY: Routledge.
Kharkhordin, O. 1999. The Collective and the Individual in Russia. A Study of Practices. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
Kienpointner, M. 2008. Impoliteness and emotional arguments. Journal of Politeness Research 4: 243–265.
LaFont, S. 2001. One step forward, two steps back: Women in the post-Communist states. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 34: 203–220.
Lavé, J. & Wenger, E. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: CUP.
Lea, M., O’Shea, T., Fung, P., & Spears, R. 1992. ‘Flaming’ in computer-mediated communication: Observations, explanations, implications. In Contexts of Computer-Mediated Communication, M. Lea (ed.), 89–112. New York NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Levin, E. 1989. Sex and Society in the World of the Orthodox Slavs, 900–1700. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.
Liberman, M. 2000. Legal, ethical and policy issues concerning the recording and publication of primary language materials. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Web-based Documentation and Description, S. Bird & G. Simons (eds).
Locher, M.A. & Limberg, H. 2012. Introduction to advice in discourse. In Advice in Discourse, H. Limberg & M.A. Locher (eds), 1–28. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Locher, M.A. 2010. Relational work, politeness, and identity construction. In APA Handbook of Interpersonal Communication, D. Matsumoto (ed.), 112–138. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Locher, M.A. 2011. Situated impoliteness: The interface between relational work and identity construction. In Situated Politeness, B.L. Davies, M. Haugh & A.J. Merrison (eds.), 187–208. London: Continuum.
Locher, M.A. & Watts, R.J. 2005. Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research 1: 9–33.
Lottes, I.L. & Alkula, T. 2011. An investigation of sexuality-related attitudinal patterns and characteristics related to those patterns for 32 European countries. Sexuality Research and Social Policy 8: 77–92.
Lorenzo-Dus, N. & Garces-Conejos Blitvich, P. 2011. On-line polylogues and impoliteness: The case of postings sent in response to the Obama Reggaeton YouTube video. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 2578–2593.
Marcoccia, M. 2004. Online polylogues: Conversation structure and participation framework in internet newsgroups. Journal of Pragmatics 36: 115–145.
Mills, S. 2009. Impoliteness in a cultural context. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 1047–1060.
Mills, S. 2011. Communities of practice and politeness. In Situated Politeness, B. Davies, M. Haugh & A. Merrison (eds), 73–87. London: Continuum.
Shvedova, N. 2009. Gender politics in Russia. In Gender Politics in Post-communist Eurasia, L. Racioppi & K. O’Sullivan See (eds.), 157–161. East Lansing MI: Michigan State University Press.
Tartakovskaya, I. 2000. The changing representation of gender roles in the Soviet and post-Soviet press. In Gender, State, and Society in Soviet and Post-Soviet Russia, S. Ashwin (ed.), 118–135. New York NY: Routledge.
Terkourafi, M. 2008. Toward a unified theory of politeness, impoliteness, and rudeness. In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, D. Bousfield & M.A. Locher (eds), 45–74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Upadhyay, S.R. 2010. Identity and impoliteness in computer mediated reader responses. Journal of Politeness Research 6: 105–127.
Wanner, C. 1998. Burden of Dreams: History and Identity in Post-Soviet Ukraine. University Park PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: CUP.
Widmer, E.D., Treas, J. & Newcomb, R. 1998. Attitudes toward nomarital sex in 24 countries. Journal of Sex Research 35: 349.
Worobec, C.D. 1987. Horse thieves and peasant justice in post-emancipation imperial Russia. Journal of Social History 21: 281–93.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Puyu Ning
2019. Ritual public humiliation. Acta Linguistica Academica 66:2 ► pp. 189 ff.
Zanotti, Serenella
2019. Investigating the genesis of translated films: a view from the Stanley Kubrick Archive. Perspectives 27:2 ► pp. 201 ff.
Liu, Xiangdong
2017. Impoliteness in Reader Comments on Japanese Online News Sites. International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics 3:2 ► pp. 62 ff.
Márquez Reiter, Rosina, Kristina Ganchenko & Anna Charalambidou
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.