Cover not available
Part of
Transatlantic Perspectives on Late Modern English
Edited by Marina Dossena
[Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 4] 2015
► pp. 73–97

Transatlantic perspectives on late nineteenth-century English usage

Alford (1864) compared to White (1871)

 | Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany
The present contribution investigates two handbooks on English usage dating from the late nineteenth century, one British (i.e. Alford’s The Queen’s English, of 1864) and the other American (i.e. White’s Words and their Uses, of 1871). Both manuals were important and successful in their time and even after, and they can be considered as early specimens of prescriptive guides on English usage on both sides of the Atlantic. The objective of the comparison is to find out whether they concentrate on the same items of disputed usage or whether British and American English had become so much separated at that point in time that both usage guides treat different items or come to different conclusions on the same items. Furthermore, by adopting a transatlantic perspective it will be worked out whether the two authors share the same ideologies concerning the standard language or not.
Published online: 12 February 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ahs.4.04bus
References (33)
Primary sources
Alford, Henry. [1864] 51880. The Queen’s English: A manual of idiom and usage. London: Bell and Sons.Google Scholar
Anon. 1856. Five hundred mistakes of daily occurrence in speaking, pronouncing, and writing the English language, corrected. New York: Daniel Burgess & Co.; Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott & Co.; Cincinnati: Applegate & Co.Google Scholar
Baker, Robert. 1770. Reflexions on the English language. London: Bell. Reprinted by: R. C. Alston. 1968. English Linguistics 1500–1800. No. 87 Menston: Scolar Press.Google Scholar
White, Richard Grant. 1880. English in England. The Atlantic Monthly 45(269). 374–386.Google Scholar
. [1871] 1886. Words and their uses, past and present: A study of the English language. 9th ed., revised and corrected. London: Sampson Low, Marston, Searle & Rivington.Google Scholar
Secondary sources
Allen, Robert E. 1992. Usage, usage guidance and criticism. In Tom McArthur (ed.), The Oxford Companion to the English Language, 1071–1078. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baugh, Albert C. & Thomas Cable. 52002. A history of the English language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beal, Joan C. 2004. English in modern times 1700–1945. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Bex, Tony. 1999. Representation of English in twentieth-century Britain: Fowler, Gowers and Partridge. In Tony Bex & Richard J. Watts (eds.), Standard English: The widening debate, 89–109. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burchfield, Robert. 1979. The Fowlers: Their achievements in lexicography and grammar. The English Association 3–23.Google Scholar
. 1991. The Fowler brothers and the tradition of usage handbooks. In 
Gerhard Leitner (ed.), English traditional grammars: An international perspective, 93–111. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Busse, Ulrich & Anne Schröder. 2006. From prescriptivism to descriptivism? 140 years of English usage guides: Some old and new controversies. In Christoph Houswitschka, Gabriele Knappe & Anja Müller (eds.), Anglistentag 2005, Bamberg. Proceedings, 457–473. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar
Busse, Ulrich & Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade. 2011. Towards a corpus of prescriptivism. Paper given at the Helsinki Corpus Festival. Helsinki University, 28 September–2 October 2011.
Drake, Glendon F. 1977. The role of prescriptivism in American linguistics 1820–1970. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finegan, Edward. 1998. English grammar and usage. In Suzanne Romaine (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Vol. IV 1776–1997, 536–588. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. Usage. In John Algeo (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Vol. VI English in North America, 358–421. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. English in North America. In Richard Hogg & David Denison (eds.), A history of the English language, 384–419. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Henry W. 1926. A dictionary of modern English usage. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Fowler, Henry W. & Francis G. Fowler. 1906. The King’s English. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Freemantle, W.H. 2013. Alford, Henry (1810–1871), rev. Roger T. Stearn. In The Oxford dictionary of national biography, [URL], accessed 11 July 2013]
Garner, Bryan A. 2001. Calling for a truce in the descriptivist-prescripivist wars: A reply to Tom McArthur, ‘Error, Editing, and World Standard English’, ET 65 (Jan 01). English Today 17(2). 5–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Görlach, Manfred. 1999. English in nineteenth-century England: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. & Joanna Kopaczyck. 2013. Communities of practice as a locus of language change. In Joanna Kopaczyck & Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Communities of practice in the history of English, 1–8. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonard, S.A. 1929. The doctrine of correctness in English usage, 1700–1800. Madison: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, William A. & Charles F. Meyer. 2012. The idea of Standard American English. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Standards of English: Codified varieties around the world, 139–158. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milroy, Lesley. 2001. Britain and the United States: Two nations divided by the same language (and different language ideologies). Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 10(1). 56–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ODNB: The Oxford dictionary of national biography, [URL]
OED: Oxford English Dictionary, [URL]
Pyles, Thomas. 1952. Words and ways of American English. London: Melrose.Google Scholar
. 21971. The origins and development of the English language. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the world. Cambridge: 
Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 2010. The usage guide: Its birth and popularity. English Today 26(2). 14–23, 44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weiner, Edmund. 1988. On editing a usage guide. In E.G. Stanley & T.F. Hoad (eds.), Words: For Robert Burchfield’s sixty-fifth birthday, 171–183. Cambridge: Brewer.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Dossena, Marina
2022. “Gems of elocution and humour”. In Earlier North American Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World, G66], ► pp. 183 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.