Mobile Menu
New
Books
Forthcoming titles
New in paperback
New titles by subject
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
Book Series
Journals & Yearbooks
New serials
Latest issues
Currently in production
Catalog
Books
Active series
Other series
Collections
Open-access books
Text books & Course books
Dictionaries & Reference
By JB editor
Journals & Yearbooks
Active serials
Other
By JB editor
Software
Browse by person
Browse by subject
Advanced Search
Downloadable lists
Printed catalogs
E-book collections
Online Resources
Customer Services
Contact
Amsterdam (Main office)
Philadelphia (North American office)
Directions
Book Orders
General
US, Canada & Mexico
E-books
Examination & Desk Copies
Journal Subscriptions
General information
Access to the electronic edition
Terms of Use
Journal collections
Journal mutations
Rights & Permissions
Mailing List
E-newsletter
Book Gazette
For Authors
Proposals for Books
Proposals for Book Series
Proposals for Journals
Submissions to Journals
Editorial Manager
Ethics Statement
Kudos
Open Access Policy
Rights Policy
For Librarians
Evidence-Based Acquisition
E-book Collections
Journal Collections
Open Access information
Journal mutations
Part of
Prototypical Argumentative Patterns: Exploring the relationship between argumentative discourse and institutional context
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren
[
Argumentation in Context
11] 2017
► pp.
183
–
184
◄
previous
Index
A
Academic domain
19, 159, 166, 172
Appeal to the majority
53–54, 59–68, 163, 171, 173
Argumentative characterization
14–15
Argumentative pattern
16–26, 158–179
Argument by/from example
26, 40, 44–45, 48, 50, 109, 110, 113–117, 118–123, 145n5, 162, 167–168, 172, 175, 177
Argument scheme
18–19, 21, 23, 158–159, 161–162, 167, 168, 171, 174–175
B
Basic argumentative pattern
4, 20, 45, 94, 97–98, 105, 139–140, 160, 165–166, 169, 171–175, 177
C
Causal argumentation
19, 23, 25, 34, 40–42, 75, 95, 100, 105–106, 114, 141, 143, 158–159, 162, 165, 171–172, 174
Clear case
125–126, 128–132, 136–137, 168, 175
Comparison argumentation
101, 117–118, 120, 143n5, 145n7, 147–148, 153, 166, 170, 174, 179
E
Elaborate argumentative pattern
see Extended argumentative pattern
European Parliament
3–4, 17, 25, 31–34, 36–37, 39, 43, 47, 54, 57, 60, 67, 109–110, 116–123, 162– 163, 167, 168, 171–172, 175, 177
European parliamentary
committee of enquiry
3, 53–69
Evaluative proposition
141–143, 169–170
Extended argumentative pattern
20, 25, 46, 72, 75, 97, 105, 134, 139, 149–150, 163, 165, 169–170, 173, 175–177
Extended pragma-dialectics
2, 7, 11–13, 16
H
Hard case
71–73, 75–77, 80, 82, 88–89, 125–126, 128–130, 137, 163–164, 168, 175, 177
I
Institutional precondition
15–21, 25, 31, 68, 72, 107, 127, 143, 154, 157, 159–161, 164, 167, 169–174, 176–177
L
Legal decision
71, 80, 88, 127, 130–131, 133, 135–136
Legal domain
14, 16, 19, 25, 71–72, 139–156, 171, 173–175
Legal interpretation (method)
72–74, 82–84, 88, 134–137, 164, 169, 173, 175–176
Legal justification
72–80, 88, 126–127, 129, 134, 136
Legal rule
71–72, 74–75, 77, 83, 89, 125–137, 163, 168–169, 171, 173, 175–176
Legislation
12, 31–37, 39, 41–48, 56, 63–65, 72, 83, 109–112, 118, 122–123, 167
M
Medical domain
2–5, 16–17, 21, 26, 93–107, 139–154, 160–161, 164, 167, 169, 172–177
O
Over-the-counter medicine advertisement
4–5, 93–107, 139–154, 164, 169–170, 172– 173, 175–177
P
Parliamentary debate
2–4, 14–15, 17–19, 25, 31–50, 109–123, 157–158, 162–164, 167–168, 171–172, 175, 177
Political domain
2–3, 5, 14, 16–17, 19, 21, 24–26, 31–50, 53–68, 110–123, 158, 160–163, 167, 171–175, 177
Pragmatic argumentation
2–5, 8, 17n13, 19, 23–26, 31, 35–39, 48, 50, 54, 59–62, 68, 71–77, 80, 82–85, 88–89, 93–94, 95–99, 101, 105, 107, 110–112, 134, 139–141, 150–152, 158, 161–167, 169–177
Presentational strategy/tactic
17, 152
Problem-solving argumentation
2, 4, 34–51, 43, 45, 50, 110–112, 118, 121, 123, 162, 167, 172–173, 175
Prototypical argumentative
pattern
16, 20–26, 160–179
S
Safety claim/profile
14, 98, 101–102, 106, 139–146, 150–152, 154, 166, 169–170, 174, 176
Scenario
see Strategic scenario
Scientific explanation
159, 166
Side-effect
4, 23–24, 39, 42–43. 45, 47–48, 50, 96, 98, 100–102, 105–106, 110, 139–140, 143–144, 146, 152, 165, 167, 174
Standard pragma-dialectics
7–12
Stereotypical argumentative pattern
22, 50, 179
Stock issue
38–39, 162
Strategic choice
3–4, 44, 94, 102, 104–106, 140, 145n8, 152, 154, 170
Strategic maneuvering
5, 7–8, 11–13, 15–17, 19n20, 20–21, 31, 36n4, 89, 103, 107, 143, 154, 160, 164, 170, 178–179
Strategic scenario
178
Symptomatic argumentation
4, 19, 21, 41–43, 78, 129, 131–132, 134–135, 141–145, 148–152, 158–159, 161–162, 164, 168–173, 175–177