Cover not available
Part of
Let's talk politics: New essays on deliberative rhetoric
Edited by Hilde Van Belle, Kris Rutten, Paul Gillaerts, Dorien Van De Mieroop and Baldwin Van Gorp
[Argumentation in Context 6] 2014
► pp. 45–59

Cultural diversity, globalization, and political correctness

Rhetorical argumentation in multicultural societies

Culture is defined by the norms, values, and beliefs a community adheres to. Arguments that in their premises, warrants, or patterns affect such values may be called culture-sensitive. Attentiveness to the audience’s background and implicitness of premises are hallmarks of rhetorical argumentation. In a globalized world, cultural communities may clash in various fields, and in cross-cultural discourse insensitivity to cultural diversity can spoil an argument. Political correctness calls for respect for otherness, yet if no cultural group must be impaired, this may stifle all argumentation. The chapter asks how rhetorical argumentation will be possible on a global scale under the impact of political correctness. By analyzing typical cases it demonstrates that pragmatic solutions are called for, which rhetoric can provide.

Published online: 30 April 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.6.03kra
References
Amossy, R
(2000)  L’argumentation dans le discours: Discours politique, littérature d’idées, fiction . Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar
Angenot, M
(2008)  Dialogues des sourds: Traité de rhétorique antilogique . Paris: Mille et une nuits.Google Scholar
Anscombre, J.-C., & Ducrot, O
(1988)  L’argumentation dans la langue . Liège-Bruxelles: Mardaga.Google Scholar
Ayim, M
(1998) Just how correct is Political Correctness? A critique of the opposition’s arguments. Argumentation, 12.4, 445–480. DOI logo
Benhabib, S
(2002)  The claims of culture: Equality and diversity in the global era . Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Berman, P
. (Ed) (1992)  Debating P.C.: The controversy over Political Correctness on college campuses . New York: Dell Publishing.Google Scholar
Burnette, A. E., & Kraemer, W. L
(2007) The argumentative framework of imperial righteousness: The war discourse of George W. Bush. In F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. A. Willard, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 193–199). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.Google Scholar
Cameron, D
(1994) Words, words, words: The power of language. In S. Dunant (Ed.), The war of the words: The Political Correctness debate (pp. 15–34). London: Virago Press.Google Scholar
Carter, R. E
(1996) The background to argument in the Far East. In D. P. Berrill (Ed.), Perspectives on written argument (pp. 205–220). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Connor, U. M
(1996)  Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-cultural aspects of second-language writing . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Connor, U., Nagelhout, E., & Rozycki, W. V
. (Eds.) (2008)  Contrastive rhetoric: Reaching to intercultural rhetoric . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dolinina, I. B., & Cecchetto, V
(1998) Facework and rhetorical strategies in intercultural argumentative discourse. Argumentation , 12, 167–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Endres, D
(2003) Responding to multiculturalism in the real world: Re-envisioning argumentation pedagogy to include culturally diverse methods of argumentation. In F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. A. Willard, & A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 293–299). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.Google Scholar
(2007) ‘Yucca Mountain will become unhappy and angry’: Culture, metaphor, and argument. In F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. A. Willard, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 381–387). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.Google Scholar
Fogelin, R. J
(1985) The logic of deep disagreements. Informal Logic , 7, 1–8.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garrett, M. M
(1993) Classical Chinese conceptions of argumentation and persuasion. Argumentation and Advocacy , 29, 105–115.Google Scholar
Hazen, M. D
(2006) Argument and culture: Seeing one while seeing the other. In F. H. van Eemeren, M. D. Hazen, P. Houtlosser, & D. C. Williams (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on argumentation: Views from the Venice Argumentation Conference (pp. 127–150). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.Google Scholar
(2007) Dissensus as value and practice in cultural argument: The tangled web of argument, con/dis-sensus, values and cultural variations. In H. V. Hansen, C. W. Tindale, J. A. Blair, R. H. Johnson, & D. M. Godden (Eds.), Dissensus and the search for common ground. CD-ROM (pp. 1–43). Windsor, ON: OSSA.Google Scholar
Hazen, M. D., & Fourcade, S. S
(2007) Argument and message contextuality: A preliminary study of argument forms and processes in different cultures. In F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. A. Willard, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 591–598). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.Google Scholar
Heidlebaugh, N. J
(2001)  Judgment, rhetoric, and the problem of incommensurability: Recalling practical wisdom . Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Hentoff, N
(1992) ‘Speech codes’ on the campus and problems of free speech. In P. Berman (Ed.), Debating P.C.: The controversy over Political Correctness on college campuses (pp. 215–224). New York: Dell Publishing.Google Scholar
Hermans, H. J. M., & Kempen, H. J. G
(1998) Moving cultures: The perilous problems of cultural dichotomies in a globalizing society. American Psychologist , 53, 1111–1120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G
(1991)  Cultures and organizations . London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
(2001)  Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations . 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications (1st ed. 1980).Google Scholar
Johnson, R., & Blair, J. A
(2006)  Logical self-defense . New York: International Debate Education Association.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A
(1988)  A comparative rhetoric: An historical and cross-cultural introduction . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kienpointner, M
(1996)  Vernünftig argumentieren: Regeln und Techniken der Diskussion . Reinbek: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
Kock, C
(2009) Choice is not true or false: The domain of rhetorical argumentation. Argumentation , 23, 61–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y
(1999) Justifying my position in your terms: Cross-cultural argumentation in a globalized world. Argumentation , 13, 297–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lueken, G.-L
(1992)  Inkommensurabilität als Problem rationalen Argumentierens . Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Macfarlane, J
(2004) Commentary: When cultures collide. In C. Bell, & D. Kahane (Eds.), Intercultural dispute resolution in aboriginal contexts (pp. 94–103). Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Manske, A
(2002)  Political Correctness und Normalität: Die amerikanische PC-Kontroverse im kulturgeschichtlichen Kontext . Heidelberg: Synchron Wissenschaftsverlag der Autoren.Google Scholar
Marrero, D
(2007) How to evaluate arguments in multicultural argumentative dialogues? In H. V. Hansen, C. W. Tindale, J. A. Blair, R. H. Johnson, & D. M. Godden (Eds.), Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground. CD-ROM (pp. 1–9). Windsor, ON: OSSA.Google Scholar
Oman, N
(2004) Paths to intercultural understanding: Feasting, shared horizons, and unforced consensus. In C. Bell, & D. Kahane (Eds.), Intercultural dispute resolution in aboriginal contexts (pp. 70–93). Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Philipsen, G
(1992)  Speaking culturally: Explorations in social communication . Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
(2002) Cultural communication. In W. B. Gudykunst, & B. Mody (Eds.), Handbook of international and intercultural communication . 2nd ed. (pp. 51–67). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Rawls, J
(1971)  A theory of justice . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, H. S
(2010)  Society against itself: Political Correctness and organizational self-destruction . London: Karnac Books.Google Scholar
Siegel, H
(1999) Argument quality and cultural difference. Argumentation , 13, 183–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Multiculturalism and argumentative norms. On an argument of Stanley Fish, as seen through the eyes of Ralph Johnson and Tony Blair. In H. V. Hansen, & R. C. Pinto (Eds.), Reason reclaimed: Essays in honor of J. Anthony Blair and Ralph H. Johnson (pp. 215–228). Newport News, VA: Vale Press.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H
. (Ed) (2000)  Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures . London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Tomalin, B., & Stempleski, S
(1993)  Cultural awareness . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wierlemann, S
(2002)  Political Correctness in den USA und in Deutschland . Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A
(1992)  Semantics, culture, and cognition: Universal human concepts in culture-specific configurations . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1997)  Understanding cultures through their key words: English, Russian, Polish, German, and Japanese . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, J
(1995)  The myth of Political Correctness: The conservative attack on higher education . Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Zarefsky, D
(2007) The U.S. and the world: The unexpressed premises of American exceptionalism. In F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. A. Willard, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 1567–1571). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.Google Scholar
(2010) What does an argument culture look like? In J. Ritola (Ed.), Argument Cultures: Proceedings of the 8th OSSA Conference, University of Windsor , 2009. CD-ROM (pp. 1–9), Windsor, ON: OSSA.Google Scholar