Article published in:
Let's talk politics: New essays on deliberative rhetoric
Edited by Hilde Van Belle, Kris Rutten, Paul Gillaerts, Dorien Van De Mieroop and Baldwin Van Gorp
[Argumentation in Context 6] 2014
► pp. 6380
References

References

Akpabio, E.
(2008) Framing of the Zimbabwean Crisis in Botswana Print Media. Paper Presented at the International Association of Media and Communication Research (IAMCR) Conference, University of Stockholm, Sweden, July 2008.
Chari, T.
(2010) Salience and Silence: Representation of the Zimbabwean Crisis in the Local Press. African Identities, 8 (2), 131–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chigora, P.
(2006) On Crossroads: Reflections on Zimbabwe’s Relations with Britain at the New Millennium. Alternatives: Journal of International Relations, 5(3), 61–76.Google Scholar
Chiumbu, S., & Musemwa, M.
(2012)  Crisis! What Crisis? The Multiple Dimensions of the Zimbabwean Crisis . Cape Town: Human and Sciences Research Council.Google Scholar
Hohmann, H.
(2002) Rhetoric and Dialectic: Some Historical and Legal Perspectives. In F. H. van Eemeren, & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis (pp. 41–52). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ilie, C.
(2003) Discourse and Metadiscourse in Parliamentary Debates. Journal of Language and Politics, 1(2), 269–291.Google Scholar
Jakaza, E.
(2009) This Poll has not Happened Yet: Temporal Play in Election Predictions, A Discourse Analysis Approach. Paper Presented at the International Conference of the African Languages Association of Southern Africa (ALASA), University of Western Cape, South Africa, July 2009.
Krabbe, E. C. W.
(2002) Meeting in the House of Callias: An Historical Perspective on the Rhetoric and Dialectic. In F. H. van Eemeren, & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis, (pp. 29–40). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leff, M.
(2002) The Relation between Dialectic and Rhetoric in Classical and Modern Perspective. In F. H. van Eemeren, & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis , (pp. 53–64). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R.
(2005)  The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English . London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Santibāñez, C.
(2010) Metaphors and Argumentation: The Case of Chilean Parliamentarian Media Participation. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 973–989. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H.
. (Ed) (2009)  Examining Argumentation in Context: Fifteen Studies on Strategic Manoeuvring . Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B.
(2008) Controversy and Confrontation in Argumentative Discourse. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Controversy and Confrontation: Relating Controversy Analysis with Argumentation Theory . (pp. 1–24). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R.
(1984)  Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed Towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion . Dordrecht: Foris Publications. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1992)  Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective . London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(2004)  A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P.
. (Eds.) (2002)  Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis . Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Strategic Manoeuvring: Maintaining a Delicate Balance. In F. H. van Eemeren, & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis , (pp. 131–159). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Strategic Manoeuvring: Examining Argumentation in Context. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Examining Argumentation in Context: Fifteen Studies on Strategic Manoeuvring , (pp. 1–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., Houtlosser, P., & Snoeck Henkemans, F. A.
(2007)  Argumentative Indicators in Discourse: A Pragma-Dialectical Study . Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Rees, A. M.
(2000) Comments on the ‘Rhetoric and Dialectic in the Twent- First Century. Argumentation, 14(3), 255–259. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009)  Dissociation in Argumentative Discussions: A Pragma- Dialectical Perspective . Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Website References

www.newzimbabwe.com/news-1503-Full+Text+Mugabe+Copenhagen+speech/news.aspx
www.newzimbabwe.com/opinion