Cover not available
Introduction published In:
Developing shared languages: The fundamentals of mutual learning and problem solving in transdisciplinary collaboration
Edited by Marlies Whitehouse, Henrik Rahm and Séverine Wozniak
[AILA Review 34:1] 2021
► pp. 1–18
Introduction

Developing shared languages

The fundamentals of mutual learning and problem solving in transdisciplinary collaboration

| Zurich University of Applied Sciences
| Lund University
| Université Lumière Lyon 2
| University of Southern Denmark
| Zurich University of Applied Sciences
| University of Klagenfurt
| Toyo University
| University of Klagenfurt
| Zurich University of Applied Sciences
| Stephen F. Austin State University
| Zurich University of Applied Sciences
| Ventspils University of Applied Sciences
This issue of the AILA Review focuses on transdisciplinarity as the key to developing shared languages in and across domains and professional settings. The relationship and collaboration between researchers and practitioners have long been discussed within and across applied sciences and theoretical disciplines, mainly in the framework of transdisciplinarity (see AILA Review 31, 2018, for a recent overview). However, research approaches that claim to combine theoretical and practical needs and expectations often lack either solid grounding in empirical data or thorough reflection from theoretical perspectives. This special issue aims to take the discussion further by rethinking transdisciplinarity systematically from theoretical and practical angles. In so doing, we focus on developing shared languages that facilitate communication and mutual learning in multistakeholder discourses – with the ultimate goal of sustainably solving socially relevant problems. In the introduction, we present working definitions of our topic’s key terms (Part 1). We then go through the topics, results, and main interconnections of the six approaches examined in the papers included in this issue (Part 2). Based on the insights from the discussion so far, we set up a framework to systematically analyse three dimensions of developing shared languages: negotiation process, interplay of key drivers, and seizing opportunities (Part 3).
Article outline
Published online: 9 September 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.00038.int
References
Buchs, A., Petit, O. & P. Roman
(2020) Can social ecological economics of water reinforce the “big tent”?. Ecological Economics, 1691. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Deborah, Frazer, Elizabeth, Rampton, Ben, & Richardson, Kay
(1992) Researching language. Issues of power and method. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Clarke, A.
(2003) On being an object of research: reflections from a professional perspective. Applied Linguistics, 24(3), 374–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressen-Hammouda, D.
(2013) Ethnographic approaches to ESP research. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Ed.), The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes. Boston: Wiley-Blackwell, 501–517.Google Scholar
Garrett, P.
(2010) Language awareness. In M. Berns (Ed.), Concise encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Oxford: Elsevier, (pp. 293–295).Google Scholar
Hall, E. T., & Hall, M. R.
(1990) Hidden differences. Doing business with the Japanese. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R.
(1989) Language, context, and text: aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. (2. ed.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1999) The notion of “context” in language education In: Ghadessy, M. (Ed.) (1999) Text and context in functional linguistics. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Handford, M., Garrett, P., & Cots, J. M.
(2019) Introduction to language awareness in professional communication contexts. Language Awareness, 28(3), 163–165. Retrieved from [URL]
Holmes, J. & M. Marra
(2014) The complexities of communication in professional workplaces. In V. Bhatia & S. Bremner (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Professional Communication. Abingdon & New-York: Routledge, 112–128.Google Scholar
International Plain Language Federation
(2020)  What is plain language? International Plain Language Federation. Retrieved from [URL]
Isani, S.
(2014) Ethnography as a research-support discipline in ESP teaching, learning and research in the French academic context. ASp, 661, 27–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keckses, I.
(2015) Language, culture, and context. In: Sharifian, F. (Ed.) (2015) The Routledge Handbook of language and culture. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge p. 113–128.Google Scholar
Kemman, M.
(2019) Knowledge asymmetry in interdisciplinary collaborations and how to reduce it. [URL]Google Scholar
Paris, A., Deygas, B., Cornu, C., Thalamas, C., Maison, P., Duale, C., Kane, M., Hodaj, E., & Cracowski, J.-L.
(2015) Improved informed consent documents for biomedical research do not increase patients’ understanding but reduce enrolment: A study in real settings. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 80(5), 1010–1020. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A.
(2018) Applied linguistics as epistemic assemblage. AILA Review, 311, 113–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perrin, D.
(2013) The linguistics of newswriting. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perrin, D. & C. Kramsch
(2018) Transdisciplinarity in applied linguistics. AILA Review, 311, 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rahm, H., Sandell, N. & Svensson, P.
(2020) Corporate dreams – Approprirate aspirations and the building of trust in annual reports. Studies in Communication Sciences, 20 (1), 77–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rankin, T., & Stegu, M.
(2018) Language for life: educational, professional and social contexts. Language Awareness, 27(1–2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Resche, C.
(2013) Economic Terms and Beyond: Capitalising on the Wealth of Notions. Bern: Peter Lang, “Linguistic Insights” Series. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rigotti, E., & Rocci, A.
(2006) Towards a definition of communication context. Foundations of an interdisciplinary approach to communication. Studies in Communication Sciences, 6(2), 155–180.Google Scholar
Sarangi, S., Clarke, A., Bennert, K., & Howell, L.
(2003) Categorisation practices across professional boundaries: some analytic insights from genetic counselling. In S. Sarangi & T. van Leeuwen (Eds.), Applied Linguistics and communities of practice. London: Continuum (pp. 150–168).Google Scholar
Schön, D. A.
(1983) The reflective practitioner: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Svalberg, A. M.-L.
(2007) State of the art. Language awareness and language learning. Language Teaching, 40(4), 287–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, T. A.
(2009) Society and Discourse [Electronic resource] How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wenger, Etienne
(1998) Communities of practice. Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whitehouse, M.
in prep.). Writing in finance: (mis)communication and its impact on society at large.
Wozniak, S.
(2019) Approche ethnographique des langues spécialisées professionnelles. Bern: Peter Lang, “Aspects linguistiques et culturels des discours spécialisés” Series. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ződi, Z.
(2019) The limits of plain legal language: understanding the comprehensible style in law. International Journal of Law in Context, 151, 246–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Graf, Eva-Maria & Frédérick Dionne
2021. ‘Knowing that’, ‘knowing why’ and ‘knowing how’. AILA Review 34:1 ► pp. 57 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.