English monolingualism in scientific communication and progress in science, good or bad?

Coulmas, Florian

doi:10.1075/aila.20.03cou

Article published In:

Linguistic inequality in scientific communication today: What can future applied linguistics do to mitigate disadvantages for non-anglophones?
Edited by Augusto Carli and Ulrich Ammon
[AILA Review 20] 2007
► pp. 5–13

English monolingualism in scientific communication and progress in science, good or bad?

Florian Coulmas | Deutsches Institut für Japanstudien

Published online: 7 March 2008

https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.20.03cou

Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Order by:

Archila, Pablo Antonio & Anne-Marie Truscott de Mejía

2020. Bilingual university science courses: a questionnaire on professors’ practices and espoused beliefs. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 23:2 ► pp. 132 ff.

Haller, Max

2019. A Global Scientific Community? Universalism Versus National Parochialism in Patterns of International Communication in Sociology*. International Journal of Sociology 49:5-6 ► pp. 342 ff.

Mueller, Jessica

2019. Rabe, Frank: Englischsprachiges Schreiben und Publizieren in verschiedenen Fachkulturen: Wie deutschsprachige Forscher mit der Anglisierung der Wissenschaftskommunikation umgehen . Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 8:1 ► pp. 167 ff.

Huang, Ju Chuan

2011. Attitudes of Taiwanese scholars toward English and Chinese as languages of publication. Asia Pacific Journal of Education 31:2 ► pp. 115 ff.

Clyne, Michael & Farzad Sharifian

2008. English as an international language. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 31:3 ► pp. 28.1 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.