References (43)
Agar, M.H. 1996. The Professional Stranger: An Informal Introduction to Ethnography, 2nd rev. edn. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Aktas, R. & Cortes, V. 2008. Shell nouns as cohesive devices in published and ESL student writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7(1): 3–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, J.L. 1970. How to Do Things with Words, 2nd edn. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Belcher, D. 2007. Seeking acceptance in an English-only research world. Journal of Second Language Writing 161: 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berkenkotter, B. & Hanganu-Bresch, C. 2011. Lunatic asylum occult genres and the certification of madness in the 19th century. Written Communication 281: 220–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. 2005. Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1985. The forms of capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, J.G. Richardson (ed.), 241–258. New York NY: Greenwood.Google Scholar
. 1987. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, R. Nice (transl.). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. 2012 [1995]. Verbal Hygiene. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casanave, C.P. 2008. The stigmatizing effect of Goffman’s stigma label: A response to John Flowerdew. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 71: 264–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Connor, U. & Mauranen, A. 1999. Linguistic analysis of grant proposals: European Union research grants. English for Specific Purposes 18(1): 47–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Curry, M.J. & Lillis, T. 2010. Academic research networks: Accessing resources for English-medium publishing. English for Specific Purposes 29(4): 281–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Englander, K. 2009. Transformation of the identities of nonnative English-speaking scientists as a consequence of the social construction of revision. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education 81: 35–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, J. 2008. Scholarly writers who use English as an additional language: What can Goffman’s “stigma” tell us? Journal of English for Academic Purposes 71: 77–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fortanet-Gómez, I. 2008a. Evaluative language in peer review referee reports. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 71: 27–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008b. Strategies for teaching and learning an occluded genre: The RA referee report. In English as an Additional Language in Research Publication and Communication, S. Burgess & P. Martin-Martin (eds), 19–38. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, B. 2001. La résistible ascension de l’écrit au travail. In Langage et Travail, Communication, Cognition, Action, A. Borzeix & B. Fraenkel (eds), 113–142. Paris: CNRS Editions.Google Scholar
Giannoni, D.S. 2008. Medical writing at the periphery: The case of Italian journal editorials. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 71: 97–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gosden, H. 2003. ‘Why not give us the full story?’ Functions of referees’ comments in peer reviews of scientific research papers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 21: 87–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harwood, N. 2005a. “I hoped to counteract the memory problem, but I made no impact whatsoever”: Discussing methods in computing science using I . English for Specific Purposes 241: 243–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005b. “Nowhere has anyone attempted... In this article I do just that”: A corpus-based study of self-promotional I and we in academic writing across four disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics 371: 1027–1231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hewings, M. 2004. An ‘important contribution’ or ‘tiresome reading’? A study of evaluation in peer reviews in journal article submissions. Journal of Applied Linguistics 1(3): 247–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K. 2004. Genre and Second Language Writing. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Kourilova, M. 1998. Communicative characteristics of reviews of scientific papers written by non-native users of English. Endocrine Regulations 321: 107–114.Google Scholar
Lillis, T. 2008 Ethnography as method, methodology, and ‘deep theorizing’: Closing the gap between text and context in academic writing research. Written Communication 25(3): 353–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. English medium writing for academic purposes: Foundational categories, certainty and contingency. In Academic Writing in a Second or Foreign Language: Issues and Challenges Facing ESL/EFL Academic Writers in Higher Education Contexts, R. Tang (ed.), 235–247. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2013. The Sociolinguistics of Writing. Edinburgh: EUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lillis, T. & Curry, M.J. 2006a. Reframing notions of competence in scholarly writing: From individual to networked activity. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 531: 63–78.Google Scholar
. 2006b. Professional academic writing by multilingual scholars: Interactions with literacy brokers in the production of English-medium texts. Written Communication 23(1): 3–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Academic Writing in a Global Context: The Politics and Practices of Publishing in English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lillis, T., Hewings, A., Vladimirou, D. & Curry, M.J. 2010. The geolinguistics of English as an academic lingua franca: Citation practices across English-medium national and English-medium international journals. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 20(1): 111–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lillis, T. & McKinney, C. 2013. The sociolinguistics of writing in a global context: Objects, lenses, consequences. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17(4): 415–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lillis, T. & Turner, J. 2001. Student writing in higher education: Contemporary confusion, traditional concerns. Teaching in Higher Education 6(1): 57–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauranen, A. 2013. Hybridism, edutainment, and doubt: Science blogging finding its feet. Nordic Journal of English Studies 13(1):7–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mungra, P. & Webber, P. 2010. Peer review process in medical research publications: Language and content comments. English for Specific Purposes 291: 43–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paltridge, B. 2013. Referees’ comments on submissions to peer-reviewed journals: When is a suggestion not a suggestion? Studies in Higher Education 40(1): 106–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sarangi, S. & Candlin, C. 2003. Categorisation and explanation of risk: A discourse analytical perspective. Health, Risk & Society 5(2): 115–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shehzad, W. 2006. How to end an introduction in a computer science article: A corpus-based approach. In Language and Computers, Corpus Linguistics beyond the Word: Corpus Linguistics from Phrase to Discourse, E. Fitzpatrick (ed.), 227–241. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Swales, J. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 2009. Worlds of genre-metaphors of genre. In Genre in a Changing World, C. Bazerman, A. Bonini & D. Figueiredo (eds), 1–16. Anderson SC: Parlor Press. Available at the WAC Clearinghouse <[URL]> DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. 2011. Language in the Academy: Cultural Reflexivity and Intercultural Dynamics. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Cited by (58)

Cited by 58 other publications

Aleksiejuk, Katarzyna
2024. Translation of Scientific Texts into English as Intercultural Mediation. Półrocznik Językoznawczy Tertium 8:2  pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Anikina, Zhanna, Ksenia Girfanova & Liubov Goncharova
2024. “Writing for English-medium publication is a journey to nowhere — no route and no tools”: Russian academics’ perceptions of the existing publication support. Higher Education DOI logo
Chauke, Ezekiel & Khashane Stephen Malatji
2024. Exploring the Implications of the Articulation Gap on Grade 6 EFAL Learners’ Essay Writing Skills. E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences  pp. 364 ff. DOI logo
Kashiha, Hadi
2024. Critical comments in the disciplines: a comparative look at peer review reports in applied linguistics and engineering. Text & Talk DOI logo
Kawase, Tomoyuki
2024. Move combinations in the conclusion section of applied linguistics research articles. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) DOI logo
McKinley, Jim
2024. Language Standards in Academic Writing. In Reference Module in Social Sciences, DOI logo
Menga, Filippo
2024. Multiple Political Geographies. In Political Geography in Practice,  pp. 225 ff. DOI logo
Warren, Leiry K. & Masatoshi Sato
2024. Multilingualism and native speakerism in academic journals’ language policies: Exploring a potential power of applied linguistics journals in promoting equitable publishing practices. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 46:3  pp. 921 ff. DOI logo
Makena, Bulelwa & Nomasomi Hilda Matiso
2023. The Impact of Linguistic Constituencies on Language Proficiency. E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences  pp. 1453 ff. DOI logo
Peters, Uwe
2023. Linguistic Discrimination in Science: Can English Disfluency Help Debias Scientific Research?. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 36:1  pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Soler, Josep, Iker Erdocia & Kristof Savski
2023. (Im)possible change. Language, Culture and Society 5:2  pp. 167 ff. DOI logo
Strauss, Pat & Emmanuel Manalo
2023. “Most good papers are published in English”. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 4:1  pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Xu, Xiatinghan
2023. Options in the (Semi-)Periphery: A Review of Multilingual Scholars’ Choices of Topics, Methodologies, and Theories in Research and Publishing. Publications 11:4  pp. 50 ff. DOI logo
Burgess, Sally
2022. On Mediating and Being Mediated: Experiences of Harmony and Contention. In The Inner World of Gatekeeping in Scholarly Publication,  pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Dongbin, Sung-Sang Yoo, Heekwon Sohn & Erin L. Sonneveldt
2022. The segmented mobility of globally mobile academics: a case study of foreign professors at a Korean university. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 52:8  pp. 1259 ff. DOI logo
Pawlicka, Aleksandra, Michał Choraś & Marek Pawlicki
2022. Opening up a discussion on the native speaker myth in science. Accountability in Research 29:7  pp. 477 ff. DOI logo
Shaw, Oliver
2022. Mediation and uptake in manuscript revision. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 3:1  pp. 6 ff. DOI logo
Smirnova, Natalia & Theresa Lillis
2022. Citation in global academic knowledge making. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 3:1  pp. 78 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Ting & Mary Jane Curry
2022. How do we know (if) it works? A review of research evaluating publishing pedagogies for multilingual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing 58  pp. 100917 ff. DOI logo
Abdeljaoued, Marii & Tahar Labassi
2021. English as the lingua franca of academic publishing in Tunisia. World Englishes 40:2  pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
Bardi, Mirela
2021. ‘How can I make something interesting for me relevant for the wider community?’ – An ethnographic exploration of Romanian researchers’ adjustment to research communication standards. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 49  pp. 100943 ff. DOI logo
Edo-Marzá, Nuria
2021. Academic writing and publishing. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 34:1  pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Getahun, Dawit Asrat, Waheed Hammad & Anna Robinson-Pant
2021. Academic writing for publication: Putting the ‘international’ into context. Research in Comparative and International Education 16:2  pp. 160 ff. DOI logo
Mendoza, Arturo, Viviana Oropeza, Daniel Rodríguez, Zazil Sobrevilla & Joaquín Martínez
2021. Challenges, feelings, and attitudes towards writing in ERPP in semi-periphery countries. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 2:2  pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
Rodríguez, Alma D., Sandra I. Musanti & Alyssa G. Cavazos
2021. Translanguaging in higher education in the US: leveraging students’ bilingualism. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 18:4  pp. 353 ff. DOI logo
Shleykina, Galina & Frances Junnier
2021. Translating authorial presence. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 2:2  pp. 104 ff. DOI logo
Smirnova, Natalia V., Theresa Lillis & Anna Kristina Hultgren
2021. English and/or Russian medium publications? A case study exploring academic research writing in contemporary Russian academia. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 53  pp. 101015 ff. DOI logo
Soler, Josep
2021. Linguistic injustice in academic publishing in English. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 2:2  pp. 160 ff. DOI logo
Demeter, Márton
2020. The Dynamics Behind the Problem of Inequality: The World-System of Global Inequality in Knowledge Production. In Academic Knowledge Production and the Global South,  pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Eve, Martin Paul, Cameron Neylon, Daniel Paul O'Donnell, Samuel Moore, Robert Gadie, Victoria Odeniyi & Shahina Parvin
2020. Reading Peer Review, DOI logo
Lei, Siyu & Ruiying Yang
2020. Lexical richness in research articles: Corpus-based comparative study among advanced Chinese learners of English, English native beginner students and experts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 47  pp. 100894 ff. DOI logo
Lillis, Theresa, Maria Leedham & Alison Twiner
2020. Time, the Written Record, and Professional Practice: The Case of Contemporary Social Work. Written Communication 37:4  pp. 431 ff. DOI logo
Monteiro, Kátia & Eliana Hirano
2020. A periphery inside a semi-periphery: The uneven participation of Brazilian scholars in the international community. English for Specific Purposes 58  pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Starks, Donna & Howard Nicholas
2020. Reflections of Vietnamese English Language Educators on Their Writer Identities in English and Vietnamese. Journal of Language, Identity & Education 19:3  pp. 179 ff. DOI logo
Broekhoff, Marna
2019. Perceived Challenges to Anglophone Publication at Three Universities in Chile. Publications 7:4  pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Corcoran, James
2019. Addressing the “Bias Gap”: A Research-Driven Argument for Critical Support of Plurilingual Scientists’ Research Writing. Written Communication 36:4  pp. 538 ff. DOI logo
Curry, Mary Jane & Theresa Lillis
2019. Unpacking the Lore on Multilingual Scholars Publishing in English: A Discussion Paper. Publications 7:2  pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Flowerdew, John
2019. The linguistic disadvantage of scholars who write in English as an additional language: Myth or reality. Language Teaching 52:02  pp. 249 ff. DOI logo
Hanauer, David I., Cheryl L. Sheridan & Karen Englander
2019. Linguistic Injustice in the Writing of Research Articles in English as a Second Language: Data From Taiwanese and Mexican Researchers. Written Communication 36:1  pp. 136 ff. DOI logo
Hultgren, Anna Kristina
2019. English as the Language for Academic Publication: on Equity, Disadvantage and ‘Non-Nativeness’ as a Red Herring. Publications 7:2  pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Hultgren, Anna Kristina
2022. Certifying Knowledge Under Neoliberalism: Global Inequality and Academic Wellbeing. In The Inner World of Gatekeeping in Scholarly Publication,  pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Nygaard, Lynn P.
2019. The Institutional Context of ‘Linguistic Injustice’: Norwegian Social Scientists and Situated Multilingualism. Publications 7:1  pp. 10 ff. DOI logo
Tardy, Christine M.
2019. We Are All Reviewer #2: A Window into the Secret World of Peer Review. In Novice Writers and Scholarly Publication,  pp. 271 ff. DOI logo
Hynninen, Niina
2018. Impact of digital tools on the research writing process: A case study of collaborative writing in computer science. Discourse, Context & Media 24  pp. 16 ff. DOI logo
Hynninen, Niina
2021. Polycentricity and Scaling in Analysing Textual Trajectories of Writing for Publication. In Academic Literacy Development,  pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Hynninen, Niina
2022. Moments and mechanisms of intervention along textual trajectories: norm negotiations in English-medium research writing. Text & Talk 42:2  pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
Hynninen, Niina
2022. Opening up the peer review process. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 3:1  pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Lillis, Theresa
2018. Resistir regímenes de evaluación en el estudio del escribir. Signo y Pensamiento 36:71  pp. 66 ff. DOI logo
Lillis, Theresa & Mary Jane Curry
2018. Trajectories of knowledge and desire: Multilingual women scholars researching and writing in academia. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 32  pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Lillis, Theresa & Mary Jane Curry
2022. The dynamics of academic knowledge making in a multilingual world. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 3:1  pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Rai, Lucy
2018. How to Get Published in a Peer Reviewed Journal: Reflections on Panel Discussion at the International Council for Open and Distance Education: World Conference on Online Learning 16–19th October 2017, Toronto, Canada. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning 33:1  pp. 70 ff. DOI logo
Hynninen, Niina & Maria Kuteeva
2017. “Good” and “acceptable” English in L2 research writing: Ideals and realities in history and computer science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 30  pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Paltridge, Brian
2017. Conclusions. In The Discourse of Peer Review,  pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Paltridge, Brian
2017. Pragmatics and Reviewers’ Reports. In The Discourse of Peer Review,  pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Paltridge, Brian
2017. The Genre of Reviewers’ Reports. In The Discourse of Peer Review,  pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Paltridge, Brian
2019. Reviewers’ Feedback on Second-Language Writers’ Submissions to Academic Journals. In Feedback in Second Language Writing,  pp. 226 ff. DOI logo
Paltridge, Brian
2023. Writing a book proposal. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 4:2  pp. 189 ff. DOI logo
Corcoran, James & Karen Englander
2016. A Proposal for Critical-Pragmatic Pedagogical Approaches to English for Research Publication Purposes. Publications 4:1  pp. 6 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.