Full-text

The politics of English, language and uptake
References

References

Agar, M.H.
1996The Professional Stranger: An Informal Introduction to Ethnography, 2nd rev. edn. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Aktas, R. & Cortes, V.
2008Shell nouns as cohesive devices in published and ESL student writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7(1): 3–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J.L.
1970How to Do Things with Words, 2nd edn. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Belcher, D.
2007Seeking acceptance in an English-only research world. Journal of Second Language Writing 16: 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berkenkotter, B. & Hanganu-Bresch, C.
2011Lunatic asylum occult genres and the certification of madness in the 19th century. Written Communication 28: 220–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J.
2005Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P.
1985The forms of capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, J.G. Richardson (ed.), 241–258. New York NY: Greenwood.Google Scholar
1987Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, R. Nice (transl.). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, D.
2012 [1995]Verbal Hygiene. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Casanave, C.P.
2008The stigmatizing effect of Goffman’s stigma label: A response to John Flowerdew. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7: 264–267. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Connor, U. & Mauranen, A.
1999Linguistic analysis of grant proposals: European Union research grants. English for Specific Purposes 18(1): 47–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Curry, M.J. & Lillis, T.
2010Academic research networks: Accessing resources for English-medium publishing. English for Specific Purposes 29(4): 281–295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Englander, K.
2009Transformation of the identities of nonnative English-speaking scientists as a consequence of the social construction of revision. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education 8: 35–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, J.
2008Scholarly writers who use English as an additional language: What can Goffman’s “stigma” tell us? Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7: 77–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fortanet-Gómez, I.
2008aEvaluative language in peer review referee reports. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7: 27–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008bStrategies for teaching and learning an occluded genre: The RA referee report. In English as an Additional Language in Research Publication and Communication, S. Burgess & P. Martin-Martin (eds), 19–38. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, B.
2001La résistible ascension de l’écrit au travail. In Langage et Travail, Communication, Cognition, Action, A. Borzeix & B. Fraenkel (eds), 113–142. Paris: CNRS Editions.Google Scholar
Giannoni, D.S.
2008Medical writing at the periphery: The case of Italian journal editorials. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7: 97–107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gosden, H.
2003‘Why not give us the full story?’ Functions of referees’ comments in peer reviews of scientific research papers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2: 87–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harwood, N.
2005a“I hoped to counteract the memory problem, but I made no impact whatsoever”: Discussing methods in computing science using I . English for Specific Purposes 24: 243–267. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005b“Nowhere has anyone attempted... In this article I do just that”: A corpus-based study of self-promotional I and we in academic writing across four disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics 37: 1027–1231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hewings, M.
2004An ‘important contribution’ or ‘tiresome reading’? A study of evaluation in peer reviews in journal article submissions. Journal of Applied Linguistics 1(3): 247–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K.
2004Genre and Second Language Writing. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
2005Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Kourilova, M.
1998Communicative characteristics of reviews of scientific papers written by non-native users of English. Endocrine Regulations 32: 107–114.Google Scholar
Lillis, T.
2008 Ethnography as method, methodology, and ‘deep theorizing’: Closing the gap between text and context in academic writing research. Written Communication 25(3): 353–388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012English medium writing for academic purposes: Foundational categories, certainty and contingency. In Academic Writing in a Second or Foreign Language: Issues and Challenges Facing ESL/EFL Academic Writers in Higher Education Contexts, R. Tang (ed.), 235–247. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2013The Sociolinguistics of Writing. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Lillis, T. & Curry, M.J.
2006aReframing notions of competence in scholarly writing: From individual to networked activity. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 53: 63–78.Google Scholar
2006bProfessional academic writing by multilingual scholars: Interactions with literacy brokers in the production of English-medium texts. Written Communication 23(1): 3–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Academic Writing in a Global Context: The Politics and Practices of Publishing in English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lillis, T., Hewings, A., Vladimirou, D. & Curry, M.J.
2010The geolinguistics of English as an academic lingua franca: Citation practices across English-medium national and English-medium international journals. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 20(1): 111–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lillis, T. & McKinney, C.
2013The sociolinguistics of writing in a global context: Objects, lenses, consequences. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17(4): 415–439. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lillis, T. & Turner, J.
2001Student writing in higher education: Contemporary confusion, traditional concerns. Teaching in Higher Education 6(1): 57–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mauranen, A.
2013Hybridism, edutainment, and doubt: Science blogging finding its feet. Nordic Journal of English Studies 13(1):7–36.Google Scholar
Mungra, P. & Webber, P.
2010Peer review process in medical research publications: Language and content comments. English for Specific Purposes 29: 43–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paltridge, B.
2013Referees’ comments on submissions to peer-reviewed journals: When is a suggestion not a suggestion? Studies in Higher Education 40(1): 106–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sarangi, S. & Candlin, C.
2003Categorisation and explanation of risk: A discourse analytical perspective. Health, Risk & Society 5(2): 115–228. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shehzad, W.
2006How to end an introduction in a computer science article: A corpus-based approach. In Language and Computers, Corpus Linguistics beyond the Word: Corpus Linguistics from Phrase to Discourse, E. Fitzpatrick (ed.), 227–241. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Swales, J.
1990Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2009Worlds of genre-metaphors of genre. In Genre in a Changing World, C. Bazerman, A. Bonini & D. Figueiredo (eds), 1–16. Anderson SC: Parlor Press. Available at the WAC Clearinghouse http://​wac​.colostate​.edu​/books​/genre/Google Scholar
Turner, J.
2011Language in the Academy: Cultural Reflexivity and Intercultural Dynamics. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 26 other publications

Abdeljaoued, Marii & Tahar Labassi
2020. English as the lingua franca of academic publishing in Tunisia. World Englishes Crossref logo
Bardi, Mirela
2021. ‘How can I make something interesting for me relevant for the wider community?’ – An ethnographic exploration of Romanian researchers’ adjustment to research communication standards. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 49  pp. 100943 ff. Crossref logo
Broekhoff
2019. Perceived Challenges to Anglophone Publication at Three Universities in Chile. Publications 7:4  pp. 61 ff. Crossref logo
Corcoran, James
2019. Addressing the “Bias Gap”: A Research-Driven Argument for Critical Support of Plurilingual Scientists’ Research Writing. Written Communication 36:4  pp. 538 ff. Crossref logo
Corcoran, James & Karen Englander
2016. A Proposal for Critical-Pragmatic Pedagogical Approaches to English for Research Publication Purposes. Publications 4:1  pp. 6 ff. Crossref logo
Curry, Mary Jane & Theresa Lillis
2019. Unpacking the Lore on Multilingual Scholars Publishing in English: A Discussion Paper. Publications 7:2  pp. 27 ff. Crossref logo
Demeter, Márton
2020.  In Academic Knowledge Production and the Global South,  pp. 63 ff. Crossref logo
Flowerdew, John
2019. The linguistic disadvantage of scholars who write in English as an additional language: Myth or reality. Language Teaching 52:02  pp. 249 ff. Crossref logo
Hanauer, David I., Cheryl L. Sheridan & Karen Englander
2019. Linguistic Injustice in the Writing of Research Articles in English as a Second Language: Data From Taiwanese and Mexican Researchers. Written Communication 36:1  pp. 136 ff. Crossref logo
Hultgren, Anna Kristina
2019. English as the Language for Academic Publication: on Equity, Disadvantage and ‘Non-Nativeness’ as a Red Herring. Publications 7:2  pp. 31 ff. Crossref logo
Hynninen, Niina
2018. Impact of digital tools on the research writing process: A case study of collaborative writing in computer science. Discourse, Context & Media 24  pp. 16 ff. Crossref logo
Hynninen, Niina
2020. Moments and mechanisms of intervention along textual trajectories: Norm negotiations in English-medium research writing. Text & Talk 0:0 Crossref logo
Hynninen, Niina & Maria Kuteeva
2017. “Good” and “acceptable” English in L2 research writing: Ideals and realities in history and computer science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 30  pp. 53 ff. Crossref logo
Kim, Dongbin, Sung-Sang Yoo, Heekwon Sohn & Erin L. Sonneveldt
2021. The segmented mobility of globally mobile academics: a case study of foreign professors at a Korean university. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Lei, Siyu & Ruiying Yang
2020. Lexical richness in research articles: Corpus-based comparative study among advanced Chinese learners of English, English native beginner students and experts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 47  pp. 100894 ff. Crossref logo
Lillis, Theresa & Mary Jane Curry
2018. Trajectories of knowledge and desire: Multilingual women scholars researching and writing in academia. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 32  pp. 53 ff. Crossref logo
Lillis, Theresa, Maria Leedham & Alison Twiner
2020. Time, the Written Record, and Professional Practice: The Case of Contemporary Social Work. Written Communication 37:4  pp. 431 ff. Crossref logo
Monteiro, Kátia & Eliana Hirano
2020. A periphery inside a semi-periphery: The uneven participation of Brazilian scholars in the international community. English for Specific Purposes 58  pp. 15 ff. Crossref logo
Nygaard, Lynn
2019. The Institutional Context of ‘Linguistic Injustice’: Norwegian Social Scientists and Situated Multilingualism. Publications 7:1  pp. 10 ff. Crossref logo
Paltridge, Brian
2017.  In The Discourse of Peer Review,  pp. 31 ff. Crossref logo
Paltridge, Brian
2017.  In The Discourse of Peer Review,  pp. 67 ff. Crossref logo
Paltridge, Brian
2017.  In The Discourse of Peer Review,  pp. 183 ff. Crossref logo
Paltridge, Brian
2019.  In Feedback in Second Language Writing,  pp. 226 ff. Crossref logo
Rai, Lucy
2018. How to Get Published in a Peer Reviewed Journal: Reflections on Panel Discussion at the International Council for Open and Distance Education: World Conference on Online Learning 16–19th October 2017, Toronto, Canada. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning 33:1  pp. 70 ff. Crossref logo
Starks, Donna & Howard Nicholas
2020. Reflections of Vietnamese English Language Educators on Their Writer Identities in English and Vietnamese. Journal of Language, Identity & Education 19:3  pp. 179 ff. Crossref logo
Tardy, Christine M.
2019.  In Novice Writers and Scholarly Publication,  pp. 271 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 02 march 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.