Article published In:
Reflexivity in Late Modernity: Accounts from linguistic ethnographies of youth
Edited by Miguel Pérez-Milans
[AILA Review 29] 2016
► pp. 114140
Archer, M. S.
2012The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauman, R.
1987The role of performance in the ethnography of speaking. Working Papers and Proceedings of the Center for Psychosocial Studies 111: 3–12.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J.
2007On scope and depth in linguistic ethnography. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11 (5): 682–688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P.
1991Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
2001Science de la science et réflexivité. Paris: Raisons d’Agir.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M.
1999“Why be normal?”: Language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls. Language in Society 28 (2): 203–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011White Kids. Language, Race, and Styles of Youth Identity. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Coupland, N.
2001Dialect stylisation in radio talk. Language in Society 30 (3): 345–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coupland, N. & Kristiansen, T.
2011SLICE: Critical perspectives on language (de)standardisation. In Standard Languages and Language Standards in a Changing Europe, T. Kristiansen & N. Coupland (eds), 11–35. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
D’Amato, J.
1993Resistance and compliance in minority classrooms. In Minority Education: Anthropological Perspectives, E. Jacob & C. Jordan (eds), 181–207. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
D’hoker, M. & Henkens, B.
2005Van segmentering naar convergentie. Structuur en karakter van het secundair onderwijs in België in de 20ste eeuw. In Paradoxen van pedagogisering. Handboek pedagogische historiografie, M. Depaepe, F. Simon & A. Van Gorp (eds), 159–176. Leuven: Acco.Google Scholar
Delarue, S.
2013Teachers’ Dutch in Flanders: The last guardians of the standard? In Language (De)standardisation in Late Modern Europe: Experimental Studies, T. Kristiansen & S. Grondelaers (eds), 193–226. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Delarue, S. & De Caluwe, J.
2015Eliminating social inequality by reinforcing standard language ideology? Language policy for Dutch in Flemish schools. Current Issues in Language Planning 16 (1–2): 8–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delarue, S. & Van Lancker, I.
2016De kloof overbruggen tussen een strikt onderwijstaalbeleid en een taaldiverse klaspraktijk: Strategieën van Vlaamse leraren en leerlingen. TNTL 132 (2): 85–105.Google Scholar
Deumert, A. & Vandenbussche, W.
2003Germanic Standardizations. Past to Present [Impact: Studies in Language and Society 18]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A.
1991Modernity and self-identiy. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E.
1981Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Grondelaers, S. & van Hout, R.
2011The standard language situation in the Low Countries: Top-down and bottom-up variations on a diaglossic theme. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 23 (3): 199–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heller, M.
2008Doing ethnography. In Blackwell Guide to Research Methods in Bilingualism and Multilingualism, L. Wei & M. Moyer (eds), 249–262. Malden MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D.
1964Introduction: Toward ethnographies of communication. American Anthropologist 66 (6): 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaspers, J.
2005Tegenwerken, belachelijk doen. Talige sabotage van Marokkaanse jongens op een Antwerpse middelbare school. Brussel: VUBPress.Google Scholar
2006Stylizing Standard Dutch by Moroccan boys in Antwerp. Linguistics and Education 17 (2): 131–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011Strange bedfellows: Appropriations of a tainted urban dialect. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15 (4): 493–524. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Stylisations as teacher practice. Language in Society 43 (4): 371–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, J. N.
2008Polylingual languaging around and among children and adolescents. International Journal of Multilingualism 5 (3): 161–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lybaert, C.
2014Het gesproken Nederlands in Vlaanderen: Percepties en attitudes van een spraakmakende generatie. Gent: Universiteit Gent.Google Scholar
Madsen, L. M.
2014Heteroglossia, voicing and social categorisation. In Heteroglossia as Practice and Pedagogy, A. Blackledge & A. Creese (eds), 41–58. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martín Rojo, L.
2010Constructing Inequality in Multilingual Classrooms. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mehan, H.
1985The structure of classroom discourse. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 3: Discourse and Dialogue, T. A. van Dijk (ed.), 119–131. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Milroy, J.
2001Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5 (4): 530–555. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milroy, J. & Milroy, L.
1985Authority in Language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicolini, D.
2009Zooming in and zooming out: A package of method and theory to study work practices. In Organizational Ethnography: Studying the Complexity of Everyday Life, S. Ybema, D. Yanow, H. Wels & F. H. Kamsteeg (eds), 120–138. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norde, M., De Clerck, B. & Colleman, T.
2014The emergence of non-canonical degree modifiers in non-standard varieties of Dutch: A constructionalization perspective. In Extending the Scope of Construction Grammar, R. Boogaart, T. Colleman & G. Rutten (eds), 207–250. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Milans, M.
2015Language education policy in late modernity: (Socio)linguistic ethnographies in the European Union. Language Policy 14 (2): 99–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rampton, B.
1995Crossing. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
2001Critique in interaction. Critique of Anthropology 21 (1): 83–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003Hegemony, social class and stylisation. Pragmatics 13 (1): 49–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005Crossing. Language & Ethnicity among Adolescents. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
2006Language in Late Modernity. Interaction in an Urban School. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Linguistic ethnography, interactional sociolinguistics and the study of identities. In Apllied Linguistics Methods: A Reader, T. L. Coffin & K. O’Halloran (eds), 234–250. London: Routledge/Open University.Google Scholar
Rampton, B., Tusting, K., Maybin, J., Barwell, R., Creese, A. & Lytra, V.
2004 UK Linguistic ethnography: A discussion paper. [URL]
Silverstein, M.
1993Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In Reflexive Language. Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, J. A. Lucy (ed.), 33–58. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smet, P.
2011Samen taalgrezen verleggen. Conceptnota. [URL]
Van De Mieroop, D., Zenner, E. & Marzo, S.
2016Standard and Colloquial Belgian Dutch pronouns of adress: A variationist-interactional study of child-directed speech in dinner table interactions. Folia Linguistica 50 (1): 31–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Lancker, I.
2016Standardizing and destandardizing practices at a Flemish secondary school. A sociolinguistic ethnographic perspective on Flemish pupils’ speech practices. Taal en Tongval 641.Google Scholar
Vandekerckhove, R.
2005Patterns of variation and convergence in the West-Flemish dialects. In Moderne Dialekte – Neue Dialektologie, E. Eggers, J. E. Schmidt & D. Stellmacher (eds), 535–552. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Vandenbroucke, F.
2007De lat hoog voor talen in iedere school. Goed voor de sterken, sterk voor de zwakken. [URL]
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Rosiers, Kirsten, Inge Van Lancker & Steven Delarue
2018. Beyond the traditional scope of translanguaging. Language & Communication 61  pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Shahri, Naseh Nasrollahi & Valeriya Minakova
2021. Reflexive engagement with social meanings through registers. Linguistics and Education 64  pp. 100926 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 august 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.