Article published In:
Reflexivity in Late Modernity: Accounts from linguistic ethnographies of youth
Edited by Miguel Pérez-Milans
[AILA Review 29] 2016
► pp. 114140
References (48)
Archer, M. S. 2012. The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauman, R. 1987. The role of performance in the ethnography of speaking. Working Papers and Proceedings of the Center for Psychosocial Studies 111: 3–12.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. 2007. On scope and depth in linguistic ethnography. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11 (5): 682–688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
2001. Science de la science et réflexivité. Paris: Raisons d’Agir.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M. 1999. “Why be normal?”: Language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls. Language in Society 28 (2): 203–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011. White Kids. Language, Race, and Styles of Youth Identity. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Coupland, N. 2001. Dialect stylisation in radio talk. Language in Society 30 (3): 345–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coupland, N. & Kristiansen, T. 2011. SLICE: Critical perspectives on language (de)standardisation. In Standard Languages and Language Standards in a Changing Europe, T. Kristiansen & N. Coupland (eds), 11–35. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
D’Amato, J. 1993. Resistance and compliance in minority classrooms. In Minority Education: Anthropological Perspectives, E. Jacob & C. Jordan (eds), 181–207. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
D’hoker, M. & Henkens, B. 2005. Van segmentering naar convergentie. Structuur en karakter van het secundair onderwijs in België in de 20ste eeuw. In Paradoxen van pedagogisering. Handboek pedagogische historiografie, M. Depaepe, F. Simon & A. Van Gorp (eds), 159–176. Leuven: Acco.Google Scholar
Delarue, S. 2013. Teachers’ Dutch in Flanders: The last guardians of the standard? In Language (De)standardisation in Late Modern Europe: Experimental Studies, T. Kristiansen & S. Grondelaers (eds), 193–226. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Delarue, S. & De Caluwe, J. 2015. Eliminating social inequality by reinforcing standard language ideology? Language policy for Dutch in Flemish schools. Current Issues in Language Planning 16 (1–2): 8–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delarue, S. & Van Lancker, I. 2016. De kloof overbruggen tussen een strikt onderwijstaalbeleid en een taaldiverse klaspraktijk: Strategieën van Vlaamse leraren en leerlingen. TNTL 132 (2): 85–105.Google Scholar
Deumert, A. & Vandenbussche, W. 2003. Germanic Standardizations. Past to Present [Impact: Studies in Language and Society 18]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and self-identiy. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1981. Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Grondelaers, S. & van Hout, R. 2011. The standard language situation in the Low Countries: Top-down and bottom-up variations on a diaglossic theme. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 23 (3): 199–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heller, M. 2008. Doing ethnography. In Blackwell Guide to Research Methods in Bilingualism and Multilingualism, L. Wei & M. Moyer (eds), 249–262. Malden MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. 1964. Introduction: Toward ethnographies of communication. American Anthropologist 66 (6): 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaspers, J. 2005. Tegenwerken, belachelijk doen. Talige sabotage van Marokkaanse jongens op een Antwerpse middelbare school. Brussel: VUBPress.Google Scholar
2006. Stylizing Standard Dutch by Moroccan boys in Antwerp. Linguistics and Education 17 (2): 131–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011. Strange bedfellows: Appropriations of a tainted urban dialect. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15 (4): 493–524. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. Stylisations as teacher practice. Language in Society 43 (4): 371–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, J. N. 2008. Polylingual languaging around and among children and adolescents. International Journal of Multilingualism 5 (3): 161–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lybaert, C. 2014. Het gesproken Nederlands in Vlaanderen: Percepties en attitudes van een spraakmakende generatie. Gent: Universiteit Gent.Google Scholar
Madsen, L. M. 2014. Heteroglossia, voicing and social categorisation. In Heteroglossia as Practice and Pedagogy, A. Blackledge & A. Creese (eds), 41–58. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martín Rojo, L. 2010. Constructing Inequality in Multilingual Classrooms. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mehan, H. 1985. The structure of classroom discourse. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 3: Discourse and Dialogue, T. A. van Dijk (ed.), 119–131. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Milroy, J. 2001. Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5 (4): 530–555. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milroy, J. & Milroy, L. 1985. Authority in Language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicolini, D. 2009. Zooming in and zooming out: A package of method and theory to study work practices. In Organizational Ethnography: Studying the Complexity of Everyday Life, S. Ybema, D. Yanow, H. Wels & F. H. Kamsteeg (eds), 120–138. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norde, M., De Clerck, B. & Colleman, T. 2014. The emergence of non-canonical degree modifiers in non-standard varieties of Dutch: A constructionalization perspective. In Extending the Scope of Construction Grammar, R. Boogaart, T. Colleman & G. Rutten (eds), 207–250. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Milans, M. 2015. Language education policy in late modernity: (Socio)linguistic ethnographies in the European Union. Language Policy 14 (2): 99–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. Reflexivity and social change in applied linguistics. AILA Review 29 (1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rampton, B. 1995. Crossing. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
2001. Critique in interaction. Critique of Anthropology 21 (1): 83–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003. Hegemony, social class and stylisation. Pragmatics 13 (1): 49–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. Crossing. Language & Ethnicity among Adolescents. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
2006. Language in Late Modernity. Interaction in an Urban School. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. Linguistic ethnography, interactional sociolinguistics and the study of identities. In Apllied Linguistics Methods: A Reader, T. L. Coffin & K. O’Halloran (eds), 234–250. London: Routledge/Open University.Google Scholar
Rampton, B., Tusting, K., Maybin, J., Barwell, R., Creese, A. & Lytra, V. 2004. UK Linguistic ethnography: A discussion paper. <[URL]>
Silverstein, M. 1993. Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In Reflexive Language. Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, J. A. Lucy (ed.), 33–58. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smet, P. 2011. Samen taalgrezen verleggen. Conceptnota. <[URL]>
Van De Mieroop, D., Zenner, E. & Marzo, S. 2016. Standard and Colloquial Belgian Dutch pronouns of adress: A variationist-interactional study of child-directed speech in dinner table interactions. Folia Linguistica 50 (1): 31–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Lancker, I. 2016. Standardizing and destandardizing practices at a Flemish secondary school. A sociolinguistic ethnographic perspective on Flemish pupils’ speech practices. Taal en Tongval 641.Google Scholar
Vandekerckhove, R. 2005. Patterns of variation and convergence in the West-Flemish dialects. In Moderne Dialekte – Neue Dialektologie, E. Eggers, J. E. Schmidt & D. Stellmacher (eds), 535–552. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Vandenbroucke, F. 2007. De lat hoog voor talen in iedere school. Goed voor de sterken, sterk voor de zwakken. <[URL]>
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Shahri, Naseh Nasrollahi & Valeriya Minakova
2021. Reflexive engagement with social meanings through registers. Linguistics and Education 64  pp. 100926 ff. DOI logo
Rosiers, Kirsten, Inge Van Lancker & Steven Delarue
2018. Beyond the traditional scope of translanguaging. Language & Communication 61  pp. 15 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.