Cover not available
Article In:
Thematic Issue: Trends in Second Language Pragmatics Research Part 2
[Applied Pragmatics 6:2] 2024
► pp. 132–147

Technology-enhanced pragmatic instruction

ORCID logo | University of Hawaiʻi at Manoa
Developing pragmatic competence in another language is not an easy task for language learners, especially in foreign language settings which are deprived of real and rich interactions with different speakers of the target language in a variety of contexts. For more than a decade, researchers of L2+ pragmatics have proposed that technology and technology-mediated environments can expose students to a large variety of context and interactional practices to enhance their pragmatic awareness and develop their pragmatic competence. This article reviews studies that have investigated the potential of teaching pragmatic features with technology using a variety of tools (e.g., email; text-, audio-, and video-based computer-mediated communication; social networks; simulations; virtual environments; games) to summarize the findings of the field so far. The article also poses some questions that still need to be addressed and suggests future directions for research within the ever-evolving world of technology.
Keywords: interactional pragmatics, L2+ pragmatics, virtual spaces, technology-mediated environments, cyberpragmatics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Key concepts of technology-mediated pragmatics instruction
  • 3.Survey of current literature
    • 3.1Computer-mediated communication (CMC) tools
    • 3.2Virtual environments and games
    • 3.3Social networks and communities
    • 3.4Simulations and interactive automated dialogues
  • 4.Critical insights and future directions
  • Author queries
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (77)
References
Abe, M., & Roever, C. (2020). Task closings in L2 text-chat interactions: A study of L2 interactional competence. CALICO Journal, 37 (1), 23–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Abrams, Z. (2013). Say what?! L2 sociopragmatic competence in CMC: Skill transfer and development. CALICO Journal, 30 (3), 423–445. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alcón-Soler, E. (2005). Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context? System, 33 (3), 417–435. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2013). Developing L2 pragmatics. Language Learning, 63 (1), 68–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barón, J., & Ortega, M. (2018). Investigating age differences in e-mail pragmatic performance. System, 78 1, 148–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belz, J. (2002). Social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language study. Language Learning & Technology, 6 (1), 60–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biesenbach-Lucas, S. (2007). Students writing emails to faculty: An examination of e-politeness among native and non-native speakers of English. Language Learning & Technology, 11 (2), 59–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blattner, G., & Fiori, M. (2011). Virtual social network communities: An investigation of language learners’ development of sociopragmatic awareness and multiliteracy skills. CALICO Journal, 29 (1), 24–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brône, G., & Oben, B. (Eds.). (2018). Eye-tracking in interaction: Studies on the role of eye gaze in dialogue. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In J. C. Richards & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and Communication (pp. 2–27). Longman.Google Scholar
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1 (1), 1–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carrol, G., & Conklin, K. (2017). Cross language lexical priming extends to formulaic units: Evidence from eye-tracking suggests that this idea ‘has legs.’ Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20 (2), 299–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y. (2015). Developing Chinese EFL learners’ email literacy through requests to faculty. Journal of Pragmatics, 75 1, 131–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chun, D. M. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22 (1), 17–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Developing intercultural communicative competence through online exchanges. CALICO Journal, 28 (2), 392–419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Codina-Espurz, V., & Salazar-Campillo, P. (2019). Openings and closing in emails by CLIL students: A pedagogical proposal. English Language Teaching, 12 (2), 57–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, D. J. (2016). Request modification in synchronous computer-mediated communication: The role of focused instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 100 (2), 484–507. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). L2 pragmatic learning in computer-mediated communication. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), Routledge handbook of SLA and pragmatics (pp. 372–386). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dimock, M. (2019). Defining generations: Where Millennials end and Generation Z begins (Generations). Pew Research Center. [URL]
Filik, R., Brightman, E., Gathercole, C., & Leuthold, H. (2017). The emotional impact of verbal irony: Eye-tracking evidence for a two-stage process. Journal of Memory and Language, 93 1, 193–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gonzales, A. (2013). Development of politeness strategies in participatory online environments: A case study. In N. Taguchi & J. M. Sykes (Eds.), Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching (pp. 101–120). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
González-Lloret, M. (2008). Computer-mediated Learning of L2 Pragmatics. In E. A. Soler & A. Martinez-Flor (Eds.), Investigating pragmatics in foreign language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 114–132). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Task-based language teaching and L2 pragmatics. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), Routledge handbook of SLA and pragmatics (pp. 338–352). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ho, S., Foulsham, T., & Kingstone, A. (2015). Speaking and listening with the eyes: Gaze signaling during dyadic interactions. PLOS ONE, 10 (8), e0136905. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holden, C., & Sykes, J. M. (2013). Complex L2 pragmatic feedback via place-based mobile games. In N. Taguchi & J. M. Sykes (Eds.), Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching (pp. 155–183). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. (1972). On Communicative Competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269–293). Penguin.Google Scholar
Jenks, C. J., & Brandt, A. (2013). Managing mutual orientation in the absence of physical copresence: Multiparty voice-based chat room interaction. Discourse Processes, 50 (4), 227–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jeon, E. H., & Kaya, T. (2006). Effects of L2 instruction on interlanguage pragmatic development: A meta-analysis. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 165–211). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kasper, G. (1997). Can pragmatic competence be taught? (NetWork #6) Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center. [URL]
(2009). L2 pragmatic development. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (1st ed., pp. 259–284). Emerald.Google Scholar
Kasper, G., & Schmidt, R. (1996). Developmental issues in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18 (2), 149–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, S. (2013). Amount of practice and pragmatic development of request-making in L2 Chinese. In N. Taguchi & J. M. Sykes (Eds.), Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching (pp. 43–69). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Minoo, A., & Nafiseh, H. (2020). Robot-assisted instruction of L2 pragmatics: Effects on young EFL learners’ speech act performance. Language Learning & Technology, 24 (2), 86–103. [URL]
Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50 (3), 417–528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L. (2019). SLA for the 21st century: Discipline progress, transdisciplinary relevance, and the bi/multilingual turn. In D. P. Macedo (Ed.), Decolonizing foreign language education: The misteaching of English and other colonial languages (pp. 111–130). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pan, P. C. (2012). Interlanguage requests in institutional e-mail discourse. In M. Economidou-Kogetsidis & H. Woodfield (Eds.), Interlanguage request modification (pp. 119–161). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perrin, A., & Atske, S. (2021). About three-in-ten U.S. adults say they are ‘almost constantly’ online (Internet Connectivity). Pew Research Center. [URL]
Peterson, M. (2012). Learner interaction in a massively multiplayer online role playing game (MMORPG): A sociocultural discourse analysis. ReCALL, 24 (03), 361–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Zhuang, J. (2019). A meta-analysis of second language pragmatics instruction. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), Routledge handbook of SLA and pragmatics (pp. 287–307). Routledge.Google Scholar
Pojanapunya, P., & Jaroenkitboworn, K. (2011). How to say “good-bye” in second life. Journal of Pragmatics, 43 (14), 3591–3602. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rafieyan, V., Sharafi-Nejad, M., Khavari, Z., Siew Eng, L., & Rashid Mohamed, A. (2014). Pragmatic comprehension development through telecollaboration. English Language Teaching, 7 (2), 11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinhardt, J., & Ryu, J. (2013). Using social network-mediated bridging activities to develop socio-pragmatic awareness in elementary Korean. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 3 (3), 18–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rockey, C., Tiegs, J., & Fernández, J. (2019). Mobile application use in technology-enhanced DCTs. CALICO Journal, 37 (1), 85–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rose, K. R., & Kasper, G. (2001). Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Showstack, R. E., & Vergara Wilson, D. (2020). Research on pragmatics learning, teaching, and curricula for heritage speakers. In D. A. Koike & J. C. Félix-Brasdefer (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of Spanish pragmatics: Foundations and interfaces (pp. 455–468). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soares Palmer, D. (2010). Second language pragmatic socialization in world of warcraft (Publication No. ED520797) [Doctoral dissertation, University of California]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
Sydorenko, T., Daurio, P., & L. Thorne, S. (2018). Refining pragmatically-appropriate oral communication via computer-simulated conversations. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31 (1–2), 157–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sydorenko, T., Jones, Z., Daurio, P., & Thorne, S. L. (2020). Beyond the curriculum: Extended discourse practice through self-access pragmatics simulations. Language Learning & Technology, 24 (2), 48–69. [URL]
Sykes, J. M. (2009). Learner requests in Spanish: Examining the potential of multiuser virtual environments for L2 pragmatic acquisition. In L. Lomicka & G. Lord (Eds.), The second generation: Online collaboration and social networking in CALL (pp. 199–234). Texas State University.Google Scholar
(2013). Multiuser virtual environments. In N. Taguchi & J. M. Sykes (Eds.), Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching (pp. 71–100). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sykes, J. M., & Dubreil, S. (2019). Pragmatics learning in digital games and virtual environments. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), Routledge handbook of SLA and pragmatics (pp. 387–399). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sykes, J. M., & Taguchi, N. (2013). The future of pragmatics and technology. In N. Taguchi & J. M. Sykes (Eds.), Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching (pp. 271–274). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N. (2013). Comprehension of conversation implicature. In N. Taguchi & J. M. Sykes (Eds.), Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching (pp. 19–41). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching, 48 1, 1–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). Learning and teaching pragmatics in the globalized world: Introduction to the special issue. The Modern Language Journal, 105 (3), 615–622. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2022a). Dispreferred speech acts in virtual reality: Analysis of tone choices and hesitations. System, 106 1, 102793. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2022b). Immersive virtual reality for pragmatics task development. TESOL Quarterly, 56 (1), 308–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N., Li, Q., & Tang, X. (2017). Learning Chinese formulaic expressions in a scenario-based interactive environment. Foreign Language Annals, 50 (4), 641–660. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N., & Roever, C. (2017). Second language pragmatics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Takamiya, Y., & Ishihara, N. (2013). Blogging: Crosscultural interaction for pragmatic development. In N. Taguchi & J. M. Sykes (Eds.), Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching (pp. 185–214). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tang, X., & Taguchi, N. (2020). Designing and using a scenario-based digital game to teach Chinese formulaic expressions. CALICO Journal, 31 (1), 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). Digital game-based learning of formulaic expressions in second language Chinese. The Modern Language Journal, 105 (3), 740–759. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thorne, S., Hellermann, J., Jones, A., & Lester, D. (2015). Interactional practices and artifact orientation in mobile augmented reality game play. PsychNology Journal, 13 (2–3), 259–286. [URL]
Timpe-Laughlin, V., Evanini, K., Green, A., Blood, I., Dombi, J., & Ramanarayanan, V. (2017). Designing interactive, automated dialogues for L2 pragmatics learning. In V. Petukhova & Y. Tain (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st workshop on the semantics and pragmatics of dialogue (pp. 143–152). SEMDIAL. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Timpe-Laughlin, V., & Dombi, J. (2020). Exploring L2 learners’ request behavior in a multi-turn conversation with a fully automated agent. Intercultural Pragmatics, 17 (2), 221–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tromp, J., Hagoort, P., & Meyer, A. S. (2016). Pupillometry reveals increased pupil size during indirect request comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69 (6), 1093–1108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsai, M.-H., & Kinginger, C. (2014). Giving and receiving advice in computer-mediated peer response activities. CALICO Journal, 32 (1), 82–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tudini, V. (2013). Form-focused social repertoires in an online language learning partnership. Journal of Pragmatics, 50 (1), 187–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Utashiro, T., & Kawai, G. (2009). Blended learning for Japanese reactive tokens: Effects of computer-led, instructor-led, and peerbased instruction. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), Pragmatic competence (pp. 275–299). Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Compernolle, R. A., Gomez-Laich, M. P., & Weber, A. (2016). Teaching L2 Spanish sociopragmatics through concepts: A classroom-based study. The Modern Language Journal, 100 (1), 341–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ward, N. G., Escalante, R., Al Bayyari, Y., & Solorio, T. (2007). Learning to show you’re listening. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20 (4), 385–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yeh, E., & Swinehart, N. (2019). Testing the waters: Developing interlanguage pragmatics through exploration, experimentation, and participation in online communities. CALICO Journal, 37 (1), 66–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Young, M. F., Slota, S., Cutter, A. B., Jalette, G., Mullin, G., Lai, B., Simeoni, Z., Tran, M., & Yukhymenko, M. (2012). Our princess is in another castle: A review of trends in serious gaming for education. Review of Educational Research, 82 (1), 61–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yus, F. (2001). Ciberpragmática. El uso del lenguaje en Internet. Ariel.Google Scholar