Article published in:
Asia-Pacific Language Variation
Vol. 8:1 (2022) ► pp. 32–71

Regional dialect leveling in Mandarin Chinese

The case of locative variation in the Chengdu dialect

| University of Pennsylvania
This paper studies the variation that stems from language contact between the suffix ‑tou, a locative marker in the Chengdu dialect spoken in Southwest China, and its standard Chinese counterpart ‑mian. The data are drawn from sociolinguistic interviews with 40 native speakers of the Chengdu dialect. It is shown that the standard Chinese form ‑mian has outnumbered ‑tou in terms of occurrence, suggesting a change in progress over apparent time that essentially involves a dialect leveling that results from language standardization and contact-induced convergence. Meanwhile, the two variants undergo certain stylistic reallocation and begin to serve new socio-stylistic roles. To our knowledge, this is the first study that systematically investigates the variation of Chinese locatives.
Keywords: Chengdu Mandarin, locative markers, dialect leveling, reallocation, morphosyntactic variation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Chengdu and its language: The social and linguistic background
  • 3.The envelope of variation: Chinese locative markers ‑tou and ‑mian
  • 4.An apparent-time study of (-tou, -mian) variation
    • 4.1Speakers
    • 4.2Data collection
      • 4.2.1Sociolinguistic interview
      • 4.2.2Picture description
      • 4.2.3Question-answering pairs
      • 4.2.4Questionnaire on language attitude
    • 4.3Coding and data analysis
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Change over time and the effects of gender and grammatical function on the change of ‑tou rate
    • 5.2Change of contextual style effect over time
    • 5.3Educational effect on the change of ‑tou rate
    • 5.4The role of language attitude
  • 6.Discussion
    • 6.1Change in progress vs. age-grading
    • 6.2Dialect-to-standard convergence
    • 6.3Morphological reallocation as a result of dialect contact
    • 6.4Gender dynamics in grammatical function
    • 6.5Gender dynamics in language attitude
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 14 February 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/aplv.20004.li
References
Auer, Peter
(1998) Dialect levelling and the standard varieties in Europe. Folia Linguistica, 32 (1–2), 1–9. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter, & Hinskens, Frans
(1996) The convergence and divergence of dialects in Europe. New and not so new developments in an old area. Sociolinguistica, 10 (1), 1–30. Available from CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter, Hinskens, Frans, & Kerswill, Paul
(Eds.) (2005) Dialect change: Convergence and divergence in European languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Mächler, Martin, Bolker, Ben, & Walker, Steve
(2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67 (1), 1–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard
(1933) Language. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre
(1977) The economics of linguistic exchanges. Information (International Social Science Council), 16 (6), 645–668. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Braga, Maria Luiza
(1982) Left-dislocation and topicalization in Capeverdean Creole. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Briggs, Charles L.
(1986) Learning how to ask: A sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interview in social science research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Britain, David
(2002) Diffusion, levelling, simplification and reallocation in past tense BE in the English Fens. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6 (1), 16–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Britain, David, & Trudgill, Peter
(1999) Migration, new-dialect formation and sociolinguistic refunctionalisation: Reallocation as an outcome of dialect contact. Transactions of the Philological Society, 97 (2), 245–256. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chao, Yuen-Ren
(1968, 2011) A grammar of spoken Chinese. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Panpan
(2016) “Tou”zhui de yanbian jiqi nengchanxing de bianhua yanjiu [A study on the development of the Chinese affix tou and the diachronic change of its productivity]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Minnan Normal University.
Chengdu Statistic Bureau
(2019) Chengdu statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistic Press. Retrieved from: http://​www​.chengdu​.gov​.cn​/english/
Cornips, Leonie, & Corrigan, Karen P.
(2005) Convergence and divergence in grammar. In Peter Auer, Frans Hinskens, & Paul Kerswill (Eds.), Dialect change: Convergence and divergence in European languages (pp. 96–134). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope
(2000) Linguistic variation as social practice: The linguistic construction of identity in Belten High. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Edwards, Viv, Trudgill, Peter, & Weltens, Bert
(1984) The grammar of English dialect: A survey of research. London: Economic and Social Research Council.Google Scholar
Feng, Lingyu
(2008) Hanyu “Mian” de cizhuihua kaocha [On affixation of “Mian” in Chinese]. Research in Ancient Chinese Language (03), 72–76.Google Scholar
Gao, Yan
(2006) Jindai hanyu cizhui “lao” “tou” “zi” de fazhan yanbian [The development and change of modern Chinese affixes: lao, tou, and zi ]. Journal of Education Institute of Taiyuan University, (S1), 37–39.Google Scholar
Guo, Xi
(2013) Zhongguo shehui yuyanxue [Sociolinguistics in China]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory R., & Boberg, Charles
(1997) Inherent variability and the obligatory contour principle. Language Variation and Change, 9 (2), 149–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
(2017) Grammaticalization. In Brain D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 573–601). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F.
(1958) A course in modern linguistics. New York: Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Michol F., & Walker, James A.
(2010) Ethnolects and the city: Ethnic orientation and linguistic variation in Toronto English. Language Variation and Change, 22 (1), 37–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Richard A.
(2000) Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Daniel E.
(2009) Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3 (1), 359–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kilbon, Omar L.
(1917) Chinese lessons for first year students in West China. Toronto: The Union University.Google Scholar
Kroskrity, Paul V.
(2000) Identity. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 9 (1), 111–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
(1963) The social motivation of a sound change. Word, 19 (3), 273–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1966) The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
(1972a) Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English vernacular, No.3. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
(1972b) Negative attraction and negative concord in English grammar. Language, 48 (4), 773–818. https://​www​.jstor​.org​/stable​/411989
(1990) The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change, 2(2), 205–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N., & Thompson, Sandra A.
(1981) Mandarin Chinese: A functional grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, Rong
(1957) Hanyu fangyan diaocha shouce [Report on Chinese dialects]. Beijing: Science Press.Google Scholar
Lü, Shuxiang
(1982) Xiandai hanyu yufa fenxi [Analysis of Modern Chinese grammar]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
McMahon, April. M. S.
(1994) Understanding language change. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, Lesley
(1980) Language and social networks. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley, & Gordon, Matthew
(2003) Sociolinguistics: Method and interpretation. Malden: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nakagawa, Shinichi, & Schielzeth, Holger
(2013) A general and simple method for obtaining R² from Generalized Linear Mixed-effects Models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4(2), 133–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Queen, Robin
(2013) Gender, sex, sexuality, and sexual identities. In J. K. Chambers & Natalie Schilling (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (pp. 368–87). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
(2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software manual]. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://​www​.R​-project​.org/
Sankoff, David
(1988) Problems of representativeness. In Ulrich Ammon, Norbert Dittmar, & Klaus J. Mattheier (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: An international handbook of the science of language and society (pp. 899–903). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David, & Laberge, Suzanne
(1978) The linguistic market and the statistical explanation of variability. In David Sankoff (Ed.), Linguistic variation: Models and methods (pp. 239–50). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sun, Chaofen
(2006) Chinese: A linguistic introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A.
(2006) Analyzing sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Variationist sociolinguistics: Change, observation, interpretation. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wang, Xuan
(2017) Investigating the role of speaker attitudes in koineisation in Hohhot, China. Asia-Pacific Language Variation, 3(2), 232–270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wardhaugh, Ronald, & Fuller, Janet M.
(2014) An introduction to sociolinguistics. Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wei, Yanling
(2007) Xiandai hanyu “tou” zhui yanjiu [A research into the suffix tou in Modern Chinese]. Unpublished master thesis, Sichuan University.
Weiner, E. Judith, & Labov, William
(1983) Constraints on the agentless passive. Journal of Linguistics, 19 (1), 29–58. https://​www​.jstor​.org​/stable​/4175664. Crossref
Wickham, Hadley
(2016) ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag. Retrieved from http://​ggplot2​.org. Crossref
Xiandai Hanyu Cidian
[Modern Chinese dictionary] (1983) Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
Xu, Daming
(2006) Yuyan bianyi yu bianhua [Language variation and change]. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press.Google Scholar
(2010) The formation of a speech community: Mandarin nasal finals in Baotou. In Marinus van den Berg & Daming Xu (Eds), Industrialization and the re-structuring of speech communities in China and Europe (pp. 120–40). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
(2012) Speech communities in transformation: The effects of linguistic urbanization in China. Plenary Speech at Sociolinguistic Symposium 19, Berlin, 21–24 August.
(2015) Speech community and linguistic urbanization: Sociolinguistic theories developed in China. In Dick Smakman & Patrick Heinrich (Eds.), Globalising sociolinguistics (pp. 95–106.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yin, Hailiang
(2008) Xiandai hanyu fangweilei houzhui “tou” he “mian” de renzhi kaocha [A cognitive investigation of modern Chinese suffixes tou and mian ]. Journal of Southeast University (Philosophy and Social Science), 10 (4), 120–122.Google Scholar
Zhang, Qing
(2005) A Chinese yuppie in Beijing: Phonological variation and the construction of a new professional identity. Language in Society, 34 ( 3 ), 431–466. https://​www​.jstor​.org​/stable​/4169435. Crossref