Article In:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics: Online-First Articles

Does gender-fair language matter?

Views from Filipino professional writers in English

ORCID logo | University of Santo TomasManila
Gender-fair language (GFL), a linguistic practice that aims to avoid gender bias or discrimination by using gender-inclusive terms, has been increasingly recognized in various contexts. Despite this growing recognition, the question of how Filipinos view the use of GFL in the workplace remains underexplored. The present study contributes to this evolving discourse by investigating the perceptions of Filipino professional writers in English toward GFL, an area that has received relatively minimal attention in the literature, particularly in more restrictive cultural contexts such as the Philippines. Using a qualitative survey with 34 Filipino professional writers, ten of whom participated in follow-up email interviews, I examine the views of these writers on GFL and the aspects that influence them in using GFL in writing. The findings demonstrate that while GFL is seen as positive for social change, practical and contextual considerations affect its use. Factors that facilitate GFL adoption are identified, such as confidence and awareness, commitment to gender equality, and professional growth. In contrast, hindering factors include cultural and ideological resistance, practical and linguistic challenges, and the lack of comprehensive GFL guidelines and resources.
Keywords: gender diversity, gender-fair language, inclusive language, professional writing in English, inclusive workplace
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Gendered and gender-fair language in the workplace
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Research design
    • 2.2Participants
    • 2.3Data collection and analysis
  • 3.Findings
    • 3.1Views on GFL
      • 3.1.1GFL as a conscious effort to make language more inclusive and respectful
      • 3.1.2GFL as a way to challenge gender norms and biases
    • 3.2Perceptions toward incorporating GFL in professional writing
      • 3.2.1GFL as an advocacy for inclusivity
      • 3.2.2GFL as an evolving and acceptable language for social transformation
      • 3.2.3Contextual and pragmatic considerations in GFL use
    • 3.3Aspects influencing GFL use in professional writing
      • 3.3.1Facilitating factors in incorporating GFL in professional writing
        • 3.3.1.1Favoring factors
          • 3.3.1.1.1Confidence in one’s knowledge and awareness of GFL (including self-evaluation)
          • 3.3.1.1.2Commitment to allyship for gender equality
        • 3.3.1.2Legitimating factor
          • 3.3.1.2.1Adopting GFL as part of one’s professional and personal growth
      • 3.3.2Hindering factors in incorporating GFL in professional writing
        • 3.3.2.1Cultural and ideological resistance
        • 3.3.2.2Practical and linguistic challenges
        • 3.3.2.3Lack of comprehensive resources and guidelines for using GFL
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Disclosure statement
  • Author queries
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (41)
References
APA. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Banegas, D. L., & López, M. F. (2021). Inclusive language in Spanish as interpellation to educational authorities. Applied Linguistics, 42 (2), 342–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baranowski, M. (2002). Current usage of the epicene pronoun in written English. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6 (3), 378–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Braun, V., Clarke, V., Boulton, E., Davey, L., & McEvoy, C. (2021). The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24 (6), 641–654. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bundesministerium für Frauen und Öffentlichen Dienst. (2009). Geschlechtergerechte Stellenausschreibungen [Gender-Fair Job Advertisements]. Unabhängiger Bericht der Gleichbehandlungsanwaltschaft iS §3 Abs 5 GBK/GAW-Gesetz, Wien.Google Scholar
CHED. (2015). CHED Memorandum Order No. 01 Series of 2015: Establishing the policies and guidelines on gender and development in the Commission on Higher Education and Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). [URL]
Darr, B., & Kibbey, T. (2016). Pronouns and thoughts on neutrality: Gender concerns in modern grammar. Pursuit, 7 (1), 71–84.Google Scholar
Formanowicz, M. M., Bedynska, S., Cislak, A., Braun, F., & Sczesny, S. (2013). Side effects of gender-fair language: How feminine job titles influence the evaluation of female applicants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43 (1), 62–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gustafsson Sendén, M., Lindholm, T., & Sikström, S. (2014). Biases in news media as reflected by personal pronouns in evaluative contexts. Social Psychology, 45 (2), 103–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hegarty, P., Watson, N., Fletcher, L., & McQueen, G. (2011). When gentlemen are first and ladies are last: Effects of gender stereotypes on the order of romantic partners’ names. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50 (1), 21–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hodel, L., Formanowicz, M., Sczesny, S., Valdrová, J., & von Stockhausen, L. (2017). Gender-fair language in job advertisements: A cross-linguistic and cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48 (3), 384–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horvath, L. K., & Sczesny, S. (2015). Reducing women’s lack of fit with leadership positions? Effects of the wording of job advertisements. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25 (2), 316–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huffman, A. H., Mills, M. J., Howes, S. S., & Albritton, M. D. (2021). Workplace support and affirming behaviors: Moving toward a transgender, gender diverse, and non-binary friendly workplace. International Journal of Transgender Health, 22 (3), 225–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
James, B. (2022). Gender-Related Language Trends in Online Written News: Comparative Corpus Analysis of Prescribed vs. Actual Usage (Bachelor’s thesis). Brigham Young University, Utah, USA. [URL]
Jaworski, A., & Coupland, N. (Eds.) (2014). The discourse reader. Routledge.Google Scholar
Lee, J. F. K. (2015). Chairperson or chairman?–A study of Chinese EFL teachers’ gender inclusivity. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 38 (1), 24–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lomotey, B. A. (2020). Exploring the adoption of gender-fair Spanish alternatives in school domains: An African university in focus. Sexuality & Culture, 24 1, 1082–1106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mavisakalyan, A. (2015). Gender in language and gender in employment. Oxford Development Studies, 43 (4), 403–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milroy, L. (1980). Language and social networks. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Paterson, L. (2011). Epicene pronouns in UK national newspapers: A diachronic study. ICAME Journal, 35 1, 171–184.Google Scholar
PCW. (2017). Gender-fair media guidebook. Philippine Commission on Women.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Lawrence Earlbaum and Associates. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pillay, P., & Maistry, S. (2018). The ‘firstness’ of male as automatic ordering: Gendered discourse in Southern African Business Studies school textbooks. The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 14 (2), a484. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pitura, J. (2023). Using the e-questionnaire in qualitative applied linguistics. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2 (1), 100034. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rea, L., & Parker, R. (2005). Designing and conducting survey research: A comprehensive guide (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Rich, A. (1980). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs, 5 (4), 631–660. [URL]. DOI logo
Sarrasin, O., Gabriel, U., & Gygax, P. (2012). Sexism and attitudes toward gender-neutral language: The case of English, French, and German. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 71 (3), 113–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sczesny, S., Formanowicz, M., & Moser, F. (2016). Can gender-fair language reduce gender stereotyping and discrimination? Frontiers in Psychology, 7 1, 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stormbom, C. (2020). Gendering in open access research articles: The role of epicene pronouns. English for Specific Purposes, 60 1, 193–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stout, J. G., & Dasgupta, N. (2011). When he doesn’t mean you: Gender-exclusive language as ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37 (6), 757–769. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Supreme Court of the Philippines. (2022). A.M. No. 21-11-25 SC: Guidelines on the use of gender-fair language in the judiciary and gender-fair courtroom etiquette.Google Scholar
Tarrayo, V. N. (2023). Gender-fair language in English language teaching: Insights from teachers in Philippine higher education institutions. Language and Education, 37 (4), 483–499. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Terry, G., & Braun, V. (2017). Short but often sweet: The surprising potential of qualitative survey methods. In V. Braun, V. Clarke, & D. Gray (Eds.), Collecting qualitative data: A practical guide to textual, media and virtual techniques (pp. 15–44). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tokarz, R. E., & Mesfin, T. (2021). Stereotyping ourselves: Gendered language use in management and instruction library job advertisements. Journal of Library Administration, 61 (3), 301–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Treharne, G. J. (2011). Questioning sex/gender and sexuality: Reflections on recruitment and stratification. Gay and Lesbian Issues and Psychology Review, 7 (2), 132–154.Google Scholar
UNESCO. (2011). Priority Gender Equality Guidelines. [URL]
Vervecken, D., Gygax, P. M., Gabriel, U., Guillod, M., & Hannover, B. (2015). Warm-hearted businessmen, competitive housewives? Effects of gender-fair language on adolescents’ perceptions of occupations. Frontiers in Psychology, 6 1, 1437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willis, M., & Jozkowski, K. N. (2018). Ladies first? Not so fast: Linguistic sexism in peer-reviewed research. The Journal of Sex Research, 55 (2), 137–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Linguistic sexism in peer-reviewed research influences recall but not perceptions. The Journal of Sex Research, 57 (3), 273–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X., & Yang, H. (2021). Gender voices in Chinese university students’ English writing: A corpus study. Linguistics and Education, 64 1, 100935. DOI logoGoogle Scholar