Article In:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics: Online-First ArticlesDoes gender-fair language matter?
Views from Filipino professional writers in English
Gender-fair language (GFL), a linguistic practice that aims to avoid gender bias or discrimination by using
gender-inclusive terms, has been increasingly recognized in various contexts. Despite this growing recognition, the question of
how Filipinos view the use of GFL in the workplace remains underexplored. The present study contributes to this evolving discourse
by investigating the perceptions of Filipino professional writers in English toward GFL, an area that has received relatively
minimal attention in the literature, particularly in more restrictive cultural contexts such as the Philippines. Using a
qualitative survey with 34 Filipino professional writers, ten of whom participated in follow-up email interviews, I examine the
views of these writers on GFL and the aspects that influence them in using GFL in writing. The findings demonstrate that while GFL
is seen as positive for social change, practical and contextual considerations affect its use. Factors that facilitate GFL
adoption are identified, such as confidence and awareness, commitment to gender equality, and professional growth. In contrast,
hindering factors include cultural and ideological resistance, practical and linguistic challenges, and the lack of comprehensive
GFL guidelines and resources.
Keywords: gender diversity, gender-fair language, inclusive language, professional writing in English, inclusive workplace
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Gendered and gender-fair language in the workplace
- 2.Method
- 2.1Research design
- 2.2Participants
- 2.3Data collection and analysis
- 3.Findings
- 3.1Views on GFL
- 3.1.1GFL as a conscious effort to make language more inclusive and respectful
- 3.1.2GFL as a way to challenge gender norms and biases
- 3.2Perceptions toward incorporating GFL in professional writing
- 3.2.1GFL as an advocacy for inclusivity
- 3.2.2GFL as an evolving and acceptable language for social transformation
- 3.2.3Contextual and pragmatic considerations in GFL use
- 3.3Aspects influencing GFL use in professional writing
- 3.3.1Facilitating factors in incorporating GFL in professional writing
- 3.3.1.1Favoring factors
- 3.3.1.1.1Confidence in one’s knowledge and awareness of GFL (including self-evaluation)
- 3.3.1.1.2Commitment to allyship for gender equality
- 3.3.1.2Legitimating factor
- 3.3.1.2.1Adopting GFL as part of one’s professional and personal growth
- 3.3.1.1Favoring factors
- 3.3.2Hindering factors in incorporating GFL in professional writing
- 3.3.2.1Cultural and ideological resistance
- 3.3.2.2Practical and linguistic challenges
- 3.3.2.3Lack of comprehensive resources and guidelines for using GFL
- 3.3.1Facilitating factors in incorporating GFL in professional writing
- 3.1Views on GFL
- 4.Discussion
- 5.Conclusion
- Disclosure statement
- Author queries
-
References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (41)
APA. (2020). Publication manual of the
American Psychological Association (7th ed.). American Psychological Association.
Banegas, D. L., & López, M. F. (2021). Inclusive
language in Spanish as interpellation to educational authorities. Applied
Linguistics,
42
(2), 342–346.
Baranowski, M. (2002). Current
usage of the epicene pronoun in written English. Journal of
Sociolinguistics,
6
(3), 378–397.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful
qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Sage Publications Ltd.
Braun, V., Clarke, V., Boulton, E., Davey, L., & McEvoy, C. (2021). The
online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research
Methodology,
24
(6), 641–654.
Bundesministerium für Frauen und Öffentlichen
Dienst. (2009). Geschlechtergerechte Stellenausschreibungen [Gender-Fair Job
Advertisements]. Unabhängiger Bericht der Gleichbehandlungsanwaltschaft iS §3 Abs
5 GBK/GAW-Gesetz, Wien.
CHED. (2015). CHED Memorandum Order
No. 01 Series of 2015: Establishing the policies and guidelines on gender and development in the Commission on Higher
Education and Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). [URL]
Darr, B., & Kibbey, T. (2016). Pronouns
and thoughts on neutrality: Gender concerns in modern
grammar. Pursuit,
7
(1), 71–84.
Formanowicz, M. M., Bedynska, S., Cislak, A., Braun, F., & Sczesny, S. (2013). Side
effects of gender-fair language: How feminine job titles influence the evaluation of female
applicants. European Journal of Social
Psychology,
43
(1), 62–71.
Gustafsson Sendén, M., Lindholm, T., & Sikström, S. (2014). Biases
in news media as reflected by personal pronouns in evaluative contexts. Social
Psychology,
45
(2), 103–111.
Hegarty, P., Watson, N., Fletcher, L., & McQueen, G. (2011). When
gentlemen are first and ladies are last: Effects of gender stereotypes on the order of romantic partners’
names. British Journal of Social
Psychology,
50
(1), 21–35.
Hodel, L., Formanowicz, M., Sczesny, S., Valdrová, J., & von Stockhausen, L. (2017). Gender-fair
language in job advertisements: A cross-linguistic and cross-cultural analysis. Journal of
Cross-Cultural
Psychology,
48
(3), 384–401.
Horvath, L. K., & Sczesny, S. (2015). Reducing
women’s lack of fit with leadership positions? Effects of the wording of job
advertisements. European Journal of Work and Organizational
Psychology,
25
(2), 316–328.
Huffman, A. H., Mills, M. J., Howes, S. S., & Albritton, M. D. (2021). Workplace
support and affirming behaviors: Moving toward a transgender, gender diverse, and non-binary friendly
workplace. International Journal of Transgender
Health,
22
(3), 225–242.
James, B. (2022). Gender-Related
Language Trends in Online Written News: Comparative Corpus Analysis of Prescribed vs. Actual
Usage (Bachelor’s thesis). Brigham Young University, Utah, USA. [URL]
Lee, J. F. K. (2015). Chairperson
or chairman?–A study of Chinese EFL teachers’ gender inclusivity. Australian Review of Applied
Linguistics,
38
(1), 24–49.
Lomotey, B. A. (2020). Exploring
the adoption of gender-fair Spanish alternatives in school domains: An African university in
focus. Sexuality &
Culture,
24
1, 1082–1106.
Mavisakalyan, A. (2015). Gender
in language and gender in employment. Oxford Development
Studies,
43
(4), 403–424.
Paterson, L. (2011). Epicene
pronouns in UK national newspapers: A diachronic study. ICAME
Journal,
35
1, 171–184.
Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical
applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Lawrence Earlbaum and Associates.
Pillay, P., & Maistry, S. (2018). The
‘firstness’ of male as automatic ordering: Gendered discourse in Southern African Business Studies school
textbooks. The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern
Africa,
14
(2), a484.
Pitura, J. (2023). Using
the e-questionnaire in qualitative applied linguistics. Research Methods in Applied
Linguistics,
2
(1), 100034.
Rea, L., & Parker, R. (2005). Designing
and conducting survey research: A comprehensive guide (3rd
ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Rich, A. (1980). Compulsory
heterosexuality and lesbian
existence. Signs,
5
(4), 631–660. [URL].
Sarrasin, O., Gabriel, U., & Gygax, P. (2012). Sexism
and attitudes toward gender-neutral language: The case of English, French, and German. Swiss
Journal of
Psychology,
71
(3), 113–124.
Sczesny, S., Formanowicz, M., & Moser, F. (2016). Can
gender-fair language reduce gender stereotyping and discrimination? Frontiers in
Psychology,
7
1, 1–11.
Stormbom, C. (2020). Gendering
in open access research articles: The role of epicene pronouns. English for Specific
Purposes,
60
1, 193–204.
Stout, J. G., & Dasgupta, N. (2011). When
he doesn’t mean you: Gender-exclusive language as
ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology
Bulletin,
37
(6), 757–769.
Supreme Court of the
Philippines. (2022). A.M. No. 21-11-25 SC: Guidelines on the use of
gender-fair language in the judiciary and gender-fair courtroom etiquette.
Tarrayo, V. N. (2023). Gender-fair
language in English language teaching: Insights from teachers in Philippine higher education
institutions. Language and
Education,
37
(4), 483–499.
Terry, G., & Braun, V. (2017). Short
but often sweet: The surprising potential of qualitative survey
methods. In V. Braun, V. Clarke, & D. Gray (Eds.), Collecting
qualitative data: A practical guide to textual, media and virtual
techniques (pp. 15–44). Cambridge University Press.
Tokarz, R. E., & Mesfin, T. (2021). Stereotyping
ourselves: Gendered language use in management and instruction library job
advertisements. Journal of Library
Administration,
61
(3), 301–311.
Treharne, G. J. (2011). Questioning
sex/gender and sexuality: Reflections on recruitment and stratification. Gay and Lesbian Issues
and Psychology
Review,
7
(2), 132–154.
UNESCO. (2011). Priority Gender Equality
Guidelines. [URL]
Vervecken, D., Gygax, P. M., Gabriel, U., Guillod, M., & Hannover, B. (2015). Warm-hearted
businessmen, competitive housewives? Effects of gender-fair language on adolescents’ perceptions of
occupations. Frontiers in
Psychology,
6
1, 1437.
Willis, M., & Jozkowski, K. N. (2018). Ladies
first? Not so fast: Linguistic sexism in peer-reviewed research. The Journal of Sex
Research,
55
(2), 137–145.