This ethnographic research probes into feedback on academic writing received by Taiwanese students in Australian higher education institutions, and examines whether the feedback received helped students to participate in the written discourse of academic communities. Academic writing dominates the academic life of students in Australia and is the key measure of their academic performance. This can be problematic for international students who speak English as an additional language and who are expected to acquire academic literacies in English ‘by doing’. As a social practice, academic writing depends on participation in dialogue for students to be included in the community of academia. However, the findings show that few participants received any useful feedback. Some assignments were never returned; in other cases, the hand-written feedback was illegible, and often included only overly general comments that puzzled the participants. As a result, the learning process came to an end once the students handed in their assignments; feedback failed to promote further learning related to content, and particularly to academic writing. The article highlights the few instances where participants received helpful feedback that was accessible and constructive, and which can be considered best practice for the promotion of academic literacy.
(2014) International student numbers 2013. Retrieved 24 July, 2014, from [URL].
Butorac, D. L.
(2011) Imagined identity, remembered self: Settlement language learning and the negotiation of gendered subjectivity (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Evans, C.
(2013) Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70–120.
Hansen, J. G.
(2000) Interactional conflicts among audience, purpose, and content knowledge in the acquisition of academic literacy in an EAP Course. Written Communication, 17(1), 27–52.
Hyland, F.
(2010) Future directions in feedback on second Language writing: Overview and research agenda. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 171–182.
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F.
(Eds.) (2006) Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hymes, D.
(1996) Report from an underdeveloped country: Toward linguistic competence in the United States. Ethnography, linguistics, narrative inequality: Toward an understanding of voice (pp. 63–105). London: Taylor & Francis.
Kubota, R., & Lehner, A.
(2004) Toward critical contrastive rhetoric. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(1), 7–27.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E.
(1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V.
(1998) Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157–172.
Leask, B., & Carroll, J.
(2011) Moving beyond ‘wishing and hoping’: internationalisation and student experiences of inclusion and engagement. Higher Education Research and Development, 30(5), 647–659.
Leki, I.
(2006) ‘You cannot ignore’: L2 graduate students’ response to discipline-based written feedback. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing (pp. 266–286). Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
Paltridge, T., Mayson, S., & Schapper, J.
(2012) Covering the gap: Social inclusion, international students and the role of local government. Australian Universities Review, 54(2), 29–39.
Piller, I., & Takahashi, K.
(2011) Linguistic diversity and social inclusion. International Journal of Bilingual Education & Bilingualism, 14(4), 371–381.
Roca de Larios, J., & Murphy, L.
(2010) Feedback in second language writing: An introduction. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), i–xv.
Storch, N.
(2010) Critical feedback on written corrective feedback research. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 29–46.
Tran, L. T.
(2009) Making visible ‘hidden’ intentions and potential choices: International students in intercultural communication. Language and Intercultural Communication, 9(4), 271–284.
Vygotsky, L. S., Hanfmann, E., Vakar, G., & Kozulin, A.
(2012) Thought and language (rev. and expanded ed.). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Wellington, J.
(2010) More than a matter of cognition: An exploration of affective writing problems of post-graduate students and their possible solutions. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 135–150.
Cited by
Cited by 6 other publications
Dimmock, Kay, Paul Weeks & Sally Ashton-Hay
2019. Voices from the coalface: Teaching in a highly diverse postgraduate tourism program. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education 24 ► pp. 70 ff.
Green, Simon
2019. What students don't make of feedback in higher education: An illustrative study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 38 ► pp. 83 ff.
Loo, Daron Benjamin
2021. Am I Promoting Feedback Cycle and Sociomaterial Learning?. Issues in Language Studies 10:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.