The acoustic properties associated with prominence (e.g. duration, F0) may also serve for “phonemic” contrasts. The question is thus how speakers correctly interpret these properties. We address this question in terms of an extension of the Functional Load Hypothesis (FLH): given that vowel length is contrastive in Hungarian, the FLH predicts that duration will not be the main cue to prominence (i.e. stress or focus). Based on a large, systematically collected corpus, we demonstrate that this is, in fact, the case; the main cue for both is pitch (F0), though its characteristics are different in the two cases. We also demonstrate that the vowel duration contrast is still present in the synchronic structure of Hungarian.
2005Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. [URL].
Chávez-Peón, Mario
2008Phonetic cues to stress in a tonal language: Prosodic prominence in San Lucas Quiaviní Zapotec. In Susie Jones (ed.). Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistics Accociation. [URL].
Chávez-Peón, Mario
2010The interaction of metrical structure, tone, and phonation types in Quiaviní Zapotec. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia dissertation.
Genzel, Susanne, Shinichiro Ishihara & Balázs Surányi
To appear. The prosodic expression of focus, contrast and givenness: A production study of Hungarian. Lingua.
1994 [Cited in Blaho & Szeredi. 2011]. A hangsúly [Stress]. In Ferenc Kiefer (ed.) Strukturális magyar nyelvtan: fonológia [A structural grammar of Hungarian: phonology]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. 393–467.
Kerek, Andrew
1971Hungarian metric: some linguistic aspects of iambic verse. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
Kornai, András & László Kálmán
1988Hungarian sentence intonation. In Harry van der Hulst & Norval Smith (eds.), Autosegmental Studies on Pitch Accent. 183–195. Dordrecht: Foris.
Lobanov, Boris M
1971Classification of Russian vowels spoken by different listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49. 606–608.
Mády, Katalin
2010Hungarian vowel quantity neutralisation as a potential social marker. Acta Linguistica Hungarica. 57(2-3). 67–188.
Mády, Katalin
2012Shortening of long high vowels in Hungarian: a perceptual loss? In Silvia Calamai, Chiara Celata & Luca Ciucci (eds.), Sociophonetics, at the crossroads of speech variation, processing and communication. Pisa, Italy: Edizioni della Normale. [URL]. DOI:
Mády, Katalin & Felicitas Kleber
2010Variation of pitch accent patterns in Hungarian. Paper presented at the 5th Speech Prosody Conference. Chicago, USA.
Mády, Katalin & Uwe D. Reichel
2007Quantity distinction in the Hungarian vowel system – just theory or also reality?Proceedings of the 16th ICPhS
. 1053–1056. Saarbrücken, Germany. [URL].
Mády, Katalin, Lasse Bombien & Uwe D. Reichel
2008Is Hungarian losing the vowel quantity distinction? In Rudolph Sock, Susanne Fuchs & Yves Laprie (eds.) Proceedings of the 8th International Seminar on Speech Production. 449–452. France: INRIA. [URL].
Magdics, Klára
1960 [Cited in Mády 2012]. A szóvégi magánhangzók rövidülése a köznyelvben [Shortening of word-final vowels in colloquial speech]. Nyelvtudományi Közlemények 62. 301–324.
Potisuk, Siripong, Jackson Gandour & Mary Harper
1996Acoustic correlates of stress in Thai. Phonetica 53. 200‐220.
Remijsen, Bert
2002Lexically contrastive accent and lexical tone in Ma’ya. In Carlos Gussenhoven & Natasha Warner (eds.), Laboratory Phonology 7. 585–614. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Siptár, Péter & Miklós Törkenczy
2000The Phonology of Hungarian. Oxford: University Press.
2012Syntax– prosody mapping, topic–comment structure and stress–focus correspondence in Hungarian. In Pilar Prieto & Gorka Elordieta (eds.) Prosody and Meaning. 35–71. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Szeredi, Dániel
2008Centralized vowels in Hungarian. In László Kálmán (ed.), Papers from the Mókus Conference. 51–62. Budapest: Tinta Publishing House.
Szinnyei, Josef
1912 [Cited in Blaho & Szeredi. 2011]. Ungarische Sprachlehre [Hungarian Language Teaching]. Berlin: Göschen.
Varga, László
2000 [Cited in Blaho & Szeredi. 2011]. A magyar mellékhangsúly fonológiai státusáról [On the phonological status of the Hungarian secondary stress]. Magyar Nyelvőr 124. 99–108.
Varga, László
2002Intonation and stress: evidence from Hungarian. Hempshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Forthcoming. Prominence, contrast and the functional load hypothesis: an acoustic investigation. In Rob Goedemans, Jeffrey Heinz & Harry van der Hulst (eds.) Accent and Stress Cambridge University Press
Vogel, Irene & István Kenesei
1987The interface between phonology and other components of grammar: the case of Hungarian. Phonology Yearbook 4. 243–263.
White, Laurence & Katalin Mády
2008The long and the short and the final: phonological vowel length and prosodic timing in Hungarian. In Plinio A. Barbosa, Sandra Madureira & César Reis (eds.),
Proceedings of the 4th Speech Prosody Conference
. 363–366. Campinas, Brazil.
2021. Prosodic prominence in a stressless language: An acoustic investigation of Indonesian. Journal of Linguistics 57:4 ► pp. 695 ff.
Kallio, Heini, Antti Suni & Juraj Šimko
2022. Fluency-related Temporal Features and Syllable Prominence as Prosodic Proficiency Predictors for Learners of English with Different Language Backgrounds. Language and Speech 65:3 ► pp. 571 ff.
Lunden, Anya, Jessica Campbell, Mark Hutchens & Nick Kalivoda
2017. Vowel-length contrasts and phonetic cues to stress: an investigation of their relation. Phonology 34:3 ► pp. 565 ff.
Surányi, Balázs & Gergő Turi
2018. Quantifier scope in sentence prosody?. Acta Linguistica Academica 65:2-3 ► pp. 385 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.