Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2018
Edited by Bert Le Bruyn and Janine Berns
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 35] 2018
► pp. 139–153

Voice and information structure in Surinamese Javanese

 | Radboud University
This paper examines the grammatical voice system of Indonesian and Surinamese Javanese speakers. Alongside Javanese, the Surinamese speakers also speak Sranantongo and Dutch. Studying the use of voice in both speaker groups shows that it depends both on givenness and animacy of arguments. This interacts with the speaker group. The Surinamese speakers were found to be less discourse-dependent, due to general language contact processes as well as convergence to Dutch and Sranantongo.
Keywords: Javanese, Sranantongo, language contact, grammatical voice
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Voice
    • 2.1Voice in Javanese
      • 2.1.1Morphology
      • 2.1.2Information structure
    • 2.2Voice in Dutch and Sranantongo
    • 2.3Research questions and predictions
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Stimuli and procedure
    • 3.3Transcription and analysis
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Overall results and modeling
    • 4.2Givenness and group
    • 4.3Givenness and animacy
  • 5.Discussion and conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 3 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00010.vil
References (22)
References
Arps, Ben, Els Bogaerts, Willem van der Molen, Ignatius Surpriyanto & Jan van den Veerdonk. 2000. Hedendaags Javaans. Semaian 20. Leiden: Leiden University, Opleiding Talen en Culturen van Zuidoost-Azië en Oceanië.Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker. 2015. “Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models using lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software 67(1): 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blust, Robert. 2013. The Austronesian languages. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Brickell, Timothy C. & Stefan Schnell. 2017. “Do grammatical relations reflect information status? Reassessing Preferred Argument Structure theory against discourse data from Tondano.” Linguistic Typology 21(1): 177–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, William D. 2005. “The richness of Madurese voice.” The many faces of Austronesian voice systems: some new empirical studies ed. by Malcolm Ross and I Wayan Arka, 197–220. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Duinhoven, A. M. 1988. “Passief en zinsfasering.” Forum der Letteren 291: 268–287.Google Scholar
Ewing, Michael C. 1999. “The Clause in Cirebon Javanese Conversation.” PhD diss., University of California.Google Scholar
Foley, W. A. & Robert D. Van Valin. 1984. Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gil, David. 2002. “The prefixes di- and N- in Malay/Indonesian dialects.” The history and typology of western Austronesian voice systems ed. by Fay Wouk and Malcolm Ross, 241–283. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Haeseryn, Walter, Kirsten Romijn, Guido Geerts, Jaap de Rooij & Maarten C. van den Toorn. 1997. Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. Groningen: Martinus Nijhoff uitgevers/Wolters Plantyn. [URL] (23 March, 2018).
Johanson, Lars. 2002. “Contact-induced change in a code-copying framework.” Language change: the interplay of internal, external and extra-linguistic factors ed. by Mari C. Jones & Edith Esch, 285–314. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moro, Francesca & Marian Klamer. 2015. “Give-constructions in Heritage Ambon Malay in The Netherlands.” Journal of Language Contact 8(2): 263–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poedjosoedarmo, Gloria R. 2002. “Changes in word order and noun phrase marking from old to modern Javanese: implications for understanding developments in western Austronesian ‘focus’ systems.” The history and typology of western Austronesian voice systems ed. by Fay Wouk & Malcolm Ross, 311–330. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Polinsky, Maria. 2008. “Gender under Incomplete Acquisition: Heritage Speakers’ Knowledge of Noun Categorization.” Heritage Language Journal 6(1): 40–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riesberg, Sonja. 2014. Symmetrical voice and linking in Western Austronesian languages. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skopeteas, Stavros, Ines Fiedler, Sam Hellmuth, Anne Schwarz, Ruben Stoel, Gisbert Fanselow, Caroline Féry & Manfred Krifka, eds. 2006. Questionnaire on Information Structure (QUIS): Reference Manual. vol.1 41. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.Google Scholar
Sorace, Antonella. 2011. “Pinning down the concept of ‘interface’ in bilingualism.” Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1(1): 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Villerius, Sophie. 2017a. “Developments in Surinamese Javanese.” Boundaries and bridges: multilingual ecologies in the Guianas ed. by Kofi Yakpo and Pieter Muysken, 151–178. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017b. “Het Surinaams-Javaans anno 2016.” Oso 36(1): 274–290.Google Scholar
Vruggink, Hein. 2001. Surinaams-Javaans – Nederlands Woordenboek. Leiden: KITLV Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winford, D. 1997. “Property items and predication in Sranan.” Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 12(2), 237–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar