Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2019
Edited by Janine Berns and Elena Tribushinina
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 36] 2019
► pp. 67–82
Part II: Selected papers presented at the Dutch Annual Linguistics Day of 2019

Posture verbs combined with past participles in Dutch

Fixed or productive patterns?

 | Leiden University
Dutch uses cardinal posture verbs (zitten ‘to sit’, staan ‘to stand’, and liggen ‘to lie’) for all sorts of purposes, many of which have received considerable research attention – like the posture progressive, e.g. zitten te lezen ‘lit. sit to read: to be reading’. This paper investigates a posture verb pattern in which a posture verb is combined with a past participle, e.g. zitten verstopt ‘lit. sit hidden: to be hidden’. Previous analyses disagree on whether these patterns correspond to a fixed set of combinations, or to a productive schema with semantic restrictions. By examining over 6,000 attestations of the pattern, this paper evaluates these competing accounts, concluding that the data point strongly at productivity.
Keywords: posture verbs, past participles, corpus linguistics, semantics, syntactic productivity, fixedness, locational, locativity, resultativity
Article outline
  • 1.A controversial posture verb pattern
  • 2.Tracking down CPV-PP-patterns
  • 3.Fixed or productive patterns?
    • 3.1Quantitative measures
    • 3.2Qualitative measure: Semantic coherence
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 5 November 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00024.bog
References (18)
References
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2006. “Predicting the productivity of argument structure constructions.” Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistic Society 321.467–478. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beliën, Maaike. 2016. “Exploring semantic differences in syntactic variation: Dutch komen ‘come’ with a past participle or an infinitive.” From Variation to Iconicity: Festschrift for Olga Fischer on the Occasion of her 65th Birthday ed. by A. Bannink & W. Honselaar, 17–32. Amsterdam: Pegasus.Google Scholar
Bogaards, Maarten. 2019a. De quotatieve sterrenhemel: Constellaties met echt, helemaal, zo en van . Paper presented at the annual Anéla/VIOT Juniorendag, 5 April, Ede. <[URL]>.
. 2019b. Sitting stuck and standing scribbled: Productivity, structure, and meaning of posture verbs combined with a complementive past participle in Dutch. MA thesis, Leiden University. <[URL]>.
. 2019c. “A Mandarin map for Dutch durativity: Parallel text analysis as a heuristic for investigating aspectuality.” Nederlandse Taalkunde 241. 157–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boogaart, Ronny. 1991. “Progressive aspect in Dutch.” Linguistics in the Netherlands 1991 ed. by F. Drijkoningen & A. van Kemenade, 1–9. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Broekhuis, Hans & Norbert Corver. 2015. Syntax of Dutch: Verbs and Verb Phrases. Volume 2. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brisau, André. 1969. “English progressive tenses and their Dutch equivalents.” Studia Germanica Gandensia 111.73–85.Google Scholar
Cornelis, Louise. 1997. Passive and Perspective. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Cornelis, Louise & Arie Verhagen. 1995. “Does Dutch really have a passive?” Linguistics in the Netherlands 1995 ed. by M. den Dikken & K. Hengeveld, 49–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Haeseryn, Walter, Kirsten Romijn, Guido Geerts, Jaap de Rooij & Maarten van den Toorn, eds. 1997. Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. Tweede, geheel herziene druk. Groningen: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Teun. 1988. “Small clause results.” Lingua 741.101–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lemmens, Maarten. 2002. “The semantic network of Dutch posture verbs.” The Linguistics of Sitting, Standing and Lying ed. by J. Newman, 103–139. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. “Aspectual posture verb constructions in Dutch.” Journal of Germanic Linguistics 171.183–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Zit je te denken of ben je aan het piekeren?” Nederlandse Taalkunde 201.5–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lemmens, Maarten & Dan Slobin. 2008. “Positie- en bewegingswerkwoorden in het Nederlands, het Engels en het Frans.” Verslagen van de Handelingen van de Nederlandse Academie voor Taal- en Letterkunde 1181.17–32.Google Scholar
Leys, Odo. 1985. “De konstruktie staan te + infinitief en verwante konstrukties.” Verslagen en Mededelingen van de Koninklijke Akademie voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde 31.265–277.Google Scholar
Oostdijk, Nelleke, Martin Reynaert, Véronique Hoste & Ineke Schuurman. 2013. “The construction of a 500-million-word reference corpus of contemporary written Dutch.” Essential Speech and Language Technology for Dutch: Results by the STEVIN-programme ed. by P. Spyns & J. Odijk, 219–247. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar