Article published In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2020
Edited by Elena Tribushinina and Mark Dingemanse
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 37] 2020
► pp. 2337
References (26)
References
Barbiers, Sjef. 1995. The syntax of interpretation, University of Leiden/HIL: PhD thesis.Google Scholar
. 2010. “Focus particle doubling.” Structure preserved. Studies in syntax for Jan Koster, ed. by Jan-Wouter Zwart and Mark De Vries. 21–29. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “Syntactic doubling and deletion as a source of variation.” Linguistic Variation in the Minimalist Framework, ed. M. Carme Picallo. 197–223. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef. 2012. “From modal particle to interrogative marker. A study of German denn .” Functional Heads, ed. by Laura Brugè, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro and Cecilia Poletto. 13–28. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. “Clitic denn and wh-movement.” Wiener Linguistische Gazette 821 [Festschrift für Martin Prinzhorn]: 1–11.Google Scholar
. 2018. “Criterial Freezing in the syntax of particles.” Freezing. Theoretical approaches and empirical domains, ed. by Jutta Hartmann, Marion Jäger, Andreas Konietzko and Susanne Winkler. 225–263. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. “Why doubling discourse particles?Linguistic variation: structure and interpretation, ed. by Ludovico Franco and Paolo Lorusso. 47–72. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef, and Hans-Georg Obenauer. 2011. “Discourse particles, clause structure, and question types.” The Linguistic Review 281: 449–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharya, Tanmoy, and Andrew Simpson. 2012. “Sluicing in Indo-Aryan: An investigation of Bangla and Hindi.” Sluicing: cross-Linguistic perspectives, ed. by Jason Merchant and Andrew Simpson. 183–218. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boone, Enrico. 2014. The syntax and licensing of gapping and fragments, University of Leiden: PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Broekhuis, Hans. 2018. “The syntax of Dutch gapping.” Linguistics in the Netherlands 2018, ed. by Janine Berns and Bert Le Bruyn. 19–33. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Broekhuis, Hans, and Norbert Corver. 2016. Syntax of Dutch. Verbs and verb phrases, volume 31. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. Syntax of Dutch. Coordination and Ellipsis. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Den Dikken, Marcel. 1995. “Extraposition as intraposition, and the syntax of English tag questions.” Unpublished ms. Free University (Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Hankamer, Jorge. 1971. Constraints on deletion in syntax, Yale University: PhD thesis.Google Scholar
. 1979. Deletion in coordinate structures. New York/London: Garland Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
Hentschel, Elke. 1986. Funktion und Geschichte der deutschen Partikeln: “Ja”, “doch”, “halt” und “eben”. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Kyle. 2009. “Gapping is not (VP-)ellipsis.” Linguistic Inquiry 401: 289–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. “Gapping.” The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax [2nd, revised edition], ed. by Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk. 1745–1783. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 1998. “Overt vs. covert movement.” Syntax 11: 128–191. Also published as chapter 13 in Parameters and universals. Oxford University Press 2000.Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence: sluicing, islands and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. “Fragments and ellipsis.” Linguistics and Philosophy 271: 661–738. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neijt, Anneke. 1979. Gapping. A contribution to sentence grammar, University of Utrecht: PhD thesis. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ott, Dennis, and Volker Struckmeier. 2018. “Particles and deletion.” Linguistic Inquiry 491: 393–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 1993. Dutch syntax. A minimalist approach, University of Groningen: PhD thesis.Google Scholar
. 1997. Morphosyntax of verb movement. A minimalist approach to the syntax of Dutch. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

McInnerney, Andrew
2024. Separability of dependents from VP in English: Beyond the argument/adjunct distinction. Journal of Linguistics  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Wallage, Phillip & Wim van der Wurff
2024. On analysing fragments: the case of No?. Linguistics DOI logo
Colley, Justin & Itai Bassi
2022. A prosodic theory of possible ellipsis remnants. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 7:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.