Article published in:Linguistics in the Netherlands 2015
Edited by Björn Köhnlein and Jenny Audring
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 32] 2015
► pp. 88–104
Crossover restrictions, A-bar pronouns and discourse antecedents
The difference between weak crossovers and weakest crossovers is usually derived from a distinction between quantifiers and non-quantifiers (Lasnik & Stowell 1991). In this paper I will derive crossover restrictions from a new example set, long movement constructions with Dutch A-bar pronouns. Besides question wh-pronouns and relative pronouns, the set of Dutch A-bar pronouns includes topic d-pronouns not available in English. I will argue that A-bar pronouns constitute a uniform set of quantifiers, be it quantifiers with a discourse antecedent. To explain the present analysis, I take Safir (2004) and Ruys (2004) as a starting point. A major difference between these approaches and my own is that my analysis will make a distinction between strong crossovers as binding failures versus weak and weakest crossovers as a matter of discourse dependency, whereas it is more usual to see a related explanation for strong and weak crossovers versus weakest crossovers.
Keywords: discourse antecedent, A-bar pronouns, topic d-pronoun, crossover restrictions
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at email@example.com.
Published online: 17 December 2015
Barbiers, Sjef, et al.
2012 Doubling in relative clauses. PhD diss., Utrecht University.
Broekhuis, Hans & Marcel den Dikken
Hinterwimmer, Stefan & Sophie Repp
2009 “Fixed Abode: What topical indefinites and wh-terms have in common”. Proceedings of NELS 38 ed. by M. Abdurrahman, A. Schardl & M. Walkow, 259–270. Amherst: GLSA Publications.
Kampen, Jacqueline van
1997 First steps in wh-movement. PhD diss. Utrecht Univerity.
1992 The scope of indefinites. PhD diss., Utrecht University.
1972 Anaphoric relations in English. PhD diss., MIT.