Article published in:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2015
Edited by Björn Köhnlein and Jenny Audring
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 32] 2015
► pp. 88104
References
Barbiers, Sjef, et al.
2005Syntactic Atlas of the Dutch Dialects, Volume 11. Amsterdam University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, Valentine
2001 “Antisymmetry and the leftness condition”. Studia Linguistica 551.1–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boef, Eefje
2012Doubling in relative clauses. PhD diss., Utrecht University.
Broekhuis, Hans & Marcel den Dikken
2012Syntax of Dutch: Nouns and noun phrases 2. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1981Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Falco, Michelangelo
2007 “Weak crossover, specificity and LF chains”. Coreference, Modality and Focus ed. by L. Eguren & O. Fernàndez-Soriano, 19–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Higginbotham, James
1983 “Logical form, binding and nominals”. Linguistic Inquiry 14:3.395–420.Google Scholar
Hinterwimmer, Stefan & Sophie Repp
2009 “Fixed Abode: What topical indefinites and wh-terms have in common”. Proceedings of NELS 38 ed. by M. Abdurrahman, A. Schardl & M. Walkow, 259–270. Amherst: GLSA Publications.
Karttunen, Lauri
1977 “Syntax and semantics of questions”. Linguistics and Philosophy 11.3–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kampen, Jacqueline van
1997First steps in wh-movement. PhD diss. Utrecht Univerity.
2007 “Relative agreement in Dutch”. Linguistics in the Netherlands ed. by Marjo van Koppen & Bettelou Los, 112–125. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 “Anaforische middelen voor topicverschuiving”. Nederlandse Taalkunde 15:2/3.189–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lasnik, Howard & Tim Stowell
1991 “Weakest crossover”. Linguistic Inquiry 221.687–720.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David
1987 “Wh-in-situ: movement and unselective binding”. The Representation of (In)definitess ed. by Eric Reuland & Alice ter Meulen, 98–129. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul
1971Crossover Phenomena. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
1993 “Remarks on weak crossover effects”. Linguistic Inquiry 241.539–556.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
2006Interface Strategies. Cambridge: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruys, Eddy
1992The scope of indefinites. PhD diss., Utrecht University.
2000 “Weak crossover as a scope phenomenon”. Linguistic Inquiry 311.513–539. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 “A note on weakest crossover”. Linguistic Inquiry 351.124–140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Safir, Ken
2004The Syntax of (In)dependence. Cambridge: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wasow, Thomas
1972Anaphoric relations in English. PhD diss., MIT.
Wiltschko, Martina
1997 “D-linking, scrambling and superiority in German”. GAGL 411.108–142.Google Scholar
1998 “On the syntax and semantics of (relative) pronouns”. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 21.143–181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crossover restrictions, A-bar pronouns and discourse antecedents