In this paper we studied the interpretation of sentences with the Dutch universal quantifiers alle (all) and elke (each) in collective, distributive and cumulative situations. In the first experiment, 25 adults and 30 children from 5 and 6 years old performed a truth-value judgement task. Adults and children show similar interpretations for collective and distributive, but perform different for cumulative. As a follow-up we performed a preference task. Participants gave their preferences for the three situations for both quantifiers. Children, regardless of the quantifier, prefer the distributive situation. Adults have a strong preference for distributive for elke, showing a wider range of interpretation for alle. These data clearly indicate that Dutch children do not yet have acquired the full range of restrictions for the quantifiers alle and elke.
1996What do children know about the universal quantifiers all and each?Cognition 601.235–268.
Brooks, P. & I. Sekerina
2006Shortcuts to quantifier interpretation in children and adults. Language Acquisition 131.177–206.
Drozd, Ken, Darinka Andjelkovi, Kristine Jensen de Lopez. et al.
In Preparation. Children’s Processing of Universal Quantification: A Cross-linguistic Study.
Gil, D
1982“Quantifier Scope, Linguistic Variation, and Natural Language Semantics”. Linguistics and Philosophy 51.421–472.
Inhelder, Bärbel
& Jean Piaget1964 The early growth of logic in the child, London: Routhledge.
loup, G
1975Some universals for quantifier scope. Syntax and Semantics 41.37–58.
Knezevic, Natasha
2014Distributivity and (inverse) scope. Presentation Workshop Nantes, University of Nantes. 23rd October, 2014.
Langacker, Ronald
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Stanford University Press. Stanford: California.
Musolino, J
2009The logical syntax of number words: Theory, acquisistion and processing. Cognition 1111.24–45
Roeper, T., U. Strauss & B. Pearson
2006The acquisition path of the determiner quantifier every: Two kinds of spreading. Current issues in first language acquisition 341.97–128.
Scha, Remko
1981Distributive, collective and cumulative quantification. Formal Methods in the Study of Language ed. by J.A.G. Groenendijk, T.M.V. Janssen and M.B.J. Stokhof, 483–512. Amsterdam: Mathematisch Centrum.
Syrett, K. & J. Musolino
2013Collectivity, distributivity, and the interpretation of plural numerical expressions in child and adult language. Language Acquisition 201.259–291.
Tunstall, Susanne
1998The interpretation of quantifiers: semantics and processing. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts PhD Dissertation.
Van der Ziel, Marie-Elise
2012The Acquisition of Scope Interpretation in Dative Constructions: Explaining children’s non-targetlike performance. Utrecht: Utrecht University PhD dissertation.
Van Koert, Margreet, Aafke Hulk, Olaf Koeneman & Fred Weerman
2015How Dutch Children Preferably Interpret Elk and how English Children Preferably Understand Every. The Proceedings of the 39d Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development.
Cited by
Cited by 4 other publications
Bosnić, Ana, Jennifer Spenader & Hamida Demirdache
2020. Dancing monkeys in Serbian and Korean – exhaustivity requirements on distributive share markers. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5:1
de Koster, Anna M. B., Petra Hendriks & Jennifer K. Spenader
2021. Child-Like Adults: Dual-Task Effects on Collective vs. Distributive Sentence Interpretations. Frontiers in Psychology 12
Shetreet, Einat & Rama Novogrodsky
2019. Differential Patterns of Children's Knowledge of Quantifier Meaning Revealed Under Different Tasks. Frontiers in Communication 4
Shetreet, Einat & Rama Novogrodsky
2020. Morphosyntactic Cues for Quantifier Comprehension in Children. Language Learning and Development 16:4 ► pp. 364 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.