Article published In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2015
Edited by Björn Köhnlein and Jenny Audring
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 32] 2015
► pp. 142154
References
Arregi, Karlos & Andrew Nevins
2012Morphotactics: Basque Auxiliaries and the Structure of Spellout. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 86. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Champollion, Lucas
2014 “The interaction of compositional semantics and event semantics”. Linguistics and Philosophy 38:1. 31–66. DOI logo9162-8Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald
1967 “The logical form of action sentences”. The logic of decision and action ed. by Nicholas Rescher, 81–95. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, Henry
2005 “On the syntax and semantics of negation in Salish”. International Journal of American Linguistics 71:1. 1–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forker, Diana
in preparation[a]. “The semantics of evidentiality and epistemic modality in Avar”. The semantics of verbal categories in Nakh-Daghestanian ed. by Diana Forker Brill’s Studies in Language, Cognition and Culture Leiden Brill
ed. in preparation[b]. The semantics of verbal categories in Nakh-Daghestanian. Brill’s Studies in Language, Cognition and Culture. Leiden: Brill.
in preparation[c]. “The semantics of verbal categories in Nakh-Daghestanian languages: Tense, aspect, evidentiality, mood/modality”. The semantics of verbal categories in Nakh-Daghestanian ed. by Diana Forker Brill’s Studies in Language, Cognition and Culture Leiden Brill DOI logo
Hale, Ken & Samuel Jay Keyser
2002Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kalinina, Elena J
1993 “Sentences with non-verbal predicates in the Sogratl dialect of Avar”. The noun phrase in the Andalal dialect of Avar as spoken at Sogratl’ ed. by Aleksandr E. Kibrik, 90–104. Eurotyp / Working papers / Theme 7. Strasbourg: Eurotyp Working Papers.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
2012Modals and conditionals: New and revised perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larson, Richard
1988 “On the double object construction”. Linguistic Inquiry 19:3. 335–392.Google Scholar
Moulton, Keir
2014 “Simple event nominalizations: Roots and their interpretation”. Cross-linguistic investigations of nominalization patterns ed. by Ileana Paul, 119–144. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, Maria, Nina Radkevich & Marina Chumakina
2014‘Agreement between arguments? Not really’. Unpublished ms., Harvard University/University of York/University of Surrey.Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian
2004 “Two types of negation in Bengali”. Clause structure in South Asian languages ed. by Veneeta Dayal and Anoop Mahajan, 39–66. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 61. Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008Verb meaning and the lexicon: a first phase syntax. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 116. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian & Peter Svenonius
2014 “Deriving the functional hierarchy”. Language Sciences 46B1. 152–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rudnev, Pavel
2015Dependency and discourse-configurationality: A study of Avar. PhD thesis. University of Groningen.
Salanova, Andrés Pablo
2007Nominalizations and aspect. PhD thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. URL: [URL].
Sauerland, Uli
2002 “The present tense is vacuous”. Snippets 61. 12–13.Google Scholar
von Uslar, Petr K
1889Аварскій языкъ [The Avar language] (Этнографія Кавказа. Языкознаніе. III). Тифлисъ [Tiflis]: Изданіе Управленія Кавказскаго Учебнаго Округа [The Caucasian Academic District Office Printing House].Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Rudnev, Pavel
2021. Against Upwards Agree. The Linguistic Review 38:1  pp. 65 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.