Article published In:
BabelVol. 61:1 (2015) ► pp.78–92
Venuti versus Nida
A representational conflict in translation theory
In western translation theories, Lawrence Venuti and Eugene Nida appear to be standing at too opposing poles regarding the equivalence theory, and are notable for their prominent disagreement on the issue. Their theories diverge in their responses to equivalence, and disagree, essentially, on the functions of translation as well as the aspects of an acceptable translation. This disagreement unfolded itself clearly during a conference at Binghamton University in 1991. In this essay, I intend to juxtapose the exceptionally different theoretical approaches of these two prominent translation scholars. I also intend to show how Venuti’s views on translation in practice challenges Nida’s theoretical approaches to translation, and surprisingly enough his own theories particularly speaking, foreignizing and domesticating translations in which he has been extensively engaged. Finally I intend to show how Venuti’s practice of translation challenges his earlier attack on Nida’s conceptions of the “dynamic equivalence,” “naturalness of expression” (Nida 1964: 159) and the notion of “the equivalent effect” (de Waard & Nida 1986: 9).
References
Baker, Mona
(ed) 2001 Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies. London: Routledge. 
Bassnett, Susan
1991 Translation Studies. London: Routledge.
Benjamin, Walter
1923 “The Task of the Translator” In Illuminations. Translation by Harry Zohn. New York: Schocken Books 1969.
Das, Samantak
2002 “Multiple Identities: Towards Sociology of Translation.” In Translation, Text and Theory: The paradigm of India, ed. by Rukmini Bhaya Nair, 35–45. New Delhi: Sage.
de Waard, Jan, and Eugene A. Nida
1986 From One Language to Another: Functional Equivalence in Bible Translating. Nashville: Thomas Nelson.
Gentzler, Edwin
. “Translation, Power, and Resistance.” (Lecture) Reinhardt Room, Binghamton University. Feb 20 2003.
Jonson, Ben, and William Gifford
1859 The Works of Ben Jonson. London, New York: Routledge.
Margala, Miriam
2002 “A Linguistic-Based Analysis of the Problem of Foreignizing versus Assimilation in Literary Translation.” [[URL]]
Nida, Eugene
1964 Toward a Science of Translating. Leiden: Brill.
Nida, Eugene, and Chr. R. Taber
1969 The Theory and Practice of Translation. Leiden: Brill.
Nida, Eugene
1996 “Translation: Possible and Impossible.” In Translation Perspectives IX: Translation Horizons: Beyond the Boundaries of Translation Spectrum, ed. by Marilyn Gaddis Rose, 7–23. Binghamton: State University of New York at Binghamton Press.
Ortega y Gasset, Jose
2000 “The Misery and the Splendor of Translation.” Translation by Elizabeth Miller. In The Translation Studies Reader, ed. by Lawrence Venuti, 49–63. London: Routledge.
Pym, Anthony
1995 “Schleiermacher and the Problem of Blendlinge.” Translation and Literature 4 (1): 5–30.
2010 “Translation Theory Today and Tomorrow: Reponses to Equivalence.” In Translationswissenschaft – Stand und Perspektiven, ed. by Lew N. Zybatow, 1–14. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. [[URL]]
Robinson, Douglas
1997 Western Translation Theory from Herodotus to Nietzsche. Manchester: St. Jerome.
2001 Who Translates: Translator’s Subjectivity beyond Reason. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Rebora, Piero, et al.
1958 Cassell’s Italian Dictionary. New York: Macmillan.
Rose, Marilyn Gaddis
1981 “Translation Types and Conventions.” In Translation Spectrum: Essays in Theory and Practice, ed. by Marilyn Gaddis Rose, 31–40. Binghamton: State University of New York at Binghamton Press.
1996 “Like the Paths around Combray, Humanistic Translation Theories Diverge and Converge.” In Translation Perspectives IX: Translation Horizons: Beyond the Boundaries of Translation Spectrum, ed. by Marilyn Gaddis Rose, 59–67. Binghamton: State University of New York at Binghamton Press.
1996 “The Matrix of Translation.” In Translation Perspectives IX: Translation Horizons: Beyond the Boundaries of Translation Spectrum, ed. by Marilyn Gaddis Rose, 1–6. Binghamton: State University of New York at Binghamton Press.
Schleiermacher, Friedrich
1977 “On the Different Methods of Translating.” In Translating Literature: The German Tradition from Luther to Rosensweig, ed. and trans. by Andre Lefevere, 67–89. Assen: Van Gourcum.
Venuti, Lawrence
1986 “The Translator’s Invisibility.” Criticism: A Quarterly for Literature and Arts 281: 179–212.
(ed) 1992 Rethinking Translation: Discourse, Subjectivity, Ideology. London: Routledge.
1993 “Translation as Cultural Politics: Regimes of Domestication in English.” Textual Practice 71: 208–223.
1995 The Translator’s Invisibility: A History of Translation. London: Routledge.
1996 “Translation as Social Practice: Or, the Violence of Translation.” In Translation Perspectives IX: Translation Horizons: Beyond the Boundaries of Translation Spectrum, ed. by Marilyn Gaddis Rose Binghamton, 195–213. Binghamton: State University of New York at Binghamton Press.
1998 The Scandals of Translation – Toward an Ethics of Difference. London: Routledge.
Translating Humor: Equivalence, Compensation, Discourse.” (Lecture) Reinhardt Room, Binghamton University. April 22, 2003.