Article published in:
Multimodality and Cognitive Linguistics
Edited by María Jesús Pinar Sanz
[Benjamins Current Topics 78] 2015
► pp. 61–78

Approaching the utopia of a global brand

The relevance of image schemas as multimodal resources for the branding industry

Increasingly global markets impose strains on the branding industry for the design of trademarks with a worldwide appeal. This paper explores the potential benefits of the exploitation of embodied schemata for this purpose. A corpus of international automobile brands is analyzed in search of the image schemas at work in the conceptualization of different car categories (i.e. minis, family cars, sports cars, and off-road 4 × 4s). Our findings evince that, together with other well-known strategies (i.e. sound symbolism), multimodal image schemas can be added to the inventory of branding tools which help to imbue brands with a globally comprehensible semantics. In the context of branding, it is also attested that the structure of the general schemas is fleshed out through their interaction with the most salient attributes of the target product/service named by a particular brand, rather than in relation to other contextual or cultural facts.
Keywords: branding, Cognitive Linguistics, image schemas, metaphor, metonymy
Published online: 15 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.78.05per
References
Clausner, T.C., & Croft, W
(1999) Domains and image schemas. Cognitive Linguistics, 10, 1–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cortés de los Ríos, M.E
(2001) Nuevas perspectivas lingüísticas en la publicidad impresa anglo sajona. Almería: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Almería.Google Scholar
Damasio, A
(1994) Descartes’ error. New York: GrossetPutnam.Google Scholar
Felices Lago, A., & Cortés de los Ríos, M.E
(2009) A cognitiveaxiological approach to print ecoadvertisements in the economist: the energy sector under scrutiny. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, 4, 59–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Finke, R., Pinker, S., & Farah, M
(1989) Reinterpreting visual patterns in mental imagery. Cognitive Science, 13, 41–78.Google Scholar
Forceville, C
(1998) Pictorial metaphor in advertising. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2007) Multimodal metaphor in ten Dutch TV commercials. Public Journal of Semiotics, 1, 19–51.Google Scholar
(2008) Pictorial and multimodal metaphor in commercials. In E.F. Mc Quarrie, & B.J. Phillips (Eds.), Go figure!: New directions in advertising rhetoric (pp. 272–310).Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R.W
(1999) Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural world. In R. Gibbs & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 145–166). Philadelphia/ Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J
(1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Grady, J
(1997) Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Ph.D. dissertation at the University of Berkeley.Google Scholar
(2005) Image schemas and perception. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 35–56). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hidalgo-Downing, L., & Kraljevic-Mujic, B
(2011) Multimodal metonymy and metaphor as complex discourse resources for creativity in ICT advertising discourse. In F. Gonzálvez García, S. Peña Cervel & L. Pérez Hernández (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy revisited beyond the Contemporary Theory of Metaphor (pp. 153–178). Special issue of Review of Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M
(1987) The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2005) The philosophical significance of image schemas. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 15–34). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kimmel, M
(2005) Culture regained: Situated and compound image schemas. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 285–312). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Properties of cultural embodiment: Lessons from the anthropology of the body. In M.F. Roslyn, R. Dirven, T. Ziemke & E. Bernardez (Eds.), Body, language and mind. Vol. 2. Socio-cultural situatedness (pp. 77–108). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Klink, R.R
(2001) Creating meaningful new brand names: A study of Semantics and sound symbolism. Journal of Marketing: Theory and Practice, 9, 27–34.Google Scholar
Koller, V
(2009) Brand images: multimodal metaphors in corporate branding. In C.J. Forceville & E. UriosAparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor(pp. 45–73). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G
(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R
(2000) Where Mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings Mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lowrey, T.M., & Shrum, L.J
(2007) Phonetic symbolism and brand name preference. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 406–414. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Núñez Perucha, B
(2003) Esquemas de imágenes y modelos populares: An estudio del lenguaje dela victimización en textos narrativos en lengua inglesa. Logroño: AESLA.Google Scholar
Ortiz, M.J
(2010) Visual rhetoric: Primary metaphors and symmetric object alignment. Metaphor and Symbol, 25(3), 162–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peña Cervel, M.S
(2000) A cognitive approach to the image schematic component in the metaphorical expression of emotions in English. PhD Dissertation. Universidad de La Rioja.Google Scholar
Pereltsvaig, A
(2011) “What’s in a name?”. Languages of the World (October 6 2011) http://​languagesoftheworld​.info​/etymology​/whatsinaname​.html.Google Scholar
Pérez Hernández, L
(2011) Cognitive tools for successful branding. Applied Linguistics, 32, 369–388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J
(2011) Metonymy and cognitive operations. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona & F.J. Ruiz de Mendoza (Eds.), What is metonymy?: An attempt at building a consensus view on the delimitation of the notion of metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 45–76). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, C., & Jensen de Lopez, K
(2000) Language, culture and the embodiment of spatial cognition. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 17–41.Google Scholar
Sweetser, E
(1990) From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Turner, M
(1991) Reading minds: The study of English in the age of Cognitive Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Umiker-Sebeok, J
(1996) Power and the construction of gendered spaces. International Review of Sociology, 6(3), 389–403. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Velasco Sacristán, M.S., & Cortés de los Ríos, M.E
(2009) Persuasive nature of image schematic devices in advertising: Their use for introducing sexisms. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 22, 239–270.Google Scholar