Cover not available
Part of
“Happiness” and “Pain” across Languages and Cultures
Edited by Cliff Goddard and Zhengdao Ye
[Benjamins Current Topics 84] 2016
► pp. 1–18

Exploring “happiness” and “pain” across languages and cultures

| Griffith University
| Australian National University

This chapter argues that the cross-linguistic study of subjective experience as expressed, described and construed in language cannot be set on a sound footing without the aid of a systematic and non-Anglocentric approach to lexical semantic analysis. This conclusion follows from two facts, one theoretical and one empirical. The first is the crucial role of language in accessing and communicating about feelings. The second is the demonstrated existence of substantial, culture-related differences between the meanings of emotional expressions in the languages of the world. We contend that the NSM approach to semantic and cultural analysis (Wierzbicka 1996; Gladkova 2010; Levisen 2012; Goddard 2011; Goddard and Wierzbicka 2014a; Wong 2014; among other works) provides the necessary conceptual and analytical framework to come to grips with these facts. This is demonstrated in practice by the studies of “happiness-like” and “pain-like” expressions across eight languages, undertaken in the present volume. At the same time as probing the precise meanings of these expressions, the authors provide extensive cultural contextualization, showing in some detail how the meanings they are analyzing are truly “cultural meanings”. The project exemplified by the volume can also be read as a linguistically-anchored contribution to cultural psychology (Shweder 2004, 2003), the quest to understand and appreciate the mental life of others in a full spirit of psychological pluralism.

Keywords: cross-linguistic semantics, happiness studies, language and culture., Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM), pain research
Published online: 26 July 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.84.01god
References
Allan, K
(2001) Natural language semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Apresjan, Ju
(2000) Systematic lexicography. [trans. Kevin Windle] Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, L.F., Mesquita, B., Ochsner, K.N., & Gross, J.J
(2007) The experience of emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 373–403. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Besemeres, M
(2002) Translating one’s self: Language and selfhood in cross-cultural autobiography. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bok, S
(2010) Exploring happiness: From Aristotle to brain science. New Haven: Yale University. (E-book).Google Scholar
D’Andrade, R
(1995) The development of cognitive anthropology. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diener, E., Lucas, R.E., & Oishi, S
(2002) Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. In C.R. Synder & S.J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 63–72). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Enfield, N.J., & Wierzbicka, A
(Eds.) 2002 The body in the description of emotion: Cross-linguistic studies . Special Issue of Pragmatics & Cognition, 10 (1/2).Google Scholar
Fehr, B. & Russell, J.A
(1984) Concept of emotion viewed from a prototype perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(3), 464–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gladkova, A
(2010) Russkaja kul’turnaja semantika: ėmocii, cennosti, žiznennye ustanovki [ Russian cultural semantics: Emotions, values, attitudes ]. Moscow: Languages of Slavonic Cultures. [in Russian]Google Scholar
Goddard, C
(2006) Ethnopragmatics: A new paradigm. In C. Goddard (Ed.), Ethnopragmatics: Understanding discourse in cultural context (pp. 1–30). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) Universals and variation in the lexicon of mental state concepts. In B. Malt & P. Wolff (Eds.), Words and the mind: How words capture human experience (pp. 72–92). New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Semantic analysis: A practical introduction. Revised 2nd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2012) Semantic primes, semantic molecules, semantic templates: Key concepts in the NSM approach to lexical typology. Linguistics 50(3), 711–743. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goddard, C. (with Zhengdao Ye
) (2015a) Ethnopragmatics. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and culture. Routledge.Google Scholar
Goddard, C
(2015b) Words as carriers of cultural meaning. In J.R. Taylor (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the word. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(Ed.) (2008) Cross-linguistic semantics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (2013) Semantics and/in social cognition. Special Issue of Australian Journal of Linguistics, 33(1).Google Scholar
Goddard, C., & Wierzbicka, A
(Eds.) (2002) Meaning and universal grammar—Theory and empirical findings. Vols I and II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014a) Words and meanings: Lexical semantics across domains, languages and cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2014b) Semantic fieldwork and lexical universals. Studies in Language, 38(1), 80–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harkins, J., & Wierzbicka, A
(Eds.) (2001) Emotions in crosslinguistic perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holland, D., & Quinn, N
(Eds.) (1987) Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hudlicka, E
(2003) To feel or not to feel: The role of affect in human-computer interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 59, 1–32.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z
(2000) Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lascaratou, C
(2007) The language of pain: Expression or description? Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lascaratou, C., Despotopoulou, A., & Ifantidou, E
(Eds.) (2008) Reconstructing pain and joy: Linguistic, literary, and cultural perspectives. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Levisen, C
(2012) Cultural semantics and social cognition. A case study on the Danish universe of meaning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McMahon, D
(2006) Happiness: A history. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press.Google Scholar
Moors, A., Ellsworth, P.C., Scherer, K.R., & Fridja, N.H
(2014) Appraisal theories of emotion: State of the art and future development. Emotion Review, 5(2), 119–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pavlenko, A
(2005) Emotions and multilingualism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (2006) Bilingual minds: Emotional experience, expression, and representation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Reid, T
1785 Essays on the intellectual powers of man. Edinburgh: John Bell. [Available on googlebooks] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russell, J.A
(1991) Culture and the categorization of emotion. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 426–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shore, B
(1996) Culture in mind: Cognition, culture and the problem of meaning. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shweder, R.A
(2003) Why do men barbeque? Recipes for cultural psychology. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2004) Deconstructing the emotions for the sake of comparative research. In A.S.R. Manstead, N. Frijda & A. Fischer (Eds.), Feelings and emotions: The Amsterdam symposium (pp. 81–97). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soloman, R.C
(1995) The cross-cultural comparison of emotion. In J. Marks & R.T. Ames (Eds.), Emotions in Asian thought: A dialogue in comparative philosophy (pp. 252–208). Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A
(1972) Semantic primitives. Frankfurt: Athenäum.Google Scholar
(1973) The semantic structure of words for emotions. In R. Jakobson, C.H. van Schooneveld & D.S. Worth (Eds.), Slavic poetics: Essays in honour of Kiril Taranovsky (pp. 499–505). The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998) “Sadness” and “anger” in Russian: The non-universality of the so-called “basic human emotions”. In A. Athanasiadou & E. Tabakowska (Eds.), Speaking of emotions: Conceptualisation and expression (pp. 3–28). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996) Semantics: Primes and universals. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1999) Emotions across languages and cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) English: Meaning and culture. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Russian cultural scripts: The theory of cultural scripts and its applications. Ethos, 30(4), 401–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Language and metalanguage: Key issues in emotion research. Emotion Review, 1(1), 3–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) Imprisoned in English: The hazards of English as a default language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wong, J.O
(2014) The culture of Singapore English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ye, Z
(2004) Chinese categorization of interpersonal relationships and the cultural logic of Chinese social interaction: An indigenous perspective. Intercultural Pragmatics, 1(2), 211–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Comparing the Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM) approach to emotion and the GRID paradigm. In J.J.R. Fontaine, K.R. Scherer & C. Soriano (Eds.), Components of emotional meaning (pp. 339–409). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoon, K-Y
(2004) Not just words: Korean social models and the use of honorifics. Intercultural Pragmatics, 1(2), 189–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Butter, Stella & Zuzanna Bułat Silva
2020. The Comfort of Home as an Ethical Value in Mike Packer’s Inheritance. In Studies in Ethnopragmatics, Cultural Semantics, and Intercultural Communication, ► pp. 85 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.