Article published in:
The Wealth and Breadth of Construction-Based Research
Edited by Timothy Colleman, Frank Brisard, Astrid De Wit, Renata Enghels, Nikos Koutsoukos, Tanja Mortelmans and María Sol Sansiñena
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34] 2020
► pp. 199–212

Pleonastic complex words as functional amalgams

| F.R.S.-FNRS | UCLouvain
| University of Colorado Boulder
Syntactic amalgams are innovative phrasal constructions that combine otherwise incompatible subparts of other constructions (Lambrecht 1988; Brenier and Michaelis 2005). We describe pleonastic formations like flavorize in English and ψηλαφ-ίζ(ω) [psilafízo] ‘palpate’ in Modern Greek as functional amalgams at the word level. We examine these formations through the lens of (function-oriented) Sign-Based Construction Grammar (Sag 2012), arguing that once we see derivational morphemes as signs, and sign combination as construction-driven rather than head-driven, we can describe such words as coercive combinations that serve a variety of semiotic functions.
Keywords: verbalizers, implicit multiple exponence, word-level amalgams, coercion, Modern Greek, English
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.IME in English and Modern Greek
  • 3.Headedness in morphology
  • 4.A SBCG approach to derivational suffixes
  • 5.Functional analysis of IME formations
    • 5.1Word-level amalgams
    • 5.2IME as construction-based selection
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 28 May 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.00046.kou
References

References

Acton, Eric K., and Christopher Potts
2014 “That Straight Talk: Sarah Palin and the Sociolinguistics of Demonstratives.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 18(1): 3–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anastasiadis-Symeonidis, Anna, and Elvira Masoura
2009 “Ληκτικό τεμάχιο και μνήμη. Μια θεωρητική πρόταση [Final constituent and memory. A theoretical approach].” In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Greek Linguistics, ed. by Georgios Giannakis, Mary Baltazani, George Xydopoulos, and Anastasios Tsangalidis, 616–634. Ioannina: University of Ioannina.Google Scholar
Arcodia, Giorgio Francesco
2012 “Constructions and Headedness in Derivation and Compounding.” Morphology 221: 365–397. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie
1990 “Beheading the Word.” Journal of Linguistics 261: 1–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Rochelle Lieber, and Ingo Plag
2013 The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert
2010 Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brenier, Jason M., and Laura A. Michaelis
2005 “Optimization Via Syntactic Amalgam: Syntax-Prosody Mismatch and Copula Doubling.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1(1): 45–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caballero, Gabriella, and Sharon Inkelas
2018 “A construction-based approach to multiple exponence.” In The construction of words. Advances in Construction Morphology, ed. by Geert Booij, 111–139. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chaves, Rui, Paul Kay, and Laura A. Michaelis
2020 Null Instantiation in Sign-Based Construction Grammar. Paper presented at HPSG-20 . Berlin.
Dixon, Richard W.
2014 Making New Words. Morphological Derivation in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fábregas, Antonio, and Francesca Masini
2015 “Prominence in Morphology: The Notion of Head.” Lingue e Linguaggio 14(1): 79–96.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles, and Paul J. Kay
1993 Construction Grammar Coursebook. Ms. University of California.Google Scholar
Gardani, Francesco
2015 “Affix Pleonasm.” In Word-formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, vol. 11, ed. by Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen, and Franz Rainer, 537–550. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele
2006 Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice
2017 Multiple exponence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1999 “Why Is Grammaticalization Irreversible?” Linguistics 37(6): 1043–1068. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1942 A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles (Part VI-Morphology, with the assistance of Paul Christophersen, Niels Haislund, and Knud Schibsbye). Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Koenig, Jean-Pierre, and Gail Mauner
2000 “A-definites and the Discourse Status of Implicit Arguments.” Journal of Semantics 161: 207–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koutsoukos, Nikos
2019 “Implicit Multiple Exponence in Modern Greek verbs.” Journal of word formation 3(2): 6–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2021 “Denominal Verb Formation in English and Modern Greek.” Languages in Contrast 21(1): 138–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1988 “Presentational Cleft Constructions in Spoken French.” In Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse, ed. by John Haiman, and Sandra A. Thompson, 135–179. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lawler, John M.
1974 “Ample Negatives.” Chicago Linguistic Society 101: 357–377.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2005 “Pleonasm and Hypercharacterization.” In Yearbook of Morphology 2005, ed. by Jaap Van Marle, and Geert Booij, 119–154. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
2008 “Roots, Stems and Word Classes.” Studies in Language 321: 546–567. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov
1957 “Diachronic Hypercharacterization in Romance.” Archivum Linguisticum 9(1): 79–113.Google Scholar
Michaelis, Laura
2003 “Headless Constructions and Coercion by Construction.” In Mismatch: Form-function Incongruity and the Architecture of Grammar, ed. by Elaine J. Francis, and Laura A. Michaelis, 259–310. Stanford University: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2013 “Sign-Based Construction Grammar.” In The Oxford handbook of construction grammar, ed. by Thomas Hoffmann, and Graeme Trousdale, 133–152. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moskal, Beata, and Peter W. Smith
(2019, April 26). The Status of Heads in Morphology. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Retrieved 20 Aug. 2020, from https://​oxfordre​.com​/linguistics​/view​/10​.1093​/acrefore​/9780199384655​.001​.0001​/acrefore​-9780199384655​-e​-583. Crossref
Newman, Paul
2000 The Hausa Language. An Encyclopedic Reference Grammar. New Haven/ London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo
1999 Morphological Productivity: Structural Constraints in English Derivation. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ralli, Angela
2005 Μορφολογία [Morphology]. Athens: Patakis Publications.Google Scholar
Riehemann, Susanne Z.
1998 “Type-based derivational morphology.” The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2(1): 49–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sag, Ivan
2012 “Sign-Based Construction Grammar: An Informal Synopsis.” In Sign-Based Construction Grammar, ed. by Hans C. Boas, and Ivan A. Sag, 39–170. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
van Eynde, Frank
2020 “Agreement, Disagreement and the NP vs. DP Debate.” Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 5(1): 65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Edwin
1981 “On the Notions “Lexically Related” and “Head of a Word”.” Linguistic Inquiry 12(2): 245–274.Google Scholar