Cover not available
Introduction published In:
The Semiotic Diversity of Language: The Case of Signed Languages
Edited by Alysson Lepeut and Inez Beukeleers
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 36] 2022
► pp. 1–15
Introduction

On the semiotic diversity of language

The case of signed languages

| University of Namur, NaLTT, LSFB-Lab
| KU Leuven

Language is complex in many respects. When conceived as a system that is to be analysed at all levels of linguistic structure, it is interpreted as a static and abstract phenomenon in which the rules are disconnected from their context of use. However, the ability to do language, construed as a fundamentally social practice grounded in our in situ face-to-face interactions, does not exclusively rely on knowing the rules that govern the grammatical principles in a given language, nor does it limit itself to understanding the lexical content of utterances. Language is more than that; it is fundamentally social and inherently multimodal in that it enables all humans to create, express, and construe meaningful utterances through their bodies. For a long time, however, linguistic theories have neglected to consider the diverse and rich ways humans do language using their bodies. In this introduction, particular attention is paid to the different roles the body plays across a range of distinct sign languages and contexts. In that respect, a short historical detour into the evolutive stages of sign language research is provided first. Next, the aims and the different contributions of this volume are outlined. Finally, some conclusions are drawn.

Keywords: sign language linguistics, sign language corpora, gesture studies, semiotics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1The early years of SL linguistics as a discipline
    • 1.2Post-modern SL linguistics
    • 1.3SL linguistics: Moving forward
  • 2.Overview of the volume
  • Note
  • References


This article is available free of charge.

Published online: 9 June 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.00069.int
References
Abuczki, Ágnes, and Ghazaleh Esfandiari Baiat
2013 “An Overview of Multimodal Corpora, Annotation Tools and Schemes.” Argumentum 91: 86–98.Google Scholar
Beukeleers, Inez, and Myriam Vermeerbergen
2022 “Show Me What You Have B/Seen: A Brief History of Depiction.” Frontiers in Psychology 131: 808814. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard
1933 Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Bono, Mayumi, Kikuchi Kouhei, Paul M. Cibulka, and Yutaka Osugi
2014 “A Colloquial Corpus of Japanese Sign Language: Linguistic Resources for Observing Sign Language Conversations.” In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), ed. by Nicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Thierry Declerck, Hrafn Loftsson, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Asuncion Moreno, Jan Odijk, and Slelios Piperidis, 1898–1904. Paris: ELRA.Google Scholar
Bressem, Jana, and Cornelia Müller
2014 “The Family of Away Gestures: Negation, Refusal, and Negative Assessment.” In Body – Language – Communication. An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction, ed. by Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill, and Jana Bressem, 1592–1604. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. Herbert
1996 Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuxac, Christian
1983 Le Langage des Sourds. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Dachkovsky, Svetlana, Christina Healy, and Wendy Sandler
2013 “Visual Intonation in two Sign Languages.” Phonology 30 (2): 211–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Vos, Connie
2013 “Sign-Spatiality in Kata Kolok: How a Village Sign Language in Bali Inscribes its Signing Space.” Sign Language and Linguistics 16 (2): 277–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, J. Nick
2009 The Anatomy of Meaning: Speech, Gesture, and Composite Utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fenlon, Jordan, and Julie Hochgesang
(eds) 2022 Signed Language Corpora. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Ferrara, Lindsay, and Gabrielle Hodge
2018 “Language as Description, Indication, and Depiction.” Frontiers in Psychology 91:716. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gabarró-López, Sílvia
2017 “Discourse Markers in French Belgian Sign Language (LSFB) and Catalan Sign Language (LSC): BUOYS, PALM-UP and SAME. Variation, Functions and Position in Discourse.” Ph.D dissertation. University of Namur.
Jaraisy, Marah, and Rose Stamp
2022 “The Vulnerability of Emerging Sign Languages: (E)merging Sign Languages?” Languages 71: 49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karlsson, Fred
1984 “Structure and Iconicity in Sign Language.” In Recent Research on European Sign Languages, ed. by Filip Loncke, Penny Boyes-Braem, and Yvan Lebrun, 149–155. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger B.V.Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam
2004 Gesture. Visible Actions as Utterances. Cambridge/New York: University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 “Semiotic Diversity in Utterance Production and the Concept of ‘Language’.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 3691: 1651. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kimmelman, Vladimir
2009 “Reflexive Pronouns in Russian Sign Language and Sign Language of the Netherlands.” MA dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Le Guen, Olivier
2019 “Emerging Sign Languages of Mesoamerica.” Sign Languages Studies 19 (3): 375–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lepeut, Alysson, and Emily Shaw
2022 “Time is Ripe to Make Interactional Moves: Bringing Evidence from Four Languages across Modalities.” Frontiers in Communication, 71:780124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liddell, K. Scott
2003 Grammar, Gesture, and Meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McBurney, Susan
2012 “History of Sign Languages and Sign Language Linguistics.” In Sign Language: An International Handbook, ed. by Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach, and Bencie Woll, 909–948. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEnery, Tony, and Andrew Hardie
2012 Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McKee, L. Rachel, Adam Schembri, David McKee, and Trevor Johnston
2011 “Variable Subject Expression in Australian Sign Language and New Zealand Sign Language.” Language Variation and Change 23 (3): 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meir, Irit, Wendy Sandler, Caroll Padden, and Mark Aronoff
2010 “Emerging Sign Languages”. In Oxford Handbook of Deaf Studies, Language, and Education, vol. 2, ed. by Mark Marschark, and Patricia E. Spencer, 267–280. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meurant, Laurence
2015 Corpus LSFB. First Digital Open Access Corpus of Movies and Annotations of French Belgian Sign Language (LSFB). [URL]
Murgiano, Margherita, Yasamin Motamedi, and Gabriella Vigliocco
2021 “Situating Language in the Real-World: The Role of Multimodal Iconicity and Indexicality.” Journal of Cognition 4 (1): 38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Özyürek, Asli, and Bencie Woll
2019 “Language in the Visual Modality: Cospeech Gesture and Sign Language.” In Human language: From genes and brain to behavior, ed. by Peter Hagoort, 67–83. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perniss, Pamela, Roland Pfau, and Markus Steinbach
2007 “Can’t You See the Difference? Sources of Variation in Sign Language Structure.” In Visible Variation. Comparative Studies on Sign Language Structure, ed. by Pamela Perniss, Roland Pfau, and Markus Steinbach, 1–34. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy
2003 “On the Complementarity of Signed and Spoken Languages.” In Language Competence across Populations: Toward a Definition of Specific Language Impairment, ed. by Yonata Levy, and Jeannette Schaeffer, 383–409. Mahwah, N.J./London: Elrbaum.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel
1996 “Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction.” In Grammar and Interaction, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel Schegloff, and Sandra Thompson, 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 “Overlapping Talk and the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language in Society 29 (1): 1–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schembri, Adam, David McKee, Rachel McKee, Trevor Johnston, Della Goswell, and Sara Pivac
2009 “Phonological Variation and Change in Australian and New Zealand Sign Languages: The Location Variable.” Language Variation and Change 21 (2): 193–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Emily
2019 “Gesture in Multiparty Interaction.” In Sociolinguistics in Deaf Communities 24, ed. by Jordan Fenlon. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Stokoe, William
1960 “Sign Language Structure: An Outline of the Visual Communication Systems of the American Deaf.” Studies in Linguistics, Occasional Papers 8. Buffalo, New York: University of Buffalo.Google Scholar
Tervoort, Bernard
1953 “Structural Analysis of Visual Language Use in a Group of Deaf Children.” PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Van Herreweghe, Mieke, Myriam Vermeerbergen, Eline Demey, Hannes De Durpel, Hilde Nyffels, and Sam Verstraete
2015 Het Corpus VGT. Een Digitaal Open Access Corpus van Video’s en Annotaties van Vlaamse Gebarentaal. Ontwikkeld aan de Universiteit Gent, i.s.m. KU Leuven. [The Corpus VGT. A Digital Open Access Corpus of Videos and Annotations of Flemish Sign Language. Developed at the University of Ghent, in Collaboration with KU Leuven]. [URL]
Vermeerbergen, Myriam
2006 “Past and Current Trends in Sign Language Research.” Language and Communication 26 (2): 168–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vermeerbergen, Myriam, and Anna-Lena Nilsson
2018 “Introduction”. In A Bibliography of Sign Languages 2008–2017, ed. by Anne Aarssen, René Genis, and Eline Van der Veken, 9–31. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Vermeerbergen, Myriam, and Eline Demey
2007 “Sign + Gesture = Speech + Gesture? Comparing Aspects of Simultaneity in Flemish Sign Language to Instances of Concurrent Speech and Gesture.” In Simultaneity in Signed Languages: Form and Function, ed. by Myriam Vermeerbergen, Lorraine Leeson, and Onno Crasborn, 257–282. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woll, Bencie
2003 “Modality, Universality, and the Similarities among Sign Languages: An Historical Perspective.” In Cross-linguistic Perspectives in Sign Language Research, ed. by Anne Baker, Beppie van den Bogaerde, and Onno Crasborn, 17–27. Hamburg: Signum Verlag.Google Scholar