Article published in:Computational Construction Grammar and Constructional Change
Edited by Katrien Beuls and Remi van Trijp
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30] 2016
► pp. 39–53
For a radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar
This squib first sketches the state-of-the-art in diachronic construction grammar by tracing it back to two strands of research which it distinguishes as historical construction grammar and constructionist grammaticalization theory. It then differentiates between usage-based work in diachronic construction grammar that focuses on (frequency of) use and work that centres on knowledge. It is posited that, to arrive at truly (radically) usage-based models of change, one should separate individual knowledge, or internal systems/constructicons, from assumed-to-be-shared knowledge, or external systems/constructicons. Two us-age-based models of constructional change, “Traugott/Trousdale” and “Fischer”, are assessed against this criterion. While the former explicitly distinguishes between individual and “community” knowledge, it is judged to confuse these by assigning a central role to reanalysis/neoanalysis. The latter model revolves around the role of analogy and is less confined to a semasiological account of the linear developments dictated by an external outlook.
Published online: 10 January 2017
Backus, Ad, Seza Doğruöz, and Bernd Heine
Barðdal, Jóhanna, and Spike Gildea[ p. 49 ]
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer, and Spike Gildea
Barlow, Michael, and Suzanne Kemmer
Bergs, Alexander, and Gabriele Diewald
Börjars, Kersti, Nigel Vincent, and George Walkden
Colleman, Timothy, and Bernard De Clerck
Colleman, Timothy, and Dirk Noël
Dąbrowska, Ewa[ p. 50 ]
De Smet, Hendrik, Lobke Ghesquière, and Freek Van de Velde
2014 “Usage-based Linguistics.” Oxford Bibliographies. (http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199772810/obo-9780199772810-0068.xml, last accessed on 26 February 2016).
Doğruöz, Seza, and Ad Backus
Goldberg, Adele E.
1990 “Constructional Borrowing and the Process of Factorization.” Unpublished manuscript. (www.princeton.edu/~adele/papers/Papers/Finished/Yiddish.doc, last accessed on 18 February 2016)
Heine, Bernd, Heiko Narrog, and Haiping Long[ p. 51 ]
Kemmer, Suzanne, and Michael Barlow
2013 “Grammaticalization in Diachronic Construction Grammar.” In Anais do IV Seminário Internacional do Grupo de Estudos Discurso & Gramática e XVII Seminário Nacional do Grupo de Estudos Discurso & Gramática: Teoria da gramaticalização e gramática de construções, ed. by Maria Angélica Furtado da Cunha, Edvaldo Balduíno Bispo, and José Romerito Silva, 5–12. Natal, RN, Brazil: UFRN.
Noël, Dirk, and Timothy Colleman
Pijpops, Dirk, Katrien Beuls, and Freek Van de Velde
Schmid, Hans-Jörg, and Annette Mantlik
Steels, Luc[ p. 52 ]
Torrent, Tiago Timponi
2015 “On the Relation between Inheritance and Change: The Constructional Convergence and the Construction Network Reconfiguration Hypotheses.” In Diachronic Construction Grammar, ed. by Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer, and Spike Gildea, 173–212. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, and Graeme Trousdale
2008a “Words and Constructions in Grammaticalization: The End of the English Impersonal Construction.” In Studies in the History of the English Language IV: Empirical and Analytical Advances in the Study of English Language Change, ed. by Susan M. Fitzmaurice, and Donka Minkova, 301–326. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
[ p. 53 ]
Van de Velde, Freek
Cited by 9 other publications
Norde, Muriel & Kristel Van Goethem
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.