Article published in:
Computational Construction Grammar and Constructional Change
Edited by Katrien Beuls and Remi van Trijp
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30] 2016
► pp. 265286
References

References

Amant, Robert St., Clayton Morrison, Yu-Han Chang, Paul Cohen, and Carole Beal
2006 “An Image Schema Language.” In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Cognitive Modelling (ICCM 2006), 292–297.Google Scholar
Baker, Christopher F., Charles J. Fillmore, and John B. Lowe
1998 “The Berkeley FrameNet project.” In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 86–90. Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, Michael, and Kemmer, Suzanne
2000Usage-Based Models of Language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Bergen, Benjamin K., and Nancy Chang
2005 “Embodied Construction Grammar in Simulation-based Language Understanding.” In Construction Grammar(s): Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman, and Mirjam Fried, 147–190. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boas, Hans C.
2001 “Frame Semantics as a Framework for Describing Polysemy and Syntactic Structures of English and German Motion Verbs in Contrastive Computational Lexicography.” In Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2001 conference, ed. by Paul Rayson, Andrew Wilson, Tony McEnery, Andrew Hardie, and Shereen Khoja, 64–73. Lancaster: University Centre for Computer Corpus Research on Language.Google Scholar
2005 “Semantic Frames as Interlingual Representations for Multilingual Lexical Databases.” International Journal of Lexicography 18 (4): 445–478. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bowerman, Margaret, and Sonja Choi
2001 “Shaping Meanings for Language: Universal and Language-specific in the Acquisition of Semantic Categories.” In Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development, ed. by Melissa Bowerman, and Stephen C. Levinson, 475–511. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 282 ]
2003 “Space under Construction: Language-specific Spatial Categorization in First Language Acquisition.” In Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought, ed. by Dedre Gentner, and Susan Goldin-Meadow, 387–427. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Nancy, Srini Narayanan, and Miriam R. L. Petruck
2002 “From Frames to Inference.” In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Scalable Natural Language Understanding, 478–484. Heidelberg: International Committee on Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Copestake, Ann
2002Implementing Typed Feature Structure Grammars. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Coventry, Kenny. R., Mercè Prat-Sala, and Lynn Richards
2001 “The Interplay between Geometry and Function in the Comprehension of Over, Under, Above and Below .” Journal of Memory and Language 44: 376–398. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
2001Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William, and D. Alan Cruse
2004Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dik, Simon
1992Functional Grammar in Prolog: An Integrated Implementation for English, French, and Dutch. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Nick, and Diane Larsen-Freeman
(eds) 2009Language as a Complex Adaptive System. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Elman, Jeffrey L., and Mary L. Hare
1997Single Mechanism = Single Representation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1985 “Frames and the Semantics of Understanding.” Quaderni di Semantica 6: 222–254.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk
2006 “Methodology in Cognitive Linguistics.” In Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives, ed. by Gitte Kristiansen, Michel Achard, René Dirven, and Francisco Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, 21–49. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk, Stefan Grondelaers, and Peter Bakema
1994The Structure of Lexical Variation: Meaning, naming, and context. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gerasymova, Kateryna, Luc Steels, and Remi van Trijp
2009 “Aspectual Morphology of Russian Verbs in Fluid Construction Grammar.” In Proceedings of the 31th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, ed. by N. A. Taatgen, and H. van Rijn, 1370–1375. Austin: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Gibson, Edward, and Evelina Fedorenko
2010 “Weak quantitative standards in linguistics research.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14: 233–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez-Marquez, Monica, Irene Mittelberg, Seana Coulson, and Michael J. Spivey
(eds) 2007Methods in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, Myma, and Martha Crago
1991 “Familial Aggregation of a Developmental Language Disorder.” Cognition 39: 1–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harnad, Stephen
1990 “The Symbol Grounding Problem.” Physica D 42: 335–346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, Stephan
2005 “The World as a Process: Simulations in the Natural and Social Sciences.” In: Modelling and Simulation in the Social Sciences from the Philosophy of Science Point of View, ed. by R. Hegselmann et al., 77–100. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
[ p. 283 ]
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide, and Javier Valenzuela
2010 “Language as a Complex System: A View from Cognitive Linguistics.” In Language as a Complex System: Interdisciplinary Challenges, ed. by Gemma Bel-Enguix, and M. Dolores Jiménez López, 3–38. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholar Press.Google Scholar
Jaeger, Jeri J., Alan H. Lockwood, David L. Kemmerer, Robert D. Van Valin, Vrian W. Murphy, and Hanif G. Khalak
1996 “A Positron Emission Tomographic Study of Regular and Irregular Verb Morphology in English.” Language 72: 451–497. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janda, Laura A.
2004 “A Metaphor in Search of a Source Domain: The Categories of Slavic Aspect.” Cognitive Linguistics 15: 471–527. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 “Semantic Motivations for Aspectual Clusters of Russian Verbs.” In American Contributions to the 14th International Congress of Slavists, Ohrid, September 2008, ed. by Christina Y. Bethin, 181–196. Bloomington: Slavica Publishers.Google Scholar
Joanisse, Mark F., and Mark S. Seidenberg
1999 “Impairments in Verb Morphology after Brain Injury: A Connectionist Model.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 96: 7592–7597. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mark
1987The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kay, Paul, and Charles J. Fillmore
1999 “Grammatical Constructions and Linguistic Generalizations: The What's X Doing Y? construction.” Language 75: 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George
1987Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
1999Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lecomte, Alain
2003 “A Computational Approach to Minimalism.” In Proceedings of ICON-2003, International Conference on Natural Language, 20–31. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.Google Scholar
Lemmens, Maarten
2002 “The Semantic Network of Dutch Posture Verbs.” In The Linguistics of Sitting, Standing and Lying, ed. by John Newman (Ed.), 103–139. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Loetzsch, Martin, Remi van Trijp, and Luc Steels
2008 “Typological and Computational Investigations of Spatial Perspective.” In Modeling Communication for Robots and Virtual Humans, ed. by Ipke Wachsmuth, and Günther Knoblich, 125–142. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mandler, Jean M.
1992 “How to Build a Baby II: Conceptual Primitives.” Psychological Review 99: 587–604. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 “The Spatial Foundations of the Conceptual System.” Language and Cognition 2: 21–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Majid, Asifa, Melissa Bowerman, Sotaro Kita, Daniel Haun, and Stephen C. Levinson
2004 “Can Language Restructure Cognition? The Case for Space.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8: 108–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M., and John A. Bateman
1991Text Generation and Systemic-Functional Linguistics: Experiences from English and Japanese. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
McClelland, James L.
2009 “The Place of Modeling in Cognitive Science.” Topics in Cognitive Science 1: 11–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 284 ]
Micelli, Vanessa, Remi van Trijp, and Joachim De Beule
2009 “Framing Fluid Construction Grammar.” In Proceedings of the 31th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, ed. by N. A. Taatgen, and H. van Rijn, 3023–3027. Austin: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Micelli, Vanessa, and Remi van Trijp
Submitted. “Information Structure in Grounded Embodied Agents.”
Michaelis, Laura
2013 “Sign-based Construction Grammar.” In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, ed. by Thomas Hoffman, and Graeme Trousdale, 133–152. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Piaget, Jean
1954The Construction of Reality in the Child. Translated by Margaret Cook. New York: Basic Books. Originally appeared as Piaget 1937, La construction du réel chez l'enfant.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven, and Alan Prince
1988 “On Language and Connectionism: Analysis of a Parallel Distributed Processing Model of Language Acquisition.” Cognition 28: 73–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plunkett, Kim, and Virginia Marchman
1993 “From Rote Learning to System Building – Acquiring Verb Morphology in Children and Connectionist Nets.” Cognition 48: 21–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rager, John, and George Berg
1992 “A Connectionist Model of Motion and Government on Chomsky's Government-binding Theory.” Connection Science 2: 35–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Regier, Terry
1996The Human Semantic Potential. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rumelhart, David, and James McClelland
1986 “On Learning the Past Tenses of English Verbs: Implicit Rules or Parallel Distributed Processing?” In Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, ed. by James McClelland, David Rumelhart, and the PDP Research Group, 216–271. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Seidenberg, Mark S., and James H. Hoeffner
1998 “Evaluating Behavioral and Neuroimaging Data on Past Tense Processing.” Language 74: 104–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shieber, Stuart M.
1986An Introduction to Unification-Based Approaches to Grammar. Volume 4. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Siskind, Jeffrey M.
2001 “Grounding the Lexical Semantics of Verbs in Visual Perception Using Force Dynamics and Event Logic.” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR) 15: 31–90.Google Scholar
Smith, Linda B., and Esther Thelen
2003 “Development as a Dynamic System.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7: 343–348. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Speelman, Dirk, Stefan Grondelaers, and Dirk Geeraerts
2003 “Profile-based Linguistic Uniformity as a Generic Method for Comparing Language Varieties.” Computers and the Humanities 37: 317–337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spranger, Michael, and Martin Loetzsch
2009 “The Semantics of SIT, STAND, and LIE Embodied in Robots.” In Proceedings of the 31th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, ed. by N. A. Taatgen, and H. van Rijn, 2546–2552. Austin: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Steels, Luc
1997 “Synthesising the Origins of Language and Meaning Using Co-evolution, Self-organisation and Level Formation.” In Approaches to the Evolution of Language: Social and Cognitive Bases, ed. by J. Hurford, C. Knight, and M. Studdert-Kennedy, 384–404. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
1998 “The Origins of Syntax in Visually Grounded Robotic Agents.” Artificial Intelligence 103: 133–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 285 ]
2000 “Language as a Complex Adaptive System.” In Parallel Problem Solving from Nature – PPSN-VI, ed. by Marc Schoenauer et al., 17–26. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 “Language Games for Autonomous Robots.” IEEE Intelligent Systems September/October 2001: 16–22.Google Scholar
2004 “Constructivist Development of Grounded Construction Grammars.” In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ed. by D. Scott, W. Daelemans, and M. Walker, 9–19. Barcelona: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
2005 “The Emergence and Evolution of Linguistic Structure: From Lexical to Grammatical Communication Systems.” Connection Science 17: 213–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steels, Luc, and Tony Belpaeme
2005 “Coordinating Perceptually Grounded Categories through Language: A Case Study for Colour.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28: 469–489. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Subirats-Rüggeberg, Carlos, and Miriam R. L. Petruck
2003 “Surprise: Spanish FrameNet!” In Proceedings of the Workshop on Frame Semantics, XVII International Congress of Linguists (CIL), Prague, Czech Republic, ed. by Eva Hajičová et al., CD-ROM. Prague: Matfyzpress.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
2003Constructing a Language: A Usage-based Theory of Language Acquisition. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ullman, Michael T., Suzanne Corkin, Marie Coppola, Gregory Hickok, John H. Growdon, Walter J. Koroshetz, and Steven Pinker
1997 “A Neural Dissociation within Language: Evidence that the Mental Dictionary is Part of Declarative Memory, and that Grammatical Rules are Processed by the Procedural System.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 9: 266–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Valenzuela, Javier
2010 “Cognitive Linguistics and Computational Modeling.” Textus 13: 763–794.Google Scholar
van Trijp, Remi
2008Analogy and Multi-Level Selection in the Formation of a Case Grammar. A Case Study in Fluid Construction Grammar. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Antwerp.Google Scholar
2010 “Cognitive Mechanisms Need to be Operationalized. Commentary on Sonia Cristofaro: Semantic Maps and Mental Representation.” Linguistic Discovery 8, Issue 1. Special Issue on Semantic Maps: Methods and Applications, edited by Michael Cysouw, Martin Haspelmath and Andrej Malchukov. Crossref.Google Scholar
Wellens, Pieter, and Joachim De Beule
2010 “Priming through Constructional Dependencies: A Case Study in Fluid Construction Grammar.” In The Evolution of Language (EVOLANG8), ed. by Andrew Smith, Marieke Schouwstra, Bart de Boer, and Kenny Smith, 344–351. Singapore: World Scientific. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zeschel, Arne
2008 “Introduction: Usage-based Models of Language Processing and Representation.” Cognitive Linguistics 19: 345–355. Crossref[ p. 286 ]Google Scholar