Chapter published in:
Second Language Acquisition Theory: The legacy of Professor Michael H. Long
Edited by Alessandro G. Benati and John W. Schwieter
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 14] 2022
► pp. 928
References
Ahmadian, M. J., & Long, M. H.
(Eds.) (2021) The Cambridge handbook of task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brezina, V., Weill-Tessier, P., & McEnery, A.
(2020) #LancsBox v. 5.x. [software]. Retrieved on 1 February 2022 from http://​corpora​.lancs​.ac​.uk​/lancsbox
De Bot, K.
(2015) A history of applied linguistics. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. H.
(Eds.) (2003) The handbook of second language acquisition. Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003) Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7 (3), 50–80.Google Scholar
Granena, G., & Long, M. H.
(2013) Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research, 29, 311–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Eds.) (2013) Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, J. E.
(2005) An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106 (46), 16569–16572. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. D., Long, M. H., & Scarcella, R. C.
(1979) Age, rate and eventual attainment in second language learning. TESOL Quarterly 13 (4), 573–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. H.
(1991) An introduction to second language acquisition research. Longman.Google Scholar
Lei, L., & Liu, D.
(2019) Research trends in applied linguistics from 2005 to 2016: A bibliometric analysis and its implications. Applied Linguistics, 40 (3), 540–561. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H.
(1975) Group work and communicative competence in the ESOL classroom. In M. Burt & H. Dulay (Eds.), On TESOL ’75: New directions in second language learning, teaching and bilingual education (pp. 211–23). TESOL.Google Scholar
(1980) Input, interaction and second language acquisition (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles.
(1981b) Input, interaction, and second language acquisition. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Native language and foreign language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379 , 259–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1981a) Questions in foreigner talk discourse. Language Learning, 31 (1), 135–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1983a) Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5 (2), 177–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1983b) Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4 (2), 126–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1983c) Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of research. TESOL Quarterly, 17 (3), 359–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1990a) Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12 (3), 251–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1990b) The least a second language acquisition theory needs to explain. TESOL Quarterly, 24 (4), 649–666. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991) Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (eds.). Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp 39–52). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.Google Scholar
(2005) Problems with supposed counter-evidence to the Critical Period Hypothesis. International Review of Applied Linguistics and Language Teaching, 43 (4), 287–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Problems in SLA. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2009) Methodological principles in language teaching. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of language teaching (pp. 373–394). Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2016) In defense of tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and real issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36 , 5–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H., & Crookes, G.
(1992) Three approaches to task-based language teaching. TESOL Quarterly 26 (1), 27–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H., & Porter, P.
(1985) Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19 (2), 207–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & Delgado López-Cózar, E.
(2018) Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics, 12 (4), 1160–1177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L.
(2021) In celebration of Michael H. Long (1945–2021). System. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serafini, E., Lake, J., & Long, M. H.
(2015) Needs analysis for specialized learner populations: Essential methodological improvements. English for Specific Purposes, 40 , 11–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Small, H.
(1973) Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 24 , 265–269.Google Scholar
Thomas, M.
(2013) The doctorate in Second Language Acquisition: An institutional history. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3 , 509–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L.
(2021) VOSviewer (1.6.17) [Computer software]. Universiteit Leiden. Retrieved on 1 February 2022 from https://​www​.vosviewer​.com/
Wang, L., & Zhang, L. J.
(2019) Chapter 8. Peter Skehan’s influence in research on task difficulty: A bibliometric analysis using CiteSpace. In Z. (Edward) Wen & M. J. Ahmadian (Eds.), Task-based language teaching (pp. 183–195). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Zhang, X.
(2020) A bibliometric analysis of second acquisition between 1997 and 2018. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42 , 199–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar