References
Abutalebi, J., & Green, D
(2007) Bilingual language production: The neurocognition of language representation and control. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 20(3), 242-275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Acosta Jr., E., & Richard Simon, J
(1976) The effect of irrelevant information on the stages of processing. Journal of Motor Behavior, 8(3), 181-187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R., Davidson, D., & Bates, D
(2008) Mixed-effects modelling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of memory and language, 59(4), 390-412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, D
(2005) Fitting linear mixed models in R. R news, 5(1), 27-30.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B
(2012) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes (2011). R package version 0.999375-42.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E
(2006) Effect of bilingualism and computer video game experience on the Simon task. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(1), 68-79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Bilingualism: The good, the bad, and the indifferent. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(01), 3-11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., & DePape, A
(2009) Musical expertise, bilingualism, and executive functioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(2), 565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F., & Luk, G
(2008) Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(4), 859. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Bilingualism: Consequences for mind and brain. Trends in cognitive sciences, 16(4), 240-250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F., Grady, C., Chau, W., Ishii, R., Gunji, A., & Pantev, C
(2005) Effect of bilingualism on cognitive control in the Simon task: Evidence from MEG. NeuroImage, 24(1), 40-49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F., Klein, R., & Viswanathan, M
(2004) Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: evidence from the Simon task. Psychology and aging, 19(2), 290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., Martin, M., & Viswanathan, M
(2005) Bilingualism across the lifespan: The rise and fall of inhibitory control. International Journal of Bilingualism, 9(1), 103-119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blumenfeld, H., & Marian, V
(2014) Cognitive control in bilinguals: Advantages in Stimulus-Stimulus inhibition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(3), 610-629. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, S., & Heathcote, A
(2005) A ballistic model of choice response time. Psychological review, 112(1), 117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) The simplest complete model of choice response time: Linear ballistic accumulation. Cognitive Psychology, 57(3), 153-178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buetti, S., & Kerzel, D
(2008) Time course of the Simon effect in pointing movements for horizontal, vertical, and acoustic stimuli: Evidence for a common mechanism. Acta Psychologica, 129(3), 420-428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Conflicts during response selection affect response programming: Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(3), 816. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coderre, E., & Van Heuven, W
(2014) Electrophysiological explorations of the bilingual advantage: Evidence from a Stroop task. PLoS ONE 9(7), e103424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costa, A., Hernández, M., & Sebastián-Gallés, N
(2008) Bilingualism aids conflict resolution: Evidence from the ANT task. Cognition, 106(1), 59-86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costa, A., Hernández, M., Costa-Faidella, J., & Sebastián-Gallés, N
(2009) On the bilingual advantage in conflict processing: Now you see it, now you don’t. Cognition, 113(2), 135-149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Jong, R., Liang, C., & Lauber, E
(1994) Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(4), 731. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donkin, C., Averell, L., Brown, S., & Heathcote, A
(2009) Getting more from accuracy and response time data: Methods for fitting the linear ballistic accumulator. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1095-1110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donkin, C., Brown, S., Heathcote, A., & Wagenmakers, E
(2011) Diffusion versus linear ballistic accumulation: different models but the same conclusions about psychological processes? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(1), 61-69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, M., Tartar, J., Padron, D., & Acosta, J
(2013) Neurophysiological marker of inhibition distinguishes language groups on a non-linguistic executive function test. Brain and Cognition, 83(3), 330-336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finkbeiner, M., & Heathcote, A
(2016) Distinguishing the time- and magnitude-difference accounts of the Simon effect. Perception and Psychophysics, 78, 848-867. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finkbeiner, M., Coltheart, M., & Coltheart, V
(2014) Pointing the way to new constraints on the dynamical claims of computational models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 40(1), 172-185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, V., Thomas, E., Kennedy, I., Prys, C., Young, N., Guasch, N., …& Jones, L
(2014) Does language dominance affect cognitive performance in bilinguals? Lifespan evidence from preschoolers through older adults on card sorting, Simon, and metalinguistic tasks. Frontiers in psychology, 5. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hedge, A., & Marsh, N
(1975) The effect of irrelevant spatial correspondences on two-choice response-time. Acta Psychologica, 39(6), 427-439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heidlmayr, K., Hemforth, B., Moutier, S., & Isel, F
(2015) Neurodynamics of executive control processes in bilinguals: Evidence from ERP and source reconstruction analyses. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hernandez, M., Costa, A., Fuentes, L., Vivas, A., & Sebastian-Galles, N
(2010) The impact of bilingualism on the executive control and orienting networks of attention. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(3), 315-325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilchey, M., & Klein, R
(2011) Are there bilingual advantages on nonlinguistic interference tasks? Implications for the plasticity of executive control processes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(4), 625-658. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karalunas, S., & Huang-Pollock, C
(2013) Integrating impairments in reaction time and executive function using a diffusion model framework. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41(5), 837-850. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karayanidis, F., Provost, A., Brown, S., Paton, B., & Heathcote, A
(2011) Switch‐specific and general preparation map onto different ERP components in a task‐switching paradigm. Psychophysiology, 48(4), 559-568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A
(1990) Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility: A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97(2), 253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kousaie, S., & Phillips, N
(2012) Conflict monitoring and resolution: Are two languages better than one? Evidence from reaction time and event-related brain potentials. Brain Research, 1446, 71-90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lu, C., & Proctor, R
(1995) The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2(2), 174-207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luk, G., Anderson, J., Craik, F., Grady, C., & Bialystok, E
(2010) Distinct neural correlates for two types of inhibition in bilinguals: Response inhibition versus interference suppression. Brain and Cognition, 74(3), 347-357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H., & Kaushanskaya, M
(2007) The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 940-967. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin-Rhee, M., & Bialystok, E
(2008) The development of two types of inhibitory control in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism Language and Cognition, 11(1), 81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marzecova, A., Asanowicz, D., Krivá, L., & Wodniecka, Z
(2013) The effects of bilingualism on efficiency and lateralization of attentional networks. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(3), 608-623. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N
(2012) The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions four general conclusions. Current directions in psychological science, 21(1), 8-14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morey, R., Rouder, J., & Jamil, T
(2014) Computation of Bayes factors for common designs. R package version 0.9, 7.Google Scholar
Ocampo, B., & Finkbeiner, M
(2013) The negative compatibility effect with relevant masks: a case for automatic motor inhibition. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 822. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oldfield, R
(1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97-113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paap, K., Johnson, H., & Sawi, O
(2014) Are bilingual advantages dependent upon specific tasks or specific bilingual experiences? Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26(6), 615-639. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pelham, S., & Abrams, L
(2014) Cognitive advantages and disadvantages in early and late bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(2), 313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poarch, G., & van Hell, J
(2012) Executive functions and inhibitory control in multilingual children: Evidence from second-language learners, bilinguals, and trilinguals. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113(4), 535-551. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prior, A., & Gollan, T
(2011) Good language-switchers are good task-switchers: Evidence from Spanish-English and Mandarin-English bilinguals. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17(4), 682-691. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prior, A., & MacWhinney, B
(2010) A bilingual advantage in task switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(2), 253-262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Proctor, R., Yamaguchi, M., & Vu, K
(2007) Transfer of non-corresponding spatial associations to the auditory Simon task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(1), 245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quek, G., & Finkbeiner, M
(2013) Spatial and temporal attention modulate the early stages of face processing: Behavioural evidence from a reaching paradigm. PloS one, 8(2), e57365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) Face-sex categorization is better above fixation than below: Evidence from the reach-to-touch paradigm. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14(4):1407-19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J
(1998) Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychological Science, 9(5), 347-356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., & McKoon, G
(2001) The effects of aging on reaction time in a signal detection task. Psychology and aging, 16(2), 323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., & Mckoon, G
(2003) A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging on brightness discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics, 65(4), 523-535. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raven, J., & Court, J
(1998) Raven manual: Section 4, Advanced Progressive Matrices. Oxford, UK: Oxford Psychologists.Google Scholar
Ridderinkhof, R
(2002) Micro- and macro-adjustments of task set: Activation and suppression in conflict tasks. Psychological research, 66(4), 312-323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salvatierra, J., & Rosselli, M
(2011) The effect of bilingualism and age on inhibitory control. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15(1), 26-37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmiedek, F., Oberauer, K., Wilhelm, O., Süβ, H.-M., & Wittmann, W
(2007) Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 414-429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, S., & Marian, V
(2012) A bilingual advantage for episodic memory in older adults. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24(5), 591-601. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon, J., & Rudell, A
(1967) Auditory SR compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51(3), 300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Song, J., & Nakayama, K
(2009) Hidden cognitive states revealed in choice reaching tasks. Trends in cognitive sciences, 13(8), 360-366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spivey, M., Grosjean, M., & Knoblich, G
(2005) Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(29), 10393-10398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, M., Janus, M., Moreno, S., Astheimer, L., & Bialystok, E
(2014) Early stage second-language learning improves executive control: Evidence from ERP. Brain and language, 139, 84-98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tao, L., Marzecová, A., Taft, M., Asanowicz, D., & Wodniecka, Z
(2011) The efficiency of attentional networks in early and late bilinguals: the role of age of acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 2. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Umiltà, C., Rubichi, S., & Nicoletti, R
(1999) Facilitation and interference components in the Simon effect. Archives italiennes de Biologie, 137(2), 139-149.Google Scholar
Wascher, E., Schatz, U., Kuder, T., & Verleger, R
(2001) Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(3), 731. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiegand, K., & Wascher, E
(2005) Dynamic aspects of stimulus-response correspondence: Evidence for two mechanisms involved in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(3), 453. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiseheart, M., Viswanathan, M., & Bialystok, E
(2016) Flexibility in task switching by monolinguals and bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(01), 141-146. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Woestenburg, J., Verbaten, M., Van Hees, H., & Slangen, J
(1983) Single trial ERP estimation in the frequency domain using orthogonal polynomial trend analysis (OPTA): Estimation of individual habituation. Biological Psychology, 17(2), 173-191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yow, W., & Li, X
(2015) Balanced bilingualism and early age of second language acquisition as the underlying mechanisms of a bilingual executive control advantage: why variations in bilingual experiences matter. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. DOI logoGoogle Scholar