Article published in:
Cognitive Control and Consequences of Multilingualism
Edited by John W. Schwieter
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 2] 2016
► pp. 397–426

Chapter 16. Time course differences between bilinguals and monolinguals in the Simon task*

| Macquarie University, Australia
| The University of Newcastle, Australia
| Macquarie University, Australia
In the Simon task, individuals need to indicate the colour of the target stimulus while ignoring its spatial location. The Simon Effect refers to the finding that participants respond more quickly when the target stimulus and response effector are spatially compatible compared to when they are not. Thus, to optimize performance in the Simon task, individuals need to ignore the task-irrelevant (spatial) information and attend to the task-relevant (colour) information. Interestingly, it has been reported that bilinguals are faster than monolinguals in the Simon task and that they exhibit a smaller Simon effect. The present study investigates whether this so-called bilingual advantage is due to bilinguals being better at ignoring task-irrelevant information, or better at activating task-relevant information, or both. In a button-press version of the task, we do not observe a bilingual advantage, but in a reach-to-touch paradigm, we find that bilinguals suppress task-irrelevant information for longer and activate task-relevant information sooner.
Published online: 03 August 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.2.17nar
References

References

Abutalebi, J., & Green, D.
(2007) Bilingual language production: The neurocognition of language representation and control. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 20(3), 242-275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Acosta Jr., E., & Richard Simon, J.
(1976) The effect of irrelevant information on the stages of processing. Journal of Motor Behavior, 8(3), 181-187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R., Davidson, D., & Bates, D.
(2008) Mixed-effects modelling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of memory and language, 59(4), 390-412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D.
(2005) Fitting linear mixed models in R. R news, 5(1), 27-30.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B.
(2012) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes (2011). R package version 0.999375-42.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E.
(2006) Effect of bilingualism and computer video game experience on the Simon task. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(1), 68-79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Bilingualism: The good, the bad, and the indifferent. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(01), 3-11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., & DePape, A.
(2009) Musical expertise, bilingualism, and executive functioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(2), 565. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F., & Luk, G.
(2008) Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(4), 859. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Bilingualism: Consequences for mind and brain. Trends in cognitive sciences, 16(4), 240-250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F., Grady, C., Chau, W., Ishii, R., Gunji, A., & Pantev, C.
(2005) Effect of bilingualism on cognitive control in the Simon task: Evidence from MEG. NeuroImage, 24(1), 40-49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F., Klein, R., & Viswanathan, M.
(2004) Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: evidence from the Simon task. Psychology and aging, 19(2), 290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., Martin, M., & Viswanathan, M.
(2005) Bilingualism across the lifespan: The rise and fall of inhibitory control. International Journal of Bilingualism, 9(1), 103-119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blumenfeld, H., & Marian, V.
(2014) Cognitive control in bilinguals: Advantages in Stimulus-Stimulus inhibition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(3), 610-629. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S., & Heathcote, A.
(2005) A ballistic model of choice response time. Psychological review, 112(1), 117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) The simplest complete model of choice response time: Linear ballistic accumulation. Cognitive Psychology, 57(3), 153-178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Buetti, S., & Kerzel, D.
(2008) Time course of the Simon effect in pointing movements for horizontal, vertical, and acoustic stimuli: Evidence for a common mechanism. Acta Psychologica, 129(3), 420-428. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Conflicts during response selection affect response programming: Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(3), 816. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coderre, E., & Van Heuven, W.
(2014) Electrophysiological explorations of the bilingual advantage: Evidence from a Stroop task. PLoS ONE 9(7), e103424. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Costa, A., Hernández, M., & Sebastián-Gallés, N.
(2008) Bilingualism aids conflict resolution: Evidence from the ANT task. Cognition, 106(1), 59-86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Costa, A., Hernández, M., Costa-Faidella, J., & Sebastián-Gallés, N.
(2009) On the bilingual advantage in conflict processing: Now you see it, now you don’t. Cognition, 113(2), 135-149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, R., Liang, C., & Lauber, E.
(1994) Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(4), 731. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Donkin, C., Averell, L., Brown, S., & Heathcote, A.
(2009) Getting more from accuracy and response time data: Methods for fitting the linear ballistic accumulator. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1095-1110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Donkin, C., Brown, S., Heathcote, A., & Wagenmakers, E.
(2011) Diffusion versus linear ballistic accumulation: different models but the same conclusions about psychological processes? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(1), 61-69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, M., Tartar, J., Padron, D., & Acosta, J.
(2013) Neurophysiological marker of inhibition distinguishes language groups on a non-linguistic executive function test. Brain and Cognition, 83(3), 330-336. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Finkbeiner, M., & Heathcote, A.
(2016) Distinguishing the time- and magnitude-difference accounts of the Simon effect. Perception and Psychophysics, 78, 848-867. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Finkbeiner, M., Coltheart, M., & Coltheart, V.
(2014) Pointing the way to new constraints on the dynamical claims of computational models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 40(1), 172-185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, V., Thomas, E., Kennedy, I., Prys, C., Young, N., Guasch, N., …& Jones, L.
(2014) Does language dominance affect cognitive performance in bilinguals? Lifespan evidence from preschoolers through older adults on card sorting, Simon, and metalinguistic tasks. Frontiers in psychology, 5. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hedge, A., & Marsh, N.
(1975) The effect of irrelevant spatial correspondences on two-choice response-time. Acta Psychologica, 39(6), 427-439. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heidlmayr, K., Hemforth, B., Moutier, S., & Isel, F.
(2015) Neurodynamics of executive control processes in bilinguals: Evidence from ERP and source reconstruction analyses. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hernandez, M., Costa, A., Fuentes, L., Vivas, A., & Sebastian-Galles, N.
(2010) The impact of bilingualism on the executive control and orienting networks of attention. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(3), 315-325. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hilchey, M., & Klein, R.
(2011) Are there bilingual advantages on nonlinguistic interference tasks? Implications for the plasticity of executive control processes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(4), 625-658. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Karalunas, S., & Huang-Pollock, C.
(2013) Integrating impairments in reaction time and executive function using a diffusion model framework. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41(5), 837-850. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Karayanidis, F., Provost, A., Brown, S., Paton, B., & Heathcote, A.
(2011) Switch‐specific and general preparation map onto different ERP components in a task‐switching paradigm. Psychophysiology, 48(4), 559-568. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A.
(1990) Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility: A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97(2), 253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kousaie, S., & Phillips, N.
(2012) Conflict monitoring and resolution: Are two languages better than one? Evidence from reaction time and event-related brain potentials. Brain Research, 1446, 71-90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lu, C., & Proctor, R.
(1995) The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2(2), 174-207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luk, G., Anderson, J., Craik, F., Grady, C., & Bialystok, E.
(2010) Distinct neural correlates for two types of inhibition in bilinguals: Response inhibition versus interference suppression. Brain and Cognition, 74(3), 347-357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H., & Kaushanskaya, M.
(2007) The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 940-967. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin-Rhee, M., & Bialystok, E.
(2008) The development of two types of inhibitory control in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism Language and Cognition, 11(1), 81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marzecova, A., Asanowicz, D., Krivá, L., & Wodniecka, Z.
(2013) The effects of bilingualism on efficiency and lateralization of attentional networks. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(3), 608-623. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N.
(2012) The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions four general conclusions. Current directions in psychological science, 21(1), 8-14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morey, R., Rouder, J., & Jamil, T.
(2014) Computation of Bayes factors for common designs. R package version 0.9, 7.Google Scholar
Ocampo, B., & Finkbeiner, M.
(2013) The negative compatibility effect with relevant masks: a case for automatic motor inhibition. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 822. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oldfield, R.
(1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97-113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paap, K., Johnson, H., & Sawi, O.
(2014) Are bilingual advantages dependent upon specific tasks or specific bilingual experiences? Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26(6), 615-639. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pelham, S., & Abrams, L.
(2014) Cognitive advantages and disadvantages in early and late bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(2), 313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poarch, G., & van Hell, J.
(2012) Executive functions and inhibitory control in multilingual children: Evidence from second-language learners, bilinguals, and trilinguals. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113(4), 535-551. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prior, A., & Gollan, T.
(2011) Good language-switchers are good task-switchers: Evidence from Spanish-English and Mandarin-English bilinguals. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17(4), 682-691. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prior, A., & MacWhinney, B.
(2010) A bilingual advantage in task switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(2), 253-262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Proctor, R., Yamaguchi, M., & Vu, K.
(2007) Transfer of non-corresponding spatial associations to the auditory Simon task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(1), 245. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quek, G., & Finkbeiner, M.
(2013) Spatial and temporal attention modulate the early stages of face processing: Behavioural evidence from a reaching paradigm. PloS one, 8(2), e57365. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Face-sex categorization is better above fixation than below: Evidence from the reach-to-touch paradigm. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14(4):1407-19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J.
(1998) Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychological Science, 9(5), 347-356. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., & McKoon, G.
(2001) The effects of aging on reaction time in a signal detection task. Psychology and aging, 16(2), 323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., & Mckoon, G.
(2003) A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging on brightness discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics, 65(4), 523-535. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Raven, J., & Court, J.
(1998) Raven manual: Section 4, Advanced Progressive Matrices. Oxford, UK: Oxford Psychologists.Google Scholar
Ridderinkhof, R.
(2002) Micro- and macro-adjustments of task set: Activation and suppression in conflict tasks. Psychological research, 66(4), 312-323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salvatierra, J., & Rosselli, M.
(2011) The effect of bilingualism and age on inhibitory control. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15(1), 26-37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmiedek, F., Oberauer, K., Wilhelm, O., Süβ, H.-M., & Wittmann, W.
(2007) Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 414-429. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, S., & Marian, V.
(2012) A bilingual advantage for episodic memory in older adults. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24(5), 591-601. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simon, J., & Rudell, A.
(1967) Auditory SR compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51(3), 300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Song, J., & Nakayama, K.
(2009) Hidden cognitive states revealed in choice reaching tasks. Trends in cognitive sciences, 13(8), 360-366. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spivey, M., Grosjean, M., & Knoblich, G.
(2005) Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(29), 10393-10398. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, M., Janus, M., Moreno, S., Astheimer, L., & Bialystok, E.
(2014) Early stage second-language learning improves executive control: Evidence from ERP. Brain and language, 139, 84-98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tao, L., Marzecová, A., Taft, M., Asanowicz, D., & Wodniecka, Z.
(2011) The efficiency of attentional networks in early and late bilinguals: the role of age of acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 2. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Umiltà, C., Rubichi, S., & Nicoletti, R.
(1999) Facilitation and interference components in the Simon effect. Archives italiennes de Biologie, 137(2), 139-149.Google Scholar
Wascher, E., Schatz, U., Kuder, T., & Verleger, R.
(2001) Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(3), 731. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wiegand, K., & Wascher, E.
(2005) Dynamic aspects of stimulus-response correspondence: Evidence for two mechanisms involved in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(3), 453. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wiseheart, M., Viswanathan, M., & Bialystok, E.
(2016) Flexibility in task switching by monolinguals and bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(01), 141-146. Crossref.Google Scholar
Woestenburg, J., Verbaten, M., Van Hees, H., & Slangen, J.
(1983) Single trial ERP estimation in the frequency domain using orthogonal polynomial trend analysis (OPTA): Estimation of individual habituation. Biological Psychology, 17(2), 173-191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yow, W., & Li, X.
(2015) Balanced bilingualism and early age of second language acquisition as the underlying mechanisms of a bilingual executive control advantage: why variations in bilingual experiences matter. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. CrossrefGoogle Scholar