Article published in:
Cognitive Individual Differences in Second Language Processing and Acquisition
Edited by Gisela Granena, Daniel O. Jackson and Yucel Yilmaz
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 3] 2016
► pp. 114
References

References

Bialystok, E.
(2009) Bilingualism: The good, the bad, and the indifferent. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 3–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., Klein, R., & Viswanathan, M.
(2004) Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon task. 19, 290–303. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caroll, J. B., & Sapon, S. M.
(1959) Modern language aptitude test. New York, NY: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B.
(1962) The prediction of success in intensive foreign language training. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Training research and education (pp. 87–136). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
(1981) Twenty-five years of research on foreign language aptitude. In K. C. Diller (Ed.), Individual differences & universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 83–118). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
(1990) Cognitive abilities in foreign language aptitude: Then and now. In T. S. Parry & C. W. Stansfield (Eds.), Language aptitude reconsidered (pp. 11–29). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Cornwall, S., & Robinson, P.
(Eds.) (2000) Individual differences in foreign language learning: Effects of aptitude, intelligence, and motivation. Tokyo, Japan: Aoyama Gakuin University.Google Scholar
DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B.
(2007) Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880–896. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diller, K. C.
(Ed.) (1981) Individual differences & universals in language learning aptitude. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z.
(2009) The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S.
(2015) The psychology of the language learner revisited. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Erlam, R.
(2005) Language aptitude and its relationship to instructional effectiveness in second language acquisition. Language Teaching Research, 9, 147–171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R. C.
(1985) Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Goo, J.
(2012) Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 445–474. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Granena, G., & Long, M.
(Eds.) (2013) Senitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harley, B., & Hart, D.
(1997) Language aptitude and second language proficiency in classroom learners of different starting ages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 379–400. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Healy, A. F., & Bourne, L. E.
(Eds.) (1998) Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J.
(1997) Second language acquisition research in the laboratory: Possibilities and limitations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 131–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Jonides, J., & Perrig, W. J.
(2008) Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1–5.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., & Bialystok, E.
(2013) Understanding the consequences of bilingualism for language processing and cognition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 497–514. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linck, J. A., Schwieter, J. W., & Sunderman, G.
(2012) Inhibitory control predicts language switching performance in trilingual speech production. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 651–662. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linck, J. A., Hughes, M. M., Campbell, S. G., Silbert, N. H., Tare, M., Jackson, S. R., Smith, B. K., Bunting, M. F., & Doughty, C. J.
(2013) Hi-LAB: A new measure of aptitude for high-level language proficiency. Language Learning, 63, 530–566. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F.
(2014) Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 861–883. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Long, M.
(2015) Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley.Google Scholar
Meara, P. M.
(2005) Llama language aptitude tests. Swansea, UK: Lognostics.Google Scholar
Michael, E. B., & Gollan, T. H.
(2005) Being and becoming bilingual: Individual differences and consequences for language production. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 389–407). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, J., & Ortega, L.
(2003) Defining and measuring SLA. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 717–761). Malden, MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parry, T. S., & Stansfield, C. W.
(Eds.) (1990) Language aptitude reconsidered. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Ranta, L.
(2002) The role of learners’ language analytic ability in the communicative classroom. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 159–180). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P.
(Ed.) (2002) Individual differences and instructed language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Implicit artificial grammar and incidental natural second language learning: How comparable are they? Language Learning, 60 (Supplement 2), 245–263. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Abilities to Learn: Cognitive Abilities. In N. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 17–20). New York, NY: Springer Academic.Google Scholar
Sasaki, M.
(1996) Second language proficiency, foreign language aptitude, and intelligence: Quantitative and qualitative analyses. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Skehan, P.
(1989) Individual differences in second-language learning. London, UK: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
(1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2015) Foreign language aptitude and its relationship with grammar: A critical overview. Applied Linguistics, 36, 367–384. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J.
(2008) Increasing fluid intelligence is possible after all. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 6791–6792. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Williams, J.
(2015) Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vatz, K., Tare, M., Jackson, S. R., & Doughty, C. J.
(2013) Aptitude-treatement interaction studies in second language acquisition: Findings and methodology. In G. Granena & M. Long (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment (pp. 273–292). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wen, Z., Borges Mota, M., & McNeill, A.
(2015) Working memory in second language acquisition and processing. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Williams, J.
(2015) Working memory in SLA research: Challenges and prospects. In Z. Wen, M. Borges Mota & A. McNeill (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 301–307). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar