Cover not available
Part of
Writing Systems, Reading Processes, and Cross-Linguistic Influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean Languages
Edited by Hye K. Pae
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7] 2018
► pp. 201–220

Chapter 10
L1-referenced phonological processing in Japanese-English bilinguals

Previous research investigating second-language processing difficulties experienced by Japanese native speakers is consistent with the notion that these individuals are representing foreign words in terms of their native phonological structure at an abstract underlying level. This issue is illustrated here by an experiment that compared Japanese-English bilinguals and native English speakers on their immediate recall of English pseudo-words. Recall performance was dependent on the number of phonemes within list items for the monolingual participants, but on the number of morae for the Japanese bilinguals, indicating that they were indeed automatically activating “Japanized” abstract representations upon encountering the non-native constructions. It is particularly noteworthy that this appeared to be true regardless of the age at which the bilinguals had learnt English.
Keywords: L2 phonological processing, Japanese-English bilinguals, immediate serial recall, phonological representations
Article outline
  • Japanese phonological structure and the processing of consonant clusters
  • Immediate serial recall and the word length effect
  • A new experiment
  • Method
    • Participants
    • Materials
    • Procedure
  • Results
    • The effect of demographic and language background variables
    • The effect of age of English acquisition
  • Discussion
    • The effect of language background factors
    • The nature of phonological representations
  • Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 10 July 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.7.10bro
References (45)
References
Adobe Audition CC [Computer Program]. (2015). Retrieved from <[URL]>
Baddeley, A. D. (1966). Short-term memory for word sequences as a function of acoustic, semantic and formal similarity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 362–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1994). Developments in the concept of working memory. Neuropsychology, 8, 485–493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N., & Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 575–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caplan, D., Rochon, E., & Waters, G. S. (1992). Articulatory and phonological determinants of word length effects in span tasks. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 177–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caplan, D., & Waters, G. S. (1994). Articulatory length and phonological similarity in span tasks: A reply to Baddeley and Andrade. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 1055–1062. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995). On the nature of the phonological output planning processes involved in verbal rehearsal: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language, 48, 191–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conrad, R., & Hull, A. J. (1964). Information, acoustic confusion and memory span. British Journal of Psychology, 55, 429–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidson, L., & Shaw, J. A. (2012). Sources of illusion in consonant cluster perception. Journal of Phonetics, 40, 234–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Dupoux, E., & Gout, A. (2000). Electrophysiological correlates of phonological processing: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 635–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dupoux, E., Kakehi, K., Hirose, Y., Pallier, C., & Mehler, J. (1999). Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: A perceptual illusion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1568–1578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dupoux, E., Pallier, C., Kakehi, K., & Mehler, J. (2001). New evidence for prelexical phonological processing in word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 491–505. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fais, L., Kajikawa, S., Amano, S., & Werker, J. F. (2010). Now you hear it, now you don’t: Vowel devoicing in Japanese infant-directed speech. Journal of Child Language, 37, 319–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1989). Chinese subjects’ perception of the word-final English /t/-/d/ contrast: Performance before and after training. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86, 1684–1697. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Fletcher, K. L. (1992). Talker and listener effects on degree of perceived foreign accent. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 370–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Frieda, E. M., & Nozawa, T. (1997). Amount of native-language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 169–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., & MacKay, I. R. A. (2004). Perceiving vowels in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I. R. A. (1995). Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3125–3134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Yeni-Komshian, G. H., & Liu, S. (1999). Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 78–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forster, J. C. (2016). DMDX (Version 5) [Computer Program]. Retrieved from < [URL] >.
Gussenhoven, C., & Jacobs, H. (2011). Understanding phonology (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hulme, C., Surprenant, A. M., Bireta, T. J., Stuart, G., & Neath, I. (2004). Abolishing the word-length effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 98–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kabak, B., & Idsardi, W. J. (2007). Perceptual distortions in the adaptation of English consonant clusters: Syllable structure or consonantal contact constraints? Language and Speech, 50, 23–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, J., Taft, M., & Davis, C. (2004). Orthographic-phonological links in the lexicon: When lexical and sublexical information conflict. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 187–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LaCharite, D., & Paradis, C. (2005). Category preservation and proximity versus phonetic approximation in loanword adaptation. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 223–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (1990). Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 251–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lovatt, P., Avons, S. E., & Masterson, J. (2000). The word-length effect and disyllabic words. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martinez-Garcia, M. T., & Tremblay, A. (2015). Syllable structure affects second-language spoken word recognition and production. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Glasgow: The University of Glasgow. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Masuda, H. & Arai, T. (2010). Processing of consonant clusters by Japanese native speakers: Influence of English learning backgrounds. Acoustical Science and Technology, 31, 320–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mueller, S. T., Seymour, T. L., Kieras, D. E., & Meyer, D. E. (2003). Theoretical implications of articulatory duration, phonological similarity, and phonological complexity in verbal working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1353–1380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neath, I., Bireta, T. J., & Surprenant, A. M. (2003). The time-based word length effect and stimulus set specificity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 430–434. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neath, I. & Nairne, J. S. (1995). Word-length effects in immediate memory: Overwriting trace decay theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 429–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nguyen-Hoan, M., & Taft, M. (2010). The impact of a subordinate L1 on L2 auditory processing in adult bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 217–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oyama, S. (1976). A sensitive period for the acquisition of a nonnative phonological system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5, 261–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peperkamp, S. & Dupoux, E. (2003). Reinterpreting loanword adaptations: The role of perception. In M. J. Sole, D. Recasens, & J. Romero (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 367–370). Barcelona: Causal Productions. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Piske, T., MacKay, I. R. A., & Flege, J. E. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rochet, B. L. & Putnam Rochet, A. (1999). Effects of L1 phonotactic constraints on L2 speech perception. In J. J. Ohala, Y. Hasegawa, M. Ohala, D. Granville, & A. C. Baily (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 1443–1446). Berkeley, CA: University of California. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Service, E. (1998). The effect of word length on immediate serial recall depends on phonological complexity, not articulatory duration. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 283–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibuya, Y. & Erickson, D. (2010, September). Consonant cluster production in Japanese learners of English. Paper presented at the Interspeech 2010 Satellite Workshop on Second Language Studies, Tokyo, Japan.
Smith, J. L. (2006). Loan phonology is not all perception: Evidence from Japanese loan doublets. In T. J. Vance & K. A. Jones (Eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics (Vol. 14, pp. 63–74). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Taft, M. (2006). Orthographically influenced abstract phonological representation: Evidence from non-rhotic speakers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35, 67–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verdonschot, R. G., Kiyama, S., Tamaoka, K., Kinoshita, S., La Heij, W., & Schiller, N. O. (2011). The functional unit of Japanese word naming: Evidence from masked priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1458–1473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vokic, G. (2008). The role of structural position in L2 phonological acquisition: Evidence from English learners of Spanish as L2. Foreign Language Annals, 41, 347–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weber, A. & Cutler, A. (2006). First-language phonotactics in second-language listening. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 597–607. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yeni-Komshian, G. H., Flege, J. E., & Liu, S. (2000). Pronunciation proficiency in the first and second languages of Korean-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3, 131–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Bae, Sungbong, Hye K. Pae & Kwangoh Yi
2018. Chapter 18. Subunit priming effects on lexical decision in Korean. In Writing Systems, Reading Processes, and Cross-Linguistic Influences [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 7], ► pp. 373 ff. DOI logo
Pae, Hye K.
2018. Chapter 1. Written languages, East-Asian scripts, and cross-linguistic influences. In Writing Systems, Reading Processes, and Cross-Linguistic Influences [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 7], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.