Cover not available
Part of
Writing Systems, Reading Processes, and Cross-Linguistic Influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean Languages
Edited by Hye K. Pae
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 7] 2018
► pp. 221–244

Chapter 11
Constituent-priming investigations of the morphological activation of Japanese compound words

This chapter reports on two experiments conducted to investigate the morphological activation of two-kanji compound words using the constituent-morpheme priming paradigm with a series of very-brief masked stimulus onset asynchronicity (SOA) conditions. In contrast to Experiment 1 where the word-formation principle (WFP) conditions all involved Sino-Japanese (SJ) compound word targets, the WFP conditions for Experiment 2 included both SJ and native-Japanese (NJ) WFP targets. The results from both experiments provide evidence for the early contributions of morphological information to the lexical processing of compound words, in terms of advantages for left-to-right processing, for head-morphemes and for lexical-stratum. The results are discussed in the context of the Japanese lemma-unit model (Joyce, 2002a, 2002b).
Keywords: Japanese compound words, morphological activation, constituent-morpheme priming paradigm, Japanese lemma-unit model
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Experiment 1: SJ compound words under brief SOAs
    • 2.1 Methods
      • 2.1.1Design
      • 2.1.2Materials
      • 2.1.3Apparatus
      • 2.1.4 Procedure
      • 2.1.5Participants
    • 2.2Results and discussion
      • 2.2.1Overall analyses
      • 2.2.2 Focusing on the VC and CV contrast
      • 2.2.3Discussion
  • 3.Experiment 2: Mixed SJ and NJ compound words
    • 3.1Methods
      • 3.1.1Design and materials
      • 3.1.2 Apparatus and procedure
      • 3.1.3Participants
    • 3.2Results and discussion
      • 3.2.1Overall analyses
      • 3.2.2Focusing on the lexical stratum contrasts
      • 3.2.3Discussion
  • 4.General discussion
  • References
Published online: 10 July 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.7.11mas
References (51)
References
Amano, S., & Kondō, T. (Eds.). (1999). Nihongo no goitokusei [Lexical properties of Japanese] (NTT database series). Tokyo: Sanseidō.Google Scholar
Feldman, L. B. (Ed.). (1995). Morphological aspects of language processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Forster, K. I. (1976). Accessing the mental lexicon. In R. J. Wales & E. Walker (Eds.), New approaches to language mechanisms: A collection of psycholinguistic studies (pp. 257–287). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Fujita, C., Ogawa, T., & Masuda, H. (2014, September). Phonological and semantic activation of homophones within the recognition of Japanese kanji compound words. Ninth International Conference on the Mental Lexicon. 29 September – 2 October, Niagara-on-the-Lake, Canada.
Hino, Y., Kusunose, Y., Miyamura, S., & Lupker, S. J. (2017). Phonological-orthographic consistency for Japanese words and its impact on visual and auditory recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(1), 126–146.Google Scholar
Hirose, H. (1992). Jukugo no ninchi katei ni kan suru kenkyū: Puraimingu hō ni yoru kentō [An investigation of the recognition process for jukugo by use of priming paradigms]. Shinrigaku Kenkyū [The Japanese Journal of Psychology], 63, 303–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ijuin, M., Fushimi, T., Patterson, K., & Tatsumi, I. (1999). A connectionist approach to Japanese kanji word naming. Psychologia, 42, 267–280.Google Scholar
Joyce, T. (1999). Lexical access and the mental lexicon for two-kanji compound words: A priming paradigm study. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Cognitive Sciences and 16th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society Joint Conference, 27–30 July, Tokyo, Japan, 511–514.
(2002a). The Japanese mental lexicon: The lexical retrieval and representation of two-kanji compound words from a morphological perspective (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Tsukuba, Japan.Google Scholar
(2002b). Constituent-morpheme priming: Implications from the morphology of two-kanji compound words. Japanese Psychological Research, 44, 79–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003a). Frequency and verb-morphology effects for constituents of two-kanji compound words. Fourth Tsukuba International Conference on Memory (Human Learning and Memory: Advanced in Theory and Application), 11–13 January, Tsukuba, Japan.
(2003b). Kanji niji jukugo ni okeru dōshi kōzō yōso no ichiteki hindo [Positional frequency of verbal constituents within two-kanji compound words]. Proceedings of the 67th Meeting of the Japanese Psychological Association, 13–15 September 2003, Tokyo University, Tokyo, Japan, 590.
Joyce, T. (2004). Modeling the Japanese mental lexicon: Morphological, orthographic and phonological considerations. In S. P. Shohov (Ed.), Advances in Psychological Research: Volume 31 (pp. 27–61). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.Google Scholar
Joyce, T. (2011). The significance of the morphographic principle for the classification of writing-systems. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 58–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Writing systems and scripts. In A. Rocci & L. de Saussure (Eds.), Verbal communication (pp. 287–308). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joyce, T., Hodošček, B., & Nishina, K. (2012). Orthographic representation and variation within the Japanese writing system: Some corpus-based observations. Written Language & Literacy, 15(2), 254–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joyce, T., & Masuda, H. (2005). Brief-presentation constituent-morpheme priming effects on the processing of Japanese two-kanji compound words, Eleventh International Conference on Processing Chinese and Other East Asian Languages (PCOEAL 2005), 9–11 December, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Joyce, T., & Masuda, H. (2008). Employing the brief-presentation constituent-morpheme priming paradigm to examine the early activation of morphological information in the processing of Japanese two-kanji compound words. Sixth International Conference on the Mental Lexicon, 7–10 October. Banff, Alberta, Canada.
(2009). Morphological activation of Sino-Japanese and Native-Japanese compound words, Thirteenth International Conference on Processing of East Asian Languages (ICPEAL 2009), 9–11 October, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
(2013). Constituent-morpheme priming study of Sino-Japanese and Native-Japanese compound words. Eighth International Morphological Processing Conference, 20–22 June, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
(2018). Introduction to multi-script Japanese writing system and word processing. In H. K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joyce, T., Masuda, H., & Hodošček, B. (2016). Constructing a database of Japanese lexical properties: Outlining its basic framework and initial components. Tama University School of Global Studies Bulletin, 8, 35–60.Google Scholar
Joyce, T., Masuda, H., & Ogawa, T. (2014). Jōyō kanji as core building blocks of the Japanese writing system: Some observations from database construction. Written Language and Literacy, 17(2), 173–194. doi DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joyce, T., & Ohta, N. (1999). The morphology of two-kanji compound words: Data from a word-formation classification survey. Tsukuba Psychological Research, 22, 45–61.Google Scholar
(2002). Constituent morpheme frequency data for two-kanji compound words. Tsukuba Psychological Research, 24, 111–141.Google Scholar
Kageyama, T. (1982). Word formation in Japanese. Lingua, 57, 215–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Libben, G. (2006). Why study compound processing? An overview of the issues, In G. Libben & G. Jarema (Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words (pp. 1–22). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Libben, G., & Jarema, G. (Eds.). (2006). The representation and processing of compound words. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lurie, D. B. (2012). The development of writing in Japan. In S. D. Houston (Ed.), The shape of script: How and why writing systems change (pp. 159–185). Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Masuda, H. (2014). Kanjinijihyōkigokan no imitekikankeisei ni kansuru dētabēsu no kōchiku [Constructing a database for the semantic relatedness of the orthographic constituents of two-kanji compound words]. Kagaku kenkyūhi joseijigyō kenkyū seika hōkokusho [Research report for grant-in-aid for scientific research from the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science].Google Scholar
Masuda, H., Joyce, T., Ogawa, T., Kawakami, M., & Fujita, C. (2014). A database of semantic transparency ratings for two-kanji Japanese compound words. ‘Orthographic Databases and Lexicons’: 9th International Workshop on Writing Systems and Literacy, 4–5 September. University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morita, A., & Saito, S. (2012). Articulatory suppression effects on rhyme and homophone judgments of two-kanji compound words. Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, 19(3), 365–379.Google Scholar
Myers, J. (2006). Processing Chinese compounds: A survey of the literature. In G. Libben & G. Jarema (Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words (pp. 169–196). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106(3), 226–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nomura, Y. (1978). Kanji no jōhōshori: Ondoku, kundoku to imi no fuyo [The information processing of Chinese characters (kanji): Chinese reading, Japanese reading and the attachment of meaning]. Shinrigaku Kenkyū [The Japanese Journal of Psychology], 49, 190–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nomura, M. (1988). Niji kango no kōzō [The structure of two-kanji Sino-Japanese words]. Nihongogaku [Japanese language research], 7(5), 44–55.Google Scholar
Ogawa, T., & Saito, H. (2006). Semantic activation in visual recognition of Japanese two-kanji compound words: Interference and facilitatory effects of neighbors. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychological Sciences, 49, 162–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1997). How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 118–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saito, H. (1997). Shinteki jisho [Mental lexicon]. In Y. Matsumoto, T. Kageyama, M. Nagata, H. Saito, & T. Tokunaga (Eds.), Iwanami kōza gengo no kagaku, 3: Tango to jisho [Iwanami lectures: Science of language 3. Words and dictionaries] (pp. 93–153). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Sandra, D. (1994). Morphology in the reader’s mental lexicon (Duisburg papers on research in language and culture 21). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Sandra, D., & Taft, M. (Eds.). (1994). Morphological structure, lexical representation and lexical access [Special issue]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9(3).Google Scholar
Taft, M. (1991). Reading and the mental lexicon. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 271–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). The nature of lexical representation in visual word recognition. In A. Pollatsek & R. Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 99–113). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Taft, M., Liu, Y., & Zhu, X. (1999). Morphemic processing in reading Chinese. In J. Wang, A. Inhoff, & H-C. Chen (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 91–113). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Taft, M., & Zhu, X. (1995). The representation of bound morphemes in the lexicon: A Chinese study. In L. B. Feldman, (Ed.). Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 293–316). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(1997). Using masked priming to examine lexical storage of Chinese compound words. In H-C. Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 233–241). Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
Tamamura, F. (1985). Go no kōsei to zōgohō [The structure of words and principles of word formation]. In Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyūjo. Go no kenkyū to kyōiku (ge) Nihongo kyōiku shidō sankōsho 13 [Vocabulary research and instruction (Part 2): Japanese language instruction guidance materials 13] (pp. 1–78). Tokyo, Japan: Ōkurashō Insatsukyoku.Google Scholar
Tamaoka, K. (2007). Rebounding activation caused by lexical homophony in the processing of Japanese two-kanji compound words. Reading and Writing, 20(5), 413–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tamaoka, K., & Hatsuzuka, M. (1998). The effects of morphological semantics on the processing of Japanese two-kanji compound words. Reading and Writing, 10, 293–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Joyce, Terry & Hisashi Masuda
2018. Chapter 9. Introduction to the multi-script Japanese writing system and word processing. In Writing Systems, Reading Processes, and Cross-Linguistic Influences [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 7], ► pp. 179 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.