This paper presents results of an eye tracking study involving sight translation. It was assumed that interpreting trainees at a more advanced stage of training would display more efficient reading patterns than their less experienced colleagues. Eighteen participants with either one year or two years of interpreting training were asked to sight translate a text from A language (Polish) into B language (English). The text included such independent variables as target sentence type (simple SVO sentences and complex non-SVO sentences) and low frequency lexical items. The dependent variables included measures assumed to indicate lexical access and syntactic processing, such as fixation count, fixation length and observation length. The study found no group effect in total task time and processing of lexical items, which indicates that one year of training might not be sufficient to show differences in the sight translation skill development. The study also revealed that sentence readability could be a better predictor of processing load than syntax and, as expected, that more readable sentences generated less cognitive load than less readable ones.
Chernovaty, Leonid, Martin Djovčoš & Natalia Kovalchuk
2023. The Impact of the Source-Text Syntactic Characteristics on the Sight-Translation Strategies and Quality. PSYCHOLINGUISTICS 34:2 ► pp. 156 ff.
Fang, Jing, Xiaomin Zhang & Haidee Kotze
2023. The effects of training on reading behaviour and performance in sight translation: a longitudinal study using eye-tracking. Perspectives 31:4 ► pp. 655 ff.
Lijewska, Agnieszka, Agnieszka Chmiel & Albrecht W. Inhoff
2022. Stages of sight translation: Evidence from eye movements. Applied Psycholinguistics 43:5 ► pp. 997 ff.
Fang, Jing & Xiaomin Zhang
2021. Pause in Sight Translation: A Longitudinal Study Focusing on Training Effect. In Diverse Voices in Chinese Translation and Interpreting [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 157 ff.
Fang, Jing
2020. Pause in Sight Translation: A Pilot Study. In Translation Education [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 173 ff.
Seeber, Kilian G., Laura Keller & Alexis Hervais-Adelman
2020. When the ear leads the eye – the use of text during simultaneous interpretation. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 35:10 ► pp. 1480 ff.
Su, Wenchao
2020. Translation Style in Sight Translation. In Eye-Tracking Processes and Styles in Sight Translation [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 19 ff.
Su, Wenchao
2020. Gaze Behaviors, Interpreting Styles, and Language Specificity. In Eye-Tracking Processes and Styles in Sight Translation [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 127 ff.
2019. Interpreting Accuracy and Visual Processing of Numbers in Professional and Student Interpreters: an Eye-tracking Study. Across Languages and Cultures 20:2 ► pp. 235 ff.
Kokanova, Elena S., Maya M. Lyutyanskaya, Anna S. Cherkasova, S. Cindori, O. Larouk, E.Yu. Malushko, L.N. Rebrina & N.L. Shamne
2018. Eye Tracking Study of Reading and Sight Translation. SHS Web of Conferences 50 ► pp. 01080 ff.
Chilingaryan, Kamo & Olga Gorbatenko
2017. Training Court Interpreting Issues. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 237 ► pp. 1081 ff.
Hvelplund, Kristian T.
2017. Eye Tracking in Translation Process Research. In The Handbook of Translation and Cognition, ► pp. 248 ff.
Seeber, Kilian G.
2017. Multimodal Processing in Simultaneous Interpreting. In The Handbook of Translation and Cognition, ► pp. 461 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.