Part of
Translation Universals: Do they exist?
Edited by Anna Mauranen and Pekka Kujamäki
[Benjamins Translation Library 48] 2004
► pp. 6582
Cited by

Cited by 34 other publications

Alasmri, Ibrahim & Haidee Kruger
2018. Conjunctive markers in translation from English to Arabic: a corpus-based study. Perspectives 26:5  pp. 767 ff. DOI logo
Arffman, Inga
2010. Equivalence of Translations in International Reading Literacy Studies. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 54:1  pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Arshad, Muddassira, Muhammad Murtaza Yousaf & Syed Mansoor Sarwar
2023. Comprehensive Readability Assessment of Scientific Learning Resources. IEEE Access 11  pp. 53978 ff. DOI logo
Bisiada, Mario
2016. ‘Lösen Sie Schachtelsätze möglichst auf’: The Impact of Editorial Guidelines on Sentence Splitting in German Business Article Translations. Applied Linguistics 37:3  pp. 354 ff. DOI logo
Cappelle, Bert & Rudy Loock
2013. Is there interference of usage constraints?. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 25:2  pp. 252 ff. DOI logo
Casado Valenzuela, Alicia
2019. Los universales de localización. Babel. Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation 65:5  pp. 678 ff. DOI logo
Castagnoli, Sara
2016. Investigating trainee translators’ contrastive pragmalinguistic competence: a corpus-based analysis of interclausal linkage in learner translations. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 10:3  pp. 343 ff. DOI logo
Defrancq, Bart, Koen Plevoets & Cédric Magnifico
2015. Connective Items in Interpreting and Translation: Where Do They Come From?. In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2015 [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, 3],  pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
Defrancq, Bart & Gudrun Rawoens
2016. Assessing morphologically motivated transfer in parallel corpora. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 28:3  pp. 372 ff. DOI logo
Dose, Stefanie
2014. Vagueness as a recurring pattern in interpreted German speech. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 32:3  pp. 331 ff. DOI logo
Fan, Lu & Yue Jiang
2021. A syntactic dependency network approach to the study of translational language. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 36:3  pp. 595 ff. DOI logo
Fan, Lu & Yue Jiang
2023. Probability distribution of dependency distance and dependency type in translational language. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 10:1 DOI logo
Gu, Yi & Ana Frankenberg-Garcia
2021. Chapter 2. ZHEN. In Corpora in Translation and Contrastive Research in the Digital Age [Benjamins Translation Library, 158],  pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Halme-Berneking, Riikka
2014. Helping Bible Translators Recognize Linguistic Interference between Angolan Bantu Languages and Portuguese. The Bible Translator 65:3  pp. 353 ff. DOI logo
Hareide, Lidun
2019. Comparable parallel corpora. In Parallel Corpora for Contrastive and Translation Studies [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 90],  pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Heilmann, Arndt, Tatiana Serbina, Daniel Couto Vale & Stella Neumann
2019. Shorter than a text, longer than a sentence. Target 31:1  pp. 98 ff. DOI logo
Ivaska, Ilmari & Laura Ivaska
2022. Source language classification of indirect translations. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 34:3  pp. 370 ff. DOI logo
Kujamäki, Minna
2019. Source text influence in student translation: results of a longitudinal study. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 13:4  pp. 390 ff. DOI logo
Li, Tao & Kaibao Hu
2021. Corpus-Based Translation Studies and Political Discourse Analysis. In Reappraising Self and Others [Corpora and Intercultural Studies, 6],  pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Marco, Josep
2010. Normalisation and the Translation of Phraseology in the COVALT Corpus1. Meta 54:4  pp. 842 ff. DOI logo
Marco, Josep & Heike van Lawick
2015. Enhancing translator trainees’ awareness of source text interference through use of comparable corpora. In Multiple Affordances of Language Corpora for Data-driven Learning [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 69],  pp. 225 ff. DOI logo
Martín Mor, Adrià
2019. Do translation memories affect translations? Final results of the TRACE project. Perspectives 27:3  pp. 455 ff. DOI logo
Mattioli, Virginia
2022. La tendencia hacia la simplificación en el discurso especializado y no-especializado: ampliando el alcance de los estudios de traducción basados en corpus al análisis multidiscursivo. TRANS: Revista de Traductología 26:1  pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
Mauranen, Anna
2020. ELF and Translation As Language Contact. In Language Change,  pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Mendes, Amália, Deniz Zeyrek & Giedrė Oles̆kevic̆ienė
Molés-Cases, Teresa
2019. Why typology matters: a corpus-based study of explicitation and implicitation of Manner-of-motion in narrative texts. Perspectives 27:6  pp. 890 ff. DOI logo
Ramón, Noelia
2009. Translating Epistemic Adverbs from English into Spanish: Evidence from a Parallel Corpus1. Meta 54:1  pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
Ramón, Noelia
2015. Comparing original and translated Spanish. Babel. Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation 61:4  pp. 527 ff. DOI logo
Sanz-Villar, Zuriñe
2018. Interference and the Translation of Phraseological Units in a Parallel and Multilingual Corpus. Meta 63:1  pp. 72 ff. DOI logo
Sole-Mauri, Francina, Pilar Sánchez-Gijón & Antoni Oliver
2021. Cadlaws – An English–French Parallel Corpus of Legally Equivalent Documents. Mutatis Mutandis. Revista Latinoamericana de Traducción 14:2  pp. 494 ff. DOI logo
Tsigou, Maria
2018. L’interférence de l’anglais dans le syntagme nominal grec. La linguistique Vol. 54:2  pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Valdeón, Roberto A.
2018. Discourse analysis, pragmatics, multimodal analysis. In Reception Studies and Audiovisual Translation [Benjamins Translation Library, 141],  pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Xu, Han & Kanglong Liu
2023. Syntactic simplification in interpreted English: Dependency distance and direction measures. Lingua 294  pp. 103607 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.