Article published in:
Diachronic Construction GrammarEdited by Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer and Spike Gildea
[Constructional Approaches to Language 18] 2015
► pp. 51–80
Toward a coherent account of grammatical constructionalization
Elizabeth Closs Traugott | Stanford University
Diachronic construction grammar addresses a range of theoretical topics from lexicalization to grammaticalization. In most cases, a historical dimension has been added to a largely synchronic theory, or construction grammar has been seen as a tool for diachronic analysis. In the spirit of rethinking grammaticalization in construction grammar terms, the present chapter focuses on how a constructionalization approach can inform certain debates in the grammaticalization literature. The specific debates addressed are: (1) Is it possible to reconcile the two current main views of grammaticalization as (a) reduced form and increased dependency (Lehmann 1995; Haspelmath 2004), or (b) expansion of contexts (Himmelmann 2004)? (2) Is there “pure” grammaticalization without analogy (Haspelmath 2004; Lehmann 2004)? (3) What relative weight should be given to reanalysis and analogy (Fischer 2007)? The answer to the first question is that from a constructional perspective the two approaches to grammaticalization can indeed be reconciled. With respect to the second and third questions, there can be no “pure” grammaticalization without analogy understood as a motivation (analogical thinking). Since reanalysis can occur independently of analogy and accompanies analogy understood as a mechanism (analogization), it encompasses more changes and is therefore primary. This approach is illustrated with a new look at the development of BE going to in English.
Published online: 30 July 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18.02tra
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18.02tra
References
Andersen, H
Anttila, R
Barðdal, J
Barðdal, J., Kristoffersen, K.E., & Sveen, A
Bergs, A., & Diewald, G
Bermúdez-Otero, R
Brems, L
Brinton, L.J
Bybee, J.L
Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W
CED
. A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760 (2006) Compiled under the supervision of M. Kytö & J. Culpeper. http://www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/CED/index.html.
Colleman, T., & Clerck, B. de
Danchev, A., & Kytö, M
Diewald, G
Eckardt, R
Fillmore, C.J., & Kay, P
Fischer, O
Fleischman, S
Francis, E.J., & Michaelis, L.A
Fried, M
Garrett, A
Gisborne, N
Gisborne, N., & Patten, A
Givón, T
Goldberg, A.E
Harris, A.C., & Campbell, L
Heine, B
Heine, B., & Kuteva, T
HC. Helsinki Corpus of English Texts
(1991) Compiled by M. Rissanen, M. Kytö; L. Kahlas-Tarkka, M. Kilpiö (Old English); S. Nevanlinna, I. Taavitsainen (Middle English); T. Nevalainen, H. Raumolin-Brunberg (Early Modern English). Department of English, University of Helsinki. http://www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/HelsinkiCorpus/index.html.
Hilpert, M
Himmelmann, N
Joseph, B.D
Kaltenböck, G., Heine, B., & Kuteva, T
Kiparsky, P
Kuteva, T
Langacker, R.W
Leech, G., Hundt, M., Mair, C., & Smith, N
Lehmann, C
Lightfoot, D
LION. Literature on line
Mair, C
Masini, F
Meillet, A
Mondorf, B
Nesselhauf, N
Noël, D
Nørgård-Sørensen, J., Heltoft, L., & Schøsler, L
OED. Oxford English Dictionary
OBP. The Old Bailey Proceedings Online, 1674-1913
2012 T. Hitchcock, R. Shoemaker, C. Emsley, S. Howard, and J. McLaughlin, et al. www.oldbaileyonline.org,version7.0.
Patten, A
Rissanen, M
Rizzi, L
Rostila, J
(2004) Lexicalization as a way to grammaticalization. In F. Karlson (Ed.), Proceedings of the 20th Scandinavian conference of linguistics. http://www.ling.helsinki.fi/kielitiede/20scl/Rostila.pdf.
Selkirk, E.O
Sommerer, L
Sowka-Pietraszewska, K
(2012) On the development of a prepositional object construction with give verbs, motion verbs and Latinate verbs in English. eVarieng 10. http://www.helsinki.fi/varieng/journal/volumes/10/sowka-pietraszewska/
Sweetser, E.E
Traugott, E.C
(2008a) Grammaticalization, constructions and the incremental development of language: Suggestions from the development of degree modifiers in English. In R. Eckardt, G. Jäger, & T. Veenstra (Eds.), Variation, selection, development-Probing the evolutionary model of language change (pp. 219–250). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2008b) 'All that he endeavoured to prove was ...': On the emergence of grammatical constructions in dialogic contexts. In R. Cooper, & R. Kempson (Eds.), Language in flux: Dialogue coordination, language variation, change and evolution (pp. 143–177). [Communication, Mind, and Language, 1]. London: Kings College Publications.
Traugott, E.C., & Trousdale, G
Trousdale, G
(2008a) Words and constructions in grammaticalization: The end of the impersonal construction. In S.M. Fitzmaurice, & D. Minkova (Eds.), Studies in the history of the English language IV: Empirical and analytical advances in the study of English language change (pp. 301–326). [Topics in English Linguistics, 61]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 

(2008b) Constructions in grammaticalization and lexicalization: Evidence from the history of a composite predicate construction in English. In G. Trousdale, & N. Gisborne (Eds.), Constructional approaches to English grammar (pp. 33–67). [Topics in English linguistics, 57]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cited by
Cited by 21 other publications
Budts, Sara & Peter Petré
Colleman, Timothy
Diewald, Gabriele
Diewald, Gabriele, Volodymyr Dekalo & Dániel Czicza
Flach, Susanne
Giacalone Ramat, Anna
Hilpert, Martin
Hoffmann, Thomas
Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita & Katsunobu Izutsu
Lu, Xiaolong
Noël, Dirk
Orqueda, Verónica, Silvana Arriagada & Francisca Toro
Orqueda, Verónica, Silvana Arriagada & Francisca Toro
Peltola, Rea
Petré, Peter
Portolés Lázaro, José
Reinöhl, Uta & Antje Casaretto
Rodríguez Rosique, Susana
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
Young, Nathan J.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 may 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.