Article published in:
Diachronic Construction GrammarEdited by Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer and Spike Gildea
[Constructional Approaches to Language 18] 2015
► pp. 51–80
Toward a coherent account of grammatical constructionalization
Elizabeth Closs Traugott | Stanford University
Diachronic construction grammar addresses a range of theoretical topics from lexicalization to grammaticalization. In most cases, a historical dimension has been added to a largely synchronic theory, or construction grammar has been seen as a tool for diachronic analysis. In the spirit of rethinking grammaticalization in construction grammar terms, the present chapter focuses on how a constructionalization approach can inform certain debates in the grammaticalization literature. The specific debates addressed are: (1) Is it possible to reconcile the two current main views of grammaticalization as (a) reduced form and increased dependency (Lehmann 1995; Haspelmath 2004), or (b) expansion of contexts (Himmelmann 2004)? (2) Is there “pure” grammaticalization without analogy (Haspelmath 2004; Lehmann 2004)? (3) What relative weight should be given to reanalysis and analogy (Fischer 2007)? The answer to the first question is that from a constructional perspective the two approaches to grammaticalization can indeed be reconciled. With respect to the second and third questions, there can be no “pure” grammaticalization without analogy understood as a motivation (analogical thinking). Since reanalysis can occur independently of analogy and accompanies analogy understood as a mechanism (analogization), it encompasses more changes and is therefore primary. This approach is illustrated with a new look at the development of BE going to in English.
Published online: 30 July 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18.02tra
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18.02tra
References
References
Andersen, H.
(2001) Actualization and the (uni)directionality. In H. Andersen (Ed.), Actualization: Linguistic change in progress (pp. 225–248). [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 219]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 
Anttila, R.
(2003) Analogy: The warp and woof of cognition. In B.D. Joseph, & R.D. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 425–440). Oxford: Blackwell.
Barðdal, J.
(2001) Case in Icelandic—A synchronic, diachronic, and comparative approach. [Lundastudier i Nordisk språkvetenskap, A 57]. Lund: Lund University, Department of Scandinavian Languages.
(2008) Productivity: Evidence from case and argument structure in Icelandic. [Constructional Approaches to Language, 8]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Barðdal, J., Kristoffersen, K.E., & Sveen, A.
(2011) West Scandinavian ditransitives as a family of constructions: With a special attention to the Norwegian V- REFL-NP construction. Linguistics, 49, 53–104.
Bergs, A., & Diewald, G.
(Eds.) (2008) Constructions and language change. [Trends in Linguistics, 194]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bermúdez-Otero, R.
(2006) Phonological change in optimality theory. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, Vol. 9 (pp. 497–505). Oxford: Elsevier, 2nd revised ed.
Brems, L.
(2011) Layering of size and type noun constructions in English. [Topics in English Linguistics, 74]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Brinton, L.J.
(2008) The comment clause in English: Syntactic origins and pragmatic development. [Studies in English Language]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, J.L.
(2003) Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In B.D. Joseph, & R.D. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 602–623). Oxford: Blackwell.
(2006) From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82, 711–733.
(2010) Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W.
(1994) The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
CED
. A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760 (2006) Compiled under the supervision of M. Kytö & J. Culpeper. http://www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/CED/index.html.
Colleman, T., & Clerck, B. de
(2011) Constructional semantics on the move: On semantic specialization in the English double object constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 22, 183–209.
Croft, W.
(2000) Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Pearson Education.
(2001) Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2006) Typology. In M. Aronoff, & J. Rees-Miller (Eds.), The handbook of linguistics (pp. 337–368). Oxford: Blackwell.
Danchev, A., & Kytö, M.
(1994) The construction be going to + infinitive in Early Modern English. In D. Kastovsky (Ed.), Studies in early modern English (pp. 59–77). [Topics in English Linguistics, 13]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
De Smet, H.
(2009) Analysing reanalysis. Lingua, 119, 1728–1755.
(2012) The course of actualization. Language, 88, 601–633.
Diewald, G.
(2002) A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In I. Wischer, & G. Diewald (Eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization (pp. 103–120). [Typological Studies in Language, 49]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2011) Grammaticalization and pragmaticalization. In H. Narrog, & B. Heine (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization (pp. 450–461). New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eckardt, R.
(2006) Meaning change in grammaticalization: An enquiry into semantic reanalysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fillmore, C.J., & Kay, P.
Fischer, O.
(2007) Morphosyntactic change: Functional and formal perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2010) An analogical approach to grammaticalization. In K. Stathi, E. Gehweiler, & E. König (Eds.), Grammaticalization: Current views and issues (pp. 181–220). [Studies in Language Companion Series, 119]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fleischman, S.
(1982) The future in thought and language. Diachronic evidence from Romance [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 36]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Francis, E.J., & Michaelis, L.A.
(Eds.) (2003) Mismatch: Form–function incongruity and the architecture of grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Fried, M.
(2008) Constructions and constructs: Mapping a diachronic process. In A. Bergs, & G. Diewald (Eds.), Constructions and language change (pp. 47–79). [Trends in Linguistics, 194]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2009) Construction grammar as a tool for diachronic analysis. Constructions and Frames, 1, 262–291.
Garrett, A.
(2012) The historical syntax problem: Reanalysis and directionality. In D. Jonas, J. Whitman, & A. Garrett (Eds.), Grammatical change: Origins, nature, outcomes (pp. 52–72). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gisborne, N.
(2011) Constructions, word grammar, and grammaticalization. Cognitive Linguistics, 22, 155–182.
Gisborne, N., & Patten, A.
(2011) Construction grammar and grammaticalization. In H. Narrog, & B. Heine (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization (pp. 92–104). New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Givón, T.
(1991) The evolution of dependent clause morpho-syntax in Biblical Hebrew. In E.C. Traugott, & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. 2 (pp. 257–310). [Typological Studies in Language, 19.2]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goldberg, A.E.
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. [Cognitive Theory of Language and Culture]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
(2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harris, A.C., & Campbell, L.
(1995) Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haspelmath, M.
(1998) Does grammaticalization need reanalysis? Studies in Language, 22, 315–351.
(2004) On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization. In O. Fischer, M. Norde, & H. Peridon (Eds.), Up and down the cline - The nature of grammaticalization (pp. 17–44). [Typological Studies in Language, 59]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Heine, B.
(2002) On the role of context in grammaticalization. In I. Wischer, & G. Diewald (Eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization (pp. 83–101). [Typological Studies in Language, 49]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Heine, B., & Kuteva, T.
(2002) World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
HC. Helsinki Corpus of English Texts (1991) Compiled by M. Rissanen, M. Kytö; L. Kahlas-Tarkka, M. Kilpiö (Old English); S. Nevanlinna, I. Taavitsainen (Middle English); T. Nevalainen, H. Raumolin-Brunberg (Early Modern English). Department of English, University of Helsinki. http://www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/HelsinkiCorpus/index.html.
Hilpert, M.
(2008) Germanic future constructions: A usage-based approach to language change. [Constructional Approaches to Language, 7]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Himmelmann, N.
(2004) Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal? In W. Bisang, N.P. Himmelmann, & B. Wiemer (Eds.), What makes grammaticalization - A look from its fringes and its components (pp. 21–42). [Trends in Linguistics, 158]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Joseph, B.D.
(2004) Rescuing traditional (historical) linguistics from grammaticalization ‘theory.’ In O. Fischer, M. Norde, & H. Peridon (Eds.), Up and down the cline - The nature of grammaticalization (pp. 45–71). [Typological Studies in Language, 59]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kaltenböck, G., Heine, B., & Kuteva, T.
(2011) On thetical grammar. Studies in Language, 35, 852–897.
Kiparsky, P.
(2012) Grammaticalization as optimization. In D. Jonas, J. Whitman, & A. Garrett (Eds.), Grammatical change: Origins, nature, outcomes (pp. 15–51). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kuteva, T.
(2001) Auxiliation: An enquiry into the nature of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Langacker, R.W.
(1977) Syntactic reanalysis. In C.N. Li (Ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change (pp. 57–139). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Leech, G., Hundt, M., Mair, C., & Smith, N.
(2009) Change in contemporary English: A grammatical study. [Studies in English Language]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lehmann, C.
(1985) Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile, XX, 303–318.
(1995) Thoughts on grammaticalization. Munich: LINCOM EUROPA (2nd, rev. ed. of Thoughts on grammaticalization: A programmatic sketch, 1982).
(2002) New reflections on grammaticalization and lexicalization. In I. Wischer, & G. Diewald (Eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization (pp. 1–18). [Typological Studies in Language, 49]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2004) Theory and method in grammaticalization. In G. Diewald (Ed.), Grammatikalisierung, Special issue of Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, 32, 152–187.
(2008) Information structure and grammaticalization. In E. Seoane, & M.J. López-Couso (Eds., in collaboration with T. Fanego), Theoretical and empirical issues in grammaticalization (pp. 207–229). [Typological Studies in Language, 77]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lightfoot, D.
(1979) Principles of diachronic syntax. [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 23]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(1999) The development of language: Acquisition, change, evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.
LION. Literature on line. http://lion.chadwyck.com.
Mair, C.
(2004) Corpus linguistics and grammaticalisation theory: Statistics, frequencies, and beyond. In H. Lindquist, & C. Mair (Eds.), Corpus approaches to grammaticalization in English (pp. 121–150). [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 13]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Masini, F.
(2007) Phrasal lexemes, compounds and phrases: A constructionist perspective. Word Structure, 2, 254–271.
Meillet, A.
(1958) L’évolution des formes grammaticales. In A. Meillet (Ed.), Linguistique historique et linguistique générale (pp. 130–148). Paris: Champion (originally published 1912).
Mondorf, B.
(2011) Variation and change in English resultative constructions. Language variation and change, 22, 397–421.
Nesselhauf, N.
(2012) Mechanisms of language change in a functional system: The recent semantic evolution of English future time expressions. Journal of Historical Linguistics, 2, 83–132.
Noël, D.
(2007) Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of Language, 14, 177–202.
Nørgård-Sørensen, J., Heltoft, L., & Schøsler, L.
(2011) Connecting grammaticalisation: The role of paradigmatic structure. [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 65]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
OED. Oxford English Dictionary. http://www.oed.com/.
OBP. The Old Bailey Proceedings Online, 1674-1913 2012 T. Hitchcock, R. Shoemaker, C. Emsley, S. Howard, and J. McLaughlin, et al. www.oldbaileyonline.org,version7.0.
Patten, A.
(2012) The English it-cleft: A constructional account and diachronic investigation. [Topics in English Linguistics, 79]. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
Rissanen, M.
(1999) Syntax. In R. Lass (Ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language: Vol. 3: 1476–1776 (pp. 187–331). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2004) Grammaticalisation from side to side: On the development of beside(s)
. In H. Lindquist, & C. Mair (Eds.), Corpus approaches to grammaticalization in English (pp. 151–170). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rizzi, L.
(1997) Parameters and functional heads: Essays in comparative syntax. [Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rostila, J.
(2004) Lexicalization as a way to grammaticalization. In F. Karlson (Ed.), Proceedings of the 20th Scandinavian conference of linguistics. http://www.ling.helsinki.fi/kielitiede/20scl/Rostila.pdf.
Selkirk, E.O.
(1977) Some remarks on noun phrase structure. In P. Culicover, A. Akmajian, & T. Wasow (Eds.), Formal Syntax (pp. 283–316). New York: Academic Press.
Sommerer, L.
(2012) Investigating the emergence of the definite article in Old English: About categorization, gradualness and constructions. Folia Linguistica Historica, 33, 175–213.
Sowka-Pietraszewska, K.
(2012) On the development of a prepositional object construction with give verbs, motion verbs and Latinate verbs in English. eVarieng 10. http://www.helsinki.fi/varieng/journal/volumes/10/sowka-pietraszewska/
Sweetser, E.E.
(1988) Grammaticalization and semantic bleaching. In S. Axmaker, A. Jaisser, & H. Singmaster (Eds.), Berkeley linguistics society 14: General session and parasession on grammaticalization (pp. 389–405). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Traugott, E.C.
(2008a) Grammaticalization, constructions and the incremental development of language: Suggestions from the development of degree modifiers in English. In R. Eckardt, G. Jäger, & T. Veenstra (Eds.), Variation, selection, development-Probing the evolutionary model of language change (pp. 219–250). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2008b) 'All that he endeavoured to prove was ...': On the emergence of grammatical constructions in dialogic contexts. In R. Cooper, & R. Kempson (Eds.), Language in flux: Dialogue coordination, language variation, change and evolution (pp. 143–177). [Communication, Mind, and Language, 1]. London: Kings College Publications.
(2010) Grammaticalization. In S. Luraghi, & V. Bubenik (Eds.), Continuum companion to historical linguistics (pp. 269–283). London: Continuum Press.
(2012) The status of onset contexts in analysis of micro-changes. In M. Kytö (Ed.), English corpus linguistics: Crossing paths (pp. 221–255). [Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics, 76]. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Traugott, E.C., & Trousdale, G.
(2010) Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization: How do they intersect? In E.C. Traugott, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization (pp. 19–44). [Typological Studies in Language, 90]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2013) Constructionalization and constructional changes. [Oxford Studies in Diachronic & Historical Linguistics, 6]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Trousdale, G.
(2008a) Words and constructions in grammaticalization: The end of the impersonal construction. In S.M. Fitzmaurice, & D. Minkova (Eds.), Studies in the history of the English language IV: Empirical and analytical advances in the study of English language change (pp. 301–326). [Topics in English Linguistics, 61]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2008b) Constructions in grammaticalization and lexicalization: Evidence from the history of a composite predicate construction in English. In G. Trousdale, & N. Gisborne (Eds.), Constructional approaches to English grammar (pp. 33–67). [Topics in English linguistics, 57]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2010) Issues in constructional approaches to grammaticalization in English. In K. Stathi, E. Gehweiler, & E. König (Eds.), Grammaticalization: Current views and issues (pp. 51–72). [Studies in Language Companion Series, 119]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by
Cited by other publications
Budts, Sara & Peter Petré
2020.
In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27],
► pp. 318 ff.
Colleman, Timothy
2016. A reflection on constructionalization and constructional borrowing, inspired by an emerging Dutch replica of the ‘time’-away construction.
Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30 ► pp. 91 ff.
Diewald, Gabriele
2020.
In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27],
► pp. 278 ff.
Flach, Susanne
2020.
In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27],
► pp. 46 ff.
Giacalone Ramat, Anna
2019. Degrees of grammaticalization and measure constructions in Italian.
Revue Romane 54:2 ► pp. 257 ff.
Hilpert, Martin
2018.
In Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 21],
► pp. 21 ff.
Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita & Katsunobu Izutsu
2018.
In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 202],
► pp. 381 ff.
Noël, Dirk
2016. For a radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar.
Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30 ► pp. 39 ff.
Petré, Peter
2016. Unidirectionality as a cycle of convention and innovation.
Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30 ► pp. 115 ff.
Reinöhl, Uta & Antje Casaretto
2018. When grammaticalization does NOT occur.
Diachronica 35:2 ► pp. 238 ff.
Rodríguez Rosique, Susana
2020. From Informational Status to Mitigation in Spanish Aunque Sea.
Corpus Pragmatics 4:1 ► pp. 11 ff.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2014.
In Grammaticalization – Theory and Data [Studies in Language Companion Series, 162],
► pp. 87 ff.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2014. Toward a constructional framework for research on language change.
Cognitive Linguistic Studies 1:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 april 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.