Diachronic construction grammar addresses a range of theoretical topics from lexicalization to grammaticalization. In most cases, a historical dimension has been added to a largely synchronic theory, or construction grammar has been seen as a tool for diachronic analysis. In the spirit of rethinking grammaticalization in construction grammar terms, the present chapter focuses on how a constructionalization approach can inform certain debates in the grammaticalization literature. The specific debates addressed are: (1) Is it possible to reconcile the two current main views of grammaticalization as (a) reduced form and increased dependency (Lehmann 1995; Haspelmath 2004), or (b) expansion of contexts (Himmelmann 2004)? (2) Is there “pure” grammaticalization without analogy (Haspelmath 2004; Lehmann 2004)? (3) What relative weight should be given to reanalysis and analogy (Fischer 2007)? The answer to the first question is that from a constructional perspective the two approaches to grammaticalization can indeed be reconciled. With respect to the second and third questions, there can be no “pure” grammaticalization without analogy understood as a motivation (analogical thinking). Since reanalysis can occur independently of analogy and accompanies analogy understood as a mechanism (analogization), it encompasses more changes and is therefore primary. This approach is illustrated with a new look at the development of BE going to in English.
(2011) West Scandinavian ditransitives as a family of constructions: With a special attention to the Norwegian V- REFL-NP construction. Linguistics, 49, 53–104.
Bergs, A., & Diewald, G
(Eds.) (2008) Constructions and language change. [Trends in Linguistics, 194]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2006) Phonological change in optimality theory. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, Vol. 9 (pp. 497–505). Oxford: Elsevier, 2nd revised ed.
(2011) Layering of size and type noun constructions in English. [Topics in English Linguistics, 74]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
(2008) The comment clause in English: Syntactic origins and pragmatic development. [Studies in English Language]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2003) Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In B.D. Joseph, & R.D. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 602–623). Oxford: Blackwell.
(2006) From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82, 711–733.
(2010) Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W
(1994) The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
. A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760 (2006) Compiled under the supervision of M. Kytö & J. Culpeper. [URL].
Colleman, T., & Clerck, B. de
(2011) Constructional semantics on the move: On semantic specialization in the English double object constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 22, 183–209.
(2000) Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Pearson Education.
(2001) Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2006) Typology. In M. Aronoff, & J. Rees-Miller (Eds.), The handbook of linguistics (pp. 337–368). Oxford: Blackwell.
Danchev, A., & Kytö, M
(1994) The construction be going to + infinitive in Early Modern English. In D. Kastovsky (Ed.), Studies in early modern English (pp. 59–77). [Topics in English Linguistics, 13]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2007) Morphosyntactic change: Functional and formal perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2010) An analogical approach to grammaticalization. In K. Stathi, E. Gehweiler, & E. König (Eds.), Grammaticalization: Current views and issues (pp. 181–220). [Studies in Language Companion Series, 119]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(1982) The future in thought and language. Diachronic evidence from Romance [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 36]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Francis, E.J., & Michaelis, L.A
(Eds.) (2003) Mismatch: Form–function incongruity and the architecture of grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
(2008) Constructions and constructs: Mapping a diachronic process. In A. Bergs, & G. Diewald (Eds.), Constructions and language change (pp. 47–79). [Trends in Linguistics, 194]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2012) The historical syntax problem: Reanalysis and directionality. In D. Jonas, J. Whitman, & A. Garrett (Eds.), Grammatical change: Origins, nature, outcomes (pp. 52–72). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2011) Constructions, word grammar, and grammaticalization. Cognitive Linguistics, 22, 155–182.
Gisborne, N., & Patten, A
(2011) Construction grammar and grammaticalization. In H. Narrog, & B. Heine (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization (pp. 92–104). New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2002) World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
HC. Helsinki Corpus of English Texts
(1991) Compiled by M. Rissanen, M. Kytö; L. Kahlas-Tarkka, M. Kilpiö (Old English); S. Nevanlinna, I. Taavitsainen (Middle English); T. Nevalainen, H. Raumolin-Brunberg (Early Modern English). Department of English, University of Helsinki. [URL].
(2004) Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal? In W. Bisang, N.P. Himmelmann, & B. Wiemer (Eds.), What makes grammaticalization - A look from its fringes and its components (pp. 21–42). [Trends in Linguistics, 158]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2004) Theory and method in grammaticalization. In G. Diewald (Ed.), Grammatikalisierung, Special issue of Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, 32, 152–187.
(2008) Information structure and grammaticalization. In E. Seoane, & M.J. López-Couso (Eds., in collaboration with T. Fanego), Theoretical and empirical issues in grammaticalization (pp. 207–229). [Typological Studies in Language, 77]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(1979) Principles of diachronic syntax. [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 23]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(1999) The development of language: Acquisition, change, evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.
(1997) Parameters and functional heads: Essays in comparative syntax. [Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2004) Lexicalization as a way to grammaticalization. In F. Karlson (Ed.), Proceedings of the 20th Scandinavian conference of linguistics. [URL].
(1977) Some remarks on noun phrase structure. In P. Culicover, A. Akmajian, & T. Wasow (Eds.), Formal Syntax (pp. 283–316). New York: Academic Press.
(2012) Investigating the emergence of the definite article in Old English: About categorization, gradualness and constructions. Folia Linguistica Historica, 33, 175–213.
(2012) On the development of a prepositional object construction with give verbs, motion verbs and Latinate verbs in English. eVarieng 10. [URL]
(1988) Grammaticalization and semantic bleaching. In S. Axmaker, A. Jaisser, & H. Singmaster (Eds.), Berkeley linguistics society 14: General session and parasession on grammaticalization (pp. 389–405). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
(2008a) Grammaticalization, constructions and the incremental development of language: Suggestions from the development of degree modifiers in English. In R. Eckardt, G. Jäger, & T. Veenstra (Eds.), Variation, selection, development-Probing the evolutionary model of language change (pp. 219–250). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2008b) 'All that he endeavoured to prove was ...': On the emergence of grammatical constructions in dialogic contexts. In R. Cooper, & R. Kempson (Eds.), Language in flux: Dialogue coordination, language variation, change and evolution (pp. 143–177). [Communication, Mind, and Language, 1]. London: Kings College Publications.
(2010) Grammaticalization. In S. Luraghi, & V. Bubenik (Eds.), Continuum companion to historical linguistics (pp. 269–283). London: Continuum Press.
(2012) The status of onset contexts in analysis of micro-changes. In M. Kytö (Ed.), English corpus linguistics: Crossing paths (pp. 221–255). [Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics, 76]. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
(2013) Constructionalization and constructional changes. [Oxford Studies in Diachronic & Historical Linguistics, 6]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2008a) Words and constructions in grammaticalization: The end of the impersonal construction. In S.M. Fitzmaurice, & D. Minkova (Eds.), Studies in the history of the English language IV: Empirical and analytical advances in the study of English language change (pp. 301–326). [Topics in English Linguistics, 61]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2008b) Constructions in grammaticalization and lexicalization: Evidence from the history of a composite predicate construction in English. In G. Trousdale, & N. Gisborne (Eds.), Constructional approaches to English grammar (pp. 33–67). [Topics in English linguistics, 57]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2022. The trajectory of the “Možno ja X?” construction: variation in speech acts of request in contemporary Russian. Russian Linguistics 46:2 ► pp. 133 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.