It is well-known that grammaticalization involves category change. The development of a lexical element into a grammatical marker more specifically entails a category shift from an open lexical class (e.g. full verbs) to a closed grammatical class (e.g. auxiliary verbs). This article claims that host-class expansion, typically accompanying the process of grammaticalization, can also be considered as category change. Host-class expansion is more specifically category-internal change in the open class of elements that a grammaticalizing element collocates with. This article analyzes the internal structure of these open classes, making use of insights from construction grammar and prototype theory. The theoretical framework is substantiated by means of two case studies of host-class expansion in Dutch and Spanish. The main findings of this study are that (a) the open class of elements associated with a grammaticalizing element is internally organized as a prototype category, and (b) host-class expansion proceeds away from the prototypical core of the open class.
(2010) Size noun constructions as collocationally constrained constructions: Lexical and grammaticalized uses. English Language and Linguistics, 14(1), 83–109.
Brems, L.
(2011) Layering of size and type noun constructions in English. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Bybee, J.
(2001) Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, J.
(2003) Cognitive processes in grammaticalization. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language (Vol. 2, pp. 145–167). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Bybee, J.
(2006) From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82(4), 711–733.
Bybee, J.
(2010) Language, usage and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bybee, J.
(2013) Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. In Th. Hoffmann, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 47–69). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2004) Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In W. Bisang, N. P. Himmelmann, & B. Wiemer (Eds.), What makes grammaticalization: A look from its components and its fringes (pp. 21–42). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hopper, P. J.
(1991) On some principles of grammaticalization. In E. C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization: Vol. I: Focus on theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 17–36). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Hopper, P. J., & Thompson, S. A.
(1980) Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language, 56(2), 251–299.
Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C.
(2003) Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Israel, M.
(1996) The way constructions grow. In A. E. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language (pp. 217–230). Stanford: CSLI.
Johnson, K.
(1997) Speech perception without speaker normalization. In K. Johnson, & J. W. Mullennix (Eds.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp. 145–165). San Diego: Academic Press.
Kuryłowicz, J.
(1964) The inflectional categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Winter.
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, R.
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Levin, B.
(1993) English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M.
(1978) Context theory of classification learning. Psychological review, 85(3), 207–238.
Meillet, A.
(1912) L’évolution des formes grammaticales. Scientia (rivista di scienza), 12(26, 6), 384–400.
Nedjalkov, V. P., & Jaxontov, S.
(1988) The typology of resultative constructions. In V. P. Nedjalkov (Ed.), Typology of resultative constructions (pp. 3–62). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Oakley, T.
(2007) Image schemas. In D. Geeraerts, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 214–235). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2002) Word-specific phonetics. In C. Gussenhoven, & N. Warner (Eds.), Laboratory phonology 7 (pp. 101–139). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Rhee, S.
(2002) Semantic changes of English prepositions against a grammaticalization perspective. Language Research, 38(2), 563–583.
Rosch, E.
(1975) Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104(3), 573–605.
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B.
(1975) Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 573–605.
Shannon, Th. F.
(1989) Perfect auxiliary variation as a function of transitivity and Aktionsart. In J. Emondset al. (Eds.), Proceedings from the Western Conference on Linguistics (WECOL) (pp. 254–266). Fresno: California State University.
(1993a) To be or not to be in Dutch: A cognitive account of some puzzling perfect auxiliary phenomena. In R. S. Kirsner (Ed.), Beyond the Low Countries (pp. 85–96). Lanham: University Press of America.
Shannon, Th. F.
(1993b) Split intransitivity in German and Dutch: Semantic and pragmatic parameters. In R. Lippi-Green (Ed.), Recent developments in Germanic Linguistics (pp. 97–113). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Shannon, Th. F.
(1995) Towards a cognitive explanation of perfect auxiliary selection: Some modal and aspectual effects in the history of German. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics & Literatures, 7(2), 129–163.
Sorace, A.
(2000) Gradients in auxiliary selection with intransitive verbs. Language, 76(4), 859–890.
Taylor, J. R.
(1995) Cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Traugott, E. C.
(2003) Constructions in grammaticalization. In B. D. Joseph, & R. D. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 624–647). Oxford: Blackwell.
Traugott, E. C.
(2007) Concepts of constructional mismatch and type-shifting from the perspective of grammaticalization. Cognitive Linguistics, 18(4), 523–557.
Traugott, E. C.
(2008a) The grammaticalization of the NP of NP construction. In A. Bergs, & G. Diewald (Eds.), Constructions and language change (pp. 21–43). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Traugott, E. C.
(2008b) Grammaticalization, constructions and the incremental development of language: Suggestions from the development of degree modifiers in English. In R. Eckardt, G. Jäger, & T. Veenstra (Eds.), Variation, selection, development – Probing the evolutionary model of language change (pp. 219–250). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G.
(2013) Constructionalization and constructional change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Trousdale, G.
(2008) Words and constructions in grammaticalization: The end of the English impersonal construction. In S. Fitzmaurice, & D. Minkova (Eds.), Empirical and analytical advances in the study of English language change (pp. 301–326). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Tuggy, D.
(2007) Schematicity. In D. Geeraerts, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 82–115). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Verveckken, K.
(2012) Towards a constructional account of high and low frequency binominal quantifiers in Spanish. Cognitive Linguistics, 23(2), 421–478.
Verveckken, K.
(2015) Binominal quantifiers in Spanish. Conceptually-driven analogy in diachrony and synchrony. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
2021. The syntax of metaphor. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 9:1 ► pp. 47 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.