Baker, M.
(1988) Incorporation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cambridge Dictionaries Online
URL: [URL]. [Downloaded 13 November 2013.]
Chomsky, N.
(1957) Syntactic structures. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1965) Aspects of the theory of language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1970) ”Remarks on nominalizations.” In Readings in English transformational grammar, ed. Jacobs, R. & Rosenbaum, P. Waltham, Mass.: Ginn.Google Scholar
(1981) Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
(1986a) Barriers. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1986) Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. Westport, Conn.: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
(1995) The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2000) New Horizons in the study of language and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) ”Opening remarks.” In: M. Piatelli-Palmarini, J. Uriagerega, & P. Salaburu, eds., Of Minds and Language: A Dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque Country. Oxford UP.Google Scholar
Cinque, G.
(1999) Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N.
(1985) The geometry of phonological features. Phonology Yearbook, 2, 225–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W.
(2001) Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culicover, P. W. & Jackendoff, R.
(2005) Simpler Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ewen, C. J. & van der Hulst, H.
(2001) The Phonological Structure of Words: An Introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J.
(1968) The case for case. In E. Bach & R. Harms (Eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory (pp. 1–89). New York, N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. & Kay, P.
(1997) Berkeley Construction Grammar. Latest update: February 27, 1997. URL: [URL]. [downloaded 19 August 2013.]
Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P. & C. O’Connor
(1988) “Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of ‘let alone.’“ Language, 64, 501–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A.
(1983) The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fried, M. & Östman, J. -O.
(Eds.) (2004) Construction Grammar in a Cross-language Perspective. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givon, T.
(1984) Syntax: A functional-typological introduction. Volume I. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A.
(1995) Constructions. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J.
(1976) Autosegmental Phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT. 170 pp.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P.
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. L. Morgan, (Eds.), Speech Acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, A.
(1976a) Suomen sitä: Pragmatiikan heijastuma syntaksissa, Sananjalka, 17: 25-41.Google Scholar
(1976b) Liitepartikkelin -han/-hän syntaksia ja pragmatiikkaa. In: A. Hakulinen: Suomen kielen generatiivista lauseoppia 2. Turku: Stiftelsens för Åbo Akademi forskningsinstitut.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, A. & Karlsson, F.
(1979) Nykysuomen lauseoppia. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, A., Vilkuna, M., Korhonen, R., Koivisto, V., Heinonen, T.R. & Alho, I.
(2004) Iso suomen kielioppi. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Harrikari, H.
(1999) Epenthesis, Geminates, and the OCP in Finnish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 22, 3–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, A.
(2005) Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish Linguistic Inquiry , 36, 533–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, A. & Nikanne, U.
(1994) Expletives and Subject Positions in Finnish. In M. Gonzàlez, (Ed.), NELS 24 (pp. 173–187). Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
(2002) Expletives, Subjects, and Topics in Finnish. In P. Svenonius, (Ed.), Subjects, Expletives, and the EPP, (pp. 71–105). Oxford University Press. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
(2008) Subject doubling in Finnish: the role of deficient pronouns. In S. Barbiers, O. Koeneman, & M. Lekakou, (Eds.), Microvariations in Syntactic Doubling (pp. 325–349). Bingley: Emerald. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, A., Nikanne, U., Reime, H., Oraviita, I., & Trosterud, T.
(1993) The structure of INFL and the finite clause in Finnish. In A. Holmberg, & U. Nikanne, (Eds.), Case and other functional categories in Finnish syntax (pp. 176–206). Studies in Generative Grammar 39. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Holmberg, A. & Platzack, C.
(1995) The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. Oxford/New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hudson, R.
(1990) English Word Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2007) Language Networks: The New Word Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Itkonen, E.
(1983) Causality in Linguistic Theory. Kent: Groom Helm.Google Scholar
(1988) A critique on the ‘post-structuralist’ conception of language. Semiotica, 71, 305–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Itkonen, T.
(1980) Spesies suomessa ja germaanisissa kielissä. Virittäjä, 83(1), 27–38.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. S.
(1972) Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1976) Toward an explanatory semantic representation. Linguistic Inquiry, 7(1): 89–150.Google Scholar
(1983) Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1987a) Consciousness and the computational mind. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1987b) The status of thematic relations in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 18(3): 369–411.Google Scholar
(1990) Semantic structures. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
(1992a) Languages of the mind: Essays on mental representation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1992b) Mme. Tussaud Meets the Binding Theory. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 10(1), 1–31.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. S.
(2002) Foundations of language : brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Language, consciousness, culture: essays on mental structure. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Karhu, A.
(1994) Suomen itämurteiden oikealle lohkeavat rakenteet ja niiden lähirakenteet: dislokaatioita, korviketopiikkeja, diskurssimerkitsimiä ja pragmaattisia partikkeleita. Licentiate’s thesis, University of Joensuu, Department of Finnish.Google Scholar
Karlsson, F.
(1983) Suomen kielen äänne- ja muotorakenne. Helsinki: WSOY.Google Scholar
Kay, P.
(1995) Construction Grammar. In J. Versceuren, J. -O. Östman, & J. Blommaert, (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics: Manual (pp. 171–177). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kettunen, L.
(1940a) Suomen murteet III A, murrekartasto. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
(1940b) Suomen murteet III B, selityksiä murrekartastoon. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1980) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York, N.Y.: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(1987a) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1: Theoretical perquisites. Stanford, Cal.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1987b) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford, Cal.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Larjavaara, M.
(2007) Pragmasemantiikka. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Levin, B.
(1993) English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Macnamara, J.
(1978) How can we talk about what we see? Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal.Google Scholar
Maling, J.
(1993) Of nominative and accusative: the hierarchical assignment of grammatical case in Finnish. In Anders Holmberg & Urpo Nikanne (Eds.), Case and other functional categories in Finnish syntax (pp. 49–74). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nikanne, U.
(1990) Zones and Tiers: A study of argument structure. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
(1993) On Assigning semantic cases in Finnish. In A. Holmberg & U. Nikanne (Eds.), Case and other functional categories in Finnish syntax, (pp. 75–87). Studies in Generative Grammar 39. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(1994) On Movement to the Spec(IP) Position in Finnish. In N. Corver & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), Studies on Scrambling pp 431–457). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995) Action tier formation and argument linking. Studia Linguistica 49, 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997a) Lexical Conceptual Structure and Syntactic Arguments. SKY 1997 (1997 Yearbook of Linguistic Association of Finland), 81–118.Google Scholar
(1997b) Suomen infiniittisten adjunktien temporaalinen tulkinta. Virittäjä, 101(4), 338–357.Google Scholar
(1998) The Lexicon and Conceptual Structure. In T. Haukioja (Ed.), Papers from the 16th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics (pp. 305–319). Department of Finnish and general linguistics of the University of Turku.Google Scholar
(2002) Kerrokset ja kytkennät: konseptuaalisen semantiikan perusteet. [URL](downloaded 24 April 2018).Google Scholar
(2005a) Constructions in Conceptual Semantics. In J. -O. Östman & M. Fried (Eds.) Construction Grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions (pp. 191–242). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005b) Path expressions in Finnish and Swedish: The role of constructions. In L. Carlson & E. van der Zee (Eds.), Functional Features in Language and Space (pp. 311–327). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Aspectual case marking of object in Finnish. Research in Language, 4, 215–242.Google Scholar
(2008) Conceptual Semantics. In J. -O. Östman & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics (20 pp). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) Kielioppi verkostona. In Janhunen, J. (Ed.) Sphinx. Societas Scientiarum Fennica, yearbook 2013–2014, (pp. 77–88). Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar
(2015) What makes Conceptual Semantics special. In I. Toivonen, P. Csuri, & E. van der Zee (Eds.), Structures in the Mind: Essays on Language, Music, and Cognition in Honor of Ray Jackendoff (pp. 35–61). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2018): Finite sentences in Finnish Word order, morphology, and information structure. In Laura R. Bailey & Michelle Sheehan (eds.), Order and structure in syntax I (pp. 69–98). Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Nikanne, U. & van der Zee, E.
(2013) The lexical representation of path curvature in motion expressions: a three-way path curvature distinction. In M. Vulchanova & E. van der Zee (Eds). Motion Encoding in Language and Space (pp. 187–212). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nikanne, U. & Östman, J.-O.
(2006) Finland-Swedish directionality in Conceptual Semantics and in Construction Grammar: A methodological dialogue. In M. Suominen, A. Arppe, A. Airola, O. Heinämäki, M. Miestamo, U. Määttä, J. Niemi, K. K. Pitkänen and K. Sinnemäki (eds.) A Man of Measure. Festscrift in honour of Fred Karlsson on his 60th birthday, (pp. 66–86). SKY Journal, special supplement to vol. 19.Google Scholar
Oxford Dictionaries: Oxford Dictionaries Online
URL: [URL]. [Downloaded 8 November 2013.]
Paulsen, G.
(2011) Causation and Dominance: A Study of Finnish causative verbs expressing social dominance. Åbo: Åbo Akademi University Press.Google Scholar
Pekkarinen, H.
(2011) Monikasvoinen TAVA-partisiippi : Tutkimus suomen TAVA-partisiipin käyttökonteksteista ja verbiliittojen kieliopillistumisesta. Ph.D. dissertation: [URL] URN:ISBN:978-952-10-6965-9
Petrova, O.
(2011) ‘Of Pearls and Pigs’: A conceptual-semantic Tiernet approach to formal representation of structure and variation of phraseological units. Åbo Akademi University Press.Google Scholar
Pollock, J. -Y.
(1989) Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry, 20(3), 365–424.Google Scholar
Pörn, M.
(2004) Suomen tunnekausatiiviverbit ja niiden lausemaiset täydennykset. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Sadock, J. M.
(2012) The Modular Architecture of Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Sagey, E. C.
(1986) The representation of features and relations in non-linear phonology. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy. URL: [URL]
Siiroinen, M.
(2001) Kuka pelkää, ketä pelottaa: nykysuomen tunneverbien kielioppia ja semantiikkaa. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Siitonen, K.
(1999) Agenttia etsimässä. U-verbijohdokset edistyneen suomenoppijan ongelmana. Publications of the Department of Finnish Language and General Linguistics, vol. 63. University of Turku.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D.
(1986) Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Suomi, K.
(1990) Huomioita yleiskielen konsonanttien yhdistelyrajoituksista ja pohjalais murteiden epenteettisestä vokaalista. Virittäjä, 94(2), 139–160.Google Scholar
Tenny, C.
(1987) Grammaticalizing Aspect and Affectedness, Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
van der Zee, E., Nikanne, U. & Sassenberg, U.
(2010) Grain levels in English path curvature descriptions and accompanying iconic gestures. In: Journal of Spatial Information Science, 1, 95–113Google Scholar
Vendler, Z.
(1957) Verbs and times. Philosophical Review, 56, 143–160. Reprinted in: Z. Vendler (1967) Linguistics in Philosophy (pp. 97–121). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Vilkuna, M.
(1984) Voiko kin-partikkelia ymmärtää. Virittäjä, 88(4), 393–408.Google Scholar
(1989) Free word order in Finnish: Its syntax and discourse functions. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Vilppula, M.
(1984) Kurkikin jo lähti. Virittäjä, 88(1), 47–60.Google Scholar
von Wright, G. H.
(1957) Logical Studies, International Library of Psychology, Philosophy and Scientific Method. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Published online 15 June 2009, URL: [URL], downloaded 28 October 2013.)
Östman, J. -O. & Fried, M.
(Eds.) (2005) Construction Grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiik, K.
(1975) Suomen frekventatiivi ja kontinuatiivi. Virittäjä, 79(2), 153–167.Google Scholar