Part of
Discourse Structuring Markers in English: A historical constructionalist perspective on pragmaticsElizabeth Closs Traugott
[Constructional Approaches to Language 33] 2022
► pp. 245–266
Elizabeth Closs Traugott
[Constructional Approaches to Language 33] 2022
► pp. 245–266
References
Data resources and corpora
CED
CEECS
Corpus of Early English
Correspondence Sampler,
1414–1680 (1998) Compiled
by T. Nevalainen, H. Raumolin-Brunberg, J. Keränen, M. Nevala, A. Nurmi, & M. Palander-Collin. University of Helsinki. 450,000
words. [URL].
CLMET_3_0
The Corpus of Late Modern
English Texts, version 3.0 compiled
by H. de Smet, H.-J. Diller, & J. Tyrkkö. Leuven
University. c. 34 million words 1710–1920. [URL].
COCA
The
Corpus of Contemporary American English.
1990–2019. Compiled
by M. Davies. Brigham
Young University. Release March 2020, 1. billion
words. [URL].
COHA
Corpus of Historical American
English. 1810–2009. Compiled
by M. Davies. Brigham Young University. 400 million words.
(Superseded by Corpus of Historical American English.
1820s–2010s. Compiled by M. Davies. Brigham Young University. Release
2021, 475 million words. [URL].)
DOE
DOEC
Dictionary of Old English
Corpus (2009) Original
release 1981 compiled by A. Cameron, A. Crandell Amos, S. Butler & A. diPaolo Healey. Release
2009 compiled by A. diPaolo Healey, J.Holland, I. McDougall, & D.
McDougall, with Xin Xiang. University of Toronto. c3 million running
words of Old English, c1 million running words of
Latin. [URL].
EEBO Davies, M.
Fisher Fisher Corpus
of American Telephone
Calls
. See C. Cieri, D. Graff, O. Kimball, D. Miller, & K. Walker (2004,
2005) Fisher English Training Speech, Part 1,
Part 2. Transcripts. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.
HC
Helsinki Corpus of English Texts.
730–1710 (1991) Compiled
by M. Rissanen Project
leader M. Kytö Project
secretary; L. Kahlas-Tarkka, M. Kilpiö Old
English; S. Nevanlinna, I. Taavitsainen Middle
English; T. Nevalainen, H. Raumolin-Brunberg (Early
Modern English). Department of English, University of Helsinki, 1.5 million words. [URL]
HGCW
Harvard’s Geoffrey Chaucer
Website. [URL]
ICE-AUS
International Corpus of
English –
Australia (1991–1995) Compiled
by P. Peters. Macquarie University, c1 million
words. [URL].
ICE-GB
International Corpus of
English-Great
Britain. International [URL].
MED
NOW
corpus
OED
OSS
OpenSource Shakespeare, An
Experiment in Literary Technology,
2003–2005, compiled
by E. M. Johnson, George Mason University, [URL].
SBCSAE
Santa Barbara Corpus of American
Spoken English,
Parts 1–4 (2000–2005) Compiled
by J. W. Du Bois, W. L. Chafe, C. Meyer, S. A. Thompson, R. Englebretson & N. Martey. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.
List of references
Acton, E. K.
(2019) Pragmatics
and the social life of the English definite
article. Language 95(1), 37–65. 
Aijmer, K.
(1986) Why
is actually so popular in spoken
English? In G. Tottie, & I. Bäcklund (Eds.), English
in speech and writing: A
symposium (pp. 119–127). Almqvist and Wiksell.
(1997)
I
think– an English modal
particle. In T. Swan, & O. J. Westvik (Eds.), Modality
in Germanic languages: Historical and comparative
perspectives (pp. 1–47). Mouton de Gruyter.
Alm, M., & Fischer, K.
(2021) The
problem of prosodic variability in the definition of constructions: The
list construction. Paper presented at
ICCG11, Antwerp, August.
Andersen, H.
(2001) Actualization
and the
(uni)directionality. In H. Andersen (Ed.,) Actualization:
Linguistic change in
progress (pp. 225–248). John Benjamins.
Anthonissen, L.
(2020) Cognition
in construction grammar: Connecting individual and community
grammars. In P. Petré, & L. Anthonissen (Eds.), Constructionalist
Approaches to Individuality in Language. Special issue, Cognitive
Linguistics 31(2), 185–212.
Anttila, R.
(2003) Analogy:
The warp and woof of
cognition. In B. D. Joseph & R. D. Janda (Eds.), The
handbook of historical
linguistics (pp. 425–440). Blackwell.
Ariel, M.
(2019)
Or
constructions: Code, inference and cue
too. In R. Finkbeiner (Ed.), On
the role of pragmatics in Construction Grammar. Special issue, Constructions and
Frames 11(2), 193–219.
Ariel, M., & Mauri, C.
(2019) An
‘alternative’ core for
or
. Journal of
Pragmatics 149, 40–59.
Athanasiadou, A., Canakis, C., & Cornillie, B.
(Eds.) (2006) Subjectification:
Various paths to subjectivity. Mouton de Gruyter.
Auer, P.
(1996) The
pre-front field in spoken German and its relevance as a
grammaticalization
position. Pragmatics 6, 295–322.
(2005) Projection
in interaction and projection in
grammar. Text 25, 7–36.
Auer, P. & Maschler, Y.
(eds) (2016) NU/NÅ:
A Family of Discourse Markers across the Language of Europe and
Beyond. De Gruyter.
Auer, P., & Pfänder, S.
(2011) Constructions:
Emergent or
emerging? In P. Auer, & S., Pfänder (Eds.), Constructions:
Emerging and
Emergent (pp. 1–21). De Gruyter Mouton.
Barðdal, J.
Barðdal, J., Smirnova, E., Sommerer, L., & Gildea, S.
Beeching, K.
(2005) Politeness-induced
semantic change: The case of
quand-même
. Language
Variation and
Change 17(2), 155–180.
Beeching, K., & Detges, U.
(Eds.) (2014a) Discourse
functions at the left and right periphery: Crosslinguistic
investigations of language use and language
change. Brill.
(2014b) Introduction. In K. Beeching, & U. Detges (Eds.), Discourse
functions at the left and right periphery: Crosslinguistic
investigations of language use and language
change (pp. 1–23). Brill.
Beeching, K., & Murphy, J.
(2019) Doing
(mock) im/politeness: Norms and variations in the use of politeness
formulae. Special
issue, Journal of
Pragmatics 142, 201–206.
Benveniste, É.
(1971[1958]) Subjectivity
in
language. In É. Benveniste, Problems
in general
linguistics (pp. 223–230), trans.
by M. E. Meek. Coral Gables: FL: University of Miami Press.
Bergs, A., & Diewald, G.
(2008) Constructions
and language change. de Gruyter Mouton.
(2009b) Contexts
and
constructions. In A. Bergs, & G. Diewald (Eds.), Contexts
and
constructions (pp. 1–14). John Benjamins.
Biber, D., & Finegan, E.
(1988) Adverbial
stance types in English. Discourse
Processes 11, 1–34.
(1989) Styles
of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality
and
effect. Text 9(1), 93–124.
Biber, D., & Gray, B.
(2011) Grammatical change in the noun phrase: The influence of written language use. English Language and Linguistics 15(2), 223-250.
(2012) The
competing demands of popularization vs. economy: Written language in the
age of mass
literacy. In T. Nevalainen, & E. C. Traugott (Eds.), The
Oxford handbook of the history of
English (pp. 314–328). Oxford University Press.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
(1999) Longman
grammar of spoken and written
English. Pearson Education.
Biberauer, T., & Roberts, I.
(2017) Parameter
setting. In A. Ledgeway, & I. Roberts (Eds.), The
Cambridge handbook of historical
syntax (pp. 134–162). Cambridge University Press.
Birner, B. J., & Ward, G.
Blakemore, D.
(1987) Semantic
constraints on
Relevance. Blackwell.
(2002) Relevance
and linguistic meaning: The semantics and pragmatics of Discourse
Markers. Cambridge University Press.
Boas, H. C.
(2013) Cognitive
construction
grammar. In T. Hoffmann, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The
Oxford Handbook of Construction
Grammar (pp. 233–252). Oxford University Press.
Boas, H. C., & Sag, I. A.
(Eds.) (2012) Sign-based
construction grammar. CSLI Publications.
Bolinger, D.
(1989) Intonation
and its Uses: Melody in grammar and
discourse. Edward Arnold.
Börjars, K., Vincent, N., & Walkden, G.
(2015) On
constructing a theory of grammatical
change. Transactions of the Philological
Society 113, 363–382.
Boye, K, & Harder, P.
(2007) Complement-taking
predicates: Usage and linguistic
structure. Studies in
Language 31(3), 596–606.
Boye, K., & Harder, P.
(2012) A
usage-based theory of grammatical status and
grammaticalization. Language 88, 1–44.
Bréal, M.
(1964[1900]) Semantics:
Studies in the Science of Meaning, trans.
by Mrs. H. Cust. Dover.
Breban, T.
(2006) Grammaticalization
and subjectification of the English adjectives of general
comparison. In A. Athanasiadou, C. Canakis, & B. Cornillie (Eds.), Subjectification:
Various paths to
subjectivity (pp. 241–278). Mouton de Gruyter.
Brems, L.
(2011) Layering
of size and type noun constructions in
English. de Gruyter Mouton.
Brems, L., Ghesquière, L., & Van de Velde, F.
(2014[2012]b) Intersubjectivity
and intersubjectification: Typology and
operationalization. In L. Brems, L. Ghesquière, & F. Van de Velde (Eds.), Intersubjectivity
and intersubjectification in grammar and
discourse (pp. 129–153). John Benjamins.
Brinton, L. J.
(1996) Pragmatic
Markers in English: Grammaticalization and discourse
functions. Mouton de Gruyter.
Brinton, L.
(2006) Pathways
in the development of Pragmatic Markers in
English. In A. van Kemenade, & B. Los (Eds.), The
handbook of the history of
English (pp. 307–334). Blackwell.
Brinton, L. J.
(2008) The
comment clause in English: Syntactic origins and pragmatic
development. Cambridge University Press.
(2017) Evolution
of Pragmatic Markers in English: Pathways of
change. Cambridge University Press.
Briz, A.
, & Grupo
Val.Es.Co (2003) Un
sistema de unidades para el estudio del lenguaje coloquial [A system of
units for the study of colloquial
language]. Oralia 6, 7–61.
Bromhead, H.
(2009) The
reign of truth and faith: Epistemic expressions in 16th and 17th century
English. Mouton de Gruyter.
Buchstaller, I., & Traugott, E. C.
(2006)
The
lady was al demonyak: Historical aspects of adverb
all
. English
Language and
Linguistics 10, 345–370.
Budts, S., & Petré, P.
(2020) Putting
connections center stage in Diachronic Construction
Grammar. In L. Sommerer, & E. Smirnova (Eds.,) Nodes
and networks in Diachronic Construction
Grammar (pp. 317–351). John Benjamins.
Bybee, J.
(2003) Mechanisms
of change in grammaticization: The role of
frequency. In B. D. Joseph, & R. D. Janda (Eds.), The
handbook of historical
linguistics (pp. 602–623). Blackwell.
Bybee, J. L.
(2010) Language,
usage and cognition. Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, J. L., & Pagliuca, W.
(1987) The
evolution of future
meaning. In A. Giacalone Ramat, O. Carruba, & G. Bernini (Eds.), Papers
from the 7th International Conference on Historical
Linguistics (pp. 109–122). John Benjamins.
Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W.
(1994) The
evolution of grammar: tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of
the world. University of Chicago Press.
Caffi, C.
(2013) On
mitigation. In M. Sbisà, & K. Turner (Eds.), Pragmatics
of speech
actions (pp. 258–286). Walter de Gruyter.
Campbell, L.
(Ed.) (2001) Grammaticalization:
A critical assessment. Language
Sciences 23, Nos. 2–3.
Cappelle, B.
(2006) Particle
placement and the case for
‘allostructions’. In D. Schönefeld (Ed.), Constructions
all over: Case studies and theoretical implications. Special issue, Constructions. [URL]
(2017) What’s
pragmatics doing outside
constructions? In I. Depraetere, & R. Salkie (Eds.), Semantics
and pragmatics: Drawing a
Line (pp. 115–151). Springer.
Carston, R.
(2002) Thoughts
and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit
communication. Blackwell.
Catford, J. C.
(1965) A
linguistic theory of translation. Oxford University Press.
Chaves, R. P.
(2007) Coordinate
structures: Constraint-based syntactic-semantic
processing. Unpublished dissertation, University of Lisbon.
Chomsky N.
(2005) Three
factors in language design. Linguistic
Inquiry 36(1), 1–22.
Clark, E. V., & Clark, H. H.
(1979) When
nouns surface as
verbs. Language 55, 767–811.
Comrie, B.
1989[1981] Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. Chicago University Press.
Conrad, S., & Biber, D.
(2000) Adverbial
marking of stance in speech and
writing. In S. Hunston, & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation
in text: Authorial stance and the construction of
discourse (pp. 56–73). Oxford University Press.
Coussé, E., Andersson, P. & Olofsson, J.
(2018b) Grammaticalization
meets Construction Grammar: Opportunities, challenges and potential
incompatibilities. In E. Coussé, P. Andersson, & J. Olofsson (Eds.), Grammaticalization
meets Construction
Grammar (pp. 3–19). John Benjamins.
Croft, W.
(2000) Explaining
language
change. Longman, Pearson Education.
(2001) Radical
Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological
perspective. Oxford University Press.
(2005) Logical
and typological arguments for Radical Construction
Grammar. In J.-O. Östman & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction
grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical
extensions (pp. 273–314). John Benjamins.
Cuenca, M. J.
(2015) Lexical connectives as grounding devices in political discourse. Paper presented at IPrA 14, Antwerp, Belgium.
Cuenca, M. J., & Bach, C.
(2007) Contrasting
the form and use of reformulation
markers. Discourse
Studies 9(2), 149–275.
Culpeper, J., & Kytö. M.
(2010) Early
Modern English dialogues: Spoken interaction as
writing. Cambridge University Press.
Davidse, K., Vandelanotte, L., & Cuyckens, H.
(Eds.) 2010 Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization. De Gruyter Mouton.
Defour, T.
(2007) A
diachronic study of the pragmatic markers well and
now
. Fundamental
research into semantic development and grammaticalisation by means of a
corpus study. Doctoral dissertation, Ghent University.
Degand, L., & Evers-Vermeul, J.
(2015) Grammaticalization
or pragmaticalization of discourse
markers? Journal of Historical
Pragmatics 16(1), 59–85.
Degand, L., & Fagard, B.
(2011)
Alors
between discourse and grammar: The role of syntactic
position. Functions of
Language 18, 29–56.
Degand, L., & Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M.
(Eds.) (2011a.) Grammaticalization,
pragmaticalization and/or (inter)subjectification: Methodological issues
for the study of Discourse Markers. Special
issue, Linguistics 49 (2).
Degand, L., & Simon-Vandenbergen, A. M.
(2011b) Introduction:
Grammaticalization and (inter)subjectification of Discourse
Markers. In L. Degand, & A.-M. Simon-Vandenbergen (Eds.), Grammaticalization,
pragmaticalization and/or (inter)subjectification: Methodological issues
for the study of Discourse Markers. Special
issue, Linguistics 49(2), 287–294.
Dehé, N., & Wichmann, A.
(2010) Sentence-initial
I think (that) and I believe
(that): Prosodic evidence for use as main clause, comment
clause and discourse marker. Studies in
Language 34, 36–74.
Deppermann, A., & Günthner, S.
Depraetere, I., & Salkie, R.
(Eds.) (2017) Semantics
and pragmatics: Drawing a
line. Springer.
De Smet, H.
(2009) Analysing
reanalysis. Lingua 119, 1728–1755.
(2012) The
course of
actualization. Language 88(4), 601–633.
De Smet, H., Ghesquière, L., & van de Velde, F.
De Smet, H., & Verstraete., J.-C.
(2006) Coming
to terms with subjectivity. Cognitive
Linguistics 17(3), 365–392.
Detges, U.
(2016) Does
reanalysis need
ambiguity? In M. Bauer, & N. Potysch (Eds.), Ambiguity.
An interdisciplinary approach. Peter Lang.
Detges, U., & Waltereit, R.
(2002) Grammaticalization
vs. reanalysis: A semantic-pragmatic account of functional change in
language. Zeitschrift für
Spachwissenschaft 21, 151–195.
Diessel, H.
(2006) Demonstratives,
joint attention, and the emergence of
grammar. Cognitive
Linguistics 17(4), 463–489.
(2015) Usage-based
construction
grammar. In E. Dąbrowska, & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook
of cognitive
linguistics (pp. 295–321). Mouton de Gruyter. .
.
(2017) Usage-based
linguistics. In M. Aronoff (Ed.), Oxford
research encyclopedia of
linguistics. Oxford University Press. .
.
(2019) The
grammar network: How linguistic structure is shaped by language
use. Cambridge University Press.
Diewald, G.
(2002) A
model for relevant types of contexts in
grammaticalization. In I. Wischer, & G. Diewald (Eds.), New
reflections on
grammaticalization (pp. 103–120). John Benjamins.
(2011) Pragmaticalization
(defined) as grammaticalization of discourse
functions. Linguistics 49, 365–390.
Diewald, G., & Smirnova, E.
(2012) Paradigmatic
integration. In K. Davidse, T. Breban, L. Brems and T. Mortelmans (Eds.), Grammaticalization
and language change: New
reflections, (pp. 111–134). John Benjamins.
Dostie, G.
(2009) Discourse
markers and regional variation in French: A lexico-semantic
approach. In K. Beeching, N. Armstrong, & F. Gadet (Eds.), Sociolinguistic
variation in Contemporary
French, (pp. 201–214). John Benjamins.
Drew, P., & Heritage, J.
(1992) Analyzing
talk at work: An
introduction. In P. Drew, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk
at work: Interaction in institutional
settings (pp. 3–65). Cambridge University Press.
Dunn. J.
(2017) Learnability
and falsifiability of construction
grammars. Proceedings of the Linguistic
Society of
America 6(1).
Durkin, P.
(2014) Borrowed
words: A history of loanwords in
English. Oxford University Press.
Eckardt, R.
(2006) Meaning
change in grammaticalization: An enquiry into semantic
reanalysis. Oxford University Press.
(2009) APO:
Avoid Pragmatic
Overload. In M.-B. Mosegaard Hansen, & J. Visconti (Eds.), Current
trends in diachronic semantics and
pragmatics (pp. 21–41). Brill.
Ehmer, O., & Rosemeyer, M.
(2018) Inferences
in interaction and language
change. In O. Ehmer, & M. Rosemeyer (Eds.), Inferences in interaction and language change, Special
issue, Open
Linguistics, 4(1), 1–20.
Enfield, N. J.
(2006) Heterosemy
and the grammar-lexicon
trade-off. In F. K. Ameka, A. Dench, & N. Evans (Eds.), Catching
language (pp. 297–320). De Gruyter Mouton.
Erman, B. & Kotsinas, U.-B.
(1993) Pragmaticalization:
The case of ba’ and you
know
. Studier i
Modernspråkvetenskap 10, 76–93. Almqvist and Wiksell.
Evans, N., & Wilkins, N.
(2000) In
the mind’s ear: The semantic extensions of perception verbs in
Australian
languages. Language 76(3), 546–592.
Evers-Vermeul, J., Degand, L., Fagard, B., & Mortier, L.
(2011) Historical
and comparative perspectives on subjectification: A corpus-based
analysis of Dutch and French causal
connectives. Linguistics 49(2), 445–478.
Fagard, B., & Sarda, L.
(2014) From
local adverbials to discourse markers: Three case studies in the
diachrony of French. Pragmatic Approaches
to Text
Structuring, halshs-01242141.
Fauconnier, G.
(2008) Pragmatics
and cognitive
linguistics. In L. R. Horn, & G. Ward (Eds.), The
handbook of
pragmatics (pp. 657–674). Blackwell.
Fetzer, A.
(2012) Context
in interaction: Relating pragmatic
wastebaskets. In R. Finkbeiner, J. Meibauer, & P. B. Schumacher (Eds.), What
is a context? Linguistic approaches and
challenges (pp. 105–127). John Benjamins.
Fillmore, C. J.
(1976) Frame
semantics and the nature of
language. In S. R. Harnad, H. D. Steklis, & J. Lancaster (Eds.), Origins
and evolution of language and
speech (pp. 20–32). New York Academy of Sciences.
Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M. C.
(1988) Regularity
and idiomaticity in grammatical
constructions. Language 64, 501–538.
Fillmore, C. J., & Baker, C. F.
(2001) Frame
semantics for text
understanding. Proceedings of WordNet and
other lexical resources
workshop (pp. 59–63). NAACL.
Finkbeiner, R.
(Ed.) (2019a) On
the role of pragmatics in Construction Grammar. Special issue,
Constructions and
Frames 11(2).
(2019b) Reflections
on the role of pragmatics in Construction
Grammar. In R. Finkbeiner (Ed.,) On
the role of pragmatics in Construction Grammar. Special issue, Constructions and
Frames 11(2), 171–192.
Fischer, K.
(Ed.) (2006) Approaches
to Discourse
Particles. Elsevier.
(2017) Cognitive
linguistics and
pragmatics. In B. Dancygier (Ed.), The
Cambridge handbook of cognitive
linguistics (pp. 330–346). Cambridge University Press.
Fischer, O.
(2007) Morphosyntactic
change: Functional and formal
perspectives. Oxford University Press.
(2011) Grammaticalization
as analogically driven
change? In H. Narrog, & B. Heine (Eds.), The
Oxford handbook of
grammaticalization (pp. 31–42). Oxford University Press.
Fitzmaurice, S.
(2010) Coalitions,
networks, and discourse communities in Augustan England: The Spectator
and the early eighteenth-century
essay. In R. Hickey (Ed.), Eighteenth-century
English: Ideology and
change (pp. 106–132). Cambridge University Press.
Flach, S.
(2020) Constructionalization
and the Sorites
paradox. In L. Sommerer, & E. Smirnova (Eds.), Nodes
and networks in Diachronic Construction
Grammar (pp. 45–67). John Benjamins.
Foolen, A.
(1996) Pragmatic
particles. In J. Verschueren, J.-O. Östman, J. Blommaert, & C. Bulcan (Eds.), Handbook
of pragmatics 1996
(pp. 1–24). John Benjamins.
Frank-Job, B.
(2006) A
dynamic-interactional approach to Discourse
Markers. In K. Fischer (Ed.), Approaches
to Discourse
Particles (pp. 395–415). Elsevier.
Fraser, B.
(1988) Types
of English discourse markers. Acta
Linguistica
Hungarica 38, 19–33.
(2006) Towards
a theory of Discourse
Markers. In K. Fischer (Ed.,) Approaches
to Discourse
Particles (pp. 189–204). Elsevier.
(2009a) Topic
orientation markers. Journal of
Pragmatics 41(5), 892–898.
(2009b) An
account of discourse
markers. International Review of
Pragmatics 1, 293–320.
(2010) Pragmatic
competence: The case of
hedging. In G. Kaltenböck, W. Mihatsch, & S. Schneider (Eds.), New
approaches to
hedging. (pp. 15–34). Brill.
(2015) The
combining of Discourse Markers: A
beginning. Journal of
Pragmatics 86, 48–53.
Fraser, B., & Traugott, E. C.
(2017) But
yet, see now this is another kind of Catch22. A
study of metatextual marker sequences. Paper presented at IPrA 15, July
16–21, Belfast.
Frawley, W.
(2013[1992]) Linguistic
semantics. Routledge.
Fried, M., & Nikiforidou, K.
(Eds) (2015) On
the interaction of constructions with register and genre. Special issue, Constructions and
Frames
7(2).
Fried, M., & Östman, J.-O.
(2005) Construction
grammar and spoken language: The case of pragmatic
particles. Journal of
Pragmatics 37, 1752–1778.
Geeraerts, D.
(1997) Diachronic
prototype semantics: A contribution to historical
lexicology. Clarendon Press.
(2003) Decontextualizing
and recontextualizing tendencies in 20th-century linguistics and
literary
theory. In E. Mengel, H.-J. Schmid, & M. Steppat (Eds.), Anglistentag
2002
Bayreuth (pp. 369–379). Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
Geeraerts, D., & Cuyckens, H.
(2007) The
Oxford handbook of cognitive
linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Ghesquière, L.
(2010) On
the subjectification and intersubjectification paths followed by the
adjectives of
completeness. In K. Davidse, L. Vandelanotte, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Subjectification,
intersubjectification and
grammaticalization (pp. 277–313). De Gruyter Mouton.
Givón, T.
Goldberg, A. E.
(1995) Constructions:
A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument
Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
(2003) Constructions:
A new theoretical approach to
language. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences 7, 219–224.
(2006) Constructions
at work: The nature of generalization in
language. Oxford University Press.
(2013) Constructionist
approaches. In T. Hoffmann, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The
Oxford handbook of construction
grammar (pp. 15–31). Oxford University Press.
(2019) Explain
me this. Princeton University Press.
Goldberg, J. A.
(1980) Discourse
particles: An analysis of the role of y’know, I mean,
well and actually in
conversations. Unpublished dissertation, Cambridge University.
Goldstein, D.
(2014) Wackernagel’s
Law I. In G. Giannakis et al.. (Eds). Encyclopedia
of ancient Greek language and
linguistics (pp. 508–513). Brill.
Gras, P., & Elvira-García, W.
(2021) The
role of intonation in Construction Grammar: On prosodic
constructions. Journal of
Pragmatics 180, 234–247.
Greenbaum, S.
(1969) Studies
in English adverbial
usage. Arnold.
Gregory, M. L., & Michaelis, L. A.
(2001) Topicalization
and left-dislocation: A functional opposition
revisited. Journal of
Pragmatics 33, 1665–1706.
Grice, H. P.
(1989[1967]) Logic
and
conversation. In H. P. Grice, Studies
in the way of
words (pp. 22–40). Harvard University Press.
Gries, S. Th., & Hilpert, M.
(2012) Variability-based
neighbor clustering: A bottom-up approach to periodization in historical
linguistics. In T. Nevalainen, & E. C. Traugott (Eds.), The
Oxford handbook of the history of
English (pp. 134–144). Oxford University Press.
Grondelaers, S., & Geeraerts, D.
(2003) Towards
a pragmatic model of cognitive
onomasiology. In H. Cuyckens, R. Dirven, & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), Cognitive
approaches to lexical
semantics (pp. 67–92). De Gruyter Mouton.
Grondelaers, S., Speelman, D., & Geeraerts, D.
(2007) Lexical
variation and
change. In D. Geeraerts, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The
Oxford handbook of cognitive
linguistics (pp. 988–1011). Oxford University Press.
Gyselinck, E.
(2020) (Re)shaping
the constructional network: Modeling shifts and reorganizations in the
network
hierarchy. In L. Sommerer, & E. Smirnova (Eds.), Nodes
and networks in Diachronic Construction
Grammar (pp. 107–140). John Benjamins.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R.
(1976) Cohesion
in
English. Longman.
Hancil, S.
(2016) Final
but, theticality and
subjectification. Anglophonia 22.
Hancil, S., Haselow. A., & Post, M.
(Eds.) (2015) Final
particles. De Gruyter Mouton.
Hansen, M.-B. M.
(1998) The
function of Discourse Particles. A study with special reference to
Spoken Standard French. John Benjamins.
(2008) Particles
at the semantics/pragmatics interface: Synchronic and diachronic issues:
A Study with special reference to the French phasal
adverbs. Elsevier.
(2012) The
semantics of pragmatic
expressions. In H.-J. Schmid (Ed.), Cognitive
pragmatics (pp. 589–613). De Gruyter Mouton.
Hansen, M.-B. M., & Visconti, J.
(2009) Current
trends in diachronic semantics and
pragmatics. In M.-B. M. Hansen, & J. Visconti (Eds.), Current
trends in diachronic semantics and
pragmatics (pp. 1–19.) Brill.
Hansen, M.-B. M., & Waltereit, R.
(2006) GCI
theory and language change. Acta
lingvistica
hafniensia 38, 235–268.
Harder, P.
(2012) Emergent
and usage-based models of
grammar. In H.-J. Schmid (Ed.), Cognitive
pragmatics (pp. 507–532). De Gruyter.
Harris, A., & Campbell, L.
(1995) Historical
syntax in cross-linguistic
perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Haselow, A.
(2012) Discourse
organization and the rise of final then in the history
of
English. In I. Hegedüs, & A. Fodor (Eds.), English
historical linguistics 2010. selected papers from the sixteenth
international conference on English historical linguistics (ICEHL 16),
Pécs, 23–27 August 2010,
(pp. 153–175). John Benjamins.
(2013) Arguing
for a wide conception of grammar: The case of final particles in spoken
discourse. Folia
Linguistica 47,375–424.
(2015) Left
vs. right periphery in grammaticalization: The case of
anyway
. In A. D. M. Smith, G. Trousdale, & R. Waltereit (Eds.), New
Directions in Grammaticalization
Research, 157–186. John Benjamins.
(2016) A
processual view on grammar: Macrogrammar and the final field in spoken
syntax. Language
Sciences 54, 77–101.
(2019) Discourse
marker sequences: Insights into the serial order of communicative tasks
in real-time turn production. Journal of
Pragmatics 146, 1–18.
Haspelmath, M.
(1999) Why is grammaticalization irrecersible? Linguistics 37, 1043-1068.
(2004) On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization. In O. Fischer, M. Norde, & H. Perridon (Eds.), Up and Down the Cline-The Nature of Grammaticalization (pp. 17–44). John Benjamins.
Hasselgård, H.
(2010) Adjunct
adverbials in English. Cambridge University Press.
Hata, K.
(2016) On
the importance of the multimodal approach to discourse markers: A
pragmatic view. International Review of
Pragmatics 8(1), 36–54.
Hawkins, J. A.
(1983) Word
order universals. Academic Press.
(2004) Efficiency
and complexity in grammars. Oxford University Press.
Heine, B.
(2002) On
the role of context in
grammaticalization. In I. Wischer, & G. Diewald (Eds.), New
reflections on
grammaticalization (pp. 83–101). John Benjamins.
(2013) On
discourse markers: Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something
else? Linguistics 51(6), 1205–1247.
(2019) Some
observations on the dualistic nature of discourse
processing. Folia
Linguistica 52(2), 411–442.
Heine, B., Claudi, U., & Hünnemeyer, F.
(1991) Grammaticalization:
A conceptual framework. University of Chicago Press.
Heine, B., Kaltenböck, G., Kuteva, T., & Long, H.
(2017) Cooptation
as a discourse
strategy. Linguistics 55(4), 813–855.
In
press). The rise of Discourse
Markers. Cambridge University Press.
Heine, B., & Miyashita, H.
(2008) Accounting
for a functional category: German drohen ‘to
threaten’. Language
Sciences 30, 53–101.
Heine, B., & Reh, M.
(1984) Grammaticalization
and reanalysis in African
Languages. Buske.
Heritage, J.
(1994) A
change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential
placement. In J. M. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures
of social
action (pp. 299–345). Cambridge University Press.
(2002)
Oh-prefaced
responses to assessments: A method of modifying
agreement/disagreement. In C. Ford, B. Fox, & S. Thompson (Eds.), The
language of turn and
sequence (pp. 196–224). Oxford University Press.
Hernández-Campoy, J. M., & Conde-Silvestre, J. C.
(Eds.) (2012) The
handbook of historical
sociolinguistics. Wiley-Blackwell.
Hilpert, M.
(2013) Constructional
change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word-formation and
syntax. Cambridge University Press.
(2018) Three
open questions in Diachronic Construction
Grammar. In E. Coussé, J. Olofsson, & P. Andersson (Eds.), Grammaticalization
meets construction
grammar, 22–39. John Benjamins.
Himmelmann, N. P.
(2004) Lexicalization
and grammaticization: Opposite or
orthogonal? In W. Bisang, N. P. Himmelmann, & B. Wiemer (Eds.), What
makes grammaticalization – A look from its fringes and its
components (pp. 21–42). Mouton de Gruyter.
Hoffmann, S.
(2004) Using
the OED quotations database as a corpus – a linguistic
appraisal. ICAME 28(4), 17–30.
Hoffmann, T.
(2020) What
would it take for us to abandon Construction Grammar? Falsifiability,
confirmation bias and the future of the constructionist
enterprise. Belgian Journal of
Linguistics 34, 149–161.
Hoffmann, T., & Trousdale, G.
(Eds.) (2013) The
Oxford handbook of construction
grammar. Oxford University Press.
Hopper, P. J.
(1987) Emergent
grammar. In J. Aske, N. Berry, L. Michaelis, & H. Filip (Eds.), Berkeley
Linguistics Society 13: General session and parasession on grammar and
cognition (pp. 139–157). Berkeley Linguistics Society.
(1991) On
some principles of
grammaticization. In E. C. Traugott, & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches
to
grammaticalization, Vol. 1, 17–35. John Benjamins.
(2008) Emergent
serialization in English: Pragmatics and
typology. In J. Good (Ed.), Linguistic
universals and language
change (pp. 252–284). Oxford University Press.
(2011) Emergent
grammar and temporality in interactional
linguistics. In P. Auer, & S. Pfänder (Eds.), Constructions:
Emerging and
emergent (pp. 22–44). De Gruyter Mouton.
Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C.
(2003[1993]) Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press, 2nd, rev.
edn.
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K.
(2002) The
Cambridge grammar of the English
language. Cambridge University Press.
Huddleston, R., Payne, J., & Peterson, P.
(2002) Coordination
and
supplementation. In R. Huddleston, & G. K. Pullum, The
Cambridge grammar of the English
language, Chapter 15. Cambridge University Press.
Hudson, R.
(2007) Language
networks: The new Word Grammar. Oxford University Press.
(2010) An
introduction to Word Grammar. Cambridge University Press.
(2015) Word
Grammar. In B. Heine, & H. Narrog, The
Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 2nd
edn. Published
online. .
.Hüning, M., Booij, G.
(2014) From
compounding to derivation: The rise of derivational affixes through
constructionalization. In F. von Mengden, & H. Simon (Eds.), Refining grammaticalization. Special
issue, Folia
Linguistica
48(2), 579–604.
Ingham, R.
(2015) Spoken
and written register differentiation in pragmatic and semantic functions
in two Anglo-Norman
corpora. In J. Gippert, & R. Gehrke (Eds.), Historical
corpora: Challenges and
perspectives (pp. 269–280). Narr.
Jakobson, R.
(1956) Two
aspects of language and two types of aphasic
disturbance. In R. Jakobson, & M. Halle (Eds.), Fundamentals
of
language (pp. 53–87). Mouton.
Jaszczcolt, K. M.
(2019) Rethinking
being Gricean: New challenges for
metapragmatics. Journal of
Pragmatics 145: 15–24.
Jiménez, S. S., Estellés Arguedas, M., & Pons Bordería, S.
(2018) Beyond
the notion of periphery: An account of polyfunctional
discourse markers within the Val.Es.Co model of
discourse. In K. Beeching, C. Ghezzi, & P. Molinelli (Eds.), Positioning
the self and others: Linguistic
perspectives (pp. 105–125). John Benjamins.
Joseph, B. D.
(1997) On
the linguistics of marginality: The centrality of the
periphery. Chicago Linguistic
Society 33, 197–213.
Joseph, B. D., & Janda, R. D.
(2003) On
language, change, and language change – or, of history, linguistics, and
historical
linguistics. In B. D. Joseph, & R. D. Janda (Eds.), The
handbook of historical
linguistics (pp. 3–180). Blackwell.
Kaltenböck, G., & Heine, B.
(2014) Sentence
grammar vs. thetical grammar: Two competing
domains. In B. MacWhinney, A. Malchukov, & E. Moravcsik (Eds.), Competing
motivations in grammar and
usage (pp. 348–363). Oxford University Press.
Kaltenböck, G., Heine, B., & Kuteva, T.
Kay, P., & Fillmore, C. J.
(1999) Grammatical
constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What’s X doing
Y
construction. Language 75, 1–33.
Kemenade, A. van
.
(2012) Rethinking the loss of verb
second. In T. Nevalainen, & E. C. Traugott (Eds.), The
Oxford handbook of the history of
English (pp. 822–834). Oxford University Press.
Kemenade, A. van
(2021) Syntactic change and pragmatic maintenance: The discourse particle then over the history of English. Paper presented at the 22nd Diachronic Syntax Conference, Konstanz, May 24th.
Kemenade, A. van, & Links, M.
(2020) Discourse
particles in early English: Clause structure, pragmatics and discourse
management. Glossa a Journal of General
Linguistics 5(1).
Kemmer, S., & Barlow, M.
(1999) Introduction:
A usage-based conception of
language. In M. Barlow, & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based
models of
language (pp. vii–xxviii). CSLI publications.
Kempson, R.
(1975) Presupposition
and the delimitation of
semantics. Cambridge University Press.
Kim, J.-B., & Davies, M.
(2020) English
what with absolute constructions: A Construction
Grammar perspective. English Language and
Linguistics 24(4), 637–666.
Kim, J.-B., & Sag, I. A.
(2005) English
object extraposition: A constraint-based
approach. In S. Müller (Ed.), Proceedings
of the HPSG05
Conference (pp. 192–212). CSLI Publications.
Kiparsky, P.
(1968) Linguistic
universals and linguistic
change. In E. Bach, & R. T. Harms (Eds.), Universals
in linguistic
theory (pp. 171–202). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
(2012) Grammaticalization
as
optimization. In D. Jonas, J. Whitman, & A. Garrett (Eds.), Grammatical
change: Origins, nature,
outcomes (pp. 15–51). Oxford University Press.
König, E.
(1985) Where
do concessives come from? On the development of concessive
connectives. In J. Fisiak (Ed.), Historical
semantics and historical word
formation (pp. 263–282). Mouton de Gruyter.
(2020) Beyond
exophoric and endophoric uses: Additional discourse-functions of
demonstratives. In Å. Ness, A. Margetts, & Y. Treis (Eds.), Demonstratives
in
Discourse (pp. 21–42). Language Science Press.
Koops, C., & Lohmann, A.
(2015) A
quantitative approach to the grammaticalization of discourse markers:
Evidence from their sequencing
behavior. International Journal of Corpus
Linguistics 20, 232–259.
Kroon, C.
(1995) Discourse
particles in Latin: A study of NAM, ENIM, AUTEM, VERO and
AT. J.C. Gieben.
Kuo, Y. H.
(2020) Late-stage grammatical change in Chinese: A constructional account. PhD thesis, Edinburgh University.
Kuteva, T.
(2001) Auxiliation:
An enquiry into the nature of
grammaticalization. Oxford University Press.
Kuteva, T., Heine, B, Hong, B., Long, H., Narrog, H., & Rhee, S.
(2019) World
lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press, 2nd
edn.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(2003[1980]) Metaphors
we live by. Chicago University Press, 2nd
edn.
Lakoff, R.
(1971) If’s,
and’s, and but’s about
conjunction. In C. J. Fillmore, & D. T. Langendoen (Eds.), Studies
in linguistic
semantics (pp. 115–150). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Langacker, R. W.
(1977) Syntactic
reanalysis. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Mechanisms
of syntactic
change (pp. 57–139). University of Texas Press.
(1987) Foundations
of cognitive grammar, Vol. I: Theoretical
prerequisites. Stanford University Press.
(1988) A
usage-based
model. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics
in cognitive
linguistics (pp. 127–161). John Benjamins.
(1990) Subjectification. Cognitive
Linguistics 1, 5–38.
(1991) Foundations
of cognitive grammar, Vol. II: Descriptive
application. Stanford University Press.
(1999) Losing
control: Grammaticalization, subjectification, and
transparency. In A. Blank, & P. Koch (Eds.), Historical
semantics and
cognition (pp. 47–175). Mouton de Gruyter.
(2006) Subjectification,
grammaticization, and conceptual
archetypes. In A. Athanasiadou, C. Canakis, & B. Cornillie (Eds.), Subjectification:
Various paths to
subjectivity (pp. 17–40). Mouton de Gruyter.
Lass, R.
(2000) Language
periodization and the concept
“Middle”. In I. Taavitsainen, T. Nevalainen, P. Pahta, & M. Rissanen (Eds.), Placing
Middle English in
context (pp. 7–42). Mouton de Gruyter.
Lehmann, C.
(2015[1995]) Thoughts
on Grammaticalization. Language Science Press, 3rd
rev. edn.
Lenk, U.
(1998) Marking
discourse coherence: Functions of Discourse Markers in spoken
English. Tübingen: Narr.
Lenker, U.
(2010) Argument
and rhetoric. Adverbial connectors in the history of
English. De Gruyter Mouton.
(2014) Knitting
and splitting information: Medial placement of linking adverbials in the
history of
English. In S. E. Pfenninger, O. Timofeeva, A.-C. Gardner, A. Honkapohja, M. Hundt, & D. Schreier (Eds.), Contact,
variation and change in the history of
English (pp. 11–38). John Benjamins.
Levinson, S. C.
(2000) Presumptive
meanings: The theory of Generalized Conversational
Implicature. MIT Press, Bradford.
(2003) Contextualizing
“contextualization
cues”. In S. L. Eerdmans, C. L. Prevignano, & P. J. Thibault (Eds.), Language
and interaction: Discussions with John J.
Gumperz (pp. 31–39). John Benjamins.
Lewis, D. M.
(2000) Some
emergent discourse connectives in English: Grammaticalization via
rhetorical patterns. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oxford.
(2007) From
temporal to contrastive and causal: The emergence of connective
after
all
. In A. Celle, & R. Huart (Eds.), Connectives
as discourse
landmarks (pp. 88–99). John Benjamins.
(2011) A
discourse-constructional approach to the emergence of discourse markers
in
English. In L. Degand, & A.-M. Simon-Vandenbergen (Eds.), Grammaticalization,
pragmaticalization and/or (inter)subjectification: Methodological issues
for the study of Discourse Markers. Special
issue, Linguistics 49(2), 415–443.
Lightfoot, D.
(1979) Principles
of diachronic syntax. Cambridge University Press.
(1991) How
to set parameters: Arguments from language
change. MIT Press.
Lohmann, A., & Koops, C.
(2016) Aspects
of discourse marker sequencing – Empirical challenges and theoretical
implications. In G. Kaltenböck, E. Keizer, & A. Lohmann (Eds.), Outside
the clause: Form and function of extra-clausal
constituents (pp. 417–446). John Benjamins.
López-Couso, M. J.
(2010) Subjectification
and
intersubjectification. In A. H. Jucker, & I. Taavitsainen, (Eds.), Historical
pragmatics (pp. 127–163). de Gruyter Mouton.
Los, B., & Kemenade, A. van
.
(2012) Information structure and
syntax in the history of
English. In A. Bergs, & L. J. Brinton (Eds.), English
historical linguistics: An international
handbook, Vol. 2, 1475–1490. De Gruyter Mouton.
Lutzky, U.
Lyngfelt, B.
(2018) Introduction:
Constructicons and
constructicography. In B. Lyngfelt, L. Borin, K. Ohara, & T. T. Torrent (Eds.), Constructicography.
Constructicon development across
languages (pp. 1–18). John Benjamins.
Lyons, J.
(1982) Deixis
and subjectivity: Loquor, ergo
sum? In R. J. Jarvella & W. Klein (Eds.), Speech,
place, and action: Studies in deixis and related
topics (pp. 101–124). Wiley.
MacWhinney, B., & O’Grady, W.
(Eds.) (2015) The
handbook of language emergence. Wiley Blackwell.
Mair, C.
(1997) Parallel
corpora: A real-time approach to the study of language change in
progress. In M. Ljung (Ed.), Corpus-based
studies in
English (pp. 95–209). Rodopi.
Mauri, C., & Auwera, J. van der
.
(2012) Connectives. In K. Allan, & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), The
Cambridge handbook of
pragmatics (pp. 377–401). Cambridge University Press.
Meillet, A.
(1958[1912]) L’évolution
des formes grammaticales [The evolution of grammatical
forms]. In A. Meillet, Linguistique
historique et linguistique générale [Historical
linguistics and general linguistics]
(pp. 130–148). Champion.
Michaelis, L. A.
(2013) Sign-Based
construction
grammar. In T. Hoffmann, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The
Oxford handbook of construction
grammar (pp. 133–152). Oxford University Press.
Milroy J., & Milroy, L.
(1985) Linguistic
change, social network and speaker
innovation. Journal of
Linguistics 21(2), 339–383.
Misković-Luković, M., & Dediać, M. N.
(2012) The
discourse marker odnoso at the ICTY: A case of disputed
translation in war crimes trials. Journal
of
Pragmatics 44, 1355–1377.
Mittwoch, A., Huddleston, R., & Collins, P.
(2002) The
clause
adjuncts. In R. Huddleston, & G. K. Pullum, The
Cambridge grammar of the English
language, Chapter 8. Cambridge University Press.
Mulder, J., & Thompson, S. A.
(2008) The
grammaticalization of but as a final particle in
conversation. In R. Laury (Ed.), Crosslinguistic
studies of clause combining: The multifunctionality of
conjunctions (pp. 179–204). John Benjamins.
Mulder, J., Thompson, S. A., & Williams, C. P.
(2009) Final
but in Australian English
conversation. In P. Peters, P. Collins, & A. Smith (Eds.), Comparative
studies in Australian and New Zealand English: Grammar and
beyond (pp. 337–358). John Benjamins.
Murray, D.
(1979) ‘Well’. Linguistic
Inquiry 10(4), 727–734.
Narrog, H.
(2014[2012]) Beyond
intersubjectification: Textual uses of modality and mood in subordinate
clauses as part of speech-act
orientation
. In L. Brems, L. Ghesquière, & F. Van de Velde (Eds.), Intersubjectivity
and intersubjectification in grammar and
discourse (pp. 29–52). John Benjamins.
Nesselhauf, N.
(2010) The
development of future time expressions in Late Modern English:
Redistribution of forms or change in
discourse? English Language and
Linguistics 14(2), 163–186.
Nevalainen, T.
(1990) Modeling
functional differentiation and function loss: The case of
“but”. In S. Adamson, V. Law, N. Vincent, & S. Wright (Eds.), Papers
from the 5th International Conference on English Historical
Linguistics (pp. 337–355). John Benjamins.
(1991) BUT,
ONLY, JUST: Focusing on adverbial change in Modern
English 1500–1900. Société Néophilologique.
Nicolle, S.
(2011) Pragmatic
aspects of
grammaticalization. In H. Narrog, & B. Heine (Eds.), The
Oxford handbook of
grammaticalization (pp. 401–412). Oxford University Press.
Noël, D.
(2007) Diachronic
construction grammar and grammaticalization
theory. Functions of
Language 14, 177–202.
(2017) The
development of non-deontic BE BOUND TO in a radically usage-based
diachronic construction grammar
perspective. Lingua 199, 72–93. .
.Norde, M.
(2009) Degrammaticalization. Oxford University Press.
Oates, S. L.
(2000) Multiple
discourse marker occurrence: Creating hierarchies for natural language
generation. Proceedings of
ANLP-NAACL (pp. 41–45).
Onodera, N. O.
Östman, J.-O.
Parkes, M. B.
(1992) Pause
and effect: An introduction to the history of punctuation in the
West. University of California Press.
Percillier, M.
(2020) Allostructions,
homostructions or a constructional family? Changes in the network of
secondary predicate constructions in Middle
English. In L. Sommerer, & E. Smirnova (Eds.), Nodes
and networks in Diachronic Construction
Grammar (pp. 213–242). John Benjamins.
Perek, F.
(2012) Alternation-based
generalizations are stored in the mental grammar: Evidence from a
sorting task experiment. Cognitive
Linguistics 23(3), 601–635.
(2015) Argument structure in usage-based construction grammar. John Benjamins.
(2020) Productivity
and schematicity in constructional
change. In L. Sommerer, & E. Smirnova, (Eds.), Nodes
and networks in Diachronic Construction
Grammar (pp. 141–166). John Benjamins.
Perek, F., & Patten, A. L.
(2019) Towards an English constructicon using patterns and frames. In S. Hunston & F. Perek (Eds.), Constructions in Applied Linguistics. Special issue, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics. 24(3), 354-384.
Petré, P.
(2016) Grammaticalization
by changing co-text frequencies, or why [BE Ving] became the
‘progressive’. English Language and
Linguistics 20(1), 31–54.
(2019) How
constructions are born. The role of patterns in the
constructionalization of be going to
INF
. In B. Busse, & R. Möhlig-Falke (Eds.), Patterns
in language and linguistics: New perspectives on a ubiquitous
concept (pp. 157–192). De Gruyter Mouton.
Petré, P., & Anthonissen, L.
(2020) Individuality
in complex systems: A constructionalist
approach. In P. Petré, & L. Anthonissen (Eds.), Constructionalist
approaches to individuality in language. Special issue, Cognitive
Linguistics 31(2), 185–212.
Petré, P., & Van de Velde, F.
(2018) The
real-time dynamics of the individual and the community in
grammaticalization. Language 94(4), 867–901.
Petruck, M. R.
Pons Bordería, S.
(2008) Do
discourse markers exist? On the treatment of discourse markers in
Relevance Theory. Journal of
Pragmatics 40, 1411–1434.
Pons Bordería, S., & Estellés Arguedas, M.
(2009) Expressing
digression linguistically: Do digressive markers
exist? Journal of
Pragmatics 41, 921–936.
Pratt, L., & Denison, D.
(2000) The
language of the Southey-Coleridge
circle. Language
Sciences 22, 401–422.
Prévost, S.
(2011)
A
propos from verbal complement to discourse marker: A case
of
grammaticalization? Linguistics 49(2), 391–413.
Pullum, G., & Huddleston, R.
(2002) Adjectives
and
adverbs. In R. Huddleston, & G. Pullum (Eds.), The
Cambridge grammar of the English
language (pp. 526–595). Cambridge University Press.
Pulvermüller, F.
(2002) The
neuroscience of language: On brain circuits of words and serial
order. Cambridge University Press.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.
(1985) A
comprehensive grammar of the English
language. Longman.
Ramat, P., & Ricca, D.
(1994) Prototypical
adverbs: On the scalarity/radiality of the notion
ADVERB. Rivista di
Linguistica 6, 289–326.
Recanati, F.
(2010) Truth-conditional
pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Rissanen, M.
(2004) Grammaticalisation
from side to side: On the development of
beside(s)
. In H. Lindquist, & C. Mair (Eds.), Corpus
approaches to grammaticalization in
English (pp. 151–170). John Benjamins.
Rosén, H.
(2009) Coherence,
sentence modification, and sentence-part modification – the contribution
of
particles. In P. Baldi, & P. Cuzzolin (Eds.), New
perspectives on historical Latin syntax: Vol. 1. Syntax of the
sentence (pp. 317–441). Mouton de Gruyter.
Rostila, J.
(2004) Lexicalization
as a way to
grammaticalization. In F. Karlsson (Ed.), Proceedings
of the 20th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics. [URL].
Rouchota, Villy
.
(1998) Procedural meaning and
parenthetical Discourse
Markers. In A. H. Jucker, & Y. Ziv (Eds.), Discourse
Markers: Descriptions and
theory (pp. 97–126). John Benjamins.
Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L.
(Eds.) (1986) Parallel distributed processing:
Explorations in the microstructures of
cognition, 2 Vols. MIT Press.
Sankoff, G.
(2019) Language
change across the life-span: Three trajectory
types. Language 95(2), 197–229.
Sarda, L., Carter-Thomas, S., Fagard, B., & Charolles, M.
(Eds.) (2014) Adverbials
in use: From predicative to discourse
functions. Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
Saussure, F. de
.
(1983[1916]) Course in general
linguistics. Trans.
by R. Harris. Open
Court.
Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H.
(1973) Opening
up
closings. Semiotica 4, 289–327.
Schiffrin, D.
(1987) Discourse
Markers. Cambridge University Press.
Schmid, H.-J.
(Ed.) (2012) Cognitive
pragmatics. De Gruyter.
(2016) Why
Cognitive Linguistics must embrace the social and pragmatic dimensions
of language and how it could do so more
seriously. Cognitive
Linguistics 27(4), 543–557.
(2017) A
framework for understanding linguistic entrenchment and its
psychological
foundations. In H.-J. Schmid (Ed.), Entrenchment
and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt
linguistic
knowledge (pp. 9–35). De Gruyter Mouton and American Psychological Association.
(2020) The
dynamics of the linguistic system: Usage, conventionalization, and
entrenchment. Oxford University Press.
Schmid, H.-J., & Mantlik, A.
(2015) Entrenchment
in historical corpora? Reconstructing dead authors’ minds from their
usage
profile. Anglia 133(4), 583–623.
Schönefeld, D.
(2011) Converging
evidence: Methodological and theoretical issues for linguistic
research. John Benjamins.
Schourup, L.
(2016[1985]) Common
discourse particles in English
conversation. Routledge.
Schwenter, S. A., & Traugott, E. C.
(1995) The
semantic and pragmatic development of substitutive complex prepositions
in
English. In A. H. Jucker (Ed.), Historical
pragmatics (pp. 243–273). John Benjamins.
Schwenter, S. A., & Waltereit, R.
(2010) Presupposition
accommodation and language change: From additivity to speech-act
marking. In K. Davidse, L. Vandelanotte, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Subjectification,
intersubjectification and
grammaticalization (pp. 75–102). De Gruyter Mouton.
Shinzato, R.
(2014) Subjectivity,
intersubjectivity and Japanese
grammar. In K. Kabata, & T. Ono (Eds.), Usage-based
approaches to Japanese grammar: Towards the understanding of human
language (pp. 85–108). John Benjamins.
Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M., & Willems, D.
(2011) Cross-linguistic
data as evidence in the grammaticalization debate: The case of discourse
markers. In L. Degand, & A.-M. Simon-Vandenbergen (Eds.), Grammaticalization,
pragmaticalization and/or (inter)subjectification: methodological issues
for the study of discourse markers. Special
issue,
Linguistics
49(2), 333–364.
Smirnova, E.
(2015) Constructionalization
and constructional change: The role of context in the development of
constructions. In J. Barðdal, E. Smirnova, L. Sommerer, & S. Gildea (Eds.), Diachronic
Construction
Grammar (pp. 81–106). John Benjamins.
Smirnova, E., & Sommerer, L.
(2020) The
nature of the node and the network – Open questions in Diachronic
Construction
Grammar. In L. Sommerer, & E. Smirnova (Eds.), Nodes
and networks in Diachronic Construction
Grammar (pp. 1–42). John Benjamins.
Sommerer, L.
(2018) Article
emergence in Old English: A constructionalist
perspective. De Gruyter Mouton.
Sommerer, L., & Smirnova, E.
Sorva, E.
(2007) Grammaticalization
and syntactic polyfunctionality: The case of
albeit
. In U. Lenker, & A. Meurman-Solin (Eds.), Connectives
in the history of
English (pp. 115–143). John Benjamins.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D.
(1995[1986]) Relevance:
Communication and
cognition. Blackwell, 2nd, rev.
edn.
Swan, T.
(1994) A
note on Old English and Old Norse initial adverbials and word order with
special reference to sentence
adverbials. In T. Swan, E. Mørck, & O. J. Westvik (Eds.), Language
change and language
structure (pp. 233–270). Mouton de Gruyter.
Sweetser, E. E.
(1988) Grammaticalization
and semantic
bleaching. In S. Axmaker, A. Jaisser, & H. Singmaster (Eds.), Berkeley
Linguistics society 14: General session and parasession on
grammaticalization (pp. 389–405). Berkeley Linguistics Society.
(1990) From
etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic
structure. Cambridge University Press.
Talmy, L.
(1985) Lexicalization
patterns: Semantic structure in lexical
forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language
typology and syntactic description, Vol. III: Grammatical categories and
the
lexicon (pp. 57–149). Cambridge University Press, 2nd
edn.
(2000) Toward
a cognitive linguistics, Vol. I. Concept structuring
systems. The MIT Press.
Terkourafi, M.
(2009) On
de-limiting
context. In A. Bergs, & G. Diewald (Eds.), Contexts
and
constructions (pp. 17–42). John Benjamins.
Thompson, S. A., & Mulac, A. J.
(1991) A
quantitative perspective on the grammaticalization of epistemic
parentheticals in
English. In E. C. Traugott, & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches
to
grammaticalization, Vol. 2, 213–329. John Benjamins. .
.Timberlake, A.
(1977) Reanalysis
and actualization in syntactic
change. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Mechanisms
of syntactic
change (pp. 141–177). University of Texas Press.
Tomasello, M.
(2003) Constructing
a language: A usage-based theory of language
acquisition. Harvard University Press.
Torrent, T. T.
(2015) On
the relation between inheritance and change: The Constructional
Convergence and Construction Network Reconfiguration
hypotheses. In J. Barðdal, E. Smirnova, L. Sommerer, & S. Gildea (Eds.), Diachronic
Construction
Grammar (pp. 173–211). John Benjamins.
Tottie, G.
Traugott, E. C.
(1982) From
propositional to textual and expressive meanings: Some
semantic-pragmatic aspects of
grammaticalization. In W. P. Lehmann, & Y. Malkiel (Eds.), Perspectives
on historical
linguistics (pp. 245–271). John Benjamins.
(1997[1995]) The
role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of
grammaticalization. Paper presented at
ICHL XII, Manchester, 1995. [URL]
(1999) The
role of pragmatics in a theory of semantic
change. In J. Verschueren (Ed.), Pragmatics
in 1998: Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics
Conference, Vol. 2, 93–102. International Pragmatics Association.
(2003) From
subjectification to
intersubjectification. In R. Hickey (Ed.), Motives
for language
change (pp. 124–139). Cambridge University Press.
(2004) Historical
pragmatics. In L. R. Horn, & G. Ward (Eds.), Handbook
of
pragmatics (pp. 538–561). Blackwell.
(2010) (Inter)subjectivity
and (inter)subjectification: A
reassessment. In K. Davidse, L. Vandelanotte, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Subjectification,
intersubjectification and
grammaticalization (pp. 29–71). de Gruyter Mouton.
(2014) On
the function of the epistemic adverbs surely and
no doubt at the left and right peripheries of the
clause. In K. Beeching, & U. Detges (Eds.), Discourse
functions at the left and right periphery: Crosslinguistic
investigations of language use and language
change (pp. 72–91). Brill.
(2018a) Modeling
language change with constructional
networks. In S. Pons Bordería, & Ó. Loureda Lemos (Eds.), Beyond
grammaticalization and Discourse Markers: New issues in the study of
language
change (pp. 17–50). Brill.
(2018b) Rethinking
the role of invited inferencing in change from the perspective of
interactional
texts. In O. Ehmer, & M. Rosemeyer (Eds.), Inferences in interaction and language
change. Special
issue, Open
Linguistics 4(1), 19–34. [URL].
(2020a) The
development of “digressive” discourse–topic shift markers in
English. In B. Fagard, & M. Charolles (Eds.), Topic shifters in contrastive perspective. Special
issue, Journal of
Pragmatics 156, 121–135.
(2020b) Expressions
of stance-to-text: Discourse management markers as stance
markers. In G. Kaltenböck, M. J. López-Couso, & B. Méndez-Naya (Eds.), Investigating
stance in English: Synchrony and diachrony. Special issue, Language
Sciences
82. Online
at .
.
(2020c) Is
back to my point a pragmatic marker? An inquiry
into the historical development of some metatextual discourse management
markers. In J. Martines, S. Rodríguez, & J. Antolí (Eds.), Context and linguistic
change. Special
issue, Catalan Journal of
Linguistics, 13–29.
In
press. Ten lectures on a diachronic
constructionalist approach to Discourse Structuring
Markers. Brill. Special issue,
Traugott, E. C., & Dasher, R. B.
(2002) Regularity
in semantic change. Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G.
(2013) Constructionalization
and constructional changes. Oxford University Press.
Traugott, E.C., & Heine, B.
(Eds) 1991 Approaches to Grammaticalization, 2 Vols. John Benjamins.
Trousdale, G., & Traugott, E. C.
(2021) Rethinking
constructionalization: The history of by the
way
. Paper presented at
ISLE 6, Joensuu, June.
van Bogaert, J.
(2011)
I
think and other complement-taking mental predicates: A case
of and for constructional
grammaticalization. Linguistics 49(2), 295–332.
Vandelanotte, L.
(2009) Speech
and thought representation in English: A cognitive-functional
approach. Mouton de Gruyter.
van der Auwera, J.
Van de Velde, F.
(2014) Degeneracy:
The maintenance of constructional
networks. In R. Boogaart, T. Colleman, & G. Rutten (Eds.), Extending
the scope of construction
grammar, 141–180. De Gruyter.
Verhagen, A.
(1995) Subjectification,
syntax, and
communication. In D. Stein, & S. Wright, (Eds.), Subjectivity
and subjectivisation in
language (pp. 103–28). Cambridge University Press.
(2005) Constructions
of intersubjectivity. Discourse, syntax, and
cognition. Oxford University Press.
(2007) Construal
and
perspectivization. In D. Geeraerts, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The
oxford handbook of cognitive
linguistics (pp. 48–81). Oxford University Press.
Vincent, N.
(2015) Compositionality
and
change. In C. Bowern, & B. Evans (Eds.), The
Routledge handbook of historical
linguistics. Routledge.
Waltereit, R.
(2006) The
rise of discourse markers in Italian: A specific type of language
change. In K. Fischer (Ed.), Approaches
to discourse
particles (pp. 61–76). Elsevier.
(2012) On
the origins of grammaticalization and other types of language change in
discourse
strategies. In K. Davidse, T. Breban, L. Brems, & T. Mortelmans (Eds.), Grammaticalization
and language change: New
reflections (pp. 51–72). John Benjamins.
Weinreich, U., Labov, W., & Herzog, M.
[2017(1968)] Empirical
foundations for a theory of language
change. In W. P. Lehmann, & Y. Malkiel (Eds.), Directions
for historical
linguistics (pp. 95–189). University of Texas Press, repr.
Wierzbicka, A.
(2006) English:
Meaning and culture. Oxford University Press.
Wilcox, S., & Occhino, C.
(2016) Historical
change in signed languages. Oxford
Handbooks Online.
Wilcox, S., & Martinez, R.
(2020) The
conceptualization of space: Places in signed
discourse. Frontiers in
Psychology 11: 1406.
Winograd, T.
(1976) Towards
a procedural understanding of
semantics. Revue Internationale de
Philosophie 30, 260–303.
Wolk, C., Bresnan, J., Rosenbach, A., & Szmrecsanyi, B.
(2013) Dative
and genitive variability in Late Modern English: Exploring
cross-constructional variation and
change. Diachronica 30, 382–419. .
.Zehentner, E.
(2019) Competition
and language change: The rise of the English dative
alternation. De Gruyter Mouton.
Zehentner, E., & Traugott, E. C.
(2020) Constructional
networks and the development of benefactive ditransitives in
English. In L. Sommerer, & E. Smirnova (Eds.), Nodes
and networks in Diachronic Construction
Grammar (pp. 168–211). John Benjamins.