This paper argues that processes of regional development have to be conceptualised in a novel way. The dominant approach displays a bias towards a macro-perspective, often reproduces a centre — periphery model, and favours an economism that aims at the production of instruments for policy makers and academics alike, both enjoying the convenience of (bureaucratic and analytical) distance. Instead we propose a constructionist approach. This is developed through a critical discussion of the received view, and builds upon the central concepts of ‘enacted collective identity’, ‘articulation/translation’, and an upgrading of the importance of time in the sense of timing. We limit this study, which includes two empirical cases, to the ‘opening phase’ of a regional development process. We identify a new role for the researcher in articulating the need for and opportunities of a regional development, and we stress a more decentralised form of public support.
2011. The entrepreneur as hero and jester: Enacting the entrepreneurial discourse. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship 29:6 ► pp. 589 ff.
Ben-Hafaïedh, Cyrine
2013. Essai de modélisation de la constitution des équipes entrepreneuriales. Vie & sciences de l'entreprise N° 193:1 ► pp. 11 ff.
Berglund, Karin & Anders W. Johansson
2007. Entrepreneurship, discourses and conscientization in processes of regional development. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 19:6 ► pp. 499 ff.
Fletcher, Denise
2007. ‘Toy Story’: The narrative world of entrepreneurship and the creation of interpretive communities. Journal of Business Venturing 22:5 ► pp. 649 ff.
Fletcher, Denise E.
2006. Entrepreneurial processes and the social construction of opportunity. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 18:5 ► pp. 421 ff.
Fletcher, Denise E.
2011. A curiosity for contexts: Entrepreneurship, enactive research and autoethnography. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 23:1-2 ► pp. 65 ff.
Franco, Mário & Heiko Haase
2017. Collective entrepreneurship: Employees’ perceptions of the influence of leadership styles. Journal of Management & Organization 23:2 ► pp. 241 ff.
Gaddefors, Johan
2007. Metaphor use in the entrepreneurial process. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research 13:3 ► pp. 173 ff.
Gaddefors, Johan & Alistair R. Anderson
2009. Market creation: the epitome of entrepreneurial marketing practices. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship 10:1 ► pp. 19 ff.
Gaddefors, Johan & Niclas Cronsell
2009. Returnees and Local Stakeholders Co-producing the Entrepreneurial Region. European Planning Studies 17:8 ► pp. 1191 ff.
2020. Regional development through entrepreneurial exaptation: Epistemological displacement, affordances, and collective agency in rural regions. Journal of Rural Studies 74 ► pp. 244 ff.
Hjorth, Daniel
2004. Creating space for play/invention – concepts of space and organizational entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 16:5 ► pp. 413 ff.
Hjorth, Daniel
2011. On provocation, education and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 23:1-2 ► pp. 49 ff.
Johannisson, Bengt
2007. Enacting local economic development – theoretical and methodological challenges. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy 1:1 ► pp. 7 ff.
Johannisson, Bengt
2008. Networking and Entrepreneurship in Place. In Entrepreneurship and Business, ► pp. 137 ff.
Johannisson, Bengt & Åsa Lindholm Dahlstrand
2009. Bridging the Functional and Territorial Views on Regional Entrepreneurship and Development: The Challenge, the Journey, the Lessons. European Planning Studies 17:8 ► pp. 1105 ff.
Johannisson, Bengt & Åsa Lindholm Dahlstrand
2009. Bridging the Functional and Territorial Rationales—Proposing an Integrating Framework for Regional Dynamics. European Planning Studies 17:8 ► pp. 1117 ff.
Johannisson, Bengt & Lena Olaison
2007. The moment of truth—Reconstructing entrepreneurship and social capital in the eye of the storm. Review of Social Economy 65:1 ► pp. 55 ff.
Lange, Bastian
2011. Professionalization in space: Social-spatial strategies of culturepreneurs in Berlin. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 23:3-4 ► pp. 259 ff.
Lewis, Kate V.
2014. Public narratives of female entrepreneurship: fairy tale or fact?. Labour & Industry: a journal of the social and economic relations of work 24:4 ► pp. 331 ff.
Lippmann, Stephen & Howard E. Aldrich
2016. A Rolling Stone Gathers Momentum: Generational Units, Collective Memory, and Entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review 41:4 ► pp. 658 ff.
Lyle, Matthew CB, Ashley S Hockensmith & Ian J Walsh
2023. Up in smoke? The lingering influence of history on community identity dynamics. Strategic Organization► pp. 147612702311691 ff.
Parkinson, Caroline, Carole Howorth & Alan Southern
2017. The crafting of an (un)enterprising community: Context and the social practice of talk. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship 35:4 ► pp. 385 ff.
Puhakka, Vesa & Hannu Stewart
2015. Social creation of opportunities: breaking boundaries to create mutually attractive business. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management n°18:3 ► pp. 53 ff.
Domingo Ribeiro‐Soriano, Toledano, Nuria, David Urbano & Marc Bernadich
2010. Networks and corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of Organizational Change Management 23:4 ► pp. 396 ff.
Sundin, Elisabeth
2011. Entrepreneurship and social and community care. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy 5:3 ► pp. 212 ff.
van der Gaast, Koen
2023. Mission accomplished? How food entrepreneurship discursively constructs futures for sustainable food. Futures 146 ► pp. 103086 ff.
Warren, Lorraine
2007. The Establishment Strikes Back? The Life and Times of Takafumi Horie. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation 8:4 ► pp. 261 ff.
Welter, Friederike
2012. All you need is trust? A critical review of the trust and entrepreneurship literature. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship 30:3 ► pp. 193 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.