Cover not available
Part of
Sensory Experiences: Exploring meaning and the senses
Danièle Dubois, Caroline Cance, Matt Coler, Arthur Paté and Catherine Guastavino
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 24] 2021
► pp. 23–65

Chapter 1
The five senses and the cognitivist approach to perception

ORCID logo
ORCID logo
ORCID logo
ORCID logo
Article outline
  • 1.1The five senses: Tradition, evidence and mainstream
    • 1.1.1The (Western) philosophical tradition
    • 1.1.2The five senses from some psychology handbooks
  • 1.2Technology of sensors and psychology
    • 1.2.1Instruments for measuring the physical world
    • 1.2.2Instruments and psychophysics
  • 1.3The digital revolution: Computers and cognitive science
    • 1.3.1The emergence of a cyberworld
    • 1.3.2Psychology and cognitive science
  • 1.4Main concepts at work in cognitive science
    • 1.4.1Information and information processing
    • 1.4.2Representation and knowledge
    • 1.4.3The classificatory tradition and “natural” categories
      • History: The classificatory tradition
      • “Natural” categories in cognitive psychology
  • 1.5Sensory science and product experience
    • 1.5.1Humans as instruments in sensory science
    • 1.5.2Descriptors for product experience
  • 1.6Language and the senses
    • 1.6.1Language and cognitive science: Words and things
    • 1.6.2The semiotic triad
    • 1.6.3Language and thought in cognitive linguistics
    • 1.6.4Word games in wording the senses
      • The word “sense”
      • Naming the five senses
  • 1.7Back to psychology: A no man’s land in cognitive science
  • 1.8Structure of the book
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 December 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.24.01dub
References
Bachelard, G.
(1934) Le nouvel esprit scientifique. Paris, France: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Barrau, A.
(2014) Des univers multiples : à l’aube d’une nouvelle cosmologie. Paris, France: Dunod.Google Scholar
Berlin, B.
(1992) Ethnobiological classifications. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berlin, B., Breedlove, D., & Raven, P.
(1973) General principles of classification and nomenclatures in folk biology. American Anthropologist, 75(1), 214–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brewster, C., & O’Hara, K.
(2007) Knowledge representation with ontologies: Present challenges – Future possibilities. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(7), 563–568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J.
(1990) Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J., Goodnow, J. J., & Austin, G.
(1956) A study of thinking. New York, NY, USA: Routledge.Google Scholar
Capurro, R.
(2009) Past, present, and future of the concept of information. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 7(2), 125–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Capurro, R., & Hjørland+++, B.
(2003) The concept of information. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(8), 343–411. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casati, R., & Varzi, A. C.
(2008) Event concepts. In T. Shipley & J. Zacks (Eds.), Understanding events: From perception to action (pp. 31–54). New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cassin, B.
(2004) Vocabulaire européen des philosophies : Dictionnaire des intraduisibles. Paris: Éditions Seuil, Dictionnaires Le Robert.Google Scholar
Cassin, B., Apter, E., Lezra, J., & Wood, M.
(2014) Dictionary of untranslatables: A philosophical lexicon. Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Civille, G. V., & Lawless, H. T.
(1986) The importance of language in describing perceptions. Journal of Sensory Studies, 1 (3–4), 203–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cosnier, J.
(1998) Le retour de psyché: Critique des nouveaux fondements de la psychologie. Desclée de Brouwer.Google Scholar
Descartes, R.
(1996) Meditations on First Philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (First published 1641) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dubois, D.
(1989) Contribution de la psychologie aux sciences du langage. Histoire épistémologie Langage, 11 (1), 85–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991) Sémantique et cognition : Catégories, prototype et typicalité. Paris, France: Éditions du CNRS.Google Scholar
(2002) Informations, représentations, connaissances, et significations : des objets en question dans les sciences cognitives. In J. B. Berthelin (Ed.), Du sujet : théorie et praxis (pp. 97–106). Paris, France: Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.Google Scholar
Dubois, D., & Braisby, N.
(1997) Catégorisation et cognition : de la perception au discours. Paris, France: Kimé.Google Scholar
Dubois, D., Coler, M., & Wörtche, H.
(2014) Knowledge Sensory Experience, and Sensor Technology. In B. J. C. Rangacharyula, E. Haven (Ed.), The world in prismatic views (pp. 97–133). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dubois, D., & Giboreau, A.
(2006) Descriptors: Attributes? Labels? Terms? Names? Food quality and preference, 17, 671–672.Google Scholar
Dubois, D., & Rouby, C.
(2002) Names and Categories for Odors: the “veridical Label”. In C. Rouby, B. Schaal, A. Holley, D. Dubois, & R. Gervais (Eds.), Olfaction, Taste, and Cognition (pp. 47–66). London, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dumas, G.
(1923) Traité de psychologie. Paris, France: Felix Alcan.Google Scholar
Eco, U.
(1988) Sémiotique et philosophie du langage (Vol. 338). Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
(1992) Leçon inaugurale: faite le vendredi 2 octobre 1992: La Quête d’une langue parfaite dans l’histoire de la culture européenne (Vol. 116). Collège de France, Chaire européenne.Google Scholar
(1995) The search for the perfect language (The Making of Europe). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1997) Kant e l’ornotorinco. Milan, Italy: Bompiani.Google Scholar
Ellen, R.
(2006) The categorical impulse: essay in the anthropology of classifying behavior. New York, NY, USA: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Everett III, H.
(1957) “Relative state” formulation of quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 29 (3), 454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G.
(1984) Espaces Mentaux. Aspects de la Construction du Sens Dans les Langues Naturelles. Les Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
(1994) Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feigl, H.
(1967) The Mental and the Physical. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J.
(1983) The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraisse, P., & Piaget, J.
(1963) Traité de psychologie expérimentale. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Geerraerts, D., Grondelaers, S., & Bakema, P.
(1994) The structure of lexical variation: Meaning, naming and context. Berlin, Germany: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D.
(2010) Psychology in cognitive science: 1978–2038. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2 (3), 328–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giboreau, A., & Body, L.
(2007) Le marketing sensoriel – De la stratégie à la mise en oeuvre. Paris, France: Vuibert.Google Scholar
Giboreau, A., Dacremont, C., Egoroff, C., Guerrand, S., Urdapilleta, I., Candel, D., & Dubois, D.
(2007) Defining sensory descriptors: Towards writing guidelines based on terminology. Food Quality and Preference, 18(2), 265–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giboreau, A., Guerrand, C. D. S., & Dubois, D.
(2009) Décrire : Identifier ou catégoriser. In D. Dubois (Ed.), Le sentir et le dire (pp. 211–232). Paris, France: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Goldstein, E. B.
(2008) The Blackwell Handbook of Sensation and Perception. Malden, MA, USA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Guillaume, P.
(1950) Manuel de psychologie. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Hallman, C. J.
(2007) Part One: A Multidimensional Model of the Dreaming State of Consciousness. Subtle Energies & Energy Medicine Journal Archives, 18(2), 75–91.Google Scholar
Harper, R., Smith, E. C., & Land, D. G.
(1968) Odour description and odour classification: A multidisciplinary examination. American Elsevier.Google Scholar
Hutchins, E.
(1995) Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kleiber, G., & Vuillaume, M.
(2011) Pour une linguistique des odeurs: présentation. Langages, 181 (1), 3–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M.
(2015) The linguistics of temperature (Vol. 107). John Benjamins Publishing Company.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M., Rakhilina, E., & Vanhove, M.
(2016) The semantics of lexical typology. Routledge.Google Scholar
Köster, E.
(1981) Sensory evaluation in a “natural environment”. In P. Schreier (Ed.), Flavour ’81 (the third weurman symposium) (pp. 93–100). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago, IL, USA: Chicago University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R.
(1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B.
(1999) Circulating Reference: Sampling the Soil in the Amazon Forest. In B. Latour (Ed.), Pandora’s hope: essays on the reality of science studies (pp. 24–79). Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S.
(1979) The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lawless, H. T., & Klein, B. P.
(1991) Sensory science theory and applications in foods. In IFT basic symposium series (USA). M. Dekker.Google Scholar
Lecointre, G., & Guyader, H. L.
(2001) Classification phylogénétique du vivant. Paris, France: Belin.Google Scholar
Le Moigne, J.-L.
(1986) Intelligence des mécanismes, mécanismes de l’intelligence: intelligence artificielle et sciences de la cognition (Vol. 1). Fayard.Google Scholar
Le Ny, J.-F.
(1979) La sémantique psychologique. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, P. H., & Norman, D. A.
(1972) Human information processing: An introduction to psychology. Academic press.Google Scholar
Linneus, C.
(1756) Odores medicamentorum. Amoenitates Academicae, 3, 183–201.Google Scholar
Lurçat, F.
(1995) L’autorité de la science: neurosciences. Espace et temps. Chaos. Cosmologie. Cerf.Google Scholar
Macpherson, F.
(2011) Individuating the senses. In F. Macpherson (Ed.), The senses: Classical and contemporary readings (pp. 3–46).Google Scholar
Majid, A., & Levinson, S. C.
(2011) The Senses in Language and Culture. The Senses and Society, 6(1), 5–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Medin, D., & Atran, S.
(1999) Folk biology. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Meilgaard, M. C., Carr, B. T., & Civille, G. V.
(1999) Sensory evaluation techniques. CRC press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. A.
(2003) The cognitive revolution: a historical perspective. Trends in cognitive sciences, 7(3), 141–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neisser, U.
(1987) Concepts and conceptual development: ecological and intellectual factors in categorization. Cambridge, MA, USA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Niessen, M.
(2010) Context-based sound event recognition (PhD Thesis). University of Groningen.
Ogden, C. K., & Richards, I. A.
(1946) The meaning of meaning. Harvest Book. (First published in 1923)Google Scholar
Palmer, S.
(1999) Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Parot, F.
(1996) Pour une psychologie historique : écrits en hommage à Ignace Meyerson. Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
(2000) Psychology in the human sciences in France, 1920–1940: Ignace Meyerson’s historical psychology. History of psychology, 3(2), 104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pike, W., & Gahegan, M.
(2007) Beyond ontologies: Toward situated representations of scientific knowledge. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(7), 674–688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S.
(2003) The language instinct: How the mind creates language. Penguin UK.Google Scholar
Plümacher, M., & Holz, P.
(2006) Speaking of colors and odors. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I.
(1979) La nouvelle alliance : métamorphose de la science. Gallimard.Google Scholar
Rastier, F.
(1990) La triade sémiotique, le trivium et la sémantique linguistique (Vol. 9). PULIM, Université de Limoges.Google Scholar
(1991) Sémantique et recherches cognitives. Paris, France: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
(2005) Sémiotique du cognitivisme et sémantique cognitive : Questions d’histoire et d’épistémologie. Texto !Google Scholar
Rosch, E.
(1973) Natural categories. Cognitive psychology, 4 (3), 328–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1978) Human categorization. In N. Warren (Ed.), Advances in cross culture Psychology (Vol. 1). London, UK: Academic press.Google Scholar
Rosch, E., & Lloyd, B.
(1978a) Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(1978b) Principles of categorisation. In E. Rosch & B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, F.
(1958) The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychological review, 65(6), 386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruhlen, M.
(1994) The origin of language: tracing the evolution of the mother tongue (Vol. 401 R933-o). Wiley.Google Scholar
Saussure, F. de, C. Bally, A. Sechehaye, & A. Riedlinger
(1971) Cours de linguistique générale. Lausanne, Switzerland: Payot. (First published 1916)Google Scholar
Sauvageot, F.
(1996) Sait-on en 1996 décrire le goût d’un aliment ou d’une boisson ? Psychologie Française, 41 (3), 289–300.Google Scholar
Sauvageot, F., & Dacremont, C.
(2001) L’évaluation sensorielle à la portée de tous – Les premiers pas en évaluation sensorielle. Dijon, France: Ensbana – Université de Bourgogne.Google Scholar
Schifferstein, H., & Hekkert, P.
(2008) Product experience. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Schifferstein, H., & Spence, C.
(2008) Multisensory product experience. In Product experience (pp. 133–161). Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scovel, T.
(1971) A look-see at some verbs of perception. Language Learning, 21 (1), 75–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seiffert, H.
(1968) Information über die Information: Verständigung im Alltag, Nachrichtentechnik, wissenschaftliches Verstehen, Informationssoziologie, das Wissen des Gelehrten (Vol. 56). Verlag CH Beck.Google Scholar
Selosse, P.
(2000) Un aspect de l’épistémè de la renaissance : méthode et “nomenclature” dans l’œuvre botanique de Caspar Bauhin (1560–1624) (PhD Thesis). Université Paris IV -Sorbonne.
Sensory analysis – part 1.1: General guide to methodology, types of test (Standard)
(2005) Sydney, Australia: Standards Australia.Google Scholar
Sinha, C.
(2007) Cognitive linguistics, psychology and cognitive science. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Speed, L. J., O’Meara, C., San Roque, L., & Majid, A.
(2019) Perception metaphors (Vol. 19). John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stangor, C., & Walinga, J.
(2010) Introduction to psychology. Flatworld Knowledge.Google Scholar
Stengers, I.
(1991) L’invention des sciences modernes. Paris, France: La Découverte.Google Scholar
(1997) Power and invention : situating science (Vol. 10). University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
(2000) The invention of modern sciences. University of Minessota Press.Google Scholar
Stengers, I., & James, W.
(2013) Une autre science est possible ! Manifeste pour un ralentissement des sciences. Paris, France: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Stiegler, B.
(2014) Digital studies : organologie des savoirs et technologie de la connaissance. FYP Editions.Google Scholar
Stone, H.
(2012) Sensory evaluation practices. Academic press.Google Scholar
Talmy, L.
(2000) Towards a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tort, P.
(1989) La raison classificatoire. Paris, France: Aubier.Google Scholar
Turner, F.
(2006) From Counterculture to Cyberculture – Stewart Brand, The Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism. Chicago, IL, USA: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tye, M.
(2017) Qualia. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University.Google Scholar
Urdapilleta, I., Nu, C. T., Denis, C. S., & Kermadec, F. H. D.
(2001) Traité d’évaluation sensorielle. Paris, France: Dunod.Google Scholar
Viberg, Å.
(1983) The verbs of perception: a typological study. Linguistics, 21 (1), 123–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vignaux, G.
(1999) Le démon du classement : penser, organiser. Paris, France: Seuil.Google Scholar
Warnier, J.-P.
(1999) Construire la culture matérielle: l’homme qui pensait avec ses doigts. Paris, France: Presses universitaires de France. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winter, B.
(2019) Sensory linguistics: Language, perception and metaphor (Vol. 20). John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L.
(1953) Philosophical investigations. Philosophische Untersuchungen. Oxford, UK: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Zalta, E. N.
(2017) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Palo Alto, CA, USA: Stanford University.Google Scholar