Chapter published in:
Sensory Experiences: Exploring meaning and the senses
Danièle Dubois, Caroline Cance, Matt Coler, Arthur Paté and Catherine Guastavino
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 24] 2021
► pp. 371402
References
Albert, M. N., & Avenier, M. J.
(2011) Légitimation de savoirs élaborés dans une épistémologie constructiviste à partir de l’expérience de praticiens. Recherches qualitatives, 30 (2), 22–47.Google Scholar
Althusser, L.
(1967) Philosophie et philosophie spontanée des savants. Paris, France: Maspero.Google Scholar
Ares, G., & Varela, P.
(2018) Methods in Consumer Research, Volume 1: New Approaches to Classic Methods. Woodhead Publishing.Google Scholar
Avenier, M. J., & Thomas, C.
(2011) Mixer quali et quanti pour quoi faire ? Méthodologie sans épistémologie n’est que ruine de réflexion. In Journée de l’atelier méthodologie de recherche de l’AIMS. Caen, France.Google Scholar
Bruner, J.
(1990) Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University press.Google Scholar
Brunswik, E.
(1943) Organismic achievement and environmental probability. Psychological Review, 50(3), 255–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1956) Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley, CA (USA): University of California press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brunswik, E., & Kamiya, J.
(1953) Ecological cue-validity of “proximity” and of other gestalt factors. American Journal of Psychology, 66, 20–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cance, C.
(2017) From Musical Instruments as Ontological Entities to Instrumental Quality: A Linguistic Exploration of Musical Instrumentality in the Digital Era. In T. Bovermann, A. D. Campo, H. Egermann, S.-I. Hardjowirogo, & S. Weinzierl (Eds.), Musical Instruments in the 21st Century (pp. 25–43). Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cassin, B., Apter, E., Lezra, J., & Wood, M.
(2014) Dictionary of untranslatables: A philosophical lexicon. Princeton University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H.
(1973) The Language-as-Fixed-Effect Fallacy: A Critique of Language Statistics in Psychological Research. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 12 (4), 335–359. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Classen, C.
(1993) Worlds of senses: Exploring the senses in history and across cultures. New York, NY, USA: Routledge.Google Scholar
Delepaut, G.
(2009) Questionner : comment et pourquoi ? Le choc des questions, le poids des mots ! In D. Dubois (Ed.), Le Sentir et le Dire : concepts et méthodologies en linguistique et psychologie cognitive (pp. 157–188). Paris, France: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
De Saint-Pierre, J.-B.-H.
(1784) Études de la Nature. Paris, France: Deterville.Google Scholar
De Sardan, J.-P. O.
(1998) Émique. L’Homme, 151–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Despret, V.
(2016) Penser comme un rat. Versailles, France: Quae.Google Scholar
Dubois, D.
(2000) Categories as acts of meaning: The case of categories in olfaction and audition. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 1, 35–68.Google Scholar
(2009) Le Sentir et le Dire – Concepts et méthodes en psychologie et linguistique cognitives. Paris, France: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Eco, U.
(2008) Experiences in translation. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, L. E., & Werner, O.
(1978) Explaining explanation: Tension in american anthropology. Journal of Anthropological Research, 34 (2), 194–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodenough, W. H.
(1980) Description and comparison in cultural anthropology (Vol. 1968). CUP Archive.Google Scholar
Guastavino, C.
(2009) Validité écologique des dispositifs expérimentaux. Pour qui ? Pour quoi ? Pour quoi faire ? In D. Dubois (Ed.), Le Sentir et le Dire (pp. 233–252). Paris (France): L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Guastavino, C., Katz, B. F. G., Polack, J.-D., Levitin, D. J., & Dubois, D.
(2005) Ecological validity of soundscape reproduction. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 50 (2), 333–341.Google Scholar
Guastavino, C., Paté, A., & Gaillard, P.
(2017) Shafer and Schafer: When musicians promote scientific hypotheses on auditory perception. In Uncommon Senses II. Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
Harris, M.
(1976) History and significance of the emic/etic distinction. Annual review of anthropology, 5 (1), 329–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koller, V.
(2008) Not just a colour: pink as a gender and sexuality marker in visual communication. Visual communication, 7 (4), 395–423. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Köster, E., Moller, P., & Mojet, J.
(2014) A “misfit” theory of spontaneous conscious odor perception (mitscop): Reflections on the role and function of odor memory in everay day life. Frontiers in Psychology, cognitive science, 5 (Special issue “Applied olfactory cognition”), 29–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lautrey, J.
(2003) La psychologie différentielle à l’épreuve de la variabilité intraindividuelle. In A. Vom Hofe, H. Charvin, J. Bernaud, & D. Guédon (Eds.), Psychologie differentielle: recherches et rélexions (pp. 9–28). Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Lestel, D.
(1996) L’animalité : essai sur le statut de l’humain. Paris, France: Hatier.Google Scholar
Lévy-Leblond, J.-M.
(1996) Aux contraires, L’exercice de la pensée et la pratique de la science. Gallimard.Google Scholar
Levy-Leblond, J.-M.
(2014) La vitesse de l’ombre. Paris, France: Seuil.Google Scholar
Lewin, K.
(1939) Field theory and experiment in social psychology: concepts and methods. American Journal of Sociology, 44 (6), 868–896. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Locke, K.
(2010) Abduction. In A. J. Mills, G. Durepos, & E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research. Sage.Google Scholar
Malson, J.
(1964) Les enfants sauvages, Paris collection 10–18.Google Scholar
Neisser, U.
(1987) Concepts and conceptual development: ecological and intellectual factors in categorization. Cambridge, MA, USA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paveau, M.-A.
(2009) Mais où est donc le sens ? Pour une linguistique symétrique. In Res per nomen 2 (pp. 21–31).Google Scholar
Pelto, P. J., & Pelto, G. H.
(1978) Anthropological research: The structure of inquiry. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pigliucci, M.
(2012) Who knows what. Aeon Magazine.Google Scholar
Pike, K. L.
(1954) Emic and etic standpoints for the description of behaviour. ln: Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior-part 1. Glandale, Summer lnstitute of Linguistics, 135–41.Google Scholar
Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I.
(1979) La nouvelle alliance : métamorphose de la science. Gallimard.Google Scholar
Reichertz, J.
(2007) Abduction: The logic of discovery of grounded theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 214–228). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sammut, G., Daanen, P., & Sartawi, M.
(2010) Interobjectivity: Representations and artefacts in cultural psychology. Culture & Psychology, 16(4), 451–463. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spinelli, S.
(2018) Semiotics and Sensory Sciences: Meaning Between Texts and Numbers. In Quantitative Semiotic Analysis (pp. 75–100). Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steffens, J.
(2013) Realism and ecological validity of sound quality experiments on household appliances. In (pp. 132–135). Merano, Italy.Google Scholar
Steffens, J., Steele, D., & Guastavino, C.
(2017) Situational and person-related factors influencing momentary and retrospective soundscape evaluations in day-to-day life. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141 (3), 1414–1425. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stengers, I.
(1987) D’une science à l’autre, des concepts nomades. Paris, France: Seuil.Google Scholar
(1991) L’invention des sciences modernes. Paris, France: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Vermersch, P.
(1994) L’entretien d’explicitation. Paris, France: ESF.Google Scholar
Vermersch, P., Martinez, C., Marty, C., Maurel, M., & Faingold, N.
(2003) Étude de l’effet des relances en situation d’entretien. Expliciter. Journal du groupe de recherche sur l’explicitation, 49, 1–30.Google Scholar
Vogel, C.
(1999) Étude sémiotique et acoustique de l’identification des signaux sonores d’avertissement en contexte urbain (PhD Thesis). Université Paris 6.
Wismann, H.
(2014) Penser entre les langues. Paris, France: Albin Michel.Google Scholar