Constructional analysis of corpus data can contribute to the analysis of a semantic frame, as demonstrated by a small corpus study of eat and feed. The EAT/FEED frame forms part of a taxonomy of frames including the superordinate CONSUME frame and subordinate frames of human vs. animal eating; constructional and metaphor data in the corpus shows that English covertly distinguishes human and animal eating. The EAT frame includes three phases (intake, process, and ingest), differentiated lexicogrammatically. The EAT frame also includes three domains in its domain matrix: physical, biological (nutritional) and social, all clearly differentiated by distinct constructions in the corpus. An examination of metaphors with eat and feed in the corpus demonstrate that the target domain contributes image-schematic structure to the metaphorical mapping, contrary to the Invariance Hypothesis.
2023. Framing Effects in the Media Coverage of the Migrant Crisis in the French Press (2015 vs. 2018). In The Representation of REFUGEES and MIGRANTS in European National Media Discourses from 2015 to 2017 [Linguistik in Empirie und Theorie/Empirical and Theoretical Linguistics, ], ► pp. 95 ff.
Wu, Tana
2023. Metaphors and culturally unique idioms of eating and drinking in Mongolian. Language and Cognition 15:1 ► pp. 173 ff.
Hullman, Gwen A. & Michael J. Kwiatkowski
2022. Social constructions of conflict and mediation as factors in mediation program decisions. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 39:3 ► pp. 211 ff.
Parizoska, Jelena & Jelena Tušek
2022. Figurative Expressions with Verbs of Ingesting in Croatian. In Computational and Corpus-Based Phraseology [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13528], ► pp. 175 ff.
2019. Similarities and Contrasts in Multisensory Metaphorical Conceptualisations of Memories in Polish and English. In Contacts and Contrasts in Cultures and Languages [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 85 ff.
2017. From the past into the present: From case frames to semantic frames. Linguistics Vanguard 3:1
Lakhfif, Abdelaziz & Mohamed Tayeb Laskri
2016. A frame-based approach for capturing semantics from Arabic text for text-to-sign language MT. International Journal of Speech Technology 19:2 ► pp. 203 ff.
2012. ‘Hungering and Lusting for Women and Fleshly Delicacies’: Reconstructing Grammatical Relations for Proto‐Germanic*. Transactions of the Philological Society 110:3 ► pp. 363 ff.
Moreira, Alexandra & Maria Margarida Martins Salomão
2012. Análise ontolológica aplicada ao desenvolvimento de Frames. Alfa : Revista de Linguística (São José do Rio Preto) 56:2 ► pp. 491 ff.
Jaspaert, Koen, Freek Van de Velde, Geert Brône, Kurt Feyaerts & Dirk Geeraerts
2011. Does framing work? An empirical study of Simplifying Models for sustainable food production. cogl 22:3 ► pp. 459 ff.
Park, Chongwon
2011. The role of metonymy in the interpretation of Korean multiple subject constructions. Language Sciences 33:1 ► pp. 206 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.