Article published In:
Constructions and Frames
Vol. 7:1 (2015) ► pp.79102
References (52)
Beck, H.-G. (1971). Geschichte der Byzantinischen Volkslitteratur. München: C. H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Beck, J.E. (2011). Two changes in greek infinitival syntax. Paper given at the LSA Annual Meeting , January 7, 2011.
Bergs, A., & Diewald, G. (Eds.). (2008). Constructions and language change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boas, H.C. (2013). Cognitive construction grammar. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 233–254). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Butt, M., & Ramchand, G. (2005). Complex aspectual structure in Hindi/Urdu. In N. Erteschik-Shir & N. Rapoport (Eds.), The syntax of aspect: Deriving thematic and aspectual interpretation (pp. 117–153). New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind's response to repetition. Language, 82(4), 711–733. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2007). Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2013). Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 49–69). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, J., & Hopper, P. (Eds.). (2001). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W. (1994). The evolution of grammar, tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2001). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, A.D. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Ö. (1985). Tense and aspect systems. Oxford/New York: Basil Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Dickey, E. (2009). The Greek and Latin languages in the papyri. In R.S. Bagnall (Ed.), The oxford handbook of papyrology (pp. 149–169). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C.J., Kay, P., & O'Connor, M.C. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone . Language, 64(3), 501–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C.J. (2013). Berkeley construction grammar. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 111–131). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fried, M. (2007). Constructing grammatical meaning: Isomorphism and polysemy in Czech reflexivization. Studies in Language, 31(4), 721–764. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2009). Construction grammar as a tool for diachronic analysis. Constructions and Frames, 2(1), 262–291.Google Scholar
. (2013). Principles of constructional change. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 419–436). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A.E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. (2005). Argument realization: The role of constructions, lexical semantics and discourse factors. In J -O.Östman & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions (pp. 17–43). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. (2013). Constructionist approaches. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 15–31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (2004). On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization. In O. Fischer, M. Norde, & H. Perridon (Eds.), Up and down the cline: The nature of grammaticalization (pp. 17–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, B. (1993). Auxiliaries: Cognitive forces and grammaticalization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. (2003). Grammaticalization. In B.D. Joseph & R. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 575–601). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hesseling, D.C. (1892). Essai historique sur l’infinitif Grec. Chartres: Durand.Google Scholar
Hilpert, M. (2014). Construction grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, P.J., & Traugott, E.C. (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Horrocks, G. (2010/1997). Greek: A history of the language and its speakers. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joseph, B.D. (1983). The synchrony and diachrony of the Balkan infinitive. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. (2014). New perspectives on Balkan developments with the infinitive. Paper given at the 19th Balkan And South Slavic Language and Literature Conference , University of Chicago, April 26, 2014.
Joseph, B.D., & Pappas, P. (2001). The development of the Greek future system: Setting the record Straight. In Greek Linguistics '99. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Greek Linguistics , Nicosia, September 1999. Thessaloniki: University Studio Press.
. (2002). On some recent views concerning the development of the Greek future System. Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies, 261, 247–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kay, P. (2013). The limits of (construction) grammar. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 32–47). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuteva, T. (2004). Auxiliation: An enquiry into the nature of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things – What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R.W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 11. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
. (2005). Construction grammars: Cognitive, radical, and less so. In M.S. Peña Cervel & F.J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics : Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (pp. 101–159). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Liddell, H.G., & Scott, R. (1996/1843). Greek-English Lexicon, with a revised supplement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lucas, S. (2012). Polarizing the future: The development of an aspectual opposition in the Greek future tense. PhD thesis. Copenhagen: Faculty of Humanities, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
. (2014). Aspect in Greek future forms. Journal of Greek Lingistics, 14(2), 163–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Makkai, A. (1972). Idiom structure in English. The Hague: Mouton and Co. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markopoulos, T. (2009). The future in Greek: From ancient to medieval. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meillet, A. (1948/1912). L’évolution des formes grammaticales. In A. Meillet (Ed.), Linguistique historique et linguistique générale (pp. 130–148). Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Nunberg, G., Sag, I.A., & Wasow, T. (1994). Idioms. Language, 70(3), 491–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. (1996/1984). Language learnability and language development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ramat, P. (1987). Introductory paper. In P. Ramat & M. Harris (Eds.), Historical development of auxiliaries [Trends in Linguistics] (pp. 3–20). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, J. (1967 (1904)). The chronicle of morea. Groningen: Verlag Bouma’s Boekhuis N. V.Google Scholar
Traugott, E.C., & Heine, B. (1991). Introduction. In E.C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization (pp. 1–14). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhoogt, A. (2010). Papyri. In E.J. Bakker (Ed.), A companion to the ancient Greek language (pp. 62–68). Chicester: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wakker, G.C. (2006). Future auxiliaries or not? In E. Crespo, J. de la Villa, & A.R. Revuelta (Eds.), Word classes and related topics in ancient Greek: Proceedings of the Conference on Greek Syntax and Word Classes (pp. 237–255). Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters.Google Scholar