Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT) aims to represent the conceptual structure of metaphors rather than the structure of metaphoric language. The theory does not explain which aspects of metaphoric language evoke which conceptual structures, for example. However, other theories within cognitive linguistics may be better suited to this task. These theories, once integrated, should make building a unified model of both the conceptual and linguistic aspects of metaphor possible. First, constructional approaches to syntax provide an explanation of how particular constructional slots are associated with different functions in evoking metaphor. Cognitive Grammar is especially effective in this regard. Second, Frame Semantics helps explain how the words or phrases that fill the relevant constructional slots evoke the source and target domains of metaphor. Though these theories do not yet integrate seamlessly, their combination already offers explanatory benefits, such as allowing generalizations across metaphoric and non-metaphoric language, and identifying the words that play a role in evoking metaphors, for example.
(1958) A grammar of metaphor. London: Secker and Warburg Ltd.
(2003) Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.
(2003) The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 161–206). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Croft, W., & Cruse, D.A.
(2004) Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(1989) Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(1987) Death is the mother of beauty: Mind, metaphor, criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
(1991) Reading minds: The study of English in the age of cognitive science. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Cited by 9 other publications
Colston, Herbert L.
2019. How Language Makes Meaning,
2021. A Frame-Inspired Task-Based Approach to Metaphor Teaching. Lexis :18
DAVID, OANA & TEENIE MATLOCK
2018. Cross-linguistic automated detection of metaphors for poverty and cancer. Language and Cognition 10:3 ► pp. 467 ff.
2022. Musterhafte Strukturen im Bereich von Metaphern und Metonymien. In Cognition and Contrast, ► pp. 47 ff.
2020. Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory,
2022. Metonymy and argument alternations in French communication frames. Cognitive Linguistics 33:2 ► pp. 387 ff.
2019. Lexico-grammatical alignment in metaphor construal. Cognitive Linguistics 30:1 ► pp. 165 ff.
Liu, Xiaoyu, Shi, Heidi H. & Zhuo, Jing-Schmidt
2020. Manual Action Metaphors in Chinese A Usage-Based Constructionist Study. In Corpus-Based Research on Chinese Language and Linguistics [Sinica venetiana, 6],
2023. Three levels of framing. WIREs Cognitive Science 14:5
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.